To think DH did nothing wrong here?

I imagine the part that freaked her out was him giving his address and suggesting she waits on his driveway in the dark and cold….and what is she meant to walk to this driveway of a man who she doesn’t even know, on a 60mph rural road?

So she gets to choose to put the lives of strangers at risk? I'd have respected her wishes to not get in my car but would probs still have done what I could to prevent another person ramming into her on the school run and maybe killing themself and their children.

There's only one tbf 🙄

Were you there??

You clearly didn't go to charm school did you? Or any school?

What is it with the wilful mis-readers here?

It's very very clear the OP's husband offered to stay with the woman in his own car... he didn't offer for her to get in his car with him nor did he suggest he got in her car.

He made it clear who he was, where he was from, why he was there, and offered a further option for her to stand on the driveway.

She declined, that's her choice however I don't actually think it is up to her to decline having someone warn other road users of a hazard ahead, it wasn't just about her preferences and her safety, was it?

@Challas She sounds like a total twat and shouldn't be driving. Sorry your H was rewarded for his kindness by having the police called!

OP said he offered her to wait in his car, not get in hers. Given the current temps I don't think that's so weird. Although I also understand why some people would be unnerved. I'd probs see it as a bigger risk to sit in the dark in a black car just around a blind corner on a high speed road.

Plus put cones out the other side of the bend.

nb always have those collapsible cones in your car just in case

Bendy rural roads are such a nightmare and there’s always a potential for something like this to happen
The driver should have put cones out if she was on a bend. She’s very much at fault in that regard.

Your dh did his best, he tried to help and sitting a distance away with his hazards on was very kind . I’m guessing she just didn’t understand why he was doing this.

Despite all of the above I do understand a women may have been scared by a man she doesn’t know talking to her whilst she’s alone on a rural road.

I don’t blame your husband for not bothering to help again.

Wow the charm schools must be so proud.

The op statement is ambiguous, the subsequent posts massage it to fit your narrative. I know what I believe that poor woman heard

🙄

There's only one poster with challenged intellect here and here's a clue, it's not the several posters who have challenged you!!

Godalmighty, it's like picking a scab!!!

Hun is dialect of a multitude of places. Urban dictionary tends to relay a class language.

Again for those of challenging intellec, the op can clearly be read as he offered to share a car. I read subsequent posts as back tracking.

What's more likely? Because let's out it like this the police turned up. If they were unconvinced by her report they wouldn't.

Denial is what I reckon is the real issue

You started it "hun" 😂

Live a little lol.

So, you don’t believe the woman embellished her tale to the police, but you do believe OP has changed her story about what DH did? Inconsistent but, again, suits your narrative.

No I am not. I have copied it ver batum ran it through AI.

I don't hate men, I hate men who are patronising people who made a woman fear and ring the police!

And seriously I very much doubt he provided such clarification as the OP didn't and obviously back peddled!

Well, if “AI” says it, it must be true. Get a grip.

No, I won’t apologise, because you are lying. OP has repeatedly clarified what she meant, i.e. DH would stay with the woman, while she sat in her car, and he in his. And you have already been told this. But, because you hate men, you’ve chosen to twist the facts to suit your narrative.

for him to stay with her (in his car)

I have thrown this phrase into AI and asked does this mean both people in one car. The answer was yes.

So it isn't the ,"readers" that are the issue!

It really is what she says.

the black and white text says IN HIS CAR. His car, meaning the husbands car. Not in HER car, the stranded woman's car.

It's exactly what the OP states. Why is that not understandable to so many "readers" here?

Hilarious so everyone else is misreading when the text is ambiguous at best. How the hell are women meant to know which are the attackers, they don't wear a badge!

Your DH did nothing wrong. She was as stupid and unreasonable as all the posters here who can't read.

It really is getting tiresome around here lately. 3 posts in and someone is both misreading the actual text and the man's intentions. 🙄

That is not what the op states! It isn't beyond reason this is what the woman believed he offered

It is in black and white

Thinking for herself would have meant she would have put her hazards on. At a minimum.