Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Being sensitive when friends don't reply to messages (having seen them)

206 replies

Anuta77 · 24/11/2024 20:25

Just to be clear I know that everyone is busy and are not obliged to immediately reply to my messages. I totally get not feeling like replying at the moment and even forgetting. It happens to me. But even if I forget, I end up remembering the unanswered message and reply something saying sorry, got busy, .... I also think that if one forgets the message, if they somehow think of you one day, they would open the messaging app and would see that they never answered something.

If I have nothing else to contribute to the conversation or someone sends some info that doesn't require a full answer, I at least acknoledge with some thumbs up or a heart or whatever.

By the way, I am very busy myself by the way, with kids, work, renovations, etc. I just think it's the polite thing to do.

So when friends just see my message and then never reply, it bugs me, especially when it happens several times. I obviously don't throw a tantrum or say anything, but it turns me off and makes me less motivated to start a conversation again. The worse is that it happens even with my close friend who's strong on manners.

I even changed hairdressers after I sent one hairdresser some info we discussed during the haircut and told her how my husband loved my hair. She ignored my message (she's very active on facebook and I could see that the message was seen), I found another hairdresser.

AIBU? How others react to their messages being ignored?

OP posts:
HappiestSleeping · 25/11/2024 12:28

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:35

That’s not to say that it could never happen to you ie someone inform you of something serious by text.

Or is it that by virtue of receiving the information by text you to decide on whether serious or not? So, “cat died, broke my hip” - not serious….

Indeed it could happen, and if I read it, I would decide based on the content, however I would also assume that the transmitter isn't requiring a particular response as they sent the news via a secondary form of communication.

MartinCrieffsLemon · 25/11/2024 10:24

Blue ticks mean "this message has been opened". It does not mean its been read.

I've had messages come through, looked at them on my pull down notification thing and read the first line. Thought "Oh that looks important. I won't open it until I can properly read it" and then accidentally clicked it. I've not read the message and I've filed it away to reply to but life moves so quickly it might be 3 weeks before I realise because I thought it had been a couple of days.

Someone needed my bank details to pay for a ticket the other, so it was me missing out. I don't have phone banking so had to get my card to get the details. I filed it away as a to do. When I went to send the details, thinking it had been maybe a week or two... it was two months later. But I'd been so busy it felt like only a couple of weeks.

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:45

Calmhappyandhealthy · 25/11/2024 09:36

Like I said earlier, it's about expectation imo

For example, a few months ago, I voice noted a (very close?) friend with some info about a really big (and quite shocking) life change for me included health deterioration

She listened (ticks went blue) and THREE WEEKS later she replied, saying how sorry she was for the delay in replying, how am I feeling now etc

My expectation was that she could have shown more care and interest, more quickly

But she didn't

For me, it's useful info about her friendship and I now know more about her as a person (which amazingly, in 12 years, I hadn't found out before)

No need to dump her as a friend (she's got good qualities) but my new knowledge about her, is useful going forward

This is it.

Dh now knows how to deal with his friend going forward and has very low expectations.

ToBeOrNotToBee · 25/11/2024 09:37

People have different levels of communication. Your hairdresser may have thought that your message didn't need a response. And truly what would be a response apart from "that's nice" or a thumbs up. And then you would have replied to that and thus the cycle continues!

Calmhappyandhealthy · 25/11/2024 09:36

Like I said earlier, it's about expectation imo

For example, a few months ago, I voice noted a (very close?) friend with some info about a really big (and quite shocking) life change for me included health deterioration

She listened (ticks went blue) and THREE WEEKS later she replied, saying how sorry she was for the delay in replying, how am I feeling now etc

My expectation was that she could have shown more care and interest, more quickly

But she didn't

For me, it's useful info about her friendship and I now know more about her as a person (which amazingly, in 12 years, I hadn't found out before)

No need to dump her as a friend (she's got good qualities) but my new knowledge about her, is useful going forward

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:36

Precisely

SallyWD · 25/11/2024 09:35

HappiestSleeping · 25/11/2024 09:30

Yes, exactly that. Nobody I know would ever inform me of anything serious by text.

When I had cancer I informed my parents on the phone (they live hundreds of miles away) but I told everyone else by text. I was overwhelmed, extremely frightened and emotionally exhausted. I simply didn't have the energy to call everyone. In fact I told people not to call me as I couldn't face talking about it over and over again.

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:35

HappiestSleeping · 25/11/2024 09:30

Yes, exactly that. Nobody I know would ever inform me of anything serious by text.

That’s not to say that it could never happen to you ie someone inform you of something serious by text.

Or is it that by virtue of receiving the information by text you to decide on whether serious or not? So, “cat died, broke my hip” - not serious….

HappiestSleeping · 25/11/2024 09:30

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:20

Are you saying that if someone informs you of something serious by text, unless it’s conveyed by phone call it becomes less important and less deserving of a timeous reply?

So the mode of information is more important than the substance?

Yes, exactly that. Nobody I know would ever inform me of anything serious by text.

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:28

TheMaenads · 25/11/2024 09:22

I think that poster is saying the opposite, that if something it’s important, it would almost never be conveyed by text message.

Dh had a serious physical injury. He was dealing with the fallout from that and would not have had the resources/energy to call around to tell people but he could inform them by text.

It was still important…. to him.

TheMaenads · 25/11/2024 09:22

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:20

Are you saying that if someone informs you of something serious by text, unless it’s conveyed by phone call it becomes less important and less deserving of a timeous reply?

So the mode of information is more important than the substance?

I think that poster is saying the opposite, that if something it’s important, it would almost never be conveyed by text message.

Maggiethecat · 25/11/2024 09:20

HappiestSleeping · 25/11/2024 06:00

I voted YABU but I think it's a generational thing. To me, messaging is a lower form of communication. If something is important and requires a response (like the message from a PP about illness or whatever it was) then a phone call is appropriate. If messaging is used then it can be replied to eventually, if ever, or wait until I speak to the person.

Pretty much everyone I know thinks the same way.

Are you saying that if someone informs you of something serious by text, unless it’s conveyed by phone call it becomes less important and less deserving of a timeous reply?

So the mode of information is more important than the substance?

2024cando1 · 25/11/2024 09:04

SabreIsMyFave · 24/11/2024 23:38

YANBU at all @Anuta77 But you have come to the wrong place here. Most people on Mumsnet apparently don't give a shit if people read their message and don't respond for 3 days, (or at all even!) They probably do it to people themselves.

In the real world, it's rude, and ignorant. And many people ARE pissed off when people leave them on 'read' and can't be fucked to reply for days - if at all. I know a few people who CBA to respond until you message them again 2-3 days later. Rude as fuck.

NO-ONE is too busy to send a quick message back. Even the same day will do! It takes a few seconds FFS.

I largely agree with this. I am always stunned when people say it’s not rude to ignore messages. Your reception here OP has been bonkers.

I had a bereavement earlier this year and a couple of people messaged to see how I was doing a few weeks later. I replied to both saying I was finding it difficult but coping etc. Both read my message and didn’t reply (one for a week and one until the next birthday so months)! That made me feel worse than if they hadn’t asked in the first place.

YANBU OP, it’s stunning how people lack common courtesy when it comes to messaging.

ClicketyClickPlusOne · 25/11/2024 09:00

When you don't reply to a friend you're basically saying to them 'You are not worth a few seconds of my time'. And then why would anyone want to stay friends with someone who clearly doesn't value them?

or

When you message a friend and expect an answer you're basically saying to them 'I can demand and command a few minutes of your time for a message of my choosing’ And then why would anyone want to stay friends with someone who clearly doesn't respect them?

Thankfully most people don’t adopt either extreme, and are relaxed, understanding and confident enough in the friendship to not take things personally etc.

GRex · 25/11/2024 09:00

Fairyliz · 25/11/2024 08:18

I’m not confused. If you read the original post the op refers to people who never reply, which is clearly not you.

I don't think so, some replies will be missed, that's natural. Eventually I would end up sending my own message and spot the thread, but that could be weeks later. If someone doesn't reply to me and it's important, then I will contact them again rather than sit stewing. If it was just about my haircut then I'd think no more of it.

TheMaenads · 25/11/2024 08:44

SallyWD · 25/11/2024 07:49

I understand OP. I find it hurtful too. I think because it's something I would never do, I don't understand how other people can do it to me. But we're all different and some people just don't seem to pay any attention to messages or forget about them as soon as they've seen them. Try not to take it personally.

Respectfully, that’s because some people (not meaning you, but certainly some posters on the thread) have far fewer friends than others, and are likely to receive fewer WhatsApp messages, hence one arriving is a bigger ‘event’, or a text exchange is a bigger deal than for someone who has a ‘busier’ phone and/or is on lots of WhatsApp groups. I have most groups muted, but it does mean that a message may easily get pushed down off my first WhatsApp screen. I certainly don’t have any issues with a non-immediate reply to mine, unless it’s urgent or time-sensitive in which case I will phone.

pinkdelight · 25/11/2024 08:26

When you don't reply to a friend you're basically saying to them 'You are not worth a few seconds of my time'. And then why would anyone want to stay friends with someone who clearly doesn't value them?

But it's not a few seconds. Because if you reply then they'll reply then you have to reply etc. Someone who expects a response is guaranteed to respond, and expect a response. And if you just heart or thumbs up, that will wear thin pretty fast. Fundamentally you can't value yourself and your friendships by this kind of shit. A few seconds of a WhatsApp is not what counts. Quality time counts. This is a very very recent thing that we are constantly available to be messaged and judged if we don't want to run relationships that way. However much OP says she understands that, it's clear she doesn't and that this is her barometer. It's not a good barometer.

Fairyliz · 25/11/2024 08:18

GRex · 25/11/2024 07:55

When I can reply, I do. I'm not sure what's confusing you?

I’m not confused. If you read the original post the op refers to people who never reply, which is clearly not you.

SharpOpalNewt · 25/11/2024 07:59

If you are on even a handful of group chats you don'f necessarily see your friend's message or you can see it but then that chat gets sent further down the page.

I have to use Notes to set reminders to reply to messages if I need to think about the reply or need more information before replying. Otherwise I would forget.

okydokethen · 25/11/2024 07:56

It really annoys me too op - I have two school friends who we kind of cling to a friendship, they would say we were best friends but urgh it can take days for a reply, even when I'm asking something directly to them. Really irritates me and I make less and less effort or it's just me chasing them.
Then when we're together we have the best time and I forget I'm annoyed.

GRex · 25/11/2024 07:55

Fairyliz · 25/11/2024 07:47

So if you are so busy why are you looking at your phone and reading messages from friends? Why no crack on with your job/looking after children and try and get everything done?

When I can reply, I do. I'm not sure what's confusing you?

pamplemoussee · 25/11/2024 07:54

One of my friends has dyslexia and she really struggles with WhatsApp / messages. How do you know that's not the case for your ex hairdresser?

My other friend has ADHD and he's so easily distracted, he is known for forgetting to reply to messages and various other things too. He's a lot better with phone calls. He does try but sometimes you don't know the full story OP, there could be other things going on sometimes that you're unaware of. I appreciate this isn't always the case but why waste energy getting frustrated with messages if you've got on well face to face?

AlpacaMittens · 25/11/2024 07:52

Anuta77 · 24/11/2024 20:30

Yea, I sometimes I don't notice too, but it's because the person is not important ;), but even when the person is not my close friend, I still try to acknoledge the message just to be nice.

Edited

"I still try to acknowledge the message just to be nice"

You do you, but I just cannot be arsed texting pointlessly "just to be nice". My friends can either be insulted by this, or hopefully they know me enough to know it's not malicious. I won't go out of my way to send pointless heart reactions and the like "just to be nice" or for fear of a friendship being ruined - if a heart reaction breaks a friendship, it was never really a great friendship was it.

Octavia64 · 25/11/2024 07:51

I'm old and ill and not familiar with modern manners.

I very frequently don't reply to messages because I'm busy being ill.

I'd never heard of offending people by leaving them on "read" until I heard about it on here.

But then I mostly message other old gimmers who probably haven't heard that it's rude either because we all do it all of the time.

SallyWD · 25/11/2024 07:49

I understand OP. I find it hurtful too. I think because it's something I would never do, I don't understand how other people can do it to me. But we're all different and some people just don't seem to pay any attention to messages or forget about them as soon as they've seen them. Try not to take it personally.