Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why agricultural land is worth so much?

136 replies

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 24/11/2024 13:13

This is a genuine question because I'm trying to understand.

I keep hearing farmers say that farming is very unprofitable, that even huge farms worth several million pounds produce next to no income, and that farmers would be forced to sell land in order to pay the tax bill, thereby making the business unviable. Hence the opposition to inheritance tax.

But if that's the case, how is it that these farms are worth so much in the first place? Surely, if it's such an unprofitable business, you would expect the value of the farm to drop to reflect the fact that it's actually a very unattractive investment?

NB I'm not trying to score a political point here, I do really want to understand.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
MarkingBad · 26/11/2024 01:19

coxesorangepippin · 25/11/2024 19:39

Farms need to do something similar to what stately homes did

Open their doors and run it as a tourist attraction

Seems to be working for Chatsworth

Stately homes were built to impress other people, by their very nature they were there as a form of entertainment for visitors, whether it was a travelling monarch, extended family, or local and visiting dignitaries/businesses. They often have enough private space for a family to live in away from the visitors.

Farms are not set up for visitors, they are places of work and frequently dangerous.

PlopSofa · 25/11/2024 21:51

MikeRafone · 25/11/2024 21:16

I did give the correct figures in the post you quoted

I didn't at any point state we were 100% food secure

So what’s your point?

Nit picking on numbers?

Essentially the problem is still there.

We are not at 100% and given that U.K. and France are discussing putting our troops on the ground in Ukraine to fight if Trump withdraws from the war, I’d say that we should begin to prioritise core requirements such as enough food. The world appears to be getting ever more hostile. Sadly.

MikeRafone · 25/11/2024 21:50

What about when Derek the tenant farmer dies, 50% of farmers are tenant farmers, so let’s include him

stichguru · 25/11/2024 21:29

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 24/11/2024 13:13

This is a genuine question because I'm trying to understand.

I keep hearing farmers say that farming is very unprofitable, that even huge farms worth several million pounds produce next to no income, and that farmers would be forced to sell land in order to pay the tax bill, thereby making the business unviable. Hence the opposition to inheritance tax.

But if that's the case, how is it that these farms are worth so much in the first place? Surely, if it's such an unprofitable business, you would expect the value of the farm to drop to reflect the fact that it's actually a very unattractive investment?

NB I'm not trying to score a political point here, I do really want to understand.

A Jonny
Jonny is a "rich" farmer- he owns land is worth a lot and valuable other assets. Tractors, combine, animals, barns, other equipment is valuable.

B Sid
Sid owns, a nice house, a few cars, perhaps other expensive things a stamp collection etc).

Jonny and Sid both die and their children inherit but are both subject to inheritance tax. Sid's children keep a few bits they want, they sell off the rest. Make a pretty penny, pay the inheritance tax and keep the rest of the money.

Jonny's children however can't really do that, because the farm is a whole, the assets, yes are worth a lot, maybe more that Sid's stuff, but if John's children are to keep farming - what can they sell to pay the inheritance tax?

  • Sell the equipment - they can't work the fields, so the farm fails
  • Sell the barns - all their crops rot before they go to market, or all the animal feed rots and the animals starve to death. The farm fails.
  • Sell their animals - there's nothing to milk, collect eggs from, sheer to sell wool, slaughter to give them meat to sell.
There's no liquid assets. There's no way of paying the tax. The only way of paying the tax is to sell the farm. Then they can pay, but then they are out of work struggling to survive, without enough money to buy another farm, and there is one less farm producing food for everyone else to buy. (Assuming it isn't sold as a going concern, but it's more likely to be sold to a property developer who builds houses on it, because other farmers won't have the money to buy it.)

Bear in mind that most farmers will be making quite a lot, but their own wage won't be much. Most of their money, by far, will go into farm up keep - new seeds, vets bills, feed bills, equipment repair and replacement etc. When they die, none of that money will be clawed back.

MikeRafone · 25/11/2024 21:16

PlopSofa · 25/11/2024 20:38

Care to provide the ‘true’ figures?

We aren’t 100% food secure. Please do provide proof that we are and I shall eat my hat. Wait a minute… actually I won’t need to…

I did give the correct figures in the post you quoted

I didn't at any point state we were 100% food secure

Allergictoironing · 25/11/2024 20:50

coxesorangepippin · 25/11/2024 19:39

Farms need to do something similar to what stately homes did

Open their doors and run it as a tourist attraction

Seems to be working for Chatsworth

And just how many people would pay, and how much per visit, to go to an arable farm? All you can see there is yards full of modern machinery and barns full of produce (and e.g. grain isn't THAT interesting to look at). And some muddy fields that may or may not have a load of the same green plant growing in it.

Livestock farms aren't much more interesting. Yes you have "cute" animals but to be honest cows up close seem much less cute when you see the sheer size of them, calves and lambs are only usually born in the spring. They tend to be covered in mud & poo, which even if you hosed everywhere down every day will accumulate within a few hours. There are thousands of farms of varying sizes, types, upkeep standards, "picturesque-ness", and most smaller farmers can't spend the time being on call to show people around if they do happen to choose that farm to turn up at. And you can't leave visitors just wandering around, farms can be VERY dangerous places.

Whereas a big stately home like Chatsworth has the house with all the glorious architecture and antiques in it, and rolling acres of attractive pleasure parkland and gardens. They were designed right from the start to be beautiful filled with even more beautiful things and surrounded by beautiful countryside.

PlopSofa · 25/11/2024 20:38

MikeRafone · 25/11/2024 19:40

the figures are not correct, and you ask would someone be happy eating 30% less. Is that to distract from the figures being incorrect?

Care to provide the ‘true’ figures?

We aren’t 100% food secure. Please do provide proof that we are and I shall eat my hat. Wait a minute… actually I won’t need to…

SleepToad · 25/11/2024 20:11

Horsieculture, where I live in a very fertile valley in North Somerset a lot is now owned by horse owners. They are prepared to buy land by paying well over the odd. About 20 years ago I had a business idea and needed about 5 acres of land. It should have sold at about £4000 per acre. Several plots came up at one time so there was an adequate supply which is unusual. The cheapest sold at £10,000 per acre. There was no way I could have made money with my plans within 5 years of the outlay.

I look at those fields now and most are really well managed with people knowing what they are doing...but some are dreadfully managed and the owners are having to feed their animals almost all year round.

SeatonCarew · 25/11/2024 19:47

This reply has been deleted

withdrawn at poster's request

I'm clearly not referring to his vacuums here.

MikeRafone · 25/11/2024 19:40

PlopSofa · 24/11/2024 19:40

So you’d be happy to have let’s say 30% less on your plate?

It’s not 100%. Shouldn’t we be aiming for that?

the figures are not correct, and you ask would someone be happy eating 30% less. Is that to distract from the figures being incorrect?

coxesorangepippin · 25/11/2024 19:39

Farms need to do something similar to what stately homes did

Open their doors and run it as a tourist attraction

Seems to be working for Chatsworth

coxesorangepippin · 25/11/2024 19:37

What kind of a question is this??

Ever heard of the landed gentry?

My life

derxa · 25/11/2024 19:33

TizerorFizz · 25/11/2024 19:27

Yes. But both Dyson and Clarkson bought land to shelter money.

Clarkson does farm but of course employs people. He publicised farmings woes but he’s odious. Farmers don’t always have the best judgement! Some voted for Brexit!

Land might get developers taking an option on it - hedging it will get included in a development plan. Any farmer sitting on £millions of development land worth squillions takes it! Anyone would!

Farmers don’t think with a hive mind. I will repeat that farmers voted for Brexit in the same proportion as the rest of the country.

TizerorFizz · 25/11/2024 19:27

Yes. But both Dyson and Clarkson bought land to shelter money.

Clarkson does farm but of course employs people. He publicised farmings woes but he’s odious. Farmers don’t always have the best judgement! Some voted for Brexit!

Land might get developers taking an option on it - hedging it will get included in a development plan. Any farmer sitting on £millions of development land worth squillions takes it! Anyone would!

taxguru · 25/11/2024 07:24

This reply has been deleted

withdrawn at poster's request

Very few inventors create something genuinely new. The vast majority of inventions are incremental improvements on things done or created by others before them. Dyson is the one who actually thought of it - everyone else didn’t- that’s how successful people become successful. It’s easy to look back in hindsight and say something was obvious or easy, but no one else actually thought or did it! Some people have vision, most don’t.

mousehole · 24/11/2024 23:38

This reply has been withdrawn

withdrawn at poster's request

Matilda1981 · 24/11/2024 23:17

Another reason land prices are high is due to big businesses (building warehouses for distribution etc and also houses) buying agricultural land to offset their carbon emissions and this is only going to get worse!

OrwellianTimes · 24/11/2024 23:16

All land that’s useable is very valuable.

Take a look at any new build estate and do the maths. One big field ends up as 300 houses with an average selling point of £450,000. That’s house value of £35,000,000 - obviously it costs a lot to build the houses, but it’s extremely profitable.

likewise try and buy a small plot of buildable land anywhere. I’ve seen tiny plots of bare grass with planning permission here in South Wales for sale for £400,000.

Land that can’t be built on is of much less value- but that’s typically land that can’t be used for farming anything other than sheep or trees.

Matilda1981 · 24/11/2024 23:14

bifurCAT · 24/11/2024 13:32

On November 21, 2024, Farmers Weekly reported that the price of milling wheat was £208.80 per tonne. Something like oilseed is about twice that.
In the United Kingdom, the wheat yield in 2023 was 8.1 tonnes per hectare. Usually one crop per year (I'm ignoring crop rotation for this)

Therefore the yield per hectare of wheat is ~£1,600

Percentage of farms in England: (ha)
<5 5<20 20<50 50<100 ≥100
13% 26% 20% 17% 24%

So, as the farm sizes are (roughly) distributed equally, lets say the average farm is 50 ha.

Income from 50 ha wheat is therefore ~£80,000

Cost per ha to purchase/sell land is ~£25,000... so easy to see why 'a bird in the hand' mentality is creeping in with farmers. A farm of 50 ha = £1.25 M. Most people would rather sell that and have a guaranteed cash in hand, rather than 'maybe' making £80,000 each year (weather, pests, disease etc, permitting).

You haven’t taken any input costs into consideration!!!! Fertiliser, spray chemicals, diesel, wear and tear on the tractors and actual man hours to grow the crop in the first place!!!! Milling wheat is also the highest standard you can get - most wheat goes to feed! Farmers may also get a higher price for oil seed rape but the input costs are huge and it’s very hard to get a decent crop due to flea beetles eating it!
So for the average 50 hectare farm that sells £80k of wheat only £40k of that will be profit and a farmer has probably had to work on average 60 hours a week 52 weeks of the year to make that £40k!

sparklychair · 24/11/2024 23:13

A local farmer told me that his most valuable crop was campers. He had a secluded field for naturist campers too.

KnittedCardi · 24/11/2024 23:07

The bigger stink, is when it is sold for housing it is often land banked for years. So it's doing nothing. Not being farmed, not being used. What a waste.

PlopSofa · 24/11/2024 22:30

@DanielaDressen says we need 100% food security - unless everyone on here has suddenly decided they don't mind reducing their plates by 30% at every meal - what they eat. Is that what you want?

Farms need to thrive, not to be contracting like the are. I agree it shouldn't be an IHT dodge but this feels like a very blunt tool that Labour have used to try and get a share of a pie they shouldn't be meddling with. We all need to eat don't we?!

As for solar panels, there are 1000s of car parks all over the country. They could easily be installed with solar panels. it's what a lot of countries are doing. It provides shade for the cars on hot days too.

https://ecoquotetoday.co.uk/blog/solar-car-parks

In France they've made it compulsory for car parks over 80 spaces to install solar panels.

France imports far less food than we do.

https://tradingeconomics.com/france/food-imports-percent-of-merchandise-imports-wb-data.html#:~:text=Food%20imports%20(%25%20of%20merchandise%20imports)%20in%20France%20was%20reported,compiled%20from%20officially%20recognized%20sources.

I'll be getting my European passport sorted before long. This country is badly run and has been for decades. So very very sad. It's hard to watch things decline but it's just one lot of bad leaders after another.

Should the UK Make Solar Car Parks?

Car parks have plenty of space that’s open to the elements, providing room for potentially thousands of hours of solar power generation across the UK. Should the UK follow France's footsteps?

https://ecoquotetoday.co.uk/blog/solar-car-parks

DanielaDressen · 24/11/2024 21:59

Totally agree with @PlopSofa , we as a country need to get more secure in our ability to produce our own/more food. Global warning, floods, Russia cutting off wheat from Ukraine……we should reduce our vulnerability to this.

We need to stop building on farming land, we need to stop allowing massive solar panel farms…….theyre applying to cover 7000 acres of a1 agricultural land near me with solar panels. We need to grow food on the fields and put solar panels on roofs or on motorway verges and central reservations.

The govt need to help farmers, not make things less sustainable. Ultimately as a country their ability to make a profit (or not) affects us all.

Allergictoironing · 24/11/2024 20:35

TreadLight · 24/11/2024 19:15

I think the old saying that there is no such thing as a poor farmer still stands true.

I also think there is no farmer who won’t plead poverty when it suits them.

Obviously this is for the land owner. Tenant farmers is a different matter.

Try looking in to it properly, rather than with the eyes of the prejudiced. There's a few series on the TV that highlight farming - This Farming Life, Our Yorkshire Farm, Springtime/Summer/Winter on the farm. Though these are mostly based around larger farms, they often have info about struggling smaller farms on there.

There are plenty of stats out there that show quite a few farms are making a net loss year after year

A little googling can also show that much of the income of farms, well over 50% for smaller farms, comes from Direct Payments which are being reduced drastically year on year.