Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think something has gone wrong in schools? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz0m2x30p4eo

364 replies

RebelBabybel · 21/11/2024 17:34

From the BBC : school exclusions have doubled in the last 10 years.

I’ve worked in schools for 30 years : KS1/Early Years.

When I first started I was expected to do : hand written, detailed plans. Assessments. Handwritten reports. I had no TA. I had a blackboard. Children had books. I had to be firm with behaviour, schools had very clear behaviour policies in place, and the head would have an overview, was visible, check classes, be the ‘go to’ person if anything was difficult to manage.

Over the years, particularly in the Early Years things have changed massively.
My latest role has involved a manager who is mostly on the computer and rarely interacts with the children. No planning, no assessment. Resources are put out, but there is an ethos that it’s ‘wrong’ to show the children how to use them. Therefore children don’t use jigsaws as puzzles, they take the pieces out and transport them round the classroom. A doctors role play is set up, but with no input as to what the resources are there are for or how to role play ‘being a doctor’.

There is an expectation, a ‘box’ of what constitutes ‘normal’ behaviour : even with very young children. Any child who is outside this box, is often labelled ‘I think they’ve got autism, I think they’ve got ADHD’ without a formal assessment. These children - rather than getting to know them, or putting clear strategies in place, are quickly labelled as difficult : and fall into a stereotype that causes a negative cycle. There seems to be little ‘fault’ addressed to the teaching style, and the ‘fault??’ is centred on the child, I’d also argue that it is NOT a fault. It’s called being a child.

Children seem to be very readily excluded from schools without the adults fully questioning their teaching style and whether that might be at fault.

To be completely honest, teaching was far easier 30 years ago. Children were better behaved, and there was far better, stronger support from senior management. It felt more like a team, rather than:

an SLT who are in meetings, on a computer, off to conferences, in the staff room, pushing ‘new’ initiatives and criticising their staff.

OP posts:
Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:16

anonymoususer9876 · 23/11/2024 12:40

I watched BBC Breakfast when this came out and they had the CEO from Chance UK saying a 7 year old boy was excluded for two days for stealing an apple from the canteen to give his mum who he was worried about as there's not enough food at home.

I'd just like to say I don't recognise this course of action in the school I work in. We've had similar and that child has been given support as has the family.

Do any other school staff on here feel exclusion would be the action taken in their school?

That's a very upsetting story and although I don't work in schools I know a lot of teachers and staff and I find this so hard to believe as it doesn't fit with their ethos and attitude, was there perhaps more to the story? Did the child headbutt a member of staff and use a racial slur and it's being reported as something else entirely?

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 13:13

Absolutely. Thats really my point. If I can't meet the needs of just two children then I have no hope with a class of 30+.

Longma · 23/11/2024 13:10

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 12:58

Balancing all the needs of children in the class is a massive challenge for any teacher.

Just one example. I have one children who needs to move around, talk or make noises constantly either with their voice or with objects. Another child is hugely sensitive to noise and can't bear working with lots of noise. If either don't have their needs met they become distressed.

Longma · 23/11/2024 12:57

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Tiredalwaystired · 23/11/2024 12:51

LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 12:33

It's also massively tedious and inaccurate to see the usual conflation of SEN and behavioural issues here.

Many children with SEN don't have behavioural issues and are therefore ignored and failed.

Many behavioural issues have nothing to do with SEN at all. In fact these kids with behavioural issues hugely distress many SEN kids and prevent them from learning even more than they do for other children.

It's utterly lazy and inaccurate to try to blame SEN children for the majority of behaviour problems in classrooms. Some SEN kids may have behaviour issues because they shouldn't be in mainstream or because the school/ LA is refusing the support they need to cope in mainstream (that was promised as part of moving most SEN children to mainstream). But to pretend they are the main cause of classroom behaviour problems is absurd.

The classes are twice the size they should be (and are in countries with decent education systems), the curriculum is ridiculous and school is started much too young before it's developmentally appropriate. And the whole ethos in most schools is horrendous, all about conformity and crushes all love of learning out of most of the keenest children who arrive there at 4 or 5 as sponges for information and wanting to learn. It's abhorrent to try to blame children with disabilities for this state of affairs.

But behaviour doesn’t mean bad or deliberately naughty behaviour. It can be anxious behaviours, tics, stammers, crying when something goes wrong etc. It doesn’t make them poorly behaved but it does mean the teacher needs to make sure their needs are met which can still be disruptive to other children. (Said as a parent of highly anxious child that wants so hard to be good but has issues controlling emotions).

User135644 · 23/11/2024 12:48

RebelBabybel · 21/11/2024 17:49

@Tangledmane

My first 10 years of teaching was in a school in a deprived area. We had a very strong, visible head with a clear behaviour policy. I can’t remember one child who was ever excluded.

I do think kids, by and large, will respect strong boundaries and discipline when it comes to school (and in general). Kids test boundaries and if they're weak they'll escalate.

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 12:47

anonymoususer9876 · 23/11/2024 12:40

I watched BBC Breakfast when this came out and they had the CEO from Chance UK saying a 7 year old boy was excluded for two days for stealing an apple from the canteen to give his mum who he was worried about as there's not enough food at home.

I'd just like to say I don't recognise this course of action in the school I work in. We've had similar and that child has been given support as has the family.

Do any other school staff on here feel exclusion would be the action taken in their school?

I agree. I think this is highly unlikely to be true. It's a sensationalist story designed to make out schools are excluding children for no good reasons and are to blame for all that is wrong with society...!

BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 12:45

anonymoususer9876 · 23/11/2024 12:40

I watched BBC Breakfast when this came out and they had the CEO from Chance UK saying a 7 year old boy was excluded for two days for stealing an apple from the canteen to give his mum who he was worried about as there's not enough food at home.

I'd just like to say I don't recognise this course of action in the school I work in. We've had similar and that child has been given support as has the family.

Do any other school staff on here feel exclusion would be the action taken in their school?

Nope, and I don't fully buy it either.

Last perm ex we had was over a child bringing a knife to school and threatening a staff member with it, to give you an idea for the kind of thing we do it for.

User135644 · 23/11/2024 12:44

Kids need to be punished for bad behaviour or it just disrupts the lesson for everyone else. Also for the safety of the other children and staff.

If bad behaviour escalates then that's going to be mean exclusion. It's poor parenting mostly or coming from poor backgrounds, but teachers are hamstrung when it comes to disciplining children. The only avenue the school have is exclusion.

BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 12:43

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 12:06

I’m just following the reports that exclusions are at an all time high. And relating to my experience.

And I think rose tinted specs are better than the black, negative, nothing can be done, doom specs worn by a lot of educators.

The number excluded in the 1994–95 school year, the first full year after the implementation of the sections of the 1993 Act, stands at over 12000.

In 2003/04, 9,880 children were permanently excluded from schools in England.

In the 2022/2023 academic year, there were 9,376permanent exclusions in England, which was a record high and a 44% increase from the previous year. The rate of permanent exclusions was 0.04, meaning there were 4 permanent exclusions for every 10,000 pupils.

Let's try again.

And of course there is a lot we can do. The vast majority of school staff have been raising awareness and talking about it for years. Actual solutions not just waffle and word soup. No one wants to listen or do anything real about it though. Definitely not past governments.

It was hilarious when Covid hit and hundreds of parents started bleating on about inequality, resources , and what not because it was THEIR kid being on the receiving end if it, and hence schools and students have been struggling for years. They also went quiet when things went back to normal, because THEIR kid was fine again.

You want solutions? More SEN schools, more funding for help and support services , early start, SS, CAMHS (all mental health services really )etc., smaller class sizes and funding for schools, early intervention and support, changes to the curriculum and the way we assess things. I could go on and on and on. No one is listening though.

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 12:42

anonymoususer9876 · 23/11/2024 12:40

I watched BBC Breakfast when this came out and they had the CEO from Chance UK saying a 7 year old boy was excluded for two days for stealing an apple from the canteen to give his mum who he was worried about as there's not enough food at home.

I'd just like to say I don't recognise this course of action in the school I work in. We've had similar and that child has been given support as has the family.

Do any other school staff on here feel exclusion would be the action taken in their school?

I am 100% sure that that is not the actual story but schools, due to confidentiality rules, aren't allowed to say what really happened.

The whole thing smacks of a kid claiming that they were sent out of the lesson for asking to borrow a pen when actually they swore at the teacher and called them a cunt when the teacher suggested that they might want to start bringing a pen in.

anonymoususer9876 · 23/11/2024 12:40

I watched BBC Breakfast when this came out and they had the CEO from Chance UK saying a 7 year old boy was excluded for two days for stealing an apple from the canteen to give his mum who he was worried about as there's not enough food at home.

I'd just like to say I don't recognise this course of action in the school I work in. We've had similar and that child has been given support as has the family.

Do any other school staff on here feel exclusion would be the action taken in their school?

LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 12:33

It's also massively tedious and inaccurate to see the usual conflation of SEN and behavioural issues here.

Many children with SEN don't have behavioural issues and are therefore ignored and failed.

Many behavioural issues have nothing to do with SEN at all. In fact these kids with behavioural issues hugely distress many SEN kids and prevent them from learning even more than they do for other children.

It's utterly lazy and inaccurate to try to blame SEN children for the majority of behaviour problems in classrooms. Some SEN kids may have behaviour issues because they shouldn't be in mainstream or because the school/ LA is refusing the support they need to cope in mainstream (that was promised as part of moving most SEN children to mainstream). But to pretend they are the main cause of classroom behaviour problems is absurd.

The classes are twice the size they should be (and are in countries with decent education systems), the curriculum is ridiculous and school is started much too young before it's developmentally appropriate. And the whole ethos in most schools is horrendous, all about conformity and crushes all love of learning out of most of the keenest children who arrive there at 4 or 5 as sponges for information and wanting to learn. It's abhorrent to try to blame children with disabilities for this state of affairs.

Longma · 23/11/2024 12:32

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Longma · 23/11/2024 12:26

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 12:26

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 12:22

My point is not that all kids have good digital skills, my point is that their motivation for memorising vast amounts of information for a test has been compromised by the digital world we now live in.

Meh, I'm a maths teacher and the existence of calculators hasn't killed off the need to be numerate quite yet.

The idea that you don't need to know anything because you can google it is an incredibly stupid one. How do you get anything done if you have to google everything? How does your brain make links between various pieces of knowledge if they are all stored on separate Wikipedia pages? How can you be creative if you have no starting point, nothing to draw inspiration from, a brain that is a blank?

If you don't fill your brain with useful information, it will fill itself with shite. How many of us can still remember advertising jingles from when we were kids? Our brains want to learn and store vast amounts of information.

hellooooooomama · 23/11/2024 12:25

ThoughtfulSchooldays · 23/11/2024 11:19

This is true, but being more likely to diagnose won't, on it's own, have changed things in schools. If these kids still existed 30 years ago, but undiagnosed (I was one of them!), why is it causing issues in the classroom now we know why they're struggling?

Because now they've got a valid excuse.

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 12:24

FrippEnos · 23/11/2024 11:33

benefitstaxcredithelp

Children today are digital natives and to them it is kind of pointless to learn facts to regurgitate for an exam to then be able to look it up again in a split second. I’m not saying all learning is pointless in school today but certainly the way we measure it has to be modernised. I’d go as far to say this information accessibility is partly what is disengaging young people.

A lot children don't progress "digitally" beyond search engines and games.
Most will just give you the first thing that they find, just a swift copy, paste and done with no critique or thought behind it.
With AI its even worse as the just type in the question and hand in what they get back.

My point is not that kids today all have good digital skills, my point is that their motivation to memorise large amounts of information has been compromised by the digital world we now live in.

Longma · 23/11/2024 12:24

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 12:22

noblegiraffe · 22/11/2024 22:51

Children today are digital natives

They really aren't. They are absolutely shit at using computers and doing basic stuff that kids of the 90s are brilliant at.

My point is not that all kids have good digital skills, my point is that their motivation for memorising vast amounts of information for a test has been compromised by the digital world we now live in.

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 12:19

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 12:17

I don't agree. No one is saying nothing can be done. School staff are trying their hardest to think of creative ways to help all children every day.

There's lots that can be done. Better funding, smaller class sizes, early intervention for children with additional needs.

Yes, people are definitely saying that there are things that can be done.

It's just they don't agree with the OP's assertion that what is needed is 'firmer boundaries'.

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 12:17

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 12:06

I’m just following the reports that exclusions are at an all time high. And relating to my experience.

And I think rose tinted specs are better than the black, negative, nothing can be done, doom specs worn by a lot of educators.

I don't agree. No one is saying nothing can be done. School staff are trying their hardest to think of creative ways to help all children every day.

There's lots that can be done. Better funding, smaller class sizes, early intervention for children with additional needs.

Longma · 23/11/2024 12:17

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

ViciousCurrentBun · 23/11/2024 12:16

There are more children living in what is defined as poverty but there is so much more to consume and SM makes it easy to see so many people feel hard done by.

There were always kids dragged up, still are but there is the rise of people wanting their children to like them all the time and be their mate. I grew up-in an abusive situation with beatings with a garden cane. I do not agree with physical punishment at all but I see plenty of people never saying no. Children need boundaries.

DH and I retired recently from higher education so they have all been filtered. Though obviously many are still exceptionally bright they seem more of a homogenous mass, influenced by SM. Critical thinking has been replaced by echo chambers online. It’s dumbing down the entire nation across all social classes. I see it on here with people vilifying the left or right wing press and anyone who reads whatever they disapprove of is to be hated, cancelled or whatever.

I like MN because there are people with views across what appears to be the entire political spectrum. It used to be very left wing, there has been a definite move to the right of late but not as much as people think.