Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think something has gone wrong in schools? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz0m2x30p4eo

364 replies

RebelBabybel · 21/11/2024 17:34

From the BBC : school exclusions have doubled in the last 10 years.

I’ve worked in schools for 30 years : KS1/Early Years.

When I first started I was expected to do : hand written, detailed plans. Assessments. Handwritten reports. I had no TA. I had a blackboard. Children had books. I had to be firm with behaviour, schools had very clear behaviour policies in place, and the head would have an overview, was visible, check classes, be the ‘go to’ person if anything was difficult to manage.

Over the years, particularly in the Early Years things have changed massively.
My latest role has involved a manager who is mostly on the computer and rarely interacts with the children. No planning, no assessment. Resources are put out, but there is an ethos that it’s ‘wrong’ to show the children how to use them. Therefore children don’t use jigsaws as puzzles, they take the pieces out and transport them round the classroom. A doctors role play is set up, but with no input as to what the resources are there are for or how to role play ‘being a doctor’.

There is an expectation, a ‘box’ of what constitutes ‘normal’ behaviour : even with very young children. Any child who is outside this box, is often labelled ‘I think they’ve got autism, I think they’ve got ADHD’ without a formal assessment. These children - rather than getting to know them, or putting clear strategies in place, are quickly labelled as difficult : and fall into a stereotype that causes a negative cycle. There seems to be little ‘fault’ addressed to the teaching style, and the ‘fault??’ is centred on the child, I’d also argue that it is NOT a fault. It’s called being a child.

Children seem to be very readily excluded from schools without the adults fully questioning their teaching style and whether that might be at fault.

To be completely honest, teaching was far easier 30 years ago. Children were better behaved, and there was far better, stronger support from senior management. It felt more like a team, rather than:

an SLT who are in meetings, on a computer, off to conferences, in the staff room, pushing ‘new’ initiatives and criticising their staff.

OP posts:
Superhansrantowindsor · 23/11/2024 15:36

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 15:32

To challenge assumptions made about children, to stop constraining them by stereotypes, to encourage positivity, self reflection, fun, love, to start enjoying the job again.

Probably a good place to start.

And to challenge the snippy, negative, sarky tone that many educators seem to have…those who would rather gossip in the staff room, have ‘meetings’, moan and belittle their staff.

Not sure if this is directed to my post - how is challenging stereotypes going to help with the practical challenges teachers face in the classroom?

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 15:32

To challenge assumptions made about children, to stop constraining them by stereotypes, to encourage positivity, self reflection, fun, love, to start enjoying the job again.

Probably a good place to start.

And to challenge the snippy, negative, sarky tone that many educators seem to have…those who would rather gossip in the staff room, have ‘meetings’, moan and belittle their staff.

OP posts:
Superhansrantowindsor · 23/11/2024 15:30

What am I supposed to do? I have 32 kids in the class so no spare seats. I have several who need to sit near the front for sensory needs, hearing impairment or just because it’s been requested by parents. I then have kids who need to sit away from others. How do I do that with no spare seats? I have differentiated the worksheet but one of the children sat at the front kicks off because they haven’t been given the differentiated sheet but the other pupil has. I can’t always group kids of a similar ability together to avoid this due to fact some need to be at the front and some at the back. I have one pupil who needs to sit at the back but also needs frequent movement breaks and needs to leave the classroom. That’s fine except when the child moves to the front they have to walk past lots of students and due to their neurodiversity they distract kids from their work. Another student has sensory issues with noise so needs a quiet room. Others need to fidget and talk to their TA a lot. I also have a child with a visual impairment in the same class who needs the worksheet in a much larger font. I also need to translate a worksheet for another pupil. I need a more challenging worksheet for a few super bright children so that’s 5 different worksheets for the lesson. Let’s add in a couple of children who just don’t like to listen and behave, at least one with a time out card for anxiety and two children who missed the last two lessons so are really struggling. I have children in the class whose target grade is 2-3 and children in the same class whose target is 8-9. I have 60 minutes. What I need is more time to plan and a class size maximum of 24. That would make a massive difference. We know the classroom environment isn’t working. We know it’s impossible to provide EVERY child with the best learning environment tailored for them so what can we do?

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 15:29

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 13:32

I agree with you that our brains naturally want to learn. And I am not saying that you don’t need to know anything at all because you can google it. What I’m saying is progress and digital modernisation has changed the world and that the curriculum and qualifications system needs to be updated to reflect that.

We also need to take into consideration that our children ARE able to Google literally anything at any time or use AI and that this undoubtedly has an impact on motivation and changes the traditional way we educate people. I’m suggesting that we should update how we measure intelligence and what we teach. Im sure you’d agree with me that the system needs an overhaul.

It might change their motivation in that they will constantly pester their teachers with 'when will I ever need to know this, I can google everything' but good teachers can deal with that, just as maths teachers have to deal with 'why do I need to know this when I can just stick it in my calculator?'

They don't need to stop studying Romeo and Juliet because they can now google the plot of Romeo and Juliet, because they weren't studying Romeo and Juliet for any particularly utilitarian reason in the first place, but because Romeo and Juliet speaks through the ages to the human condition. They learn history so that they can understand their place in the world and so that we can try to not repeat the mistakes of the past. They learn science so that they can understand the world around them.

They don't stop needing to know these things because of AI. In fact it's probably even more important to connect them to their shared humanity.

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 15:22

BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 15:18

So? What solutions have you come up with? What will you change in your practice and what will you advocate for?

Perhaps they could clarify what their current practice is because it doesn’t seem to be teaching, merely judging.

BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 15:18

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 15:01

I also don’t think it’s right to blame the parents, blame screens etc etc. It’s absolving responsibility.
I’d rather people took accountability rather than blame others.
Thought what can I proactively do to make this situation better rather than lay the blame elsewhere.
If the world has changed for our children, we need to adapt the way we educate for that world.
If (and I hate these words) we have labelled/segregated our children into neurotypical and neurodiverse : and the neurodiverse are become increasingly ‘typical’ - then our schools need to adapt to this change.

Edited

So? What solutions have you come up with? What will you change in your practice and what will you advocate for?

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 15:13

@RebelBabybel

I have missed when you said it. When were you last a teacher in school?

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 15:12

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 15:01

I also don’t think it’s right to blame the parents, blame screens etc etc. It’s absolving responsibility.
I’d rather people took accountability rather than blame others.
Thought what can I proactively do to make this situation better rather than lay the blame elsewhere.
If the world has changed for our children, we need to adapt the way we educate for that world.
If (and I hate these words) we have labelled/segregated our children into neurotypical and neurodiverse : and the neurodiverse are become increasingly ‘typical’ - then our schools need to adapt to this change.

Edited

So you're saying it's the fault of school staff?

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 15:01

I also don’t think it’s right to blame the parents, blame screens etc etc. It’s absolving responsibility.
I’d rather people took accountability rather than blame others.
Thought what can I proactively do to make this situation better rather than lay the blame elsewhere.
If the world has changed for our children, we need to adapt the way we educate for that world.
If (and I hate these words) we have labelled/segregated our children into neurotypical and neurodiverse : and the neurodiverse are become increasingly ‘typical’ - then our schools need to adapt to this change.

OP posts:
RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 14:50

EHCP’s record high, exclusions record high, EOTAS record high, non attendence etc

Focus on that @BlueSilverCats

OP posts:
LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 14:49

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 10:48

Also this. Local Authorities deliberately break the law and deny children their legal right to education in order to save money. They are losing 98% of tribunals for EHCPs so it's quite clear that they are denying them to children that they know should have one: that is far above the level that could possibly result from genuine error

And this is because councils are going bankrupt over the costs. It's not just to 'save money', it's because they don't have it.

In the meantime everyone else is paying shedloads of council tax and wondering where it is all going because public services like libraries are closing down, potholes aren't being filled and bin collections are being reduced.

Something drastic needs to happen about SEN funding because the current system is failing everyone.

By far the largest cost to most Councils is social care. But yes, SEN costs are large. Not helped of course by Councils obstructing attempts at getting early intervention so their own behaviour is increasing the costs they'd have to pay within the existing dysfunctional system, as well as harming children. "We're skint" is not a valid legal defence to deliberate illegal behaviour.

And why are Council's skint? Because we have had total economic mismanagement for decades and still continuing, because we have a totally dysfunctional healthcare system and tax system and have screwed all of our trading relationships and our pensions systems are ponzi schemes, so central Government cut Local Authority budgets.

None of that justifies denying children their right to a decent education which should be right near the top of the list of UK funding priorities both morally and in terms of the country having any hope of saving itself from its self-inflicted decline.

RebelBabybel · 23/11/2024 14:46

@BlueSilverCats

I think it depends what data you look at and how you look at it.

I imagine that data collected in the 90’s/definition of exclusions/suspensions may be different to now.

What I read said 1.7 out of 10000 in the 90’s and 4.3 most recent data.

That 1.7 probably reflects a decade spread.

What IS being reported in the press is an all time record high.

So instead of nit picking, maybe it’s better to think of what is going wrong and solutions.

I just want to echo the poster stating how everyone equates SEN with certain behaviours. Or rather that is the assumption that is ‘jumped to’ before they’ve even met the child. It’s just so @@@@@ negative.

OP posts:
BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 14:46

To add to this, teacher's are acutely aware they aren't providing the best learning environment for children and it's currently. one of the hardest parts of the job. I cannot split myself into any more pieces than I do•

Yup, no matter what you're doing ,someone is missing out or actually failed and the impotence of it all is fucking soul destroying.

BlueSilverCats · 23/11/2024 14:44

@User135644 the issue is some of that poor conduct would not be considered bad behaviour in the work place. Fidgeting or moving around, talking to yourself, taking your jacket off, loosening your tie , getting a drink when you're thirsty, going to the toilet when you need to , the colour of your socks or shoes etc.

Not just that, but there is a certain choice over employment too. If you're an outdoorsy, creative, needing to move type , who is absolutely crap at maths , no one will force you in an accountant's office will they?

There are laws and regulations to support your needs in the workplace, and if the company is shit you have legal recourse and/ or you can find another job.

Add in all these frustrations, especially on top of extra stressors, the lack of choice or options and you end up with even more extreme behaviours.

You also forget completely a vast number of children who will never be able to live independently, much less actually work somewhere. These kids are in mainstream schools, in nappies, nonverbal, self harming etc.

LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 14:41

@Sherrystrull it must be quite soul-destroying. As I said in an earlier post, from my perspective as a parent the class teachers and TAs are incredible. The problems are incompetent and incapable SENCOs, Head Teachers and Local Authorities.

Sherrystrull · 23/11/2024 14:30

LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 14:05

But behaviour doesn’t mean bad or deliberately naughty behaviour. It can be anxious behaviours, tics, stammers, crying when something goes wrong etc. It doesn’t make them poorly behaved but it does mean the teacher needs to make sure their needs are met which can still be disruptive to other children. (Said as a parent of highly anxious child that wants so hard to be good but has issues controlling emotions).

And such children would have far fewer anxious behaviours in appropriately sized classes with half as many children in, and a calm learning environment where chaos/ violence wasn't tolerated: it's not their SEN that's the problem, it is schools not providing a decent educational environment.

To add to this, teacher's are acutely aware they aren't providing the best learning environment for children and it's currently. one of the hardest parts of the job. I cannot split myself into any more pieces than I do.

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 14:26

Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:47

Perhaps we are moving towards a post work/post literate society where large swathes of the population will be passive media consumers on UBI.. I wonder what 'jobs' will remain and what schooling will look like when an educated populace is liability 😂

Im not sure why you quoted me here? I’m talking about updating our education system to reflect our modern society and also about how to motivate our young people, not about not educating people at all?

LemonadeCrayon · 23/11/2024 14:05

But behaviour doesn’t mean bad or deliberately naughty behaviour. It can be anxious behaviours, tics, stammers, crying when something goes wrong etc. It doesn’t make them poorly behaved but it does mean the teacher needs to make sure their needs are met which can still be disruptive to other children. (Said as a parent of highly anxious child that wants so hard to be good but has issues controlling emotions).

And such children would have far fewer anxious behaviours in appropriately sized classes with half as many children in, and a calm learning environment where chaos/ violence wasn't tolerated: it's not their SEN that's the problem, it is schools not providing a decent educational environment.

Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:47

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 13:32

I agree with you that our brains naturally want to learn. And I am not saying that you don’t need to know anything at all because you can google it. What I’m saying is progress and digital modernisation has changed the world and that the curriculum and qualifications system needs to be updated to reflect that.

We also need to take into consideration that our children ARE able to Google literally anything at any time or use AI and that this undoubtedly has an impact on motivation and changes the traditional way we educate people. I’m suggesting that we should update how we measure intelligence and what we teach. Im sure you’d agree with me that the system needs an overhaul.

Perhaps we are moving towards a post work/post literate society where large swathes of the population will be passive media consumers on UBI.. I wonder what 'jobs' will remain and what schooling will look like when an educated populace is liability 😂

ThisTeaIsBad · 23/11/2024 13:41

noblegiraffe · 21/11/2024 22:54

And for the sniffy, sarky posters here - do you think you know it all? What’s the answer then - let’s hear it?

I certainly wouldn't claim to know it all, but I think your insistence that everyone was just fine and dandy and in school learning back in the day with a bit of firm discipline, hardly anyone had SEN and everyone was wonderfully included is bollocks. I also think that your assertion that kids today are being diagnosed with SEN merely for not 'fitting into a box' is rubbish. I think your claim that teachers aren't allowed to tell kids how to use a jigsaw is bullshit.

David Blunkett was the Ed Sec whose policy of inclusion in the late 90s saw the widespread closure of special schools. The idea was the all but the most seriously disabled children would be educated in mainstream. This was while you were teaching so you should have noticed the increasing number of children with SEN in your classes. That policy has been a failure, but those special schools are gone.

Since 2010 school funding has been subject to a policy of austerity. The first people to lose their jobs were teaching assistants and pastoral workers. A huge amount of support that could be allocated to pupils with difficulties disappeared.

Then in 2015 the funding system for special needs changed. School funds had shrunk, and now the only way to get additional funding for pupils with SEN is if they have an EHCP. Schools are desperate for extra money and the number of pupils with EHCPs has doubled since then. (This doesn't necessarily mean that schools are making up the needs, rather that pupils could get extra funding before the changes without an EHCP, and there was more money in schools generally so EHCPs weren't as urgently required). This has put pressure on councils who are now bankrupting themselves with the cost of SEN funding so they now routinely reject any application for an EHCP, including kids with extreme needs, so those kids go unsupported, end up more likely to be excluded as they can't cope with school and school can't cope with them. An exclusion is sometimes the only way to get them an appropriate placement.

There has been an increase in diagnoses of SEN, not sure if it is clear if it is better recognition, or environmental factors, or things like increasing premature births or whatever, but we've also had a pandemic and a definite increase in children with e.g. speech and language issues as a result. There's also a mental health crisis in both children and adults (which will affect children as well) and a huge increase in child poverty which will impact behaviour in school.

At the same time there has been a huge turnover in school staff. Teachers leaving and being replaced by a series of supply teachers. Lack of experienced staff. Kids form a relationship with a TA or pastoral leader only for them to leave. That also has an impact, particularly on kids who need stability and routine.

Solutions? Massive funding for SEN support, taking the responsibility away from councils so they can focus on potholes and bin collections. More special schools, properly staffed. More properly trained SEN staff in schools. Overhaul of the EHCP system. Fixing teacher workload so that schools can recruit and retain a stable workforce. Reducing the curriculum in primary and secondary and giving more time to creative and physical subjects. Stop forcing kids who can't reliably add up to sit GCSE Maths. Give everyone in schools a bit of room to breathe.

for a start.

Completely agree with everything you say here.

The policy of "inclusion" has collided with curriculum changes that make the learning inaccessible to too many children (especially those with SEN) add to that an attitude from a significant minority that school is a pointless waste of time and/or their child can do no wrong.

I feel the need to say that the vast majority of the SEN children I work with are an absolute delight. Polite, well behaved, and grateful for the help. The same is true for the majority of ESL children. In fact some of the hardest working, most focused children are ESL. The worst behaviour comes from children who are either neglected (and I think there's far more in this category than anyone realises) or who are overly pandered to by indulgent parents.

Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:39

User135644 · 23/11/2024 13:28

Not in society but people wouldn't get away with poor conduct in the workplace (for the most part). You have to behave and do your job or you'll be on a disciplinary and eventually dismissed. The same applies to school.

If kids aren't taught discipline and boundaries in school, then they won't cope in the workplace.

Edited

They're not coping. Look at the rise of the NEET.

benefitstaxcredithelp · 23/11/2024 13:32

noblegiraffe · 23/11/2024 12:26

Meh, I'm a maths teacher and the existence of calculators hasn't killed off the need to be numerate quite yet.

The idea that you don't need to know anything because you can google it is an incredibly stupid one. How do you get anything done if you have to google everything? How does your brain make links between various pieces of knowledge if they are all stored on separate Wikipedia pages? How can you be creative if you have no starting point, nothing to draw inspiration from, a brain that is a blank?

If you don't fill your brain with useful information, it will fill itself with shite. How many of us can still remember advertising jingles from when we were kids? Our brains want to learn and store vast amounts of information.

I agree with you that our brains naturally want to learn. And I am not saying that you don’t need to know anything at all because you can google it. What I’m saying is progress and digital modernisation has changed the world and that the curriculum and qualifications system needs to be updated to reflect that.

We also need to take into consideration that our children ARE able to Google literally anything at any time or use AI and that this undoubtedly has an impact on motivation and changes the traditional way we educate people. I’m suggesting that we should update how we measure intelligence and what we teach. Im sure you’d agree with me that the system needs an overhaul.

User135644 · 23/11/2024 13:28

Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:19

There is no longer any societal consensus of what constitutes poor conduct. Teachers really are at the sharp end of this.

Not in society but people wouldn't get away with poor conduct in the workplace (for the most part). You have to behave and do your job or you'll be on a disciplinary and eventually dismissed. The same applies to school.

If kids aren't taught discipline and boundaries in school, then they won't cope in the workplace.

Appuskidu · 23/11/2024 13:26

was there perhaps more to the story? Did the child headbutt a member of staff and use a racial slur and it's being reported as something else entirely?

I suspect that is exactly what’s happened but why let the truth get in the way of a good story!

Annabella92 · 23/11/2024 13:19

User135644 · 23/11/2024 12:44

Kids need to be punished for bad behaviour or it just disrupts the lesson for everyone else. Also for the safety of the other children and staff.

If bad behaviour escalates then that's going to be mean exclusion. It's poor parenting mostly or coming from poor backgrounds, but teachers are hamstrung when it comes to disciplining children. The only avenue the school have is exclusion.

Edited

There is no longer any societal consensus of what constitutes poor conduct. Teachers really are at the sharp end of this.