"chest feeding" men should not be put above women and babies by La Leche League. Reasonable?

Why?

Be careful how you through language around.
Rejecting identity politics means you cannot insist on protecting the right to breastfeed in public ("exposing yourself") because you are a breastfeeding mother

1. What is its meaning? When would I need to use it in a sentence?
2. We know that many people don't understand what a trans woman is and what a trans man is, and get them the wrong way round. Just because you think it's easy for people to understand doesn't mean it is. Of course, if we were allowed to say, "a trans woman is a man who wants to be a woman and a trans man is a woman who wants to be a man", people would find that explanation easier to understand, but we're not even allowed to use plain English to explain what these terms mean, because plain English is transphobic.

100 percent would self exclude from a breast feeding group that allowed in fetishism and child abuse. This is sickening on so many levels.

What the fuck has meeting a transwoman got to do with anything? Why do you think his desire to breastfeeding feed a baby should come before that baby's health? Are you so lost in your perceived righteousness that willing to sacrifice children to the alter of trans?

The word cis is a real word that has a meaning. Just because you don't like it doesn't it isn't a thing.

I stand by the fact trans man/woman is a simple self obvious term and the only peouwho don't understand it are either stupid and can't understand the semantics of the English language or are misunderstanding on purposes to make a point, like you have done in your post. Your prejudice is showing.

So as long as it doesn’t exist at the local cafe it’s ok for babies to be subject to this?

You’re a pervert apologist.

"He didn't bruise her where anyone can see so why are you all making such a fuss?"

You're highly highly unlikely to come across anyone abusing a child at a café.
Not being able to enjoy a latte in peace is not the reason I raise awareness about child abuse.
Sometimes other people may as well be martians for all I can figure out what goes on in their heads.

Don't they hate being women so bind or get rid of breasts. Having a baby is a very female thing to do for someone who thinks they are now male. Obviously we all know you can't actually change sex.

If only there were ways a ‘trans man’ could prevent themselves from undergoing such a “distressing” event 🙄

Bet if they had chapped bleeding nipples or mastitis they wouldn’t want to do it.

The opposite of a woman is a man, so I'm not sure that this language is as helpful as some people think in convincing us all that a trans woman is a woman.

If you are using the words "man" and "woman" in accordance with their original meanings, the way they have been used consistently for about a thousand years, a man is a male person and a woman is a female person. So a trans man would be a biologically male person who is trans, and a trans woman would be a biologically female person who is trans.

The word "cis" is completely meaningless to the vast majority of the population, who don't need it in their vocabulary. Stop trying to make "cis" happen.

Surely if you identify as a man, you don't put your body through the uniquely female pregnancy and birth.

How many women do you feel is acceptable to you to be harmed by self excluding because policy allowed a male to join a breastfeeding group?

How many women do you feel is acceptable to be harmed before women are allowed to discuss the policy without being shamed by those who support the policy changes or just dismiss the significance of the changes?

Because, as was repeatedly highlighted by some posters declaring that two male boxers were ‘cis women’ because they were ‘assigned female at birth’, cis is actually meaningless in describing the unique needs of female people.

The language changes that one group of people has tried to coerce society into using to support their philosophical belief are changes that remove the ability to speak precisely and communicate clearly.

Because "trans man" contains "man", so you could imagine that it is "a man who has become trans". The word "trans" appears to be a qualification of "man", i.e., the basic category is "man" and this is a special kind of man, namely, one who lives as a woman. (Again, I know this is wrong, but I'm explaining the logic of the person who gets it wrong.) Compare "gay man", which communicates that this is a man who has a specific attribute.

I have taught myself to get it right, but I completely understand how people who don't discuss the topic much might not be sure which way round it goes.

Finally some sense.

Get your flame suit on though, trans women are despised on Mumsnet.

You're vastly more likely to die in a random car accident on your way to a breastfeeding cafe than tragically encounter a breastfeeding transgender woman at one, but don't let that stop you getting very very angry and scared at the hypothetical likelihood of it happening.