Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

"chest feeding" men should not be put above women and babies by La Leche League. Reasonable?

293 replies

GenerativeAIBot · 14/11/2024 16:40

How many women will self exclude based on this outcome? How many children will suffer because of it? Anything more than zero is unacceptable

This is the direct and foreseeable outcome of ever allowing the word woman to be mutable. This is the ultimate outcome of all these progressive policies, generally well meaning, with terrible outcomes

https://archive.ph/NsquC

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/society/article/breastfeeding-charity-chief-quits-over-transgender-policy-zhvhl8nps

Identity politics should be dead and we need to bury it.

Trustee quits breastfeeding charity over trans policy

Miriam Main resigned from La Leche League over a policy that allows biological men to attend support groups

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/society/article/breastfeeding-charity-chief-quits-over-transgender-policy-zhvhl8nps

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 14:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Why would you defend men who want access to women's breastfeeding groups?

PunnySheep · 15/11/2024 13:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:58

We've got to stop talking about 'trans people' like they're a monolith. There are many different types of people lurking under that umbrella.

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:58

Still curious who the 6% are

OP posts:
lifeturnsonadime · 15/11/2024 13:34

Your only stance appears to be ‘you haven’t MET any transpeople, you don’t understand them’. We don’t have to. We need men to stay out of our spaces and sports.

Not only that when we have experience of trans people, even within our own families and express a different view Izimbra either downplays those opinions or doesn't come back to thread.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 15/11/2024 13:26

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:15

There's no point. I've gone through these threads and read your comments.

The reality is this: all the huge problems facing women right now - the state of the NHS, women's lack of access to housing, appalling postnatal care, women's poverty - and you're typing hundreds of thousands of words and expending vast amounts of energy in a state of fury about any and all organisations showing acceptance and support of a tiny and marginalised community. (in fact a community so small that most of you would never know even existed if you hadn't made engaging in GC debates on social media a central core of your identity).

It's boring and frankly a bit bizarre.

Since when are boundary pushing men an ‘tiny marginalised minority’?! Women’s rights to single sex spaces, including within the NHS is a massive issue for A LOT of women. You don’t get to decide whether it’s an issue or not.

You can’t answer the most basic of questions of how you think biological men should be allowed in women’s spaces and sports, you don’t seem to us stand the concept of basic safeguarding and why single sex spaces exist in the first place, and now you are defending men with fetishes. Slow handclap for you.

Your only stance appears to be ‘you haven’t MET any transpeople, you don’t understand them’. We don’t have to. We need men to stay out of our spaces and sports.

What I find boring and frankly bizarre is hanging about these boards spouting the same shite despite reasonable argument, points and evidence put to you. You offer nothing. Wash rinse repeat. Is that really the best use of your time?

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 15/11/2024 13:24

I'm commenting on the cognitive dissonance one needs to be convinced they are not a biological female yet choose to gestate and feed an infant.

There are plenty of marginalised groups in society today who do not seem to merit the concessions which are applied to the trans community.

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:22

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:17

Because Stonewall and friends associated trans and ID politics with the (justified and won) argument about gay rights but forgot to think through the consequences

so everyone pointed at dissenters and treated them like gay bashers

now people are starting to see the emperor actually has no clothes - enough that the trickle has become a stream and since Trump won - I think it’s a river

we must keep talking about g about it and in places other than mumsnet

A very clever approach. I guess I just can't fathom how it worked so well. But yes, absolutely agree with everything you're saying

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:17

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:08

True. But why didn't they? How did they become so intimidated?

Because Stonewall and friends associated trans and ID politics with the (justified and won) argument about gay rights but forgot to think through the consequences

so everyone pointed at dissenters and treated them like gay bashers

now people are starting to see the emperor actually has no clothes - enough that the trickle has become a stream and since Trump won - I think it’s a river

we must keep talking about g about it and in places other than mumsnet

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 15/11/2024 13:10

RadioBamboo · 15/11/2024 12:57

Trans men are female.

Cross posted.

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:08

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:07

Good people did not speak up (not enough of them, not big enough ones. Don’t say JKR she’s the exception that proves the rule)

people need to STAND UP

identity politics is DEAD and we need to be shown to BURY IT

or, Trump is in power for ever

True. But why didn't they? How did they become so intimidated?

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:07

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:06

I know I keep asking this, but can anyone shed further light on how we got here?

Misogyny, yes - and this is a particularly depraved version of it. Misogyny has always plagued our societies, yet even 10 years ago, this kind of behaviour would have been condemned as perversion. What changed?

Good people did not speak up (not enough of them, not big enough ones. Don’t say JKR she’s the exception that proves the rule)

people need to STAND UP

identity politics is DEAD and we need to be shown to BURY IT

or, Trump is in power for ever

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 15/11/2024 13:07

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 12:54

So you can't actually answer the question and you think men should be allowed to infiltrate women's spaces, without consent from women, simply because they want to.

Got it.

Just imagine holding women in the degree of contempt that you do. It's actually disgusting.

The misogyny of the position of this poster has been mentioned before if I remember correctly.

GenerativeAIBot · 15/11/2024 13:06

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 15/11/2024 12:49

A better question is why organisations such as LLL, the NHS and so on are expending so much energy on this tiny minority (who are not actually marginalised in any meaningful sense of the word) at the expense of the majority?

How dare you minimise someone’s virtue signalling.

OP posts:
TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 13:06

I know I keep asking this, but can anyone shed further light on how we got here?

Misogyny, yes - and this is a particularly depraved version of it. Misogyny has always plagued our societies, yet even 10 years ago, this kind of behaviour would have been condemned as perversion. What changed?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 15/11/2024 13:03

RadioBamboo · 15/11/2024 12:57

Trans men are female.

Yes, they are. But the article linked to in the OP is about trans women inducing lactation so they can "breastfeed", and LLL's policy about that.

lifeturnsonadime · 15/11/2024 13:00

RadioBamboo · 15/11/2024 12:57

Trans men are female.

**This is not about trans men. Read the LLL website, it's also about males/ transwomen who want to breastfeed. Miriam Main did not resign because females want to chest feed!

This is from the LLL website.

^Trans women can use a protocol similar to adoptive and other non-gestational mothers and stimulate their milk supply: it is called the Newman-Goldfarb protocol. You can read more here https://laleche.org.uk/relactation-induced-lactation/ and here http://www.asklenore.info/breastfeeding/inducedlactation/protocols4print.shtml.^

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 12:58

@izimbra argument seems to come down to - perverts should be able to do as they please because women face a multitude of issues.

I don't even have works for how f*cked up that position is 😵‍💫

RadioBamboo · 15/11/2024 12:57

lifeturnsonadime · 15/11/2024 12:43

I've got no interest in listening to why a male wants to insert his nipple into a babies mouth for the purpose of excreting chemicals into the baby.

Because I don't want to indulge his fetish.

You can go right ahead with that.

You can minimise child abuse all you wish but most, right minded, people are appalled that this behaviour is condoned because only a tiny minority of males want to act out their fetish on babies.

I have to question how anyone can think that this is in any way acceptable.

But you do you.

Trans men are female.

TheKeatingFive · 15/11/2024 12:54

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:15

There's no point. I've gone through these threads and read your comments.

The reality is this: all the huge problems facing women right now - the state of the NHS, women's lack of access to housing, appalling postnatal care, women's poverty - and you're typing hundreds of thousands of words and expending vast amounts of energy in a state of fury about any and all organisations showing acceptance and support of a tiny and marginalised community. (in fact a community so small that most of you would never know even existed if you hadn't made engaging in GC debates on social media a central core of your identity).

It's boring and frankly a bit bizarre.

So you can't actually answer the question and you think men should be allowed to infiltrate women's spaces, without consent from women, simply because they want to.

Got it.

Just imagine holding women in the degree of contempt that you do. It's actually disgusting.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 15/11/2024 12:49

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:15

There's no point. I've gone through these threads and read your comments.

The reality is this: all the huge problems facing women right now - the state of the NHS, women's lack of access to housing, appalling postnatal care, women's poverty - and you're typing hundreds of thousands of words and expending vast amounts of energy in a state of fury about any and all organisations showing acceptance and support of a tiny and marginalised community. (in fact a community so small that most of you would never know even existed if you hadn't made engaging in GC debates on social media a central core of your identity).

It's boring and frankly a bit bizarre.

A better question is why organisations such as LLL, the NHS and so on are expending so much energy on this tiny minority (who are not actually marginalised in any meaningful sense of the word) at the expense of the majority?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 15/11/2024 12:45

DazedAndConfused321 · 15/11/2024 12:17

I see it as I have a very rare medical condition that causes issues with my nerves and co-ordination. I don't join in on support groups for people with sciatica, because we have different nerve issues. There are no support groups for people with my condition because it's rare but also not a big deal generally. So if I need support, I'd have to make my own group.

If a trans man (i.e. female to male) wants to breast/chest feed and needs support, they need a men's group! Make their own!

Why do they need their own support?

I would have no issue attending the same breastfeeding support group as a trans man.

I just don't think it needs to be renamed "chestfeeding" and I don't want it to become all about the trans man and their identity. If they are only there to get help with feeding their baby then their identity doesn't need to be discussed at all. At most, all I need to do is remember to refer to the trans man as "he" if I need to refer to them in the third person during the support group, which I probably won't need to do.

Trans women shouldn't be in support groups for breastfeeding mothers because they are male, and they don't need their own support for breastfeeding because they shouldn't be attempting to breastfeed.

lifeturnsonadime · 15/11/2024 12:43

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:19

"I think it must be incredibly hard bearing a child as a trans man, and probably extremely distressing. I'd imagine going to a class that called it "breastfeeding" would be the least of their worries"

The important phrase here that's doing a lot of heavy lifting is 'I imagine'.

Because nobody on this thread has any interest or experience in actually listening to transgender people, or listening to people that provide services for them.

I've got no interest in listening to why a male wants to insert his nipple into a babies mouth for the purpose of excreting chemicals into the baby.

Because I don't want to indulge his fetish.

You can go right ahead with that.

You can minimise child abuse all you wish but most, right minded, people are appalled that this behaviour is condoned because only a tiny minority of males want to act out their fetish on babies.

I have to question how anyone can think that this is in any way acceptable.

But you do you.

Helleofabore · 15/11/2024 12:43

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:15

There's no point. I've gone through these threads and read your comments.

The reality is this: all the huge problems facing women right now - the state of the NHS, women's lack of access to housing, appalling postnatal care, women's poverty - and you're typing hundreds of thousands of words and expending vast amounts of energy in a state of fury about any and all organisations showing acceptance and support of a tiny and marginalised community. (in fact a community so small that most of you would never know even existed if you hadn't made engaging in GC debates on social media a central core of your identity).

It's boring and frankly a bit bizarre.

Ok. And so because you, personally, have different priorities and women are not focusing enough on your personal priorities, you feel you should be able to shame them. That you can actively find time, hypocritically, to censure women for not believing in your personal beliefs and focusing on what you want?

Yes, we understand that you think the numbers of people in the population who are transgender are directly correlated to the significance of the issues we are discussing. The discussions you don’t like so shame others for having.

That belief that the issues are small in significance is as misinformed as your opinion has been that ‘most of us have never met or talked to a trans person’ (paraphrasing). Yet for something apparently so insignificant, you feel the need to enter threads with the sole purpose to shame others for discussing it.

izimbra · 15/11/2024 12:19

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 15/11/2024 12:05

I think it must be incredibly hard bearing a child as a trans man, and probably extremely distressing. I'd imagine going to a class that called it "breastfeeding" would be the least of their worries

//

Agree with this and actually have to ask - if your female biology distresses and triggers you to the degree everyone around you is compelled to change their language and processes to lessen this, why in gods name (accidents aside obv) would you put yourself through that all womanly experience of pregnancy? Confused

"I think it must be incredibly hard bearing a child as a trans man, and probably extremely distressing. I'd imagine going to a class that called it "breastfeeding" would be the least of their worries"

The important phrase here that's doing a lot of heavy lifting is 'I imagine'.

Because nobody on this thread has any interest or experience in actually listening to transgender people, or listening to people that provide services for them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread