Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How old is too old to have a baby?

611 replies

Shaz83 · 14/11/2024 11:40

Just wondering how old is too old to have a baby? Fair enough being healthy etc is fine.. but how old is too old?

OP posts:
ludicrouslycapaciousbags · 15/11/2024 13:41

4th thread you have done on this, perplexing, wonder what answer your waiting on...

Anything above 35 is too old.

Jk987 · 15/11/2024 13:35

Too old is when you're in menopause. (Excluding those who go through it prematurely).

LePetitMaman · 15/11/2024 13:35

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:43

I personally think if that’s how your mindset is then you should not have children at 40+ because if you are going to feel like that it’s not always like that my gran had my mom at 42 and she lived till 97 my mom has had enjoyed her life with her mom she don’t feel she has missed out… at all…

It's clear you think it's brilliant to be an elderly mother and get all defensive at everyone pointing out the major downsides, so.... why ask for opinions?

WonderingAboutThus · 15/11/2024 13:35

I would have said 35 but reading this post makes me realize I am weeks from turning 35 and I don't think now I am too old for another one...

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 13:34

SallyWD · 15/11/2024 13:14

Why did I have a child at 38? Because sadly life didn't work out as I wanted and I didn't meet the right person until later.
Of course, life is unpredictable and a young mum could die early and an old mum could live to a 100. I know that's true. I myself had cancer when my children were toddlers. My friend died young of cancer, leaving two children behind. My mum had my brother at 42.
However we do know that it's rare to die young and in general, the later you have your children, the less time you'll have with them.
I don't think being an older mum is a disaster, at all. We all know older mums who are doing a great job (I include myself!! Haha!). I just think that in an ideal world there are many benefits to having them younger. Like I said in my first post, many women have a really tough time through perimenopause/menopause - low energy, insomnia, anxiety etc. I wish I'd had mine earlier so I had more energy when they were younger.

So you think to be a mummy to a child for 50 plus years being there emotionally for them etc?? Is not enough time?

OP posts:
Over40smum · 15/11/2024 13:33

I had children at 43/45 - natural conception, trouble free births. Now in early 60s - so the dreaded ‘teenagers in 60s’ territory. It’s actually all going fine. Still working full time - not floored by menopause during toddler years. No zimmer frame yet or lack of energy. I seemed to cope with pregnancy better than many younger colleagues - no time off - and this was before the days of WFH, travelling regularly etc. Everyone is different. I agree that it’s unlikely I’ll be much practical use as a grandmother and will likely die earlier than most of their contemporaries’ mothers but I’ve been a solid, dependable, engaged and loving parent who was able to provide a comfortable home and allow them to reach their potential (so far). Very few people grow up in 100% ideal circumstances. Having a partner who shoulders their share is also a massive bonus.

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 13:23

noodlercanoodler · 15/11/2024 12:48

I'd one at 24 and one at 31

I'm fit and healthy but no thank you, no more

I wouldn't have another one past 35

That’s because you have children at a young age But there are others who have not been as lucky as you. If you had no children by 35 would you stop trying no 1 can say unless they actually stop with no children.

OP posts:
SallyWD · 15/11/2024 13:14

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:55

So why have them at 38 if that’s how you feel? 38 is young! As I have already mentioned to the other poster my mom had her mom till 97 and really enjoyed her life with her mum my mum don’t feel she had less time… you could have a baby at 20 and still anything can happen you could get cancer etc and die… no 1 can say how long u will live for only god knows.. I know someone who had a baby at 29 and her daughter is 9 same age as mine I had my first at 33 I’m fit and healthy so far… thank god! But my friend she has stage 4 alk lung cancer and now on chemotherapy. So yea I think now especially reading everyone posts that age is just definitely a number! And I’m gonna be here for my last for a long time! God Willing! ❤️🥰

Why did I have a child at 38? Because sadly life didn't work out as I wanted and I didn't meet the right person until later.
Of course, life is unpredictable and a young mum could die early and an old mum could live to a 100. I know that's true. I myself had cancer when my children were toddlers. My friend died young of cancer, leaving two children behind. My mum had my brother at 42.
However we do know that it's rare to die young and in general, the later you have your children, the less time you'll have with them.
I don't think being an older mum is a disaster, at all. We all know older mums who are doing a great job (I include myself!! Haha!). I just think that in an ideal world there are many benefits to having them younger. Like I said in my first post, many women have a really tough time through perimenopause/menopause - low energy, insomnia, anxiety etc. I wish I'd had mine earlier so I had more energy when they were younger.

BackinBlack24 · 15/11/2024 13:09

I just had my first at 37 didn't meet my DP till I was 31 and when we started TTC it took us 2 years . If I have another one I would probably be 40 giving birth not sure I want another one as I feel that's too old but I don't want her to be an only child (I'm an only child)

Bakedpotatoes · 15/11/2024 13:09

I think anything under 40 is fine (I had my last at 33 but plenty of my friends had them up to 40) but my friend had a baby at 42 and she says that her DC has aged her by about 25 years overnight and she is physically and mentally exhausted.

Menopausalsourpuss · 15/11/2024 13:08

Yes not sure what you're asking, I had my last one at 49, surprise pregnancy despite using contraception, obviously that was as nature intended, has given me a new lease of life in some ways. But had 3 other children to help. Ideal is younger for energy but some people don't meet the right partner until later on (I married at 29 so not that young). And not usually ideal for finance/career path.

Whatanidiot123 · 15/11/2024 13:04

Investinmyself · 15/11/2024 11:43

@Shaz83 Basic life expectancy eg If life expectancy for a woman is 80. if she has a baby at 20 she’s got 60 years time as their mum, 45 and she’s only their mum for 35 years.

Not quite as simplistic as that - this study showed that maternal life expectancy increased by 5% for every year of maternal age and indicated that women who have children later live longer.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270889/#:~:text=For%20each%20additional%20year%20in,last%20child%20before%20age%2029.

As an older mum, one thing I do feel very keenly is that I must take responsibility for my health and wellbeing so that I can stay healthy and well for as long as possible and minimize my risk of developing long term chronic or acute health conditions. So maintaining a healthy weight, exercising, not eating ultra processed food, taking time for self care and limiting stress.

JaninaDuszejko · 15/11/2024 13:01

If you can get pregnant naturally you are not too old to have a baby. Average life expectancy is in the 80s in this country and late motherhood is correlated with long life. Even women who have children at the end of their fertile years can expect to live beyond their children becoming independent adults. And older parents are more stable parents.

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:58

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:55

So why have them at 38 if that’s how you feel? 38 is young! As I have already mentioned to the other poster my mom had her mom till 97 and really enjoyed her life with her mum my mum don’t feel she had less time… you could have a baby at 20 and still anything can happen you could get cancer etc and die… no 1 can say how long u will live for only god knows.. I know someone who had a baby at 29 and her daughter is 9 same age as mine I had my first at 33 I’m fit and healthy so far… thank god! But my friend she has stage 4 alk lung cancer and now on chemotherapy. So yea I think now especially reading everyone posts that age is just definitely a number! And I’m gonna be here for my last for a long time! God Willing! ❤️🥰

And my gran had my mom at 42!

OP posts:
Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:55

SallyWD · 15/11/2024 11:59

Yes, @Investinmyself explained it well. That's what I meant. If I'd had my children ten years earlier I would have had ten years longer with them - and also more time with them as a younger woman. I feel sad that for a big chunk of their lives I'll be an old lady, then they'll likely lose me when they around 40 or younger. I'm getting a lot more time with my mum than they will get with me - because my mum had me in her early 20s. I appreciate that. I still need my mum despite being nearly 50!
Yes, I know some people live until their 90s but I don't think I will as I've had a history of health problems so far. I also don't think we'd have quality time together if I did reach my 90s. It would probably be stressful for them!

So why have them at 38 if that’s how you feel? 38 is young! As I have already mentioned to the other poster my mom had her mom till 97 and really enjoyed her life with her mum my mum don’t feel she had less time… you could have a baby at 20 and still anything can happen you could get cancer etc and die… no 1 can say how long u will live for only god knows.. I know someone who had a baby at 29 and her daughter is 9 same age as mine I had my first at 33 I’m fit and healthy so far… thank god! But my friend she has stage 4 alk lung cancer and now on chemotherapy. So yea I think now especially reading everyone posts that age is just definitely a number! And I’m gonna be here for my last for a long time! God Willing! ❤️🥰

OP posts:
Dolly567 · 15/11/2024 12:54

I had mine at 25 and 29
To be honest, I would have had them younger! And if financially able, maybe another.
I'm 32 with a three year old and definitely notice the difference with my fitness levels this time around. I always want to use the pram because picking up my toddler is a struggle sometimes now Blush
I'm not overweight or anything I'm 5'2 and around 9st just more tired with school run in the mix etc.

My cut off would be 34.

Purplecatshopaholic · 15/11/2024 12:52

AmusedMaker · 15/11/2024 08:26

Anything over very early 40’s.
pregnant at 41 / 42 I wouldn’t think anything.
But pregnant at 44 I’d probably silently think that’s a bit old - funny how just a couple of years makes such a difference. But that’s probably because it’s rare for a woman to be pregnant at 44 ( statistically quite hard )

Agree with this. Much more likely you and/or the child are damaged in some way, or suffer complications or ongoing conditions. Plus you’re dealing with teens in your 60’s, while probably still working and maybe supporting elderly relatives. Fuck that.

Blondeshavemorefun · 15/11/2024 12:50

AmusedMaker · 15/11/2024 08:26

Anything over very early 40’s.
pregnant at 41 / 42 I wouldn’t think anything.
But pregnant at 44 I’d probably silently think that’s a bit old - funny how just a couple of years makes such a difference. But that’s probably because it’s rare for a woman to be pregnant at 44 ( statistically quite hard )

Mine was ivf but own eggs from a frozen cycle when I was 42

But my friend got preg naturally at 43

Yes obv rarer but happens as op can testament

DiamondGoldandSilver · 15/11/2024 12:50

From mid 40s. I had my first in my mid 30s and my second in late 30s.This enabled me to pursue my career and I was in a more senior and financially stable position when children came along.

parisinjanuary · 15/11/2024 12:48

For me, 35 was my limit. I found pregnancy very hard and the early years exhausting. I cant imagine going through that in my 40s, plus the risks get higher and higher.

I'm also really enjoying having teens in my 40s and being able to get my life back.

noodlercanoodler · 15/11/2024 12:48

I'd one at 24 and one at 31

I'm fit and healthy but no thank you, no more

I wouldn't have another one past 35

Shaz83 · 15/11/2024 12:43

Investinmyself · 15/11/2024 11:43

@Shaz83 Basic life expectancy eg If life expectancy for a woman is 80. if she has a baby at 20 she’s got 60 years time as their mum, 45 and she’s only their mum for 35 years.

I personally think if that’s how your mindset is then you should not have children at 40+ because if you are going to feel like that it’s not always like that my gran had my mom at 42 and she lived till 97 my mom has had enjoyed her life with her mom she don’t feel she has missed out… at all…

OP posts:
Justpregnant2024 · 15/11/2024 12:27

I don't want any after 35. Am 32 and pregnant with first child which would be my only. If I didn't have children, I wouldn't have an age limit

TaylorSwish · 15/11/2024 12:25

sel2223 · 15/11/2024 08:18

Sorry I should have added 'in my experience / in my social and family circle'

You are right, there are always exceptions

I see what the poster is saying. If you have a baby at 45 you would be way more tired if you have done 10 years of parenting already, if it’s your first baby you would be more likely to be well rested I guess.

Investinmyself · 15/11/2024 12:15

Yes there are exceptions but generally a younger mum will have longer with her dc.
I do think older years is overlooked. My dc’s friend has retired parents. They have massive arguments as they are not on her wavelength. They are also facing having to fund her at uni while retired (the SFE thresholds are so low that 2 pensions mean she isn’t eligible for full loan and her rent is just under £10,000 a year at a norther uni)

Swipe left for the next trending thread