Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

SIL describing herself as "retired" pissing me off

695 replies

SacreBleugh · 12/11/2024 18:07

I have recently retired. I've worked full time my entire career, as well as bringing up 4 kids. I know. Heroic.
My SIL is a SAHM to 3 grown up kids. She's had the odd temporary very part time hobby job in the 30 years I have known her. She is now also describing herself as "retired". I'm not sure why I find this irritating.

OP posts:
Greywool · 12/11/2024 20:27

Artistbythewater · 12/11/2024 19:55

This is just ridiculous. Looking after your own children and cleaning is STILL work, of course it is. You may not be paid for it, but it’s still your second job regardless. Unless you really do have a dh that does 50% then you have a full time job and a part time job with dh.

I wish women would start waking up to this fact! It is a job paid or not.

Edited

I do all my own gardening. And work for an employer. Does that mean that I have 2 jobs? What do I put as my profession when asked? I also clean and cook, do painting and decorating, etc. Are these also my jobs? I don’t consider these things as the same as when I earn money from something. That, to me, is working my job. The other things are activities that I have to do, but I don’t see it as a job of work, even though it’s bloody hard ‘work’ …. Just find this being a mum is a job a bit confusing to be honest (not disputing that it is hard work mind!)

TruthAndTrust · 12/11/2024 20:26

@mayorofcasterbridge

What do you put then - unemployed?

If asked I say I don't work. Im not looking for work so unemployed doesn't feel right. I had a professional career and worked up until my early thirties which is now over 30 years ago so I don't feel right calling myself by my former profession although I will do if I think it's what the person asking needs me to do. (in order to stop bothering me)

sweetpeaorchestra · 12/11/2024 20:24

Not RTFT but I would feel EXACTLY the same OP. However it’s shit. It’s rubbish that working full time with kids is so bloody hard and draining, and not that much in anyone’s interests half the time.. And it’s rubbish that not doing that leaves you so vulnerable and condescended to by the rest of society.

pollyglot · 12/11/2024 20:23

In my childhood, children, especially those of parents who had a farming background it seems, were required to do a great deal of the household labour. We were latchkey kids. I was responsible, from age 8, for cooking dinner at least two, and sometimes three evenings a week while my mother played golf and socialised at the 19th with the girls. . We kids were largely neglected most of the time, especially at weekends, when our parents left us to our own devices from the age of 5. From the age of ten, we were responsible for all the vegetable gardens, from twelve, mowing half an acre of lawns and painting a huge old wooden villa. This while keeping up with our studies.We had no social life. My mother was at best a part-time mother, and at worst disgracefully neglectful. There were plenty more like her back then, too...though they had had an easy war with little or no hardship.

But when, as the product of the first wave of post-war feminine empowerment, I went back to work when my first child was 5 months, she was hateful to me, saying that she was disgusted that my husband could not "keep" me and that DS1 would be permanently scarred. I am quite bitter about her implication that she was a full-time worker in the home and family by describing herself as "retired". Her recollections were full of how hard she worked to grow our own food, fill the cake tins, feed us nourishing and well-balanced meals. Ermmm, no.

thestudio · 12/11/2024 20:23

OP, she and her OH made the decision (and could afford to make the decision) that she would be at home for the kids, and devote their working hours (and realistically, probably all their time) to the kids and his welfare, food, cleaning, organisation, facilitation of everything and emotional wellbeing.

Lucky him and her kids. It's not nothing.

And there is always a price to pay, whichever choice you make (or don't make). Nothing is free.

Whoever said we live in a sexist economy is right.

ChristmasCwtch · 12/11/2024 20:22

Just ignore your SIL when she says she’s retired. She’s been unemployed/bankrolled by a husband for a long time.

I have a lot of friends who don’t work with secondary age children. It’s fine until their other half leaves/cheats/dies earlier than expected/realises it’s too expensive to fund two people from one pension 🤷🏼‍♀️ Try not to be annoyed, it’s not an enviable position for her to be in.

SabrinaThwaite · 12/11/2024 20:22

I have a friend who hasn’t worked for a while, children are grown up and his wife works long hours and earns big bucks. He describes his occupation as ‘trophy husband’.

FrogsLoveRain · 12/11/2024 20:21

ohtowinthelottery · 12/11/2024 18:33

I haven't been in paid employment for 25 years. I had to give up work to become an unpaid carer. I did that for 17 years until the person I cared for died. I didn't return to work. My previous employment afforded me a final salary pension which I started receiving this year.
When people ask if I work/what I do, I tell them I'm retired. What else am I going to say?
Would I annoy you too?

You've been working. Just unpaid as a carer. Different circumstances really.

PureBoggin · 12/11/2024 20:21

mayorofcasterbridge · 12/11/2024 20:07

So what about when the children go to school? Are the teachers providing childcare then?

Hate it however you want, it doesn't change the fact that working mothers (and let's face it, it is predominantly mothers) still shoulder all the responsibilities for their children as they would if they were at home with them. I don't know of regular childcare that takes them to the doctor/dentist, to get their hair cut, does school uniform shopping, yada yada yada. Working mums just have to squeeze more of their responsibilities into less time.

No they don't. They delegate it to someone else. When I was at work, I wasn't changing nappies, reading to my child, comforting them when they hurt themselves ,preparing their meals, feeding them, putting them down for a nap. When they got older I wasn't dropping them off or picking them up, I wasn't making them dinner, I wasn't taking them to the clubs that started before 6. Post 6pm, I would do that. SAHM's tend to do it ALL DAY. You don't have to pretend that you parented your child whilst you were at work. It's ok if you didn't.

pavementgerms · 12/11/2024 20:17

It is possible to leave the occupation space blank - we do this if the informant doesn't know what the deceased's occupation was.

Homemaker is the usual if someone never worked, for whatever reason (disability or choice). I personally prefer that to housewife.

PureBoggin · 12/11/2024 20:17

SacreBleugh · 12/11/2024 18:17

I know I'm probably being grouchy and unreasonable. That's why I'm voicing it here anonymously! I wouldn't say this out loud to anyone. I think it's because I feel I have worked so hard and am delighted to be retired whereas she has just smoothly morphed from one type of leisure to another.

Maybe THIS is why she calls her self "retired". You clearly feel superior because you worked. Lots of people do. Maybe she's fed up opening herself up to the judgement and superiority of others.

NoisyDenimShaker · 12/11/2024 20:16

Dibbydoos · 12/11/2024 18:42

You're irritated because you think only those earning a wage can claim they've retired?

Well, how wrong you are.

Retirement is usually understood to mean retiring from a paid job. I agree with OP.

ForGreyKoala · 12/11/2024 20:15

lolly792 · 12/11/2024 18:16

I wouldn't be pissed off, I'd feel sorry for her if she's never had any sort of success in the working world.

Ask her about her pension arrangements now she's 'retired'!! She won't even have a full state pension by the sound of it never mind an occupational one. Guess she's relying on the Important Man to bank roll her Grin

Why feel sorry for her? I worked for almost 50 years, but didn't have any "success" in the working world - because I didn't want it. I worked to pay the bills, nothing more. Believe it or not there is more to life than work for some of us.

Sayoonara · 12/11/2024 20:14

She's not retired is she, she is a housewife. And then when she hits state pension age is a pensioner. 'Retired' doesn't come into it.

Not sure I'd be annoyed, but a while ago I was speaking with a lady who was in her 70s, had never worked, had lived a very fancy ex-pat lifestyle with her oil company husband, DC and no doubt nannies. She, too, was 'retired'. When an older man in the group graciously made a comment to the younger people about working and 'thank you for paying my pension' (which is factually true, the younger generation pays for the older), the lady bristled that 'they're not paying mine.' Well no, the bulk would have been from her husband's mega pension, but she certainly hadn't paid any herself.

Trumptonagain · 12/11/2024 20:13

I think it's because I assume retired means retired from work. Paid work.

As said don't let it bother you..

Just tell people you're a retired...nurse/accountant/
receptionist...or whatever.

Leave your SIL to say what she will... if she's happy to say she's a retired SAHM so be it.

ForGreyKoala · 12/11/2024 20:13

CamillaCanterbaum · 12/11/2024 18:14

Your not sure why it irritates you so ask yourself- Why does it matter to you and your life? What impact does her describing herself as retired have on you?

This. What a ridiculous thing to bother you. If she doesn't work then surely she is allowed to call herself retired. You are envious of her - that is your problem, not hers.

ProfessionalPirate · 12/11/2024 20:13

lolly792 · 12/11/2024 18:16

I wouldn't be pissed off, I'd feel sorry for her if she's never had any sort of success in the working world.

Ask her about her pension arrangements now she's 'retired'!! She won't even have a full state pension by the sound of it never mind an occupational one. Guess she's relying on the Important Man to bank roll her Grin

Assumption, assumption, assumption. 🙄

Bethany83 · 12/11/2024 20:10

Im surprised at all the negative responses. Just want to say, 'I hear ya'! X and enjoy your well deserved retirement as you really do deserve it!

mymissycat · 12/11/2024 20:09

SouthLondonMum22 · 12/11/2024 20:00

No it isn’t. It’s just what you do as an adult with responsibilities.

This. Just life. But some can’t cope or are lazy. Both are fine, but don’t pretend.

mayorofcasterbridge · 12/11/2024 20:07

Newsenmum · 12/11/2024 20:03

I hate these threads bashing SAHM. So goady. If you pay for a cleaner and pay for childcare then you are paying for someone to do a job. You are not looking after your children whilst you are working, you are paying someone else to. I hate it when people
pretend they’re just extra amazing and doing both.

Edited

So what about when the children go to school? Are the teachers providing childcare then?

Hate it however you want, it doesn't change the fact that working mothers (and let's face it, it is predominantly mothers) still shoulder all the responsibilities for their children as they would if they were at home with them. I don't know of regular childcare that takes them to the doctor/dentist, to get their hair cut, does school uniform shopping, yada yada yada. Working mums just have to squeeze more of their responsibilities into less time.

Lucy25 · 12/11/2024 20:07

mymissycat · 12/11/2024 19:55

Ok, so is this a UK problem then? It’s expected of women? Because it’s certainly not a women only problem where I come from, or the countries around. From here it sounds liks UK is from the stone age. Not sure how you can join the rest of us.

If you’re not from the uk why as you assuming every other poster, are only from the uk Anyone can comment on MN from around the world, just like you are.

mymissycat · 12/11/2024 20:06

babyproblems · 12/11/2024 20:04

Maybe if it was properly recognised as being fundamentally important to society then Men would be jumping over themselves to be recognised for their success at it. As we’ve got it now; women dismissing the value of our own unpaid labour really helps the patriarchy continue to out earn us because only ‘their’ work is the one that counts. Us growing & raising future citizens, tax payers and employees means diddly squat so come on ladies, just do that in your spare time whilst climbing the greasy pole. And of course berate other women that choose a different version of equality for themselves. Meanwhile we squabble on mumsnet thinking this is what equality is. I despair!

role models

SouthLondonMum22 · 12/11/2024 20:06

BetterInColour · 12/11/2024 19:58

Looking after your own children and cleaning your own house is what the vast majority of people do, most people do it around working

If you read threads on here, you will see that IMO the majority of women find juggling full time or even part time work and childcare and cleaning very hard, exhausting, tiring, there are high rates of depression and anxiety, people take pills and life doesn't feel rewarding.

I think it is probably the least optimum state to be in- to be a full time working mum and do all the household stuff (with tiny amount of help from partners). Being a single or lone parent is all kinds of exhausting.

Running a household and doing childcare is tiring and a job. It may not be a whole job for 40 years, but there's no need to make out it's 'nothing', otherwise what are all those tired exhausted working mums doing posting on here?

Well people aren’t going to start a thread saying how much they aren’t struggling, are they? People tend to start threads on here when they are struggling.

I work FT with 3 children and don’t find it particularly hard and I’m not depressed at all. Some days are obviously harder than others, it can also be tiring at times too but overall? It’s great and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

NoisyDenimShaker · 12/11/2024 20:06

Grooch · 12/11/2024 18:35

I think the disdain towards women who stay at home to look after house/children is really nasty. The capitalist system wants you to think that paid employment is the only thing of value to society but that’s far from true. Tbh ‘retired’ is probably the description that best describes her situation. It’s certainly better than ‘sahm’ (because her kids are adults) or ‘unemployed’ (because that implies she’s looking for work)

Look after the house!! Working women have to look after the house just as much, but they have to fit it around working and commuting! I suppose the people who never work again after they have kids, even when the kids are long gone, would say that they're looking after the house, which is a cop-out. People who don't work and don't have young children are just lazy.

Lentilweaver · 12/11/2024 20:05

The thing is if you choose to have 4 children, it's going to be a very hard and expensive road no.matter what you do, and you will get no applause.