Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think new builds are too small

188 replies

Neuroticmillenial · 07/11/2024 12:31

Especially social housing.

Much prefer old style council houses with the smaller kitchens but larger living rooms and dining rooms.

I’m in a rented new build and I’d trade a hallway/porch and grassy garden for our bigger kitchen (bigger than living room) and downstairs toilet. Our stairs is less than 2 metres from our front door and it’s a pain with the buggy!

OP posts:
hadenoughofplayinggames · 07/11/2024 13:55

I’m more bothered about how close they are to each other!

SoloSofa24 · 07/11/2024 13:51

I think part of the problem is the massive preference in the UK for houses rather than flats. In much of Europe and around the world, cities are full of large apartments designed for families, and people are used to living in apartments. Here, even in cities people insist on houses, which are a much less efficient use of land and space. Perhaps it is also to do with our antiquated leasehold system for flats which makes them less appealing.

IcyLilacZebra · 07/11/2024 13:50

I lived in a ha new build build back in 2019 and the house was small come through front door and you have the tiniest square area for a hallway you can imagine then a toilet opposite of downstairs again small small toilet
Lounge was medium size certainly not huge
Kitchen was an ok size no dining room
Upstairs main bedroom was small and en-suite off of it
Main family bathroom was pokey and you could barely move in it that had a bath in and the other bedrooms was small less then single sized

Older houses are much better

MrsCarson · 07/11/2024 13:48

TheoriginalMrsDarcy · 07/11/2024 12:39

We have a new housing estate being built near us. I'm watching the foundations being put in place and can see the layout of the downstaira rooms. The rooms are small and pokey. I'm thinking one 3 piece suite and there's no space to move.

Went to look at the demo house, looks lovely, furnishings look good but if you really look properly, there's no wardrobe in the bedrooms, the sofas are 2 seater sofas and look slightly smaller than ur average size ones. Beds are small doubles etc...gardens are tiny, just a small square patch in the back. And on top of that, they're charging a small fortune for the privilege.

I bet the bedrooms didn't have doors on to make it all look more spacious too.

My Ds and his new wife are looking and won't look at anything under 30 years old as the rooms have got progressively smaller with time. They are hoping for an Ex local authority house built in the 40's

AutumnLeaves1990 · 07/11/2024 13:48

ByMerryKoala · 07/11/2024 13:38

They wouldn't build them if there weren't a demand for them. I'm not sure what all the fuss is about? You could also get a period home, or an ex council house, and then swallow the additional maintenance and energy costs.

Majority of new builds are shared ownership so many don't have a choice, if they want to get on the property ladder.

pinotgrigeeeeo · 07/11/2024 13:45

Wtfdude · 07/11/2024 12:45

Like this one.
How is 2.3m on 1.4m a bedroom???
Yes. 1.4m! Single bed is 0.9x1.9. That leaves 50cm and less next to the bed each side.
I could put 1 foot infront of another and that is the spare space. Literally.

It should not be allowed to be classed as bedroom. Bedroom 2 is also quite shit. Pretty sure that just tiny bit longer than 30s semi box room...

https://www.barratthomes.co.uk/new-homes/dev002575-brun-lea-heights/plot-69-h850169/?location=Manchester

That is tiny!

We have a box room which is 2.08 x 2.74.

I'd love to use it as a guest room (with a single bed) but have assumed it would be too small.

What do you think? Do you think that would be do-able?

Whammyammy · 07/11/2024 13:39

Not all okd houses are big Our house is a 1920s cottage and was small. Luckily it has huge garden so we extend the size of the house agsin. And still have a very large garden

Maray1967 · 07/11/2024 13:38

Mozartine · 07/11/2024 13:05

It’s the lack of storage that gets to me. Where does the hoover go? Or the Christmas decs? Or the camping gear? Madness.

Yes - or even just coats and shoes! Some have very small hallways and they don’t have porches. I’m in a 30s semi and our coats that we wear a lot are in the porch, as well as wellies and liking boots and umbrellas. I love a good new build as the best ones are well designed - but many others have practically no storage.

ByMerryKoala · 07/11/2024 13:38

They wouldn't build them if there weren't a demand for them. I'm not sure what all the fuss is about? You could also get a period home, or an ex council house, and then swallow the additional maintenance and energy costs.

LadyJaneEarlGreyTea · 07/11/2024 13:38

Bulletproofboobs · 07/11/2024 12:55

Meant to say I agree with you, there is always a thread like this going, there are lots of new builds in my town and they are massive, obviously you have to pay for size.

The thing is in my area 4 bed new builds would cost a minimum of £800,000+, 6 bed (massive?) nearly news are going for £1.3 million. That means that the houses that people who earn average incomes are priced out of anything other than a shoe box. Yes, I am in the south; no, I’m not in London

pinotgrigeeeeo · 07/11/2024 13:37

I agree.

I used to live in an ex council house. Bog standard style, not sure when it was built - between the 40s and 60s sometime.

Lounge with dining room off. Decent sized kitchen with enough room for a table and serving hatch to dining table. Small porch with back door.

Nice big staircase with half landing. Big bathroom and 3 good sized bedrooms. Bedroom 3 was still a really decent size and all had good built in storage.

New builds now seem so small and flimsy in comparison.

Beezknees · 07/11/2024 13:36

I quite like it. Less to clean. Mine's a flat though.

Latevictorianpleasureseeker · 07/11/2024 13:36

I bought a 3 bed 1970s terrace. It's tiny at 69sqm. But it had the biggest master bedroom of houses we viewed and all bedrooms including the box room (where we had to buy a smaller than normal single bed) have built in wardrobes which makes a huge difference as does the airing cupboard.

Before this we lived in a 1950s council house of the same size but no storage apart from under the stairs and the water tank was in the box room so no space for a wardrobe. linen was kept under my bed.

We viewed a second hand new build of more square footage and would have preferred that house as it had parking and more than one loo but the bedrooms were a lot smaller. Had we'd been able to buy that house we'd have taken out the en suite to use for our desk. 3 loos is a bit much for a 4 person household.

There's a large new build development that's going to be built in the next village to mine. Hilariously, the developer seems to think there will only be 0.5 cars per household (it's an affluent area, my household is weird in only having 1 car).

RaraRachael · 07/11/2024 13:35

I have a turn of the century fisherman's cottage - 2 bedrooms so big enough for us. I did have a brief fancy to look at new builds but for £60K more, I'd have had less room.

My daughter lives in a 3 bedroom semi and when you actually break down the amount of space and size of rooms, apart from the garden, we have more.

AutumnLeaves1990 · 07/11/2024 13:30

I agree. My brother has one. No room to extend either.

BookishType · 07/11/2024 13:30

In my new job, I sometimes get to go inside council houses built in the 50s and 60s. They are so big! Really decent room sizes and massive gardens, front and back.

I agree, most new builds are utterly pokey.

soupfiend · 07/11/2024 13:28

Most people dont have the money for the ones that are a decent size, thats why there is a lot of discussion about it. New builds are hugely overpriced in the first place let alone paying more for 'executive' size houses, most of us cant afford that

Mozartine · 07/11/2024 13:27

I am luckily to be old and therefore have housing equity. I am used to period houses with big rooms. Anything less than 10x10 in old money should not be a room. It’s too small.

tooface · 07/11/2024 13:27

Older properties are not energy efficient and cost more to heat.

No one really uses dining rooms anymore just another room to clean and heat.

I live in a terrace but its warm in winter. One day i might decide to sell and move to a swanky new apartment.

CharlotteLucas3 · 07/11/2024 13:27

Yes they’re too small and the gardens are absolutely terrible for wildlife. Areas with older housing tend to have huge areas of garden so are better for wildlife than the countryside (which is all taken up with heavily sprayed crops). Sorry - that wasn’t what you asked but it’s something that bothers me!

oOiluvfriendsOo · 07/11/2024 13:24

Not all are tiny.
Mine has 3 double bedrooms with built in wardrobes.
The small downstairs toilet could easily have fitted a shower in.
The kitchen/diner is so big i was able to set up my sofas and tv etc and make a temporary living room when getting my living room floor done.

Dappy777 · 07/11/2024 13:24

There definitely ought to be stricter laws. There should be a minimum size for houses and flats, and also for the rooms inside those houses and flats. There should also be laws on sound-proofing and wall thickness. I have known two people driven to suicide attempts by noisy neighbours, and a work colleague ended up on anti-depressants because of the noisy idiots who moved in next door. In fact, there ought to be laws on how many houses you can build within a certain area, and how much distance there must be between them. None of that will happen of course. This country is so crowded, and the demand is so high, that developers get away with murder. They jam us into these horrible rabbit hutches, with no light or space or silence, and then disappear abroad with the profits.😡

Nourishinghandcream · 07/11/2024 13:23

Bulletproofboobs · 07/11/2024 12:55

Meant to say I agree with you, there is always a thread like this going, there are lots of new builds in my town and they are massive, obviously you have to pay for size.

Exactly.
Seems to be a weekly thing.☹️

Not saying that some social & FTB homes aren't small but as someone who has also owned 30's, 50's & 70's houses I can confirm that our NB is the biggest of the lot.
Of course you can't go comparing apples & pears and TBH all our previous houses were a 3-bed semi whereas our NB is a generous 4-bed det which has actually been designed very well with good bedrooms, family space, ample storage, high ceilings etc.
Just putting it out there that not all NB are small.

Fizbosshoes · 07/11/2024 13:17

Wtfdude · 07/11/2024 12:45

Like this one.
How is 2.3m on 1.4m a bedroom???
Yes. 1.4m! Single bed is 0.9x1.9. That leaves 50cm and less next to the bed each side.
I could put 1 foot infront of another and that is the spare space. Literally.

It should not be allowed to be classed as bedroom. Bedroom 2 is also quite shit. Pretty sure that just tiny bit longer than 30s semi box room...

https://www.barratthomes.co.uk/new-homes/dev002575-brun-lea-heights/plot-69-h850169/?location=Manchester

How are they showing 2 x single beds lengthways , they must be toddler beds!

That is so misleading with the furniture pics compared to the measurements. Even the table in the kitchen is dubious

Flumoxed · 07/11/2024 13:16

Yes, new builds are awful. The 3rd bedroom is always too small, never enough storage space and they seem to overstuff the plan with toilets (downstairs loo, family bathroom and en suite bathroom to main bedroom) - how much time do the developers think people spend in a bathroom? 1970s/80s houses all had 1 bathroom but 3 good sized bedrooms and lots of storage space. New builds rarely have storage cupboards, let alone a garage or usable loft space (half of the new builds around where I live are built with bedrooms in the eaves), and a shed would take up half the garden space!