Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To just be loving The Donald Win!

713 replies

Farting · 06/11/2024 13:06

I just love it. So pleased.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
XChrome · 09/11/2024 04:09

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 03:00

See, why are people peddling such wild misinformation!?
The facts are:
Women will still be able to have abortions - just not at VERY late term, when the baby is a viable human. I think that's fair enough.
-The caveat to that is that late-term abortions will be allowed if the pregnancy is the result of a) rape b) incest c) or there's immediate danger to life. Which again is fair enough.

It's not misinformation. The Project 2025 blueprint outlines how they plan to deny abortion care in medical emergencies.

Project 2025 calls for the Department of Health and Human Services to dismantle the abortion protections provided under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal policy that outlines requirements for emergency departments that receive Medicare funds.
The plan recommends rescinding Biden administration guidance from 2022 stating that people needing abortion care as part of emergency treatment are entitled to that care under federal law, even in states where abortion is banned. It would also end investigations into cases where patients’ rights were violated by denial of necessary emergency abortion care.7
Further, it seeks to eliminate injunctions against states that have violated EMTALA and recommends that the Department of Justice withdraw from all ongoing litigation where it is currently defending the right to emergency abortion care.
Refusal to enforce EMTALA’s protections for abortion care puts pregnant people’s lives in jeopardy, by forcing providers to risk criminal charges if they perform potentially lifesaving abortion care.

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/how-project-2025-seeks-obliterate-srhr

This is already happening in states with abortion bans and women are dying as a result. Project 2025 details how they plan to make these atrocities the law of the land.

How Project 2025 Seeks to Obliterate Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/how-project-2025-seeks-obliterate-srhr

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 03:47

DdraigGoch · 09/11/2024 03:30

What are you talking about? More than a dozen states have implemented total abortion bans since Roe v Wade was overturned. Several more have set a six week threshold (a long way from viable). Most of those states do not have exceptions for rape or incest.

So the final decision doesn't rest with Trump; it's been left up to the individual States to decide. And it looks like they're deciding.

DdraigGoch · 09/11/2024 03:30

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 03:00

See, why are people peddling such wild misinformation!?
The facts are:
Women will still be able to have abortions - just not at VERY late term, when the baby is a viable human. I think that's fair enough.
-The caveat to that is that late-term abortions will be allowed if the pregnancy is the result of a) rape b) incest c) or there's immediate danger to life. Which again is fair enough.

What are you talking about? More than a dozen states have implemented total abortion bans since Roe v Wade was overturned. Several more have set a six week threshold (a long way from viable). Most of those states do not have exceptions for rape or incest.

Sheri99 · 09/11/2024 03:20

Tiedyesquad · 07/11/2024 20:34

I think the Democrats have dropped the ball. I am very fearful of the Starmer gov doing the same thing. There needs to be a much more radical look at how the whole system works and how to connect with voters and the political system is basically tired and old.

The thing I fear most is that lots of political folks think that the adversarial, abstract crap that is talked among themselves, about what people want, is a feature not a bug - they think they're doing all this stupid shit with Whips and Private Members Bills and blah blah and they think it leads to good policy and legislation and don't even realise how far off they are from real life.

So yeah I think the Democrats did that and also here we are doing that. I don't think either gov has "plans" that are strategic enough to take on the challenges we really face and describe them accurately to people.

Excellent post.

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 03:00

DdraigGoch · 06/11/2024 14:10

You realise that the Republicans want to abolish even those "certain circumstances"?

Threat to the mother's life and no chance the foetus will be viable anyway? Well the mother will have to die, because she's not getting an abortion.

Child raped and impregnated? She'll have to carry the rapist's child to term then. Forced marriage will be next.

See, why are people peddling such wild misinformation!?
The facts are:
Women will still be able to have abortions - just not at VERY late term, when the baby is a viable human. I think that's fair enough.
-The caveat to that is that late-term abortions will be allowed if the pregnancy is the result of a) rape b) incest c) or there's immediate danger to life. Which again is fair enough.

Jumpingthruhoops · 09/11/2024 02:50

Beezknees · 06/11/2024 14:02

People can have different views but I find it abhorrent that people are fine seeing the rights of women stripped away before our very eyes. How on earth can anyone justify that?

What rights are women being stripped of? Genuine question.

Decencydiedtoday · 09/11/2024 01:14

Revolting. All the gleeful joy on electing a serial rapist, crook, cheat, narcissistic failure as a human being is utterly sickening.
Well, you made your bed. I can only hope the consequences come crashing down on you personally and you have some semblance of shame when you remember whose fault it was.
Trouble is, all the vulnerable people will probably suffer more. But again that's what you voted for.

roorants · 08/11/2024 18:59

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 15:36

The Anti-Defamation League has also tracked the conspiracy’s antisemitic tropes that claim the WEF is “controlled” by Jews who are using the “Great Reset” to set up a “One World Government.

https://www.visionofhumanity.org/the-spread-of-the-great-reset-conspiracy-in-the-netherlands/

The bit about "run by Jews" is antisemetic.

The bits saying that the Great Reset is possibly not the best thing for humanity, and that other WEF plans are going to increase power held by the minority at the expense of the common man, and that the end game is the unipolar world, as you say, are not antisemetic, I think is what you mean? How can it be antisemetic? The ideology is what is being questioned, not the religion(s) of the people who want all the power. Not all of them are Jewish or identify as Jewish.

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 15:36

roorants · 08/11/2024 14:30

How so?

The Anti-Defamation League has also tracked the conspiracy’s antisemitic tropes that claim the WEF is “controlled” by Jews who are using the “Great Reset” to set up a “One World Government.

https://www.visionofhumanity.org/the-spread-of-the-great-reset-conspiracy-in-the-netherlands/

“The Great Reset” Conspiracy Flourishes Amid Continued Pandemic

https://www.adl.org/blog/the-great-reset-conspiracy-flourishes-amid-continued-pandemic

roorants · 08/11/2024 14:30

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 10:57

WEF conspiracies are anti-semitic.

How so?

herecomesautumn · 08/11/2024 14:21

Sandygoldenbeaches · 08/11/2024 14:00

Has anyone seen what donald trump junior had been putting on instagram and tiktok.

Some shocking stuff

I did see something about immigration.

Considering his family tree that is either a joke or he is as stupid as the orange buffoon

Sandygoldenbeaches · 08/11/2024 14:00

Has anyone seen what donald trump junior had been putting on instagram and tiktok.

Some shocking stuff

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 13:23

https://x.com/shellshockkk/status/1854857305268916628

Don't go to a bar in the USA.

Apparently by the logic of some on this thread the Harris supporters all have the same beliefs.

x.com

https://x.com/shellshockkk/status/1854857305268916628

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 13:23

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 13:00

Lol where do people even get Qanon information seeing as you know, what is it? You sound like you are projecting?

Do you spend your life making up the lives/beliefs of others? I feel quite sorry for you.

I provided facts and a source of a study you gave reasons why you wouldn't accept facts or use Google.

Why (retechoral) am I extreme on abortion by stating that you can abort away in a blue state?

I was under the impression Matt Walsh is the extreme end by wanting to have it banned all over the USA, he has more influence than me. It is quite normal to not want to abort yourself and leave those who do to get on with it.

Most white women aren't bothered about access to abortion in the USA and voted to retain the abortion laws as they are, except Florida. Most women are happy to accept a disabled baby or deal with the consequences of their behaviour, they have zero intention of ever aborting so don't need those laws.

You seem to require access to my brain and at the same time seem to alraedy know the answer and solution, that I am all about punishment of women, crack on love with the cognative dissonance. I would appreciate if you don't ask me more questions as you sound ultra rude to me.

So you missed where I said I don't like Trump then, comprehension issues along with rudeness again, this is tiresome and funny.

Edited

You have said that the other children of women who terminate a pregnancy due to foetal abnormalities will be scared that their mother will send them to Canada to be murdered via their assisted dying programme if they get ill or have an accident. If that is not extreme, I don't know what is.

You have said that most women are happy to accept a disabled baby. That is not true. In the US, between 67% and 85% of people with a prenatal diagnosis of Downs Syndrome choose to terminate the pregnancy.

I am not being rude to you. I am just questioning the things you have said and disagreeing with many of them. That is the nature of this forum.

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 13:20

https://x.com/shellshockkk/status/1854857254010327202/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1854857254010327202&currentTweetUser=shellshockkk

Maybe we should accuse all Harris voters as being responsible for throwing used tampons all over men's vehicles, see how they like being clumped together?

x.com

https://x.com/shellshockkk/status/1854857254010327202/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1854857254010327202&currentTweetUser=shellshockkk

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 13:00

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 12:46

You're funny! Of course you won't change your beliefs. You can't. You're stuck down a QAnon rabbit hole and Trump is your saviour. Your posts are all emotion and no facts.

It's reasonable to ask anti-abortion activists their views on gun control and policies that support pregnant women and mothers (e.g. maternity leave, maternity pay, affordable childcare, child benefit). People at the extreme end of the anti-abortion spectrum don't tend to support gun control or child friendly policies. It's all about punishing women.

Lol where do people even get Qanon information seeing as you know, what is it? You sound like you are projecting?

Do you spend your life making up the lives/beliefs of others? I feel quite sorry for you.

I provided facts and a source of a study you gave reasons why you wouldn't accept facts or use Google.

Why (retechoral) am I extreme on abortion by stating that you can abort away in a blue state?

I was under the impression Matt Walsh is the extreme end by wanting to have it banned all over the USA, he has more influence than me. It is quite normal to not want to abort yourself and leave those who do to get on with it.

Most white women aren't bothered about access to abortion in the USA and voted to retain the abortion laws as they are, except Florida. Most women are happy to accept a disabled baby or deal with the consequences of their behaviour, they have zero intention of ever aborting so don't need those laws.

You seem to require access to my brain and at the same time seem to alraedy know the answer and solution, that I am all about punishment of women, crack on love with the cognative dissonance. I would appreciate if you don't ask me more questions as you sound ultra rude to me.

So you missed where I said I don't like Trump then, comprehension issues along with rudeness again, this is tiresome and funny.

Deja321 · 08/11/2024 12:55

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/IKGx6bt8FZc

Do did women die because of state law or because of individual doctors malpractice?

Before you continue to YouTube

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/IKGx6bt8FZc

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 12:46

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 12:15

Other person, I am going to chastised you for your beliefs in the hope it makes you change them, (well it won't) and then I will demand you answer my question (which I won't), regardless I have decided what your answer is and I have already chastised you even though I don't know the answer, other person now feels fantastic (I couldn't give a flying shit).

You're funny! Of course you won't change your beliefs. You can't. You're stuck down a QAnon rabbit hole and Trump is your saviour. Your posts are all emotion and no facts.

It's reasonable to ask anti-abortion activists their views on gun control and policies that support pregnant women and mothers (e.g. maternity leave, maternity pay, affordable childcare, child benefit). People at the extreme end of the anti-abortion spectrum don't tend to support gun control or child friendly policies. It's all about punishing women.

ItIsBeginingToLookLike · 08/11/2024 12:15

Other person, I am going to chastised you for your beliefs in the hope it makes you change them, (well it won't) and then I will demand you answer my question (which I won't), regardless I have decided what your answer is and I have already chastised you even though I don't know the answer, other person now feels fantastic (I couldn't give a flying shit).

Puzzledandpissedoff · 08/11/2024 12:05

GotToLeave · 08/11/2024 06:47

You are both right.

Some people migrate to create a better life for themselves and their children or to make money to send home because they can’t see how it can be done in their own country.

Some people migrate because where they live has become uninhabitable due to climate change. This has been reported on in some regions of the world already and is predicted to increase dramatically as the climate crisis worsens.

Some people migrate to get away from suffering, fear and danger from other human beings. Some are in such danger they are classed as ‘seeking sanctuary’.

Some migrate because they feel the values in another country reflect their own better.

Some will migrate to be closer to family.

Some will have more than one of those reasons and there might be other reasons too.

Some will have brown skin, some will have white skin, most will very much add benefit to the society they join, some will be problematic. You can’t tell which will be which from skin colour. You can have good processes to vet people and cap numbers to maintain an healthy society and compassionate pathways for sanctuary seekers that don’t force them into dangerous journeys.

What a beautifully balanced post, GotToLeave

I do get so tired of the division creating, conflicting extremes of "they're all just trying to batten on us" versus "they're all fleeing awful circumstances or wouldn't come"
People and their motivations are various, and while a sensible approach might aim to do more towards sorting the wheat from the chaff, unfortunately sense doesn't always come into it

Sandygoldenbeaches · 08/11/2024 11:43

What's worse than four years of Trump.

Is 8 years of Trump.

I'd love to live on a different world

Acsa · 08/11/2024 11:42

RequestSubmitted · 07/11/2024 22:30

You are starting to sound a tad unhinged. And like a stereotypical Trump supporter! It’s all coming out now ;-)

I used to just laugh off the unhinged comments about Trump and the conspiracy theories, but even some of the comments on this thread, if genuine, are scary. People actually believe these theories, and think Trump is actually going to do good, or support him in his nonsensical ramblings regardless.
That he has been voted in, again, as President, when he has only somehow managed to get worse since his last stint (now a proven criminal amongst other things mentioned many times), people STILL fawn over him. It's worrying.
Okay, I can still laugh at the "loony left/liberal" comments because it's a last resort "I don't have a reasonable response" comeback, but other parties, e.g. Democrats, Labour, other non-extreme parties really need to look at why these people are getting such support and combat it. What they can do, I don't know, but surely there is something.

thepariscrimefiles · 08/11/2024 10:57

Farting · 07/11/2024 13:42

When you’ve all finished, this is what’s happening:

All the bullshit free money etc.. is going to get super real / stop.

Trump was allowed to win without interference because it is now time to allow the house of cards to fail.

It all hinged on Ukraine - what if we had won and Russia lost? Jeez, untold $trillions in leveraged natural resources would have allowed the US national debt to increase maybe 10x (to $350T).
The MIC/DoD/State/CIA/FBI/NSA apparatus unrivaled in power and control.

But, the unthinkable happened, the gas station with nukes developed missle weapons systems that defeated Western air supremacy doctrine. Oh, shit! Russia is winning and will win and we can’t stop them.

So now, plan B: the reset.

No, not the WEF version, the $dollar version where the USA loses the reserve and is consigned to a generation or two wandering the wilderness, our very own 90s as previously experienced by Russia.

Bringing Washington’s policy into line with the national interests of the United States will lead to the sobering up of Europe and the fall of anti-people treacherous regimes in Germany and France and the U.K.

Were seeing regimes fall already in parts of the EU, specifically Germany right now.

Climatic psychosis will subside, as will the gender mental illness as the systems can’t afford to pay for it anymore.

It’s going to get real.

WEF conspiracies are anti-semitic.

roorants · 08/11/2024 10:05

Farting · 07/11/2024 13:42

When you’ve all finished, this is what’s happening:

All the bullshit free money etc.. is going to get super real / stop.

Trump was allowed to win without interference because it is now time to allow the house of cards to fail.

It all hinged on Ukraine - what if we had won and Russia lost? Jeez, untold $trillions in leveraged natural resources would have allowed the US national debt to increase maybe 10x (to $350T).
The MIC/DoD/State/CIA/FBI/NSA apparatus unrivaled in power and control.

But, the unthinkable happened, the gas station with nukes developed missle weapons systems that defeated Western air supremacy doctrine. Oh, shit! Russia is winning and will win and we can’t stop them.

So now, plan B: the reset.

No, not the WEF version, the $dollar version where the USA loses the reserve and is consigned to a generation or two wandering the wilderness, our very own 90s as previously experienced by Russia.

Bringing Washington’s policy into line with the national interests of the United States will lead to the sobering up of Europe and the fall of anti-people treacherous regimes in Germany and France and the U.K.

Were seeing regimes fall already in parts of the EU, specifically Germany right now.

Climatic psychosis will subside, as will the gender mental illness as the systems can’t afford to pay for it anymore.

It’s going to get real.

Trump was allowed to win without interference because it is now time to allow the house of cards to fail.

You are saying that the peop who "allowed" the house of cards to fail have also engineered the situations in the UK, France and Germany? If so do you not think you should refer to them as "controlled colonies by treacherous regimes"?

Otherwise how would you justify those countries becoming treacherous regimes? Do you think that there are two power houses out there, one of which destroys G, F and the UK and the other destroys the US? And they are carving up the world? Or there are many power houses controlling things behind the scenes of different countries, fighting it out for unipolar supremacy?

Just wondering.

SerenityNowSerenityNow · 08/11/2024 08:37

Oh no, the strange neurotic people on the internet don't like what I say...

Most women oppose sexual assault and think 'joking' about grabbing a woman pussy isn't funny.

Hardly a surprise is it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread