Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

imane khelif has been allegedly confirmed to be a man.

959 replies

Cartwrightandson · 04/11/2024 13:15

A leaked French medical report from 2023 has confirmed that Algerian boxer Imane Khelif is male.

Top endocrinologists found that Khelif has XY chromosomes, no uterus, internal testicles, and a "micropenis."

The report was drafted in June of 2023 via a collaboration between the Kremlin-Bicêtre hospital in Paris, France, and the Mohamed Lamine Debaghine hospital in Algiers, Algeria. Drafted by expert endocrinologists Soumaya Fedala and Jacques Young, the report reveals that Khelif is impacted by 5-alpha reductase deficiency, a disorder of sexual development that is only found in biological males.

reduxx.info/algerian-boxer-imane-khelif-has-xy-chromosomes-and-testicles-french-algerian-medical-report-admits/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
Helleofabore · 04/11/2024 18:44

IhateSPSS · 04/11/2024 18:35

Not a boxer, I could never be violent to another being (unfortunately! I might not have been walked all over as a child/young adult if I had a natural propensity for violence 😞)

I was punched by a woman in a Sunderland nightclub because I picked up my male friend off the floor (after he was headbutted by her boyfriend and she didn't take kindly to me helping him). I was also punched (more than once, again unfortunately) by my ex husband. I've been physically assaulted by a couple of men and a couple of women in various ways and there is a world of difference in force and technique. I'd pick the woman over the man every time. Less damage.

Flowers
Namechangeforadhd · 04/11/2024 18:44

The link provided, even read in the original French as suggested, doesn't treat the matter as complicated. It is written slightly like an essay, that's all, so 'argument for the decision to let Khelif fight, argument against, and conclusion' . That doesn't mean that the article is saying it's complicated. If anything, in the French, it's a touch patronising/rude in tone about the pro Khelif approach. Or that's how I read it - that may not be intended and could be cultural: I'm neither French nor Algerian so may be reading more into it than necessary. Definitely very firmly on the side of women though.

heathspeedwell · 04/11/2024 18:43

I would add that some rare DSDs are more complex than 46 XY 5 ARD, but given that so many elite female athletes have to compete with men who have 5 ARD it's important to recognise that after puberty men with this particular DSD are not all that different to any other men.

Helleofabore · 04/11/2024 18:42

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:32

Phrases like this:
Alpha 5 reductase type 2” deficiency, a genetic anomaly which leads to metabolic dysfunction in testosterone and dehydroandrosterone”.

As I said, there are posts with lots of easier to digest information on this thread. Perhaps they will help.

Dragger · 04/11/2024 18:40

Yeah that article is from a reputable source. Not.

The girl done good.

heathspeedwell · 04/11/2024 18:39

I think some people are under the misconception that Khelif's situation is incredibly complex and confusing. But a small penis is nothing like a vagina. A baby born with a small penis might be mistaken for having a vulva. But it doesn't mean that someone with 5 ARD is 'neither one nor another'.

A colloquial name for 5 ARD is 'penis at 12' because once puberty kicks in, the small penis tends to enlarge, and the testosterone from the undescended testicles unmistakably masculinises the body. Instead of having periods, a boy's voice breaks and he develops a male body shape and musculature.

There was a famous Olympic 'female' athlete called Erika Schinegger. He found out after winning a gold medal that he was a man with 5 ARD. He changed his name to Erik and gave his medals back to the women who should have won them. Then he had an operation to descend his testicles and went on to naturally become a father.

Khelif could do the same thing.

NewGreenDuck · 04/11/2024 18:38

BTW I follow a man on twitter who has a DSD. He is totally and utterly fed up, sick to the back teeth with having to tell people that he is male. That despite having a DSD which renders him infertile amongst other issues, he is male. No matter how many times he says it some idiot will insist that he is intersex, neither one thing or the other, or bizarrely both male and female. He's often called an hermaphrodite.
There is a huge amount of information out there about DSDs, often written for those of us who are non scientific. I wish people would read up about the conditions.

IhateSPSS · 04/11/2024 18:35

AcceptAllChanges · 04/11/2024 17:24

I hope you are a boxer, otherwise I am so sorry that you have had such rough luck! Flowers

Not a boxer, I could never be violent to another being (unfortunately! I might not have been walked all over as a child/young adult if I had a natural propensity for violence 😞)

I was punched by a woman in a Sunderland nightclub because I picked up my male friend off the floor (after he was headbutted by her boyfriend and she didn't take kindly to me helping him). I was also punched (more than once, again unfortunately) by my ex husband. I've been physically assaulted by a couple of men and a couple of women in various ways and there is a world of difference in force and technique. I'd pick the woman over the man every time. Less damage.

TheKeatingFive · 04/11/2024 18:34

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 04/11/2024 18:21

The cognitive dissonance on this thread is depressingly familiar. It’s always the same when the “inclusive” “be kind” SJW are faced with hard evidence that they have been unfair and unkind.

In simple terms, they either have to reflect on the truth that they condoned and championed a male punching a female as a good and progressive thing which destroys any pretence of them being progressive and “on the right side of history” or they have to try and argue that reality is not reality.

Anyone who attempts to justify a male punching a female at all, let alone for personal gain, is not progressive or liberal or enlightened but an old fashioned misogynistic bully.

Exactly - and building on all of this, it's important to be able to admit that we got something wrong and evolve our view accordingly.

Women do not deserve to fight men in the ring when they have not consented to this. Surely that can be agreed on as a principle?

TheGander · 04/11/2024 18:33

For historical reasons Algeria and France have a very complicated and fractious relationship and Algeria is wont to cry discrimination, imperialism etc whenever France makes a move which doesn’t suit them. I wonder if this has affected decisions made around this case.

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:32

Scirocco · 04/11/2024 18:29

What do you find confusing?

Phrases like this:
Alpha 5 reductase type 2” deficiency, a genetic anomaly which leads to metabolic dysfunction in testosterone and dehydroandrosterone”.

Scirocco · 04/11/2024 18:29

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:22

It's not offensive, and certainly not meant to be either.
I'm not saying it's correct- but it wouldn't be an uncommon conclusion based on what the article says.
There's nothing wrong or offensive with finding something confusing. Like many people, I find this story/situation confusing.

What do you find confusing?

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/11/2024 18:29

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 04/11/2024 18:21

The cognitive dissonance on this thread is depressingly familiar. It’s always the same when the “inclusive” “be kind” SJW are faced with hard evidence that they have been unfair and unkind.

In simple terms, they either have to reflect on the truth that they condoned and championed a male punching a female as a good and progressive thing which destroys any pretence of them being progressive and “on the right side of history” or they have to try and argue that reality is not reality.

Anyone who attempts to justify a male punching a female at all, let alone for personal gain, is not progressive or liberal or enlightened but an old fashioned misogynistic bully.

so many people cannot/will not admit the truth to themselves.

they keep digging in the face of all evidence to the contrary.

Its tragic really - for us all, & for society at large.

Men aren't women.

Men never will be women.
Not even those men who have DSD's and might have worn a pink ribbon as a child.
Not even those men who really really really want to be women.

None of us get to choose our sex - acceptance of this basic fact is very important. We are seeing how damaging lying about these fundamental trusths can be.

commonsense61 · 04/11/2024 18:26

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:22

Helleofabore · 04/11/2024 18:16

Please read the thread.

There is a huge amount of information about 5ARD athletes on this thread.

Khelif is not 'neither one or the other.' This is very much misinformation and offensive.

Khelif is a male person with a difference of sex development under the name of 5ARD. Only male people get this. They have testes and their bodies produce testosterone and other hormones and use those hormones to go through male puberty.

Having a penis or not, nor having visible testicles or not does not make someone not a male person.

It is irrelevant to the sport and the sex category they are participating in that they were 'brought up as a girl' under organisations that understand how very dangerous it is to allow a male person to punch female people in boxing. The IOC failed to have any regulations that were boxing specific and therefore they allowed this boxer to compete and punch women in the face.

It's not offensive, and certainly not meant to be either.
I'm not saying it's correct- but it wouldn't be an uncommon conclusion based on what the article says.
There's nothing wrong or offensive with finding something confusing. Like many people, I find this story/situation confusing.

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 04/11/2024 18:21

The cognitive dissonance on this thread is depressingly familiar. It’s always the same when the “inclusive” “be kind” SJW are faced with hard evidence that they have been unfair and unkind.

In simple terms, they either have to reflect on the truth that they condoned and championed a male punching a female as a good and progressive thing which destroys any pretence of them being progressive and “on the right side of history” or they have to try and argue that reality is not reality.

Anyone who attempts to justify a male punching a female at all, let alone for personal gain, is not progressive or liberal or enlightened but an old fashioned misogynistic bully.

NewGreenDuck · 04/11/2024 18:20

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:08

I followed the whole article from the link OP provided.
It's complicated. If you can read it in the orginal French do so, it's clearer.
https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

It's not black or white really. He/she seems neither one or the other.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be boxing as a woman, but also I am uncomfortable with the witch hunt. I've been to that part of Algeria- it is poor and is socially quite conservative (unlike Algiers where you see girls in jeans and t-shirts), and as others have said, they were brought up as a girl, not a boy.

Everyone is either male or female. People with a DSD are just that, people with a DSD. The fact is that certain DSDs are only found in males, and others in females. Ambiguous genitalia does not alter that. Today, tests can detect both the actual sex and also the DSD.
This person is a man with a DSD and has undescended testes and a micropenis. You can't get much more male than having a penis and testes.

Helleofabore · 04/11/2024 18:16

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:08

I followed the whole article from the link OP provided.
It's complicated. If you can read it in the orginal French do so, it's clearer.
https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

It's not black or white really. He/she seems neither one or the other.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be boxing as a woman, but also I am uncomfortable with the witch hunt. I've been to that part of Algeria- it is poor and is socially quite conservative (unlike Algiers where you see girls in jeans and t-shirts), and as others have said, they were brought up as a girl, not a boy.

Please read the thread.

There is a huge amount of information about 5ARD athletes on this thread.

Khelif is not 'neither one or the other.' This is very much misinformation and offensive.

Khelif is a male person with a difference of sex development under the name of 5ARD. Only male people get this. They have testes and their bodies produce testosterone and other hormones and use those hormones to go through male puberty.

Having a penis or not, nor having visible testicles or not does not make someone not a male person.

It is irrelevant to the sport and the sex category they are participating in that they were 'brought up as a girl' under organisations that understand how very dangerous it is to allow a male person to punch female people in boxing. The IOC failed to have any regulations that were boxing specific and therefore they allowed this boxer to compete and punch women in the face.

Slothtoes · 04/11/2024 18:15

CabbagesAndCeilingWax · 04/11/2024 18:01

The IOC knew the exact nature of Khelif's genetic condition. They just decided that a passport that says "female" (presumably because of ambiguous external genitalia at birth) overrides everything else. "Everything else" being "male in every measurable way except for external presentation of genitals.

This is outrageous discrimination against female athletes and so dangerous for them. How can the rules be changed well in time for the next Olympics?

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/11/2024 18:14

adding to @Helleofabore 's excellent point, if you watched the Olympic womens boxing the two MALE players won every single match they entered into. Their female opponents scored no points against either of the men in any of the fights.

This is highly unusal at Olympic level boxing - perhaps unprecendented?

BodyKeepingScore · 04/11/2024 18:10

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:08

I followed the whole article from the link OP provided.
It's complicated. If you can read it in the orginal French do so, it's clearer.
https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

It's not black or white really. He/she seems neither one or the other.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be boxing as a woman, but also I am uncomfortable with the witch hunt. I've been to that part of Algeria- it is poor and is socially quite conservative (unlike Algiers where you see girls in jeans and t-shirts), and as others have said, they were brought up as a girl, not a boy.

All human beings are either male or female. No such condition exists where a human can be both/or neither

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/11/2024 18:09

Helleofabore · 04/11/2024 18:04

I never hear how unfair it is that 7' 6" basketball players have an unfair advantage over 5' 10", regardless of the sex of either.

Here is more about the 'Phelps Gambit'. It is really a weak fallacy to be posting as any credible point.

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE / PHELPS GAMBIT / PHELPS ARGUMENT

https://x.com/Scienceofsport/status/1820462042765001041

Ross Tucker

5 August 2024

Yeah, poor old Phelps became the poster child for this illogical argument that his advantages are the same as those of males. I'll try to explain why this is such poor thinking. First, Phelps' advantages are not category-crossing. That is, there is no category for short arms, and there is no category for small feet, or high lactate producers etc. So we have decided, for better or worse, not to create a category for people without Attribute X. And thus, when a person has X, they shouldn't be excluded, so there's no basis to disqualify Phelps.

Now, one could have a debate over whether we SHOULD think about creating a category for small feet or short arms. If we did this, then Phelps' supposed advantages would become 'outside of category', and we'd say that he's not allowed to swim in the protected category, right?
But we don't need to do this, because the advantages that he has are tiny compared to what male advantage does to performance. Phelps wins by 0.5%. Males win by 12% (compared to females). By scale, then, these advantages are orders of magnitude different.

It's also a massive oversimplification to say that Phelps won because his arms are long or that he produces less lactate. They're daft, incorrect attributions anyway. And finally, females also have some of these advantages - there are women who produce less lactate, or have long arms.

They don't make up for the absence of male advantage. So they're totally different situations. Fundamentally, what sport is trying to reward are those exceptional individuals within categories. We actually celebrate these advantages, they make sport what it is, no?

But we need to rule out some other advantages - size/mass in boxing, age in all sport - because otherwise the things that do NOT matter overwhelm the things that do. Phelps physiology matters - it's why he wins gold medals. Katie Ledecky, though, also has physiology that deserves gold.
It's just she doesn't have male advantage as well. And that's the point - "as well". They are equally great swimmers, but within their categories. The only way around this is to say that we should create a category because Advantage X is so large it also overwhelms the result.

But it doesn't - as mentioned, by scale, what Phelps has over males is tiny compared to what males have over females. Put another way - the fastest swimmer with small feet or shorter arms (whatever that means) is not beaten by thousands of longer armed, bigger footed swimmers!
So I hope I've not laboured that or explained it clumsily. To sum up, Phelps is a bad counter point. So is height in basketball (there's no "short people NBA, only 180cm or under" category).

Rather think age, weight and disability class, and ask if the attribute, X, devalues the things we actually want to reward, or whether it's part of it. Phelps' advantages are part of the excellence. Male advantage is not - being male is NOT a talent, and as such, shouldn't be part of the mix. What Phelps has, those are different.

thanks for posting this.

I was looking for the excellent podcast Ross Tucker did on Science of Sport back in the 2020 Olympics on this subject when Laurel "I wanna be an answer to a Trivial Pursuit question & I am used to getting what I want" Hubbard cheated his way into womens weightlifting.

But I couldnt find it.

pleasehelpwi3 · 04/11/2024 18:08

I followed the whole article from the link OP provided.
It's complicated. If you can read it in the orginal French do so, it's clearer.
https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

It's not black or white really. He/she seems neither one or the other.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be boxing as a woman, but also I am uncomfortable with the witch hunt. I've been to that part of Algeria- it is poor and is socially quite conservative (unlike Algiers where you see girls in jeans and t-shirts), and as others have said, they were brought up as a girl, not a boy.

Imane Khelif, boxeuse algérienne, cible d'une polémique

Imane Khelif : ni ovaires ni utérus, mais des testicules ... - Le Correspondant

REVELATIONS LE CORRESPONDANT. Non, Imane Khelif n’a pas été injustement accusée d’être un homme. Comme Le Correspondant s’en est fait l’écho, en septembre dernier, la boxeuse algérienne, dont l’affaire a empesté les Jeux Olympiques de Paris 2024, n’est...

https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/11/2024 18:06

Peter Tatchell famously bangs on about his TIM friend who plays womens rugby and is apparently so much smaller than the women in his team. This, Tachell argues, is showing how men don't have any advantage.

What Tatchell & co ignores COMPLETELY is there are no small women in the rugby team - and the reason his TIM mate can hold his own on the WOMENS rugby team, being such a teeny little what not, is because he is MALE and has all that male muscle & strength in his small body - whereas a woman of the same size wouldn't make the team and if she did she would be much more physically vulnerable to injury.

The stupid is so strong in this movement - how on earth did they make so mch ground? How on earth did they convince so many people that men can be women with words and it will only concern you if you are a nasty bigot?

CabbagesAndCeilingWax · 04/11/2024 18:05

oakleaffy · 04/11/2024 18:00

Serena Williams has a female body structure- softer face, not masculine.

https://images.app.goo.gl/BEFk9SaDBVKDdwob6

She also has a cracking pair of boobs, and a spectacular arse (not that "appearance" is in any way definitive, but she happens to be an absolutely beautiful woman, with no male features whatsoever) and, even more revealingly, she's birthed two children.

Swipe left for the next trending thread