imane khelif has been allegedly confirmed to be a man.

Men and women come in all kinds of shapes and sizes. Feminists have been shouting from the rooftops for years that short hair "masculine features" don't make a woman less female. You know what does make someone not a female though... a penis and testes.

No you've only barely understood the very surface level of the argument.

Women aren't inherently demure, sitting inside etc. We are socialised by patriarchal societies to varying degrees. It can be very difficult to break free, especially in deeply conservative societies. It can be dangerous to break free.

Physical strength differences are inherent, of course.

Feminists support women having any personality, any presentation, any occupation etc. That doesn't mean pretending that women have the same life experiences as men or that all women have free choice, especially in extreme patriarchies.

I actually hope your post doesn't get deleted, as it portrays your attitude towards women who won't do and say what you want them to, far more eloquently than anyone else could put it. Pure, aggressive hatred

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

He/she can't possibly have gone through male puberty. Without modern medical investigations there would be no way of knowing he was not a women.

Again, why do some people insist that sexual dimorphism is not a thing in humans?

How do they imagine humans find mates if they can't tell what sex other humans are by looking at them? Given that we don't go round sniffing each others bums, for example.

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

Why do you assume that just because you haven't read the thread, we haven't either?

I love how people are trotting out the same tired arguments and ignoring the actual information about there being a literal cock and balls present.

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

He/she can't possibly have gone through male puberty. Without modern medical investigations there would be no way of knowing he was not a women.

Again, why do some people insist that sexual dimorphism is not a thing in humans?

How do they imagine humans find mates if they can't tell what sex other humans are by looking at them? Given that we don't go round sniffing each others bums, for example.

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

So many of the arguments on here about this person are so hypocritical. Lots of
postwrs saying they act like man, smirk and swagger like a man etc, should look in the mirror as of course they are a man. It implies women can’t have swagger or smirk or be arrogant or look masculine. And maybe the biological truth is that they are a man, but saying you knew all along because ‘he acts like a man’ is bullshit when you argue the opposite when it suits ‘just because they act or look like a woman, doesn’t make them a woman’

I followed the whole article from the link OP provided.
It's complicated. If you can read it in the orginal French do so, it's clearer.
https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

It's not black or white really. He/she seems neither one or the other.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be boxing as a woman, but also I am uncomfortable with the witch hunt. I've been to that part of Algeria- it is poor and is socially quite conservative (unlike Algiers where you see girls in jeans and t-shirts), and as others have said, they were brought up as a girl, not a boy.

It's fascinating that this case was always so important to trans ideology believers. All along there's been the same old celebrity misogynists virtue signalling their allyship on twitter and the same old incoherent posts on MN scolding women for their tone and refusing to engage in discussion.

The thing is, this shows they, like feminists, were certain IK was male from the offset. Otherwise it would have held no relevance as IK said at the time they weren't trans.

But instead of defending their actual beliefs (that any man with woman feelings is entitled to anything for women and that sex is irrelevant), they all colluded with IK's lies and slurred women for speaking the truth even through they agreed with half of what we were saying!

Why did they do that? I would love to know what it is about trans ideology that has supposedly normal people willing to give up any shred of logic and integrity in the service of it.

He/she can't possibly have gone through male puberty. Without modern medical investigations there would be no way of knowing he was not a women.

He/she can't possibly have gone through male puberty. Without modern medical investigations there would be no way of knowing he was not a women.