Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if you are against private schools…

657 replies

Unsrr · 02/11/2024 12:16

Why is this? As in against their existence?

I was brought up in a reasonably poor area and my education was not good. I sometimes went to the nearest private school for swimming lessons and remember being in awe of it. We have one dc now age 7 and can’t afford private but there is maybe a chance we could for secondary. I wouldn’t give it a second thought if we could make it work.

I have never felt private schools should disappear because surely that’s what we should be aspiring to? An education that is excellent (yes I know not all private schools are good and lots of state schools are better), isn’t that what we should aim for?

I feel sad that this country has now made it harder to access this education. What is the reason people are against private schools existing at all? I don’t think it can be jealousy, I think many people are genuinely opposed to it from an ideological perspective and I can’t understand it at all. Just interested really as there’s been so much talk about schools recently.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
hardhatready · 02/11/2024 17:51

No33 · 02/11/2024 12:36

Children should all have the same opportunities, outside their parents wealth.

In an ideal world this would be the case but within the state system there’s vast differences between schools…. largely dependant on area. VAT on private schools will increase house prices in areas that have good schools even more. This also seems unfair. As is all the other consequences of this policy. I feel very sorry for the children that will suffer as a consequence and those people (not just teachers but support staff) that have or will loose their jobs when schools close. I doubt there will be much if any net gain to this policy given all the negative effects. It’s more divisive politics, pitting people against each other and I’m sick of it.

OrangeBlossomsinthesun · 02/11/2024 17:51

CrabSignalArmy · 02/11/2024 16:26

You are of course correct ideologically. However if I had £50,000 in assets and my life, or even achieving a pain-free quality of life depended on an operation that I would either have to wait 2 years for or never get at all on the NHS then I'd certainly pay that money to get it privately ratter than die or suffer a life of pain for that ideology.

Ideologies are fine in theory or when applied at a population level. On an individual level if the state is failing to provide a reasonable quality of service then I can't say it's unethical for someone with the resources to go private to do so. The sin lies with the government choices that let the stare provision get so bad.

But in a perfect system you wouldn't need to go private. You shouldn't need to. That's my point. The two tiers should not exist. There should be no need for private.

MildGreenDairyLiquid · 02/11/2024 17:50

Yes, in principle, I think they shouldn’t exist.

Would I send DD to one - yes, of course, because I don’t live in an ideal world, I live in the real world.

I’m aware that’s hypocritical but there you go.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:48

Mosalahiwoukd · 02/11/2024 17:43

Exactly! And not everyone going to be a lawyer, doctor or engineer either but we need an educated population - not least because a lot of the children in school now will become parents themselves and responsible for helping with the education of the next generation.
Let private schools keep spitting out yet more banker wankers going to work in mummy and daddy’s firm that won’t stop, but for god sake let’s educate the future carers, nurses, entrepreneurs, teachers, builders, tradespeople etc too - the ones who actually add to our society not just take take take

Your post really nails it. The VAT on school fees is based on spite and envy, which your post drips with.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:46

frostywhite · 02/11/2024 17:37

The VAT from those 4% won't cure the problems in the state sector. It's driven by spite, envy and class hatred.

I think it's 7% but, either way, that 7% can't solve the problems of 93%. Why people with millions who send their kids to state schools aren't being asked to cough up to fund the education they are actually using, is beyond me.

The figure bandied about varies. 4% is the Scottish figure about 6% overall. It makes no difference to the funding of the state sector.

Mosalahiwoukd · 02/11/2024 17:43

noblegiraffe · 02/11/2024 16:49

It's bizarre that some people can't see that a well-educated population benefits everyone, not just the parents of the children who receive the education.

State education isn't just a favour to parents, it's an economic necessity.

Exactly! And not everyone going to be a lawyer, doctor or engineer either but we need an educated population - not least because a lot of the children in school now will become parents themselves and responsible for helping with the education of the next generation.
Let private schools keep spitting out yet more banker wankers going to work in mummy and daddy’s firm that won’t stop, but for god sake let’s educate the future carers, nurses, entrepreneurs, teachers, builders, tradespeople etc too - the ones who actually add to our society not just take take take

XxSideshowAuntSallyx · 02/11/2024 17:39

Fordian · 02/11/2024 17:18

I'd have less of a problem with private schools if all onward destinations were contextual offers; Eton? 3 A stars, please. St Bogwoods? ABB.

There are only so many uni places.

Furthermore, private school networks entrench privilege. Other parents at the school can offer internships to your son and vice versa. Even in the NHS, where I worked, the HR hassle of work experience caused them to shut the scheme down; yet somehow the offspring of consultants from the 2 top public schools locally managed to get each others kids in.

I know you cannot totally erase such unfairnesses from society, but you can limit the overt exercise of it.

I have yet to see this 'private school network' that gets trotted out in threads like this or to experience it myself. What has going to private school done for me other than help me go through education from 11-16 without changing schools. It's not given me a leg up in my career, it's not helped me get some high flying job. In fact I spent a lot of my life being thoroughly ashamed of it because people judge on their perceived ideas of private school. Just like you are.

Everyone uses their contacts for work experience not just parents of privately educated children. Someone approached me at work as his son wanted to do work experience.

frostywhite · 02/11/2024 17:37

The VAT from those 4% won't cure the problems in the state sector. It's driven by spite, envy and class hatred.

I think it's 7% but, either way, that 7% can't solve the problems of 93%. Why people with millions who send their kids to state schools aren't being asked to cough up to fund the education they are actually using, is beyond me.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:34

Psychologymam · 02/11/2024 17:31

My children don’t go to private school - I said I could afford it. I choose not to use it.

But accessing private health care does have an impact too - it means privileged people can opt out and not advocate for a better system so NHS patients end up with systems which aren’t great and have significant waits but there’s less of a demand for change.

Exactly if you (general you, not you in particular) are of such refined moral sensibilities that you won't use private education you shouldn't be touching private healthcare with a barge pole.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:32

Aside from that - private schools aren't the reason that lots of state schools aren't good

That's the real issue 4% of parents will be paying VAT. The schools will charge VAT but will now be able to claim back all the VAT on equipment, food, fuel, repairs and maintenance, wi fi, etc, etc, which they currently can't.

The VAT from those 4% won't cure the problems in the state sector. It's driven by spite, envy and class hatred.

Psychologymam · 02/11/2024 17:31

Fordian · 02/11/2024 17:20

You accessing private healthcare doesn't deprive an NHS patient of care.

The enhanced academic grades your privately educated child gets may well deprive a poorer but possibly more able child of a university place.

They are not comparable.

My children don’t go to private school - I said I could afford it. I choose not to use it.

But accessing private health care does have an impact too - it means privileged people can opt out and not advocate for a better system so NHS patients end up with systems which aren’t great and have significant waits but there’s less of a demand for change.

frostywhite · 02/11/2024 17:28

Everything???? Love, nurturing,kindness,stability, these are some of the things that money can't buy

Money doesn't buy everything, but it sure helps lots of things. I'm currently working two jobs and my children are feeling the impact. I'm very stressed and much less available than I used to be. If I had more money and only needed just the one job, that wouldn't be the case. So I'm afraid yes, the life any child is largely predicated on family money.

Aside from that - private schools aren't the reason that lots of state schools aren't good. The reason for that is chronic underfunding and under resourcing over a sustained period of time. Neither of which has anything, at all, to do with private schools.

Cerealkiller4U · 02/11/2024 17:27

Unsrr · 02/11/2024 13:21

@Screamingabdabz but it does? People buying expensive homes near the best state schools, for example? Those paying for music or sports lessons when other parents can’t afford it… why do you have an issue with use of money for private education but not use of money to buy a multi million pound home by a great state school? I genuinely don’t understand the distinction you seem to make?

I don’t know anyone who could afford to move closer to a state school. I know a couple that are very close to becoming billionaires that sent all their kids to state schools because they don’t feel private schools are good morally. Even though they could afford too

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:27

CoatRack · 02/11/2024 16:17

That's only half an argument though.

Should anything else [not] be predicated on how wealthy the parents are?
Food, gifts, holidays, houses, clothes, wellbeing etc?

If not, then is the solution to ban everything above an arbitrary point and then make everyone have the same?

Well there are Labour party members who would support that.

ALunchbox · 02/11/2024 17:25

I disagree that state education is subpar. Having worked in a variety of state schools, I have repeatedly found the teaching to be excellent. Of course there'll be kids who don't listen and mess about but if you want to learn you can.
I went to rough state schools myself with kids messing about in class and still it worked out perfectly fine. The average NT child can do just fine in a state school.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 02/11/2024 17:24

Fordian · 02/11/2024 17:20

You accessing private healthcare doesn't deprive an NHS patient of care.

The enhanced academic grades your privately educated child gets may well deprive a poorer but possibly more able child of a university place.

They are not comparable.

Universities downgrade entrance requirements.

NoisyDenimShaker · 02/11/2024 17:21

insideoutsider · 02/11/2024 13:11

Saying every child deserves a decent education (which is right) so no child should go to private school is like saying every child deserves decent clothes so no child should wear Boden or Ralph Lauren, all should wear Primark or George. Or that because every child deserves decent food, no child should eat M&S or Waitrose food, all should eat Aldis and Lidls.

If people can afford to pay more for their child's education, why shouldn't they? I know people working several jobs to be able to afford private school for their kids. Why shouldn't they?

There are different types of schools catering for different children. As long as a child is in school (where possible) then that's all that is important. The more kids in private schools, more space for other kids.

My kids all went to the local state schools or grammar school (no extra tuition). I could probably afford private schools if I worked extra hard but it wasn't that important to me. My best friend did that, good for her.

I see a few holes in this argument. Wearing Boden clothes and eating Waitrose food doesn't confer the kind of huge networks and privilege that private school does, doesn't completely separate you from other clothes and junk food, and some Boden items and Waitrose food are vastly more accessible to vastly more people than private school is. You can get items on sale from those retailers. There are no sales on school fees!

As for people working several jobs...we all have the same number of hours in the day. If someone is working "several" jobs - i.e. three or more - then they are obviously not full-time at each.

Most people could have a full-time job and a part-time one on top and still not be able to afford private school. The fees are excessive these days. It's not like 50 years ago when you could send a child or two to private school on one teacher's salary. What you say perpetuates the lie that most people could send their children to private school if only they worked harder! It's just not true.

Fordian · 02/11/2024 17:20

Psychologymam · 02/11/2024 12:28

I can afford private health care and private education for my children and I still believe that access to decent health and education are a fundamental right for children and shouldn’t be related to how much your parents earn.

You accessing private healthcare doesn't deprive an NHS patient of care.

The enhanced academic grades your privately educated child gets may well deprive a poorer but possibly more able child of a university place.

They are not comparable.

Fordian · 02/11/2024 17:18

I'd have less of a problem with private schools if all onward destinations were contextual offers; Eton? 3 A stars, please. St Bogwoods? ABB.

There are only so many uni places.

Furthermore, private school networks entrench privilege. Other parents at the school can offer internships to your son and vice versa. Even in the NHS, where I worked, the HR hassle of work experience caused them to shut the scheme down; yet somehow the offspring of consultants from the 2 top public schools locally managed to get each others kids in.

I know you cannot totally erase such unfairnesses from society, but you can limit the overt exercise of it.

NoisyDenimShaker · 02/11/2024 17:08

Diorchristian · 02/11/2024 13:09

@RobinStrike that's what grammar schools did in the old days, they gave people a chance to succeed on the same level as old type private educated people.

Unfortunately now the teacher element is removed it's abandoned bright children from families who for whatever reason don't value education.
. So yes, now grammar have become a bastion at the very least of the invested parent.

The Sutton trust highlighted this years ago and said disadvantaged child needed more help to access grammar.

What do you mean by the teacher element having been removed?

Thecleanersings · 02/11/2024 17:03

Stability is often partly down to money. And tho love, nurturing and kindness aren' down to money specifically, if people are stressed because they don't have money or have to work two jobs to make the money they need they often don't have the brain space to show it as much as someone who isn't worried where the next meal is coming from.

BondStreet · 02/11/2024 17:01

Screamingabdabz · 02/11/2024 12:20

Because the standard of education a child receives should not be predicated on how much money their parents have.

This!

It’s so desperately unfair that children from poverty will undoubtedly receive a lesser standard of education than the middle/upper classes (where they already enjoy so many more privileges).

Surely every single child deserves the same standard of education irrespective of £?

GivingitToGod · 02/11/2024 16:58

frostywhite · 02/11/2024 16:24

I agree with this to a certain extent, but the plain truth is that literally everything in a child's life is predicated on how much money their parents have.

Everything???? Love, nurturing,kindness,stability, these are some of the things that money can't buy

Frowningprovidence · 02/11/2024 16:58

The thing is state education is near universal. It's 5.9% in independent schools now. This is actually fewer than some countries people have mentioned below as not using independent schools.
Wales has less in private school than Finland. I appreciate that it's uneven so edingburgh and surrey have much higher numbers.

Obviously education is for everyone's benefit, but I remain unconvinced banning private schools or indeed just taxing the users will materially benefit my son at state school.

SleeplessInWherever · 02/11/2024 16:57

Unsrr · 02/11/2024 16:46

@SleeplessInWherever i don’t think my child could potentially fail because someone else’s child is at a better school. I worry my child could fail because the state sector is not good enough.

Agreed, it is failing - for lots of different reasons.

One of them is chronic underfunding, which will at least apparently be addressed by money coming from the private sector and into the state sector.

Private education parents can then leave their kids in the schools they believe to be better, and hopefully those in state get a better deal too.

Personally I’ve got no issue with those in the better financial positions (as in, can afford private education) putting that money in.