Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation £1000 per employee

542 replies

flashbac · 01/11/2024 06:41

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation on average £1000 per employee, The lowering of the threshold alone is going to cost around £600 extra per employee.

We are heavily regulated with fixed income. We're a not for profit. Our customers expectations are increasing. We are now most likely going to have to somehow reduce our headcount now, and payrises for April are going to be off the table.

Just shaking my head really. Our employees don't deserve this. Hard to see how this isn't a tax on jobs.

The lowering of the threshold also means employers have to pay for more workers, because part time salaries are now dragged into it.

A lot of people reading this won't care. All I can say is this NI increase will also affect you. just think about Local authorities, childcare providers and other services. Do you think it won't affect your Councils services/tax bills, to give one example?

(I'm not a Tory bot btw, before anyone starts accusing me of being one. I voted Remain, don't support the Tories at all, can't stand Boris and his cronies.)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
flashbac · 01/11/2024 20:56

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 10:30

Well it’s quite simple. The threshold has dropped from £9,100 to £5000. So every single employee immediately costs 15% of £4,100 more. That’s £615. Not £210. And for someone on the average UK salary of £35k, there’s also another 1.2% on £25,900. So that’s another £310. So the average employee now costs just under £1k more.

Thank you! I couldn't be bothered addressing the posters doing their sums wrong. It's so annoying how ppl don't read the OP or can't do the maths and make out they are in the right!

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 01/11/2024 20:43

Username056 · 01/11/2024 19:13

I don’t believe they will be “exempt” as such. They will be given extra money by the Chancellor from taxation to cover the cost of the NI payroll increase. NHS also has recent pay rises to cover with consequent increase in pensions too. The bill will be enormous.

Why do you think they’d waste time and money for such a convoluted approach when exemption would be so much simpler?

Username056 · 01/11/2024 19:13

Annabel28 · 01/11/2024 17:22

My understanding is the NHS is going to be exempt from paying increase NI - GP practices aren't but are lobbying for it.

I don’t believe they will be “exempt” as such. They will be given extra money by the Chancellor from taxation to cover the cost of the NI payroll increase. NHS also has recent pay rises to cover with consequent increase in pensions too. The bill will be enormous.

NorthWestWoes · 01/11/2024 19:03

Shakeoffyourchains · 01/11/2024 13:55

It impacts low-paying organisations the most anyway.

A business employing all their staff on the national median wage would see a c2.4% increase in overall staff wage costs with these changes. One employing them on the real living wage will see a c2.9% increase and one that's employing staff on the national minimum wage will see a 3.1% increase from the NI changes.

Given that it's pretty standard to budget for a 2-5% increase in staff costs, most decent businesses should be in a position to absorb these changes and say "Hey folks, unfortunately due to these NI changes you won't get / will get less of a pay rise this year (which is shit), but your jobs are safe and we'll be able to resume again next year".

The issue is most acute for business paying NMW as they have no choice but to cover both the NI and NMW increases in one go, which means they're facing a c 7.3% increase in overall staff costs. But that's the risk you run if you opt for NMW over a fair wage. If those same businesses had chosen to pay their staff the real living wage instead (a whole £1.16 p/h more than NMW) they'd only be looking at the 3% increase next year.

Your calculations are wrong. If you’re paying NMW your staff costs are going up 9% to 10%. If you’re committed to paying UK-wide RLW your costs are going up about 8.5% (RLW increase plus NI changes).

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 18:56

Noname99 · 01/11/2024 16:07

Labour supporters are hilarious. Farmers are all whingers and Jeremey Clarkeson is the typical example apparently! Charities are made up of fat cat bosses and the staff that work for them are all useless. Business owners are all running ‘unviable’ businesses when they can absorb the largest tax hike in decades and minimum wage hike within 6 months.

Is there anyone other than MW public sector workers that you don’t hate?

Yep

friendlycat · 01/11/2024 18:53

Noname99 · 01/11/2024 16:07

Labour supporters are hilarious. Farmers are all whingers and Jeremey Clarkeson is the typical example apparently! Charities are made up of fat cat bosses and the staff that work for them are all useless. Business owners are all running ‘unviable’ businesses when they can absorb the largest tax hike in decades and minimum wage hike within 6 months.

Is there anyone other than MW public sector workers that you don’t hate?

Indeed

ginasevern · 01/11/2024 17:45

Coolasfeck · 01/11/2024 15:27

After campaigning so hard for Brexit, you’d think the farmers would be keeping their head down for a while when it comes to the country’s finances.

Oh yes indeed, you would've thought so wouldn't you!

Annabel28 · 01/11/2024 17:22

Fairyliz · 01/11/2024 06:55

I wondered about this. If the NHS employs 1.5 million won’t the extra money Labour put into it go on increased NI contributions?

My understanding is the NHS is going to be exempt from paying increase NI - GP practices aren't but are lobbying for it.

Boomer55 · 01/11/2024 17:21

Noname99 · 01/11/2024 16:07

Labour supporters are hilarious. Farmers are all whingers and Jeremey Clarkeson is the typical example apparently! Charities are made up of fat cat bosses and the staff that work for them are all useless. Business owners are all running ‘unviable’ businesses when they can absorb the largest tax hike in decades and minimum wage hike within 6 months.

Is there anyone other than MW public sector workers that you don’t hate?

I have got sympathy for some of this, but I’m not sure Clarkson and Allstrop are the best poster boy and girl for the farming campaign.

There is a large London protest planned.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14030241/Furious-farmers-hold-major-Westminster-protest-Labours-Budget-land-cash-raid-Rachel-Reeves.html

Agri-avengers assemble! Farmers to hold major Westminster tax protest

The National Farmers Union is to hold a major Westminster rally next month after Rachel Reeves revoked farmland's exemption from inheritance tax (IHT).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14030241/Furious-farmers-hold-major-Westminster-protest-Labours-Budget-land-cash-raid-Rachel-Reeves.html

Boomer55 · 01/11/2024 17:18

Fairyliz · 01/11/2024 06:55

I wondered about this. If the NHS employs 1.5 million won’t the extra money Labour put into it go on increased NI contributions?

They are exempt, for some reason, as are other public service departments. 🤷‍♀️

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 01/11/2024 17:16

Brananan · 01/11/2024 16:49

Farmers literally provide your food.

Yes and look at the fuss people made about a few tomatoes missing on shelves recently.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 16:49

Coolasfeck · 01/11/2024 15:27

After campaigning so hard for Brexit, you’d think the farmers would be keeping their head down for a while when it comes to the country’s finances.

Farmers literally provide your food.

Noname99 · 01/11/2024 16:07

Labour supporters are hilarious. Farmers are all whingers and Jeremey Clarkeson is the typical example apparently! Charities are made up of fat cat bosses and the staff that work for them are all useless. Business owners are all running ‘unviable’ businesses when they can absorb the largest tax hike in decades and minimum wage hike within 6 months.

Is there anyone other than MW public sector workers that you don’t hate?

StatisticallyChallenged · 01/11/2024 15:36

Shakeoffyourchains · 01/11/2024 13:55

It impacts low-paying organisations the most anyway.

A business employing all their staff on the national median wage would see a c2.4% increase in overall staff wage costs with these changes. One employing them on the real living wage will see a c2.9% increase and one that's employing staff on the national minimum wage will see a 3.1% increase from the NI changes.

Given that it's pretty standard to budget for a 2-5% increase in staff costs, most decent businesses should be in a position to absorb these changes and say "Hey folks, unfortunately due to these NI changes you won't get / will get less of a pay rise this year (which is shit), but your jobs are safe and we'll be able to resume again next year".

The issue is most acute for business paying NMW as they have no choice but to cover both the NI and NMW increases in one go, which means they're facing a c 7.3% increase in overall staff costs. But that's the risk you run if you opt for NMW over a fair wage. If those same businesses had chosen to pay their staff the real living wage instead (a whole £1.16 p/h more than NMW) they'd only be looking at the 3% increase next year.

The ones it hits the hardest are business where a large number of the staff are part time, because most of the hike comes from the threshold increase rather than the rate increase. We have our own business, it's only open part time hours so most of the staff are also part time. No way round that. Real living wage employer but because the staff are part time the hit is about 6%.

We had budgeted about 5% for pay rises which is about right for the latest real living wage increase. Hadn't planned on having to find the same again down the back of the sofa though.

Coolasfeck · 01/11/2024 15:27

ginasevern · 01/11/2024 12:49

Was there ever a time that farmers didn't moan their heads off about something?

Just out of interest, where would people suggest we raise tax from to pay for our (ever crumbling) public services. Or would they prefer a "pay as you go for everything" system rather like the States. Genuine question.

After campaigning so hard for Brexit, you’d think the farmers would be keeping their head down for a while when it comes to the country’s finances.

newchapternewday · 01/11/2024 15:22

Fairyliz · 01/11/2024 06:55

I wondered about this. If the NHS employs 1.5 million won’t the extra money Labour put into it go on increased NI contributions?

They have excluded the NHS from these additional payments

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 15:14

financiallyiliterate · 01/11/2024 13:53

Might be prudent to check whats happening today?

Markets have calmed dramatically, Gilt yields marginally just higher than in the spring of 2024 after Hunts budget. 4.37 vs 4.41.

As I had just posted I was listening to an economist rounding up the market reaction, so pretty close to real time analysis

This was about then too

https://www.ft.com/content/ae73cfba-b9c4-4c5c-843e-d45ada55db95

Investors warn of lasting ‘risk premium’ in gilts following UK Budget

Traders play down parallels with 2022 market crisis but say rise in borrowing costs will linger

https://www.ft.com/content/ae73cfba-b9c4-4c5c-843e-d45ada55db95

taxguru · 01/11/2024 14:49

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 14:36

The local economy seems to actively dislike him. It's a frequent feature on his shows.

Also he doesn't run it as a 'farm', it's run for entertainment purposes and that's clearly and easily its primary purpose. No farmer in his or her right mind would run the farm like he does if they actually had to live off the proceeds.

Some "locals" don't like him because of prejudice. He's "annoyed" a lot of people over the years, such as Express readers and Peugeot drivers. I can assure you that lots of locals absolutely love and support him, especially the local businesses who benefit directly from his businesses, the staff he employs, and the local businesses who benefit indirectly by virtue of the extra "footfall" he's brought into the area, just to visit his farm, and who stay in local holiday lets and hotels, drink in local pubs, eat in local cafes and restaurants and shop in local shops. The "Clarkson" affect on the surrounding area is huge!

The "entertainment" side is all staged. No sane person thinks that Clarkson genuinely runs the business like that. No sane person thinks he genuinely ploughs his own fields. He employs lots of local staff to actually "run" the farm professionally - it's far more than Gerard and Kaleb, in fact, neither of them actually do much "proper" work on the farm anymore either - their involvement is now also primarily on the "entertainment" side of things.

One thing that IS real is Clarkson's campaigning on behalf of other farmers. He's absolutely nailed it with his highlighting of the problems being faced by farmers and how tough it is.

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 14:36

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 13:03

And has owned it, I think, for nearly 20 years creating employment for many, and spending huge amounts of money on contractors, builders, advisors, staff etc in the local area in the mean time. He has also established two other thriving enterprises - a farm shop and a pub, also employing people locally, and providing work for local businesses. Sure, he makes most of his money elsewhere but one can’t really say that he hasn’t benefited the local economy. And so the IHT relief is small beer compared to the impact locally and to the exchequer. But sure, focus on just part of the picture…

The local economy seems to actively dislike him. It's a frequent feature on his shows.

Also he doesn't run it as a 'farm', it's run for entertainment purposes and that's clearly and easily its primary purpose. No farmer in his or her right mind would run the farm like he does if they actually had to live off the proceeds.

Shakeoffyourchains · 01/11/2024 13:55

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

It impacts low-paying organisations the most anyway.

A business employing all their staff on the national median wage would see a c2.4% increase in overall staff wage costs with these changes. One employing them on the real living wage will see a c2.9% increase and one that's employing staff on the national minimum wage will see a 3.1% increase from the NI changes.

Given that it's pretty standard to budget for a 2-5% increase in staff costs, most decent businesses should be in a position to absorb these changes and say "Hey folks, unfortunately due to these NI changes you won't get / will get less of a pay rise this year (which is shit), but your jobs are safe and we'll be able to resume again next year".

The issue is most acute for business paying NMW as they have no choice but to cover both the NI and NMW increases in one go, which means they're facing a c 7.3% increase in overall staff costs. But that's the risk you run if you opt for NMW over a fair wage. If those same businesses had chosen to pay their staff the real living wage instead (a whole £1.16 p/h more than NMW) they'd only be looking at the 3% increase next year.

financiallyiliterate · 01/11/2024 13:53

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 13:45

Could there be less accountability. I don't think they planned the response and the reality is that high debt will cost more to service.

Might be prudent to check whats happening today?

Markets have calmed dramatically, Gilt yields marginally just higher than in the spring of 2024 after Hunts budget. 4.37 vs 4.41.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 13:45

Brananan · 01/11/2024 13:41

Could there be less accountability. I don't think they planned the response and the reality is that high debt will cost more to service.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 13:41

UK still suffering from trauma of Liz Truss, says Treasury chief https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/nov/01/uk-still-suffering-from-trauma-of-liz-truss-says-treasury-chief-darren-jones?CMP=share_btn_url

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 13:40

Brananan · 01/11/2024 13:36

I see the government are blaming Liz truss for the slump in the pound after their budget.

Still?

I’ve just been listening to an economist round up the markets’ thumbs down and why

He was clear on reasons related to Reeves’ budget

WeWillGetThereInTheEnd · 01/11/2024 13:39

Just out of interest, where would people suggest we raise tax from to pay for our (ever crumbling) public services.

I would have reversed the Tories recent cut in NI, which was only done to spite Labour pre-election; amalgamate income tax and employees NI and then increased the new income tax. That is the most progressive way imo.

I also would have abandoned the idea of spending £22 billion on this deluded carbon capture scheme.

Swipe left for the next trending thread