Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation £1000 per employee

542 replies

flashbac · 01/11/2024 06:41

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation on average £1000 per employee, The lowering of the threshold alone is going to cost around £600 extra per employee.

We are heavily regulated with fixed income. We're a not for profit. Our customers expectations are increasing. We are now most likely going to have to somehow reduce our headcount now, and payrises for April are going to be off the table.

Just shaking my head really. Our employees don't deserve this. Hard to see how this isn't a tax on jobs.

The lowering of the threshold also means employers have to pay for more workers, because part time salaries are now dragged into it.

A lot of people reading this won't care. All I can say is this NI increase will also affect you. just think about Local authorities, childcare providers and other services. Do you think it won't affect your Councils services/tax bills, to give one example?

(I'm not a Tory bot btw, before anyone starts accusing me of being one. I voted Remain, don't support the Tories at all, can't stand Boris and his cronies.)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:46

mrshoho · 01/11/2024 11:44

Good point. And I keep reminding myself of the fact that the Conservatives were only offering more of the same at the last GE. I lalso agree that reducing NI at the time they did it was irresponsible.

Labour and the other parties voted against Sunak's increase in NI at the time anyway.

mrshoho · 01/11/2024 11:44

Toastandbutterand · 01/11/2024 11:40

I think it's worth noting that of all the different finance institutions assessments of this budget, the worst assessment, the very worst one said:

It's nearly as bad as the conservatives would have been.

Good point. And I keep reminding myself of the fact that the Conservatives were only offering more of the same at the last GE. I lalso agree that reducing NI at the time they did it was irresponsible.

Toastandbutterand · 01/11/2024 11:40

I think it's worth noting that of all the different finance institutions assessments of this budget, the worst assessment, the very worst one said:

It's nearly as bad as the conservatives would have been.

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:37

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:35

Our economy has been based on buying/selling houses and the service economy of coffees and spa days for 2 or 3 decades now. All on the flawed assumption we can easily and cheaply import what we need, whether food, goods or power. Now we can all see the folly of that short-sightedness but still the politicians can't change their flawed mindset and just carry on making the same mistakes.

Agreed. We actually had some promise for maker industry resurgence in the late 2010s with lots of young people starting to create small manufacturing businesses but it got crippled by the high cost of housing post Covid.

IdaGlossop · 01/11/2024 11:36

CoralReader · 01/11/2024 07:35

Now is a good time to start supporting the tories then

On what basis? It is a party battered at the polls in July and with, as yet, no leader and no policies.

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:36

devilsadvocate77 · 01/11/2024 11:29

Yes, happy for tech companies or multinational/global firms but it is really not hitting those, though, are they.
Again, we are taxed something like 10% less individually than other European nations.

Yep, tech companies have the broad shoulders, but they're not really impacted this much by this. Just don't understand why they didn't go for Corporation tax.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:35

Twistybranch · 01/11/2024 11:28

I honestly wouldn’t worry.

Theres going to be a u-turns galore on this budget. She’s already spooked the markets. Moody’s are issuing warnings. Charities are panicking…..it’s a complete shit show.

At least we know they will take a hammering at the next local elections and will be out at the next GE. So just a case of getting through the next few years.

Hopefully then they will recognise that a centrist approach is the only way that Labour can work.

Edited

Moody’s are issuing warnings

Wonder what Labour will do next

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:35

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:27

Quite. It's actually pathetic.

Our economy has been based on buying/selling houses and the service economy of coffees and spa days for 2 or 3 decades now. All on the flawed assumption we can easily and cheaply import what we need, whether food, goods or power. Now we can all see the folly of that short-sightedness but still the politicians can't change their flawed mindset and just carry on making the same mistakes.

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:32

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:25

UK manufacturing and farming.

Why on earth would they want to impact two things that provide a certain level of security?

Mumsnetters are constantly going on about how brilliant Germany is and manufacturing and farming are two highly protected industries there.

It was the same when they chose not to renew our Nuclear power station capability because it was "cheaper" to import electricity than build our own replacement infrastructure.

Same with the loss of the manufacturing industries in the 70s and 80s. Again "cheaper" to outsource our manufacturing to the emerging cheap workforces of the Eastern countries.

No one is in it for the long term anymore. By the time the inevitable shit hits the fan, i.e. Ukraine, Covid, Suez, etc., the politicians making short term decisions years ago are long retired and enjoying their gold plated pensions, consultancy fees, etc., so they can just shrug it off.

Ilovemycatalot · 01/11/2024 11:30

The problem is everyone wants improved services but no one wants to pay for it.
I would of been happy with a direct tax on everyone with the money going direct to the NHS with those earning more taxed more.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:30

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:26

If I had the answer to all these problems, I'd be applying to be Chancellor myself. The economy is basically a circle that can't be squared.

I'm afraid not thinking redundancies and lower pay will help growth is a basic requirement for the Chancellor, and even if mners can't see it Reeves should be able to.

Even if some think favourably enough of Labour that they overlook those things happening (even to them) it really will be problematic for growth and all the pledges that rest on it. Including defence spending

devilsadvocate77 · 01/11/2024 11:29

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 10:53

I'm struggling to understand why people don't think it should come from tech companies making huge profits. They are effectively the ones replacing people's jobs in order to make these profits and take the money that used to be taxed from those jobs out of the system, so why aren't they the ones being made to put it back into the system.

Doesn't seem like Labour have any interest in working people when they're just going to continue to allow this to happen.

Edited

Yes, happy for tech companies or multinational/global firms but it is really not hitting those, though, are they.
Again, we are taxed something like 10% less individually than other European nations.

Twistybranch · 01/11/2024 11:28

I honestly wouldn’t worry.

Theres going to be a u-turns galore on this budget. She’s already spooked the markets. Moody’s are issuing warnings. Charities are panicking…..it’s a complete shit show.

At least we know they will take a hammering at the next local elections and will be out at the next GE. So just a case of getting through the next few years.

Hopefully then they will recognise that a centrist approach is the only way that Labour can work.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:27

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:26

Agreed

USA and Germany are trying to re-industrialise, meanwhile we're putting the nail in the coffin and getting rid of non-doms, and foreign property investors too.

So I guess our economy is going to be based on selling each other houses.

Quite. It's actually pathetic.

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:26

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

Agreed

USA and Germany are trying to re-industrialise, meanwhile we're putting the nail in the coffin and getting rid of non-doms, and foreign property investors too.

So I guess our economy is going to be based on selling each other houses.

Bromptotoo · 01/11/2024 11:26

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

I think they backed themselves into a corner.

With hindsight opposition to Hunt's last cut for employees as wholly without principle and a commitment to reverse it would have been better.

But it would have been a stick for the Tories to beat them with...

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:26

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:24

Your response below to redundancies and lower pay was that you were ok with it, but how do they help growth?

If I had the answer to all these problems, I'd be applying to be Chancellor myself. The economy is basically a circle that can't be squared.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:25

UK manufacturing and farming.

Why on earth would they want to impact two things that provide a certain level of security?

Mumsnetters are constantly going on about how brilliant Germany is and manufacturing and farming are two highly protected industries there.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:24

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 10:59

We haven't had growth for nearly a decade now under the Tories. The country has been teetering on the brink of recession for years. What was being done, wasn't working. Maybe this won't work either but the definition of madness it to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect different results.

People have had low wages for years. The average wage of £37K is low compared to comparable western economies, and not even accurate once you factor out all the HWIs. Plus it only went up to that in the last couple of years due to high inflation. The fact is that the UK is a low wage, high tax economy, with extremely poor public services. Maybe now we'll at least be a low wage, high tax economy with half-decent public services.

Your response below to redundancies and lower pay was that you were ok with it, but how do they help growth?

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Bromptotoo · 01/11/2024 11:20

Thanks, that confirms what I suspected; it's lowering the start point that's doing the heavy lifting rather than the 1.2% increase in the headline rate.

Initially I just used the 1.2% and got to the same £80+k as AI did.

Edited

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

Newterm · 01/11/2024 11:22

Papyrophile · 01/11/2024 09:14

First, you have to find someone who wants to buy it!!

DH has been trying to sell his business to retire for the last four years. In light of Wednesday's Budget announcements, the potential purchaser list has got even shorter.

Yes, selling a business is nigh on impossible these days. My friend’s husband had to put his company in liquidation recently as needed to retire due to ill health.

Bromptotoo · 01/11/2024 11:20

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:17

The maths isn’t that difficult…

Previously employers NI on £35k was (£35,000 - £9,100) x 13.8% = £3,574
Now it will be (£35,000 - £5,000) x 15% = £4,500
Increase £926.

Thanks, that confirms what I suspected; it's lowering the start point that's doing the heavy lifting rather than the 1.2% increase in the headline rate.

Initially I just used the 1.2% and got to the same £80+k as AI did.

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:19

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:18

And that’s why you shouldn’t rely on chat GPT without some knowledge of the subject 😂😂

edited to add, not even the subject. Just maths.

Edited

I'm no tax expert but that does look quite high. Maybe AI won't be taking over the planet just yet....

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:18

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:16

This is what I got from sticking the calculation into ChatGPT:

  1. Identify the increase in contributions: The employer is paying £1000 more due to a 1.2% rise in the National Insurance rate.
  2. Determine the salary: Let the salary be ( S ).
  3. Consider the new threshold: National Insurance is now paid on earnings over £5,000 instead of £9,000.
The increase in contributions is given by: [ \text{Increase} = (S - 5000) \times \frac{1.2}{100} ] Given that the increase is £1000: [ (S - 5000) \times \frac{1.2}{100} = 1000 ] Solving for ( S ): [ S - 5000 = \frac{1000 \times 100}{1.2} ] [ S - 5000 = \frac{100000}{1.2} ] [ S - 5000 = 83333.33 ] [ S = 83333.33 + 5000 ] [ S = 88333.33 ] So, the salary of the employee is approximately £88,333.

And that’s why you shouldn’t rely on chat GPT without some knowledge of the subject 😂😂

edited to add, not even the subject. Just maths.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:17

Bromptotoo · 01/11/2024 11:12

Can you show your workings for that?

I guess it's the lowering of the floor rather than the headline 1.2% change in the rate that's making the difference.

The maths isn’t that difficult…

Previously employers NI on £35k was (£35,000 - £9,100) x 13.8% = £3,574
Now it will be (£35,000 - £5,000) x 15% = £4,500
Increase £926.