Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

NMW to increase again next year to £12.21 ph.

810 replies

ZoeZee · 29/10/2024 19:51

If you’ve not had a pay rise this year, despite bringing it up to your employer, and now there’s set to be another 6% NMW increase next year (which is fantastic, don’t get me wrong) the pay gap is narrowing ever more between skilled/unskilled employees.

Skilled and those with MANY years of experience, might as ditch their responsible/stressful jobs (which often keep you awake at night) and look for something that doesn’t have the added responsibility?

Almost 20 years experience means nothing to some employers! AIBU?

Any employers who have a view on this increase, please let me know how this might affect you and your staff.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Feelingathomenow · 30/10/2024 20:36

hamsterchump · 30/10/2024 20:08

Or perhaps the lowest paid could be allowed to earn enough to afford to use the products and services they labour over and we could have less inequality. The lowest paid tend to spend their whole pay packet and a greater proportion of that in their local economy.

Unless you live in la la land how do you think this would work? If day everyone earned the same the cost of those luxuries would increase to cover the cost the wages, it would still be unaffordable to those it is currently unaffordable. Those buying those luxuries must earn more than those providing the services earn.

Human society is hierarchical we choose means by which to decide who gets to the top and who is at the bottom- there will always the haves and have nots. Those who have the things society values most will always be at the top of the tree. Those who lack them will be at the bottom. The only way to change the current structure would be to change what we value and therefore who gets most resources. But if we did that we would just change who was at the top and who was at the bottom.

BinkyBeaufort · 30/10/2024 20:12

I posted earlier about how the pay and NI rises affect us.
In our manufacturing business the cost of raw materials is volatile and rose by 50% a couple of years ago, and with the huge rise in the energy costs that come with our industry we have been squeezed tighter and tighter.
We can't pass all the costs onto our customers because they'd go to China or eastern Europe, which does no good for either the environment or the country's economy. Not to mention the risk of losing ever more scarce skills.
When the politicians talk about 'working people' they forget that people like us ARE working (way past retirement age too), and trying our best to keep loyal employees in work.

hamsterchump · 30/10/2024 20:08

Feelingathomenow · 30/10/2024 19:47

And unfortunately this sums it up. Where the skilled/unskilled pay gap is being eaten away at where is the incentive to do well, to work hard?

If business owners are struggling why continue ti run that business? Where prices increase to compensate in places like supermarkets the cost of living will increase, those not being blessed with 6/16% pay rises will feel poorer. The luxuries like eating out, beauty treatments etc, many of which will be done away with, ironically the very businesses likely to be paying minimum wage will then fold.

We have built a service industry economy, many of those services are luxuries. To maintain this there needs to be lots of people earning substantially more than the people whose services they use if they are to continue to be able to afford those services.

Labour has set us off on a downward spiral of economic decline. It’s disgusting!

Or perhaps the lowest paid could be allowed to earn enough to afford to use the products and services they labour over and we could have less inequality. The lowest paid tend to spend their whole pay packet and a greater proportion of that in their local economy.

Feelingathomenow · 30/10/2024 19:47

OnePearlOtter · 30/10/2024 19:31

Unfortunately labour intensive low paid business really struggle. Lots of small labour intensive businesses will close because of the costs. The government doesn't understand this. I own such a business (hairdressing salon) and it is getting harder to keep a pay gap between unskilled and skilled staff. Sometimes I don't even pay myself the minimum wage. In a competitive sector you can only put the prices up so much.

And unfortunately this sums it up. Where the skilled/unskilled pay gap is being eaten away at where is the incentive to do well, to work hard?

If business owners are struggling why continue ti run that business? Where prices increase to compensate in places like supermarkets the cost of living will increase, those not being blessed with 6/16% pay rises will feel poorer. The luxuries like eating out, beauty treatments etc, many of which will be done away with, ironically the very businesses likely to be paying minimum wage will then fold.

We have built a service industry economy, many of those services are luxuries. To maintain this there needs to be lots of people earning substantially more than the people whose services they use if they are to continue to be able to afford those services.

Labour has set us off on a downward spiral of economic decline. It’s disgusting!

Lucy25 · 30/10/2024 19:43

CoatRack · 30/10/2024 19:05

And your answer appears to be to accelerate the problem. Nice work 👍

It was a factual comment, it wasn’t an answer
How is my comment accelerating the problem?
This 'new’ information of yours, is businesses will move their operations to China and other countries.It’s already happening, been this case for years.And that was my point👍

OnePearlOtter · 30/10/2024 19:31

Unfortunately labour intensive low paid business really struggle. Lots of small labour intensive businesses will close because of the costs. The government doesn't understand this. I own such a business (hairdressing salon) and it is getting harder to keep a pay gap between unskilled and skilled staff. Sometimes I don't even pay myself the minimum wage. In a competitive sector you can only put the prices up so much.

CoatRack · 30/10/2024 19:05

Lucy25 · 30/10/2024 13:21

Many companies in the UK are already doing this and it’s never going to change.This isn’t new information.

And your answer appears to be to accelerate the problem. Nice work 👍

GotToLeave · 30/10/2024 19:00

If it affects small businesses, we’ll thats just capitalism. I don’t like it but that’s what we have chosen. If you can’t afford to pay your staff a wage that sustains them then your business isn’t viable. It’s not ok for people to work full time hours but not be able to afford to eat properly or heat their home.

Horsemum40 · 30/10/2024 18:56

I used to be permanent band 2 with nhs at my local hospital. The hourly weekday pay has always been minimum wage or very slightly over. The stress level of things we saw and did, combined with full time rota was ridiculous (expected to work a mix of days and nights. Night shift and weekend pay better)
I went onto zero hours and back to freelance equine based work. The hours, pay and stress levels are SO much better! I've had colleagues leave to go and work in Costa, or aldis, because of the pay and conditions! It's sad but understandable 😔

laraitopbanana · 30/10/2024 18:48

@JenniferBooth it is the wannabe rich syndrome lol except I doubt rich people look down at their nannies, good ones are snatched and not going anywhere ahah!!

laraitopbanana · 30/10/2024 18:46

Leafstamp · 29/10/2024 20:03

What do you mean by this? I’ve not heard this turn of phrase?

I think it means self service tills…

fetchacloth · 30/10/2024 18:08

ExtraOnions · 29/10/2024 20:12

If you can’t afford to pay your staff £12ph, you shouldn’t have a business.

Totally agree, especially when one bears in mind that any UC top ups also required are funded by the taxpayer.

Feelingathomenow · 30/10/2024 16:34

jcyclops · 30/10/2024 15:37

The increase in NMW from £11.44 to £12.21 on its own will be swallowed up many (most?) employers. The problem comes when it is coupled with the employers NI increase in today's budget.

A part time worker (20hrs/week) currently costs the employer £11,900 per year + £386 employers national insurance - a total of £12,286. From April 2025, the cost to an employer will be £12,700 + £1,155 NI - total of £13,855. This is an extra £1,569 the employer has to find - an increase of 12.8%, and this will be much harder for employers to swallow.

yes it’s the dropping of the threshold here that’s the real killer. That alone will cost an employer with 1000 staff well over half a million more each year - i expect quite a few redundancies are going to occur as that is the only way to keep within budgets, even dropping peoples hours won’t help.

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 16:05

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/10/2024 15:04

So you agree that PP has been hounded by UC?

Should be hounding her employer. Do you want both wages AND UC to stay as they were

republicofjam · 30/10/2024 15:46

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:39

It always astounds me that people are happy to leave their kids (who they are supposed to love) to be looked after by someone they look down on. WTF is that about!!!

This!!

jcyclops · 30/10/2024 15:37

The increase in NMW from £11.44 to £12.21 on its own will be swallowed up many (most?) employers. The problem comes when it is coupled with the employers NI increase in today's budget.

A part time worker (20hrs/week) currently costs the employer £11,900 per year + £386 employers national insurance - a total of £12,286. From April 2025, the cost to an employer will be £12,700 + £1,155 NI - total of £13,855. This is an extra £1,569 the employer has to find - an increase of 12.8%, and this will be much harder for employers to swallow.

Bodeganights · 30/10/2024 15:36

ZoeZee · 29/10/2024 21:34

Think we might have similar bosses! I could write a book about him.

I have this year left a company like that.
Almost exactly the same apart from 18 high end cars not just one. Still in a multi million pound house, and I've heard is thinking of letting yet more people go, if not actively making them redundant, by not replacing those who leave freely.
The workers although paid pretty well, have not had a pay rise of more than half or one percent. Some are just hanging on til retirement in the next 3 to 5 years. The younger ones are getting trained then leaving for better money as soon as possible.
I think that company will go under soon, but it's not to do with wage rise costs or NI costs. More likely the man at the top wants more. Which I do understand, if I was head of a multi million pound company I would want rewarded. But I'd hope I would remember those below me and try to keep them all employed first.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/10/2024 15:17

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:57

Its people like you that make me wish essential workers had gone on strike during at least one of the lockdowns.

On second thought, don’t bother answering.

Can’t be bothered with whinging.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/10/2024 15:04

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:57

Its people like you that make me wish essential workers had gone on strike during at least one of the lockdowns.

So you agree that PP has been hounded by UC?

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:57

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/10/2024 08:39

You can be out of the country for up to 4 weeks.

Just now much travelling outside the UK do you think someone who is not on UC can afford?

And you had to show in the JC and provide bank statements for checks?

In exchange for a healthy monthly payment?

How much UC do yo get? You don’t have to answer, or course if it makes you feel uncomfortable for some reason.

Its people like you that make me wish essential workers had gone on strike during at least one of the lockdowns.

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:49

Mealplanningfatigue · 30/10/2024 07:49

Of course not but to get sanctioned you've got to have done a number of things wrong. I've been unemployed and on UC and never once got sanctioned nor did I feel hounded by them. I missed an appointment once, notified them through my journal, got told not to do it again or I'll be sanctioned or considered for sanctions, and that was the matter closed.

Fucking glad im not on UC Would probably have to miss my dads funeral at the end of November
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05wjtl0

BBC Two - Victoria Derbyshire, 'I was sanctioned for going to a funeral'

'I was sanctioned for going to a funeral'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05wjtl0

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:39

Gorgonemilezola · 30/10/2024 07:34

So carers, childcare workers, teaching assistants, none of whom will require a degree to do their jobs, aren't worth a decent wage?

If everyone on NMW suddenly decided to 'better' Hmm themselves by getting a degree and jacking in their jobs as cleaners, dinner ladies, childcare workers, hospital porters etc etc, we'd be screwed. Because their roles are 'worth' far more than many earning excessive salaries.

It always astounds me that people are happy to leave their kids (who they are supposed to love) to be looked after by someone they look down on. WTF is that about!!!

JenniferBooth · 30/10/2024 14:33

Shitshower · 30/10/2024 07:24

Social workers are not on a MW salary.
Anyone who feels hard done by certainly can go and work in a shop on MW, as it’s clearly so easy.

I find the argument against paying people £12.21 ph repugnant.

Anyone who comes up with that shit should be made to work in retail for the whole of December

ElaborateCushion · 30/10/2024 13:45

RedToothBrush · 30/10/2024 12:04

Which hightlights that the problem probably isn't actually wages.

Its job opportunities and housing costs.

Housing has been driven hugely by four things - the rise in the number of second and holiday homes, inefficient use of the housing we have got (older couples an singles in large family homes and families in small houses and flats) and the rise of the buy to let industry and availability of work locally.

Seeing houses as an investment opportunity an a way to make money lies at the heart of cost of living issues. Even with stagnating wages, the population growth we have had and internal migration patterns, the rate at which housing costs has gone up has far outstripped the rate it should have.

Some of the places with the biggest issues with housing are those where young people have left to go to cities! Places like Cornwall and the Lakes. You can add a few quid to the NMW in these places, say 'look we did aren't we amazing', but you aren't solving shit for people on minimum wage in these places. They still haven't got a hope in hell of finding somewhere to live.

Then you've got places like the NE, where theres shit all left. The NMW will go much further here and you've got a decent chance of getting a house if you are employed cos no fucker else wants to live there. But thats the catch, there's no sodding jobs, cos no one invested there. So people are living on benefits and there are no jobs to find. So raising the NMW only serves to hit these people hardest of all because the cost of living is liable to increase so that supermarkets maintain their profit margins. Food banks will have less donations because those in the middle are also more squeezed because their wages HAVEN'T risen.

The issue is about the richest getting richer, but anyone who didn't own property by 2007 or had a significant inheritence since is significantly disadvantaged. 2007 marks the last housing market crash... (the cash rich bought up property whilst those who didn't have mortgages faced tighter restrictions and couldn't get property).

The market crash led to a decade of stagnanted wages whilst there was this huge move into property made possible by the crash for those who had money.

For years its been said that the lack of investiment in provincial towns has massively driven politics. Its what all the red wall/ blue wall stuff was about. People wanting jobs and services (yes like your local pub too) rather than boarded up buildings. The cost of living is part of that but actually if there are jobs and services available people who are struggling are significantly happier because theres still a sense of community. Its about the sense of abandonment by government.

In terms of business, the number of business peaked in 2020. Since then costs have risen considerably and taxes/wages have gone up.

It makes no sense to therefore try and hit small businesses that provide services in local areas harder. It will push people towards more radical politics because of the sense of being abandoned.

I think its note worthy to already acknowledge how many businesses have popped in the last couple of years. These are the latest government figures which were published earlier this month:

Between 2023 and 2024:

  • the total business population decreased by 56,000 (1.0%)
  • numbers of employing businesses decreased by 18,000 (1.2%), whilst non-employing business numbers decreased by 38,000 (0.9%)
  • the decrease in non-employing businesses resulted from a decrease of 43,000 (1.5%) unregistered businesses, offset by an increase in non-employing registered businesses of 5,000 (0.4%)
  • numbers of registered businesses decreased by 13,000 (0.5%)

Whilst we might want to improve wages and improve quality of life, we don't actually improve cost of living issues by raising the NMW. It sounds great to a lot of people, BUT IT DOESNT SOLVE ANY OF THE UNDERLYING ISSUES, and arguably it makes them worse in many areas.

Unless the government manages to tackle multinationals and housing then its all totally fucking meaningless deck chair shuffling, which I genuinely think will cause most problems for those right at the bottom.

100%!

When I earned £12,500 around 2000 I bought a nice 2 bed flat for £70,000 with my ex (who earned £20k).

If someone is on NMW now at just under £24,000, there aren't many places in the country where you could buy a nice 2 bed flat for £134k. Certainly not where I bought mine. They're worth about £260k now.

During the time in between, people with plenty of money went round snapping up the £70k flats and reduced the housing stock available.

When DH bought his old house, everyone lived in the property they bought. It's a road full of one bed flats and one bed cluster houses.

Nearly all of those properties are now owned by investors. The effect of this is that no-one really cares about their surroundings. Gardens, frontages and upkeep in general is awful and the whole road looks really run down. All the while people are having to pay at least £1,000 a month for it.

As you say, none of these measures in the budget make it any easier for people to own their own home and provide themselves with the stability of their own home.

It's a shit show all round really.

RedToothBrush · 30/10/2024 13:34

BinkyBeaufort · 30/10/2024 13:24

We have a small business employing 8 staff, 2 on minimum wage.
Every time it goes up we have to raise the other 6 as well to keep the differential.
As a result of this we are having to do away with overtime, resulting in lower productivity and therefore sales and profit.
For the record I work unpaid and DH has not had a pay rise in 9 years.
This is going to be tough ....

Good luck.

I think you have to know small business owners well to truly appreciate how difficult it is to make a success of it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread