Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

NMW to increase again next year to £12.21 ph.

810 replies

ZoeZee · 29/10/2024 19:51

If you’ve not had a pay rise this year, despite bringing it up to your employer, and now there’s set to be another 6% NMW increase next year (which is fantastic, don’t get me wrong) the pay gap is narrowing ever more between skilled/unskilled employees.

Skilled and those with MANY years of experience, might as ditch their responsible/stressful jobs (which often keep you awake at night) and look for something that doesn’t have the added responsibility?

Almost 20 years experience means nothing to some employers! AIBU?

Any employers who have a view on this increase, please let me know how this might affect you and your staff.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Horseracingbuddy · 30/10/2024 00:15

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:59

No one's said any of that. Only a gap in the market will attract new businesses, some will just never be replaced because they are no longer wanted or needed, twas ever thus.

Why should the lowest paid always be sacrificed for the greater good but no one else? Why should they bear all the burden and always take one for the team so Janice can continue to run the cute little coffee shop or pub she's always dreamed of or whatever?

I'm sorry that some small business owners will probably find themselves in difficulty because of this, but low paid workers have found themselves in difficulty for ages and no one cared then and they clearly still don't care now so yeah they're going to celebrate that finally they will be forced to care and put their hands in their pockets.

Besides those same ex business owners will probably be glad of improved labour laws and wage protections when they find themselves back in the labour force. Maybe they'll see the value of them finally then. It really is such a shame so many can't see past the ends of their noses.

Do you see the prospect of growing the economy anytime soon?

Maggispice · 30/10/2024 00:11

Carpr · 29/10/2024 20:01

I think we can expect to see more do it yourself in retail,

Thomas Sowell, gave an example of how not long ago when you went to the cinema to watch of movie there will be young people there with a little flash light to lead you to your seat. Now most don't do this anymore.
More supermarkets are installing self service etc.
These are jobs young people used to do.

Higher minimum wage only results in more unemployment, less innovation, ambition and graft.

Wages should match the value the market places on the amount of productivity generated by the worker.

Labour will soon increase welfare benefits. Pay more people to administer all sorts of benefits. The bloated middle men. Yet those who contribute valuable productivity feel poorer. Eventually they'll be less productive and the country will go bust.

“Unfortunately, the real minimum wage is always zero, regardless of the laws, and that is the wage that many workers receive in the wake of the creation or escalation of a government-mandated minimum wage, because they lose their jobs or fail to find jobs when they enter the labor force. Making it illegal to pay less than a given amount does not make a worker’s productivity worth that amount—and, if it is not, that worker is unlikely to be employed.”
― Thomas Sowell, Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:59

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:52

But hey, someone who has magic money will swoop in to create a new service because there will be such demand and the service will be so viable.

Christ knows how they'll get the business plan past the bank outlining how they can run the business when the previous one went tits up, but hey, we live in an economy thats always expanding right? Cos thats how its always been.

And stagnation and social and economic decline isn't possible.

Oh wait thats part of the point. The only people who can set up will be those who already have the capital (and no costs associated with loans) and they can come in and cyphen off the profits off shore. Cos thats just so great for us all. Theres no need to undercut anyone. Why would you? Thats just going to hurt your bottomline.

Disaster Capitalism is where its at in 2024.

No one's said any of that. Only a gap in the market will attract new businesses, some will just never be replaced because they are no longer wanted or needed, twas ever thus.

Why should the lowest paid always be sacrificed for the greater good but no one else? Why should they bear all the burden and always take one for the team so Janice can continue to run the cute little coffee shop or pub she's always dreamed of or whatever?

I'm sorry that some small business owners will probably find themselves in difficulty because of this, but low paid workers have found themselves in difficulty for ages and no one cared then and they clearly still don't care now so yeah they're going to celebrate that finally they will be forced to care and put their hands in their pockets.

Besides those same ex business owners will probably be glad of improved labour laws and wage protections when they find themselves back in the labour force. Maybe they'll see the value of them finally then. It really is such a shame so many can't see past the ends of their noses.

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:52

Horseracingbuddy · 29/10/2024 23:38

Sorry to hear this, looks like your community will lose a valuable service.

But hey, someone who has magic money will swoop in to create a new service because there will be such demand and the service will be so viable.

Christ knows how they'll get the business plan past the bank outlining how they can run the business when the previous one went tits up, but hey, we live in an economy thats always expanding right? Cos thats how its always been.

And stagnation and social and economic decline isn't possible.

Oh wait thats part of the point. The only people who can set up will be those who already have the capital (and no costs associated with loans) and they can come in and cyphen off the profits off shore. Cos thats just so great for us all. Theres no need to undercut anyone. Why would you? Thats just going to hurt your bottomline.

Disaster Capitalism is where its at in 2024.

HairyPie · 29/10/2024 23:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

flosset · 29/10/2024 23:41

Whilst I'm happy this will help those on minimum wage jobs I can't help but feel so demotivated in my own role. I'm a social worker and work for the public sector (not a local authority but other government sector) I am only on £2.20 an hour more than this
For the stress I'm under and case load I manage it's just not worth it. I know it isn't a job you do for the money but the pressure, expectations and accountability is crazy high :(

Horseracingbuddy · 29/10/2024 23:38

Trikey · 29/10/2024 23:14

I think this will finish my pre-school which has been running for 30 years. The nmw increase, the rise in employer NI contributions, the fact we can't charge top-up fees and the funding that doesn't match what it actually costs to provide places. Successive governments have meddled with and distorted the sector so much that it is now un-workable.
We are a not for profit small, excellent setting but we can't run at a loss.

Sorry to hear this, looks like your community will lose a valuable service.

Shitshower · 29/10/2024 23:37

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:14

We could approach this in a different wage and not actually make it about wages, but properly fairly tasking people and business who can find all the legal loopholes to avoid taxation that small businesses can't.

That way you raise treasury income so the need to tax small business as heavily is reduced. It also means you can reduce taxation on citizens in other ways.

So the cost of living crisis eases and wages go further.

You could also do a lot to tackle the rental market which is fleecing a lot of the poorest in society (and most likely to be on MW).

Again you solve the issues in a different way without jeapordising crucial public and community services that many small businesses provide.

But nope this is actually all about the stranglehold these huge multinationals have and how they are able to direct the political narative so people just bleat on about wages as if this is the solution to the problem.

Its really not. Its going to produce a whole pile of its own economic and social issues.

That nursery you desparately need so you can go to your MW job is now the only one in town. So what are you going to do? You have to take a job or lose your benefits. But lack of places and rising costs means the nursery left in town can hike its prices up massively. Oh fuck you are priced out cos you can't compete with those on £60k.

Whoopie.

There are far too many people who have totally one dimenionsal thinking on this.

My thinking isn’t one dimensional. It’s just not the same as yours.
Yes, all of that can be done, but none of it happens overnight and all of it should be alongside wages rising.
Again, as I have said before, this is not an issue when higher wage earners get an increase, only when the poorly paid do.
It is not my responsibility to worry about how the NHS will be funded, if the local public will shut, whether my increase will push prices up, it’s not fair to expect NMW earners to never earn more because we will crash the system, whilst anyone higher earning than us is totally justified in their increased earnings.

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:33

Laptoppie · 29/10/2024 23:21

You're one of the most ignorant posters I've ever seen on here, and that's saying something.

Good argument.

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:31

Walkden · 29/10/2024 23:24

"Its. Not. A. Wage. Issue.
Its. A. Cost. Of. Living. Issue"

Patronising. People. Like. This. Does. Not. Make . You. Right

No.

Patronising doesn't make me right.
Being right makes me right.

😂

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:31

Laptoppie · 29/10/2024 23:16

Or the government could support SMEs? They're often the drivers for innovation and growth, they often offer jobs in areas the big businesses don't bother going to, and often offer skills or services not found in abundance elsewhere. I think they should top up low earners wages in small companies, ones with a huge turnover should have to pay the wages themselves- like the supermarkets.

...They often exploit their workers worse than larger companies who at least usually have clued up legal departments to quash their most exploitative ideas.

Where I live the majority of people are employed in the hospitality sector, the tales I could tell you about small "family" businesses and the way they treat their staff would make your hair curl!

No, they can't be trusted and like almost all businesses must be forced to treat their staff decently. Those who pay NMW would pay less if they could.

IDontHateRainbows · 29/10/2024 23:29

BIossomtoes · 29/10/2024 23:18

Fucking hell. Do people really think like this?

I believe it was ironic. Although the poster forgot to mention gruel.

Lucy25 · 29/10/2024 23:29

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:14

We could approach this in a different wage and not actually make it about wages, but properly fairly tasking people and business who can find all the legal loopholes to avoid taxation that small businesses can't.

That way you raise treasury income so the need to tax small business as heavily is reduced. It also means you can reduce taxation on citizens in other ways.

So the cost of living crisis eases and wages go further.

You could also do a lot to tackle the rental market which is fleecing a lot of the poorest in society (and most likely to be on MW).

Again you solve the issues in a different way without jeapordising crucial public and community services that many small businesses provide.

But nope this is actually all about the stranglehold these huge multinationals have and how they are able to direct the political narative so people just bleat on about wages as if this is the solution to the problem.

Its really not. Its going to produce a whole pile of its own economic and social issues.

That nursery you desparately need so you can go to your MW job is now the only one in town. So what are you going to do? You have to take a job or lose your benefits. But lack of places and rising costs means the nursery left in town can hike its prices up massively. Oh fuck you are priced out cos you can't compete with those on £60k.

Whoopie.

There are far too many people who have totally one dimenionsal thinking on this.

One dimensional thinking! Maybe, it’s more to do with, people have different views, that you disagree with and are going by their own work experience.How dare people for ‘bleating’

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:27

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:14

We could approach this in a different wage and not actually make it about wages, but properly fairly tasking people and business who can find all the legal loopholes to avoid taxation that small businesses can't.

That way you raise treasury income so the need to tax small business as heavily is reduced. It also means you can reduce taxation on citizens in other ways.

So the cost of living crisis eases and wages go further.

You could also do a lot to tackle the rental market which is fleecing a lot of the poorest in society (and most likely to be on MW).

Again you solve the issues in a different way without jeapordising crucial public and community services that many small businesses provide.

But nope this is actually all about the stranglehold these huge multinationals have and how they are able to direct the political narative so people just bleat on about wages as if this is the solution to the problem.

Its really not. Its going to produce a whole pile of its own economic and social issues.

That nursery you desparately need so you can go to your MW job is now the only one in town. So what are you going to do? You have to take a job or lose your benefits. But lack of places and rising costs means the nursery left in town can hike its prices up massively. Oh fuck you are priced out cos you can't compete with those on £60k.

Whoopie.

There are far too many people who have totally one dimenionsal thinking on this.

So another prospective nursery provider spots the gap in the market and money to be made and sets up, undercutting the original one, oh and then another and another, and the price reduces. Come on you read about this is school yes?

This is actually why essential services should not be privatised in my opinion so they aren't subject to this kind of market flux and I suppose we could all argue about whether a nursery is an essential service or not but we should probably have another thread. I actually would most likely come down on the side that they are essential and in my opinion should be nationalised along with the NHS, all utilities, public transport and social care but that really is another thread.

MintsPi · 29/10/2024 23:27

BIossomtoes · 29/10/2024 23:18

Fucking hell. Do people really think like this?

I wasn't being entirely serious..I earn 11.94 a hour myself..

But this is what the argument is seeming boiling down to. NMW increase is bad but benefit tops are also bad. We need people to work as cleaners, carers, retail workers etc but not in a capacity where they can have a little bit of anything above the basics. The only way to balance things is to bring in some form of cheap communal living. Satisfies those who think the minimum wage earners should know their place.

friendlycat · 29/10/2024 23:27

Laptoppie · 29/10/2024 23:21

You're one of the most ignorant posters I've ever seen on here, and that's saying something.

Quite agree. The person you are responding to is clueless about business.

MangoRose · 29/10/2024 23:26

Trikey · 29/10/2024 23:14

I think this will finish my pre-school which has been running for 30 years. The nmw increase, the rise in employer NI contributions, the fact we can't charge top-up fees and the funding that doesn't match what it actually costs to provide places. Successive governments have meddled with and distorted the sector so much that it is now un-workable.
We are a not for profit small, excellent setting but we can't run at a loss.

This will happen to so many settings. People just do not understand the impact of these rises, as shown on this thread.

Walkden · 29/10/2024 23:24

"Its. Not. A. Wage. Issue.
Its. A. Cost. Of. Living. Issue"

Patronising. People. Like. This. Does. Not. Make . You. Right

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:22

ZoeZee · 29/10/2024 23:19

I’m probably bitter as I work for someone (not original employer) who doesn’t think anything of blowing £1K on parking fines, new cars, money really is no object.

I do need to leave for my own sanity!

See this is the real point.

Theres a world of difference between that and someone who is putting in 60 or 70 hours a week and taking far less home per week than their staff who do 35 hours on NMW.

DownThePubWithStevieNicks · 29/10/2024 23:21

MintsPi · 29/10/2024 23:16

I am completely against the rise. This will lead to a huge increase in my weekly shop. The staff there are friendly but I am not concerned if they can pay their bills or not. Getting my shopping cheaper is far more of a concern.

Maybe the government could look at building large communal homes where all these workers can live? Food, water, heating and a small room all supplied in exchange for their wages. If they want anything more than that they should have worked harder.

Says a lot about this thread that I can’t be completely sure this is a joke!

Laptoppie · 29/10/2024 23:21

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:20

Of course there would be, but hopefully they'd be ran by people smart enough to understand the nature of business and consider risk and weigh it up against uncertain reward!

You're one of the most ignorant posters I've ever seen on here, and that's saying something.

RedToothBrush · 29/10/2024 23:20

Its. Not. A. Wage. Issue.

Its. A. Cost. Of. Living. Issue.

Its about inflation. Even if you get a pay rise this doesn't mean your quality of life improves. It only improves if inflation isn't also pushed up. And you retain a job and the ability to get to work (child care and transportation). And you don't tip the economy into resession because of ll these business going pop. And then renters and mortgage owners end up defaulting.

Small businesses have had to absorb particular steep increases in costs across the board in a very short period. This will be the final straw for so many.

hamsterchump · 29/10/2024 23:20

Lulubo1 · 29/10/2024 23:14

If everyone had that mindset, there would be no businesses or jobs at all. Smh

Of course there would be, but hopefully they'd be ran by people smart enough to understand the nature of business and consider risk and weigh it up against uncertain reward!

cardibach · 29/10/2024 23:20

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 29/10/2024 23:18

How can you not see that if minimum wage goes up, everyone not on minimum wage will want their wage to rise by the same amount?

Where did I say anything of the sort?
You already pay more than NMW, and presumably have a pay structure your staff is happy with. You won’t be affected.

ZoeZee · 29/10/2024 23:19

I’m probably bitter as I work for someone (not original employer) who doesn’t think anything of blowing £1K on parking fines, new cars, money really is no object.

I do need to leave for my own sanity!

OP posts: