Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Expected to start teams meetings?

457 replies

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 14:40

I’ve started a new job and my diary for now is very empty with few meetings and there’s quite a lot of training material that I have to go through.

My manager is always in back to back meetings and he’s put two 30 minute catchups in with me for the first month. From experience meetings tend to overrun so I’ve waited for him to be ready for our call and then I’ll hop on as I’m just reading - or he might need a loo break or get a drink.

Today it got to 5 past our meeting and he messaged me to say “are you joining”. So I started the call and he said that I am expected to always start the meetings.

Obviously once I’m more busy I won’t even give it a second thought as to who starts a meeting, but this seems such a weird rule to me.

OP posts:
LouiseTopaz · 29/10/2024 17:28

He's your manager and if he's asking you to start meetings first then that's what you should do. Like others have said you can put yourself on mute and wait for him to join. You can still study your training materials until he joins. If he's in back to back meetings and one over runs he'll be waiting to see if you join the meeting before leaving one earlier for no reason

purplebeansprouts · 29/10/2024 17:28

TheSilkWorm · 29/10/2024 15:48

No! That's not what's happening. Senior staff with very full diaries need to juggle their time. If he was in a meeting that was running on, and you started your meeting, he could then choose to either end the meeting he was in to join you, or message you in the chat to say running 5 minutes late or whatever. But you sitting there like a spare part waiting for him means he's more likely to overrun in his other meeting because he assumes you're not ready. Like it or not senior managers often have a lot of demands on their time and it's up to those junior to them to manage their own time efficiently and not add to time pressures of those with greater levels of responsibility. It's not a power play, it's a time efficiency issue.

Yeah he's not going to end a meeting in the hopes you remember to turn up

RawBloomers · 29/10/2024 17:27

I think he's probably irritated that you haven't been ready for him at previous meetings despite doing self directed work at the moment. He doesn't see it as you giving him the space to finish off whatever he was doing and being ready to drop in as soon as he says he's ready for you, he sees it as you thinking your time is more important than his and that you think he should be prompting you. Whereas he thinks his time as more important and that you should have everything ready so he can drop in when he's ready.

I suspect (based on bosses I've had) he's a bit disorganized, runs everything up to the wire, gets distracted easily and relies on prompts like you starting the meeting to move him on from one task to the other. But he frames that in his head as him being super busy and important.

It's kind of irrelevant though, as I'm sure you've realised, he's your boss and you just need to suck it up.

Squigface · 29/10/2024 17:26

I’m sure this has been said a million times already, but if you’re sitting there doing nothing reading training materials, then it’s not at all unreasonable for your boss to expect you to start all the meetings! You’ve said yourself that he’s got back-to-back meetings, so you starting the meeting (and generating the “meeting started” dialogue box) is HIS prompt to say “gotta go, due in another meeting”… It really is that simple!

To be fair, is this is all you’ve got to worry about at work, I’m very envious of your job!

Ewock · 29/10/2024 17:26

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 16:02

Ah yes the old Mumsnet trope of “you sound aggressive” - would you always like to throw in “are you usually this angry?”

No one is being aggressive. If you’re choosing to read text in an aggressive manner then carry on, but just because that’s your narrative it doesn’t make it true.

And I’m solely posting for opinions on what I said. The people that wet their pants and fall over themselves to tell you how you won’t last in your job and how they personally view you as irrelevant to me - they don’t know me, they don’t work with me, they know nothing about my work history. I could turn around and say you’re shite at your job and you wouldn’t care because I’m a stranger to you and neither do I employ you.

Ahhh the old Mumsnet trope of ignoring what else was said and focusing on one part.
You don't like it so speak to him. Or suck it up and do as you've been asked.

That's the choices you realistically have. You've made it clear on here you're not happy, you think anyone who calls a superior "boss" is outdated. You don't seem to want to take advice. So again why put it on here? Lots have people have given you different perspectives but you say he demanded so that's that.
As you say we don't know you or you us so people can only offer advice based on your comments and how that comes across. Hopefully you can find a solution that you're happy with and works for you and your direct line (not sure what he is in your workplace)

Nanny0gg · 29/10/2024 17:25

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 15:22

Thankfully I’ve never had a manager before that pulls power moves and see anyone below them as the little people.

You think because someone is (gasp) a manager that it entitles them to sit staring at a screen and refusing a start a meeting because they deem themselves as too senior?

Did you read the suggestions that he might be in another meeting which he will wind up when he sees you're ready?

Why assume he's on a power trip?

coffeesaveslives · 29/10/2024 17:25

Your attitude stinks.

I expect if you carry on as you are, you won't need to worry about who starts the meetings anymore.

PuddlesPityParty · 29/10/2024 17:22

Also OP if you’re new to the job and in your probation maybe just stop acting like a dick?

Teddyjumper · 29/10/2024 17:22

Regardless of who set the meeting up, I would join it and start it on time. I'd split my screen and work on something else until he joined.

Westofeasttoday · 29/10/2024 17:22

Gwenhwyfar · 29/10/2024 16:03

Then why is her boss making a big deal out of it?

He really isn’t. Perhaps he can’t understand why a new employee trying to make a good impression wouldn’t attend the meeting in time and start the meeting at the prescribed time.

Westofeasttoday · 29/10/2024 17:21

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 14:54

Yeah thank you, that’s my whole point.

He is demanding I start all meetings. So he’s seemingly happy to sit there until I decide to start the meeting.

I had a reason for waiting for him, and if he doesn’t think it’s valid or needed then fine. But I don’t see why there has to be a rule of the person less senior starting it?

He isn’t demanding let’s be clear. He’s your boss, you didn’t show up to a meeting on time (and yeah that means more when you are new), he should know you aren’t in meetings so no reason to be late and you are complaining.

Join the meeting on time and understand corporate culture,

PuddlesPityParty · 29/10/2024 17:18

BeMintBee · 29/10/2024 16:00

Ahh bless your sensitive soul. Maybe the boss is a boomer and can’t find the start meeting button so needs his minion to do it for him.

LOL. Just calling it out because if you make a comment about boomers on here the oldies all cry. Why can’t I call it out back?

NewFriendlyLadybird · 29/10/2024 17:15

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 15:57

I can’t find the post now, but I agree there’s too many outdated opinions on this thread. Even using the word “boss” seems so beyond outdated to me. Seems the type of word someone in middle management would use to describe themselves and declare they “pay your wages” - as if it directly comes out of their HSBC current account.

I’ve been lucky that I’ve had good managers previously that don’t make up pointless rules to insert authority. Ive only ever had one manager who lorded his authority and he lost his position and was demoted within six months.

Times have drastically moved on since Covid.

😂oh dear oh dear oh dear.

nam3c4ang3 · 29/10/2024 17:13

HI Op - this is fairly standard for someone junior to start, its not a hard and fast rule, its more of an 'unwritten rule' where i am - personally (i am a manager) i dont quite care who starts the call first, people are busy, meetings over run etc, but i am in the minority - im my own company, its the juniors who are always assumed to have to start the meeting. If your diary is empty-ish - then i dont see the issue, you might be thoughtful in the reasons behind your process of starting late - but meetings should start on time, he will turn up when he does, but it needs to be started. Sound like he is a bit more traditional in the manager-junior stance.

Ewock · 29/10/2024 17:13

surrpundedby · 29/10/2024 16:02

Ah yes the old Mumsnet trope of “you sound aggressive” - would you always like to throw in “are you usually this angry?”

No one is being aggressive. If you’re choosing to read text in an aggressive manner then carry on, but just because that’s your narrative it doesn’t make it true.

And I’m solely posting for opinions on what I said. The people that wet their pants and fall over themselves to tell you how you won’t last in your job and how they personally view you as irrelevant to me - they don’t know me, they don’t work with me, they know nothing about my work history. I could turn around and say you’re shite at your job and you wouldn’t care because I’m a stranger to you and neither do I employ you.

🤣🤪

Dutchhouse14 · 29/10/2024 17:09

I can see why you did this, but no harm in joining first and waiting.
I think manager was a bit rude to say are you joining when they hadn't joined meeting themselves.
I think it's just a communication thing/differing expectations.
It's not a big issue. Just explain why you hadn't started it but say next time you'll start meeting and wait for then to join.
In our organisation anyone can be the first to join, there's no expectation that it has to be either a junior or senior member of staff to join first/start meeting

JanetheObscure · 29/10/2024 17:06

OP. As starting a Teams meeting takes a nanosecond, is probably a daily action for hundreds of thousands of workers and is not some sort of punishment, what exactly is the problem?

purplebeansprouts · 29/10/2024 17:05

OnlyFoolsnMothers · 29/10/2024 14:51

I understand you’re trying to come across as whenever you’re ready to your boss but actually it screams rude because they’re waiting for you. Join and mute at the meeting time. Sometimes I join and then get a teams to reschedule or the person will call me when free- but I’m always available and on time.

I guess it's a bit like back in the day if you were meeting him in his office at a certain time, you might sit in the nice waiting area outside and let his secretary know you were there.

HolyPeaches · 29/10/2024 17:02

@surrpundedby are you in the NHS (corporate)?

No point arguing with the manager OP. Or just leave and find a different job if this one is too much hassle for you.

purplebeansprouts · 29/10/2024 17:02

This!

SoNiceToComeHomeTo · 29/10/2024 17:01

It would freak me out too, OP, first week in a new job and all, but you didn't do anything wrong. It was just a misunderstanding and you'll know next time.

Mummyoflittledragon · 29/10/2024 17:01

By the sound of it your manager doesn’t want the stress and responsibility for starting the meetings so as to prevent people from be kept waiting. He / she was probably taken aback that you were late to the meeting, which would indicate poor time keeping, rudeness etc.

Stravaig · 29/10/2024 17:01

This thread is reminding me of a radio phone-in show about employers finding it difficult to hire new young employees who are grounded, capable, and have any semblance of work ethic. They are all feelings, and imagined slights, and 'I have better things to do today, you don't mind do you'. 🤣

Peaceandquietandacuppa · 29/10/2024 16:59

If a meeting starts at 10, you join at that time and then wait on mute. Teams notifications don’t always pop up when someone starts the call so it’s safer that way. I say this as someone who always waits for their manager to join!

EBearhug · 29/10/2024 16:58

We are expected to be there on time - everyone joining, whoever happens to be first starts the meeting. If the person chairing the call isn't there, there's usually some chat first, which may or may not be work-related. If someone will be late, regardless of ran, they will message to say so.

However, in my previous place, we used different meeting software, and by default, the person arranging the meeting had to open it, unless they'd had the foresight to clicking the "any attendant can open meeting" button, which many meeting arrangers forgot to do.

So I think it can depend on company culture and software configuration.