Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To choose the local state comp over the high achieving private boys school?

185 replies

Seaofcake · 27/10/2024 10:42

We have narrowed down our secondary school choices to two options and DH and I disagree about which one is best. DH is willing to pay for private and although it wouldn’t by any means be a drop in the ocean, we could do it.

We’ve gone round in circles with this decision. My pros and cons are below. Any advice would really be welcome.

State comp

Pros

  • Mixed sex
  • 10 minute drive in rush hour. He could walk or catch the bus eventually.
  • Ofsted report is outstanding in all areas
  • Enrichment programme
  • Strict on behaviour
  • 1.5 mile catchment, local kids
  • Get to stay in area and younger DC can go to primary when ready.

Cons

  • Less chance for trips and opportunities, will need to fight for them
  • Some kids look rough when we’ve hung around during end of school day (but there is a good number of polite, decent kids too; it’s just very varied)
  • Only 20% scored above 7 in English and Maths
  • Strict but some rules are over the top

Private school

Pros

  • Excellent GCSE and A level scores
  • Excellent extra-curriculars
  • Excellent and varied trips
  • Well behaved, polite boys

Cons

  • Boys school so limited social opportunities with girls. No contact with girls till 16
  • It’s a city school with little greenery
  • School finishes at 16:00 but coach gets back at 17:15 and that’s without after-school clubs
  • Have to get the coach in the morning too and it leaves at 07:40 so it makes for a very long day
  • If he does clubs, they finish at 17:30 but coach gets back at 18:40
  • Forced to move?
  • Can afford an extended semi in the city centre but it doesn’t have the greenery of our current location and we will lose the catchment of our local primary for younger DC who are due to join in a few years time

What would you do?

OP posts:
SmallhopesPenny · 27/10/2024 20:10

Hopelessinhomecounties · 27/10/2024 18:16

I’d narrow it down to extra curricular.

Does you son like sports or music/art …
If the private school has lots of opportunities for extra curricular and he’s going to make use of them that is a big factor.
We had a similar situation and went state. The extra curricular on the town is amazing but we are always travelling and dropping the kids off at clubs all over town. Sometimes I wish I’d just gone private and had a one stop shop.
However I think my kids will get similar grades as if they’d gone to private. So state is great value for money !

extra curricular may be excellent at state school though. My DD goes to state school and gets:
-trampolining club (free)
-LAMDA drama (free)
-debate club (free)
-writing club (free)
-sax lessons (paid for by me)

there's also football, netball, gymnastics, rugby STEAM, art, skateboarding, dance, SEN homework support, languages etc

NalafromtheLionKing · 27/10/2024 20:08

Looking at the first cons list, you already know the answer OP.

SmallhopesPenny · 27/10/2024 20:03

TheaBrandt · 27/10/2024 19:59

“All the kids have given up sports”

Gosh if I said similar about “all the private school children” I would be jumped on 🙄🙄. What utter nonsense. Our state school
children have all played sport and not had boyfriends. They socialise with state and private pupils and I can assure you the teens from the two sectors are utterly interchangeable.

my daughter hated sport in primary but loves it at secondary (state) she loves netball and trampolining now.

ThreeGreen · 27/10/2024 20:02

I went to a selective state around a 45 min coach journey away which had a fairly large catchment area. The journey didn’t massively bother me but the distance and catchment meant I had friends who all lived quite far from me. My parents spent a lot of my school days driving me around to friends houses / parties etc. Not the most important thing I know but just something to consider

LifeD1lemma · 27/10/2024 20:01

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 27/10/2024 19:58

The comp is not selective so her child (assuming he got a place at the selective private) is likely to be within that top 20%, and should therefore come out with exactly the same grades as if he’d gone to the independent.

That's a big assumption. You surely don't think grades are purely based on a student's intelligence and have nothing to do with the quality of teaching, class sizes, the speed/level a class is taught at based on the ability of the other students in the class etc? Lots of state schools can't even reliably recruit enough qualified teachers in some subjects at the moment. Classes end up just being supervised by unqualified cover teachers. Even GCSE classes sometimes.

Yes but 20% of the kids at this school get top grades - that is a large percentage (above the National average) and I’d be willing to put good money on the OP‘s son who is (a) bright, (b) affluent, with ability to afford private tuition if need be, and (c) has engaged supportive parents making it into that top 20%. Indeed, it would be odd if he didn’t.

Possible, of course, if he went totally off the rails, but that could happen at any school.

SmallhopesPenny · 27/10/2024 20:00

TeenToTwenties · 27/10/2024 14:25

@Charlotte120221

A lot of the answers on here are "state but tutor straight away" - which sounds rather sad. Either a school provides a decent education or it doesn't.

I don't think that's true. A school can be fine in general, but have a weak point, as can a student. You wouldn't tutor in all subjects, that would be ridiculous, but some 1-1 help in a weak subject (or for that matter a subject of special interest) can give a bit of dedicated time. I also wouldn't tutor straight away unless there was already a known issue.

(What does surprise me is people who pay for private and still tutor on top of that!)

Ultimately it comes down to the specific state school, and the specific private school, and the funds of the person paying.

I went to a private school on an assisted place. Whilst the atmosphere was calm and rather enjoyably quaint, the teaching was nothing to write home about, and in some cases, abysmal. Children were expected to have private tuition if they were falling behind... even when it's the fault of the shoddy teaching.

I was behind in French bc I'd transferred from a different school and the teacher was horrible to me. Didn't help me at all, just picked on me in class and told me to concentrate.

I remember Spanish being offered for the first time at the school and the teacher could barely speak it- apparently she was doing gcse Spanish at the same as teaching it... (she got away with it because she taught French and German at the school).

TheaBrandt · 27/10/2024 19:59

“All the kids have given up sports”

Gosh if I said similar about “all the private school children” I would be jumped on 🙄🙄. What utter nonsense. Our state school
children have all played sport and not had boyfriends. They socialise with state and private pupils and I can assure you the teens from the two sectors are utterly interchangeable.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 27/10/2024 19:58

The comp is not selective so her child (assuming he got a place at the selective private) is likely to be within that top 20%, and should therefore come out with exactly the same grades as if he’d gone to the independent.

That's a big assumption. You surely don't think grades are purely based on a student's intelligence and have nothing to do with the quality of teaching, class sizes, the speed/level a class is taught at based on the ability of the other students in the class etc? Lots of state schools can't even reliably recruit enough qualified teachers in some subjects at the moment. Classes end up just being supervised by unqualified cover teachers. Even GCSE classes sometimes.

Ncocta · 27/10/2024 19:55

If money isn’t a concern then private for sure. Teenagers change fast and can be influenced by peers easily - having friends who have taught at local comprehensive high schools - none of them want to send their kids there if they had a choice. Just the lack of discipline and disruption one or two kids have in the class even if your kid is one that wants to learn. It’s a no brainer if money is not a concern

SmallhopesPenny · 27/10/2024 19:54

Neveragain35 · 27/10/2024 11:41

I work in a state school and both my DC go to the local state school. I assure you it is “cool” to do all those things- DD is a sports leader, has done D of E, participated in school shows, been on amazing school trips etc. Honestly sometimes I wonder what private school educated people actually think goes on in a state school!

Personally I think being able to walk to school and have local friends is so important. I am also vehemently anti selective schooling in all forms, due to the elitism and inequality it perpetuates and I think it’s important to demonstrate those values to my DC.

Edited

Same for my DD who attends a local comp. She loves it and is in no way teased for playing instruments or liking maths and science.

She goes to an after school club every day of the week.

She has local friends, some of whom she walks to school with. And how lovely that she can walk to school too!

NoNapsNowPlease · 27/10/2024 19:52

Definitely private but that’s based on my personal experience with a crappy local state school plus seeing the opportunities / connections my kids have had having gone through private.

LifeD1lemma · 27/10/2024 19:52

catstaff47 · 27/10/2024 18:22

Hi OP - you say only 20% at the state option achieve grades 7-9 at GCSE. What is the percentage at the independent?

Eg. if it's 30% 7-9 at the independent, probably wouldn't bother. But if it's something like 90% 7-9 at the independent, that's obviously a very different matter!

Is it though?

If the private is selective at 11 then 90% could even be a low figure.

The comp is not selective so her child (assuming he got a place at the selective private) is likely to be within that top 20%, and should therefore come out with exactly the same grades as if he’d gone to the independent.

FrodisCapering · 27/10/2024 19:52

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn at author's request

amIloud · 27/10/2024 19:51

Secondly two warnings:

Fees have gone up ridiculously since just after Covid I'm talking 8% rises year on year.

Calculate VAT. It will happen.

Finally project the 8% fee rises into the future plus the VAT.

Oh finally finally - instrument lessons (c£300 per term per instrument) and finally finally the trips and the extra curricular outside of school. All the kids will do netball, cricket, hockey, athletics outside of school as well as in school.

HairyToity · 27/10/2024 19:50

We went state. I felt my child would fit in better, and be happier. So far no regrets, private would have been a stress. In the back of my mind my dad died when I was 13, and I wanted finances to be secure above anything else.

amIloud · 27/10/2024 19:48

I would say Private. Hear me out, we have an outstanding comp near us but all the kids have given up sport (in the main). It's cooler to have extensions than play netball, it's cooler to have a boyfriend than focus on an instrument, having done outstanding state primary, considered the outstanding comp, we went private, the differences in kids and their focus from state to private is so very different.

Araminta1003 · 27/10/2024 19:46

The private school sounds like a lot more work for your DS and you as a whole family! Whereas the state option sounds good and easy. I would definitely at least try the state option first, move him in year 9 if he doesn’t thrive. Unis and the Government appear anti private school so why work harder and put yourselves through that? It’s better and cheaper to just get tutors if you need to.

Timetoread · 27/10/2024 19:43

I don't know what I would do but you list more pros than cons for the state and more cons than pros for the private, so on the basis of quantity of pros/cons you have given yourself the answer. If some weigh more than others is another matter and also is you husband's list the same?

sunbum · 27/10/2024 19:38

I cal bullshit on the 'we only recruit state school'. Aside from being discrimination, that your HR department would never let you get away with, I do grad recruitment and is largely institution blind these days.

VeraYin · 27/10/2024 19:27

If he's bright I'd choose state, as he'll do well there and be in that top 20%. As it's not selective they'll have all abilities entering GCSE, so their results can't be compared with a selective private school.

If he has additional needs I'd choose private as they will cater for him better.

Easipeelerie · 27/10/2024 19:22

My private school regret is that DD can’t now have a contextual university offer. She’s at a state college but you need to have gone to a state secondary as well. I think she’s probably the only student in her year at her college that won’t get a contextual offer.

Montydone · 27/10/2024 19:13

pestothepenguin · 27/10/2024 18:23

I've not read all the comments but have you missed this

Private you are buying in to network that cannot be rivalled in state.

This is a really interesting post - do you mean like buying into privilege in a sense?

Montydone · 27/10/2024 19:10

This sounds like a great state school, with an outstanding ofsted.
Where does your DS want to go?
I went to a good state school and got really good GCSEs (all As A*s) as did my friendship group and have a PhD now; a state educated family member is at Oxford uni now. It depends on your DS’s character - do you think he needs a particular environment in order to meet his potential? How do you think he will navigate socially in a single sex setting? Does he have close female friends and family members?
Having gone mixed sex, I always appreciated the boys being around - I was bullied and they were mich kinder to me than girls. Also I learnt loads about talking to and navigating the opposite sex which some private and grammar educated friends say they really missed.
In my job now I am really pleased that I mixed growing up with individuals from lots of different backgrounds; different financial situations, I think it really helped me understand a lot about our community. And in fact a number of the most interesting and clever kids at my school I don’t think would have had the finances to go private.
I want this for my kids and if we have an outstanding state school near us then I will definitely be sending my kids there.

Nomorescreentime · 27/10/2024 18:48

Neither sound like a bad choice, OP - a nice problem to have :) I’d just go and look around both, make the journey from both at the times he’d be travelling, to help make an informed decision. How much homework do the private school give - will he be pressured for time after bussing home? Some people don’t find that an important factor, others do. Do you really have an appetite to move home? Only you and your family can answer these questions. Sounds like he’ll do well wherever he ends up.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 27/10/2024 18:39

I'd be interested to know where you got the information you listed about what each of the schools is like. Hearsay? School website? Open Day? Friends with dc currently at the schools?

Obviously schools can't fake Ofsted reports or exam results, but I would take what they say about behaviour with a pinch of salt. No school will say 'We are lax on behaviour' or 'behaviour is poor at this school'. The state school might have a strict behaviour policy, but that doesn't necessarily mean there isn't lots of bad behaviour.

As a teacher, and with bitter experience of my choice of schools for my own dc, I'd rather send my child to a school that didn't actually need draconian discipline methods because there was just a culture of good behaviour. In reality, this is to do with the intake, not the rules. I now teach at a school where behaviour is great.