Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Yorkshire Ripper question?

436 replies

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 13:42

Just read that it cost the taxpayer 11 billion to keep him alive including his funeral?
Do you still feel the same way about him being hung for his murders?

is it acceptable to the taxpayer to pay that much, when there are so many other things that the money could have been spent on, or dosent the money matter?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TorroFerney · 22/10/2024 16:59

One of my teachers at secondary school taught him. Not in my school , somewhere else. He was very quiet apparently. Op I’d take on board what she used to say. Pictures are hung, people are hanged.

Tickledpinkk · 22/10/2024 16:59

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

GoldenPheasant · 22/10/2024 16:54

Superworm24 · 22/10/2024 15:12

I'm going to go completely against the grain here and say that I'm all for the death penalty. In cases where there is overwhelming amounts of evidence and the criminal will be sentenced for the rest of their life, I feel it is more humane to end their life and their suffering.

I think it is much better for them to spend the rest of their lives thinking about their crimes and how they have no-one but themselves to blame for the fact that they have totally ruined their lives. If that actually leads them to feeling sorry for what they did, so much the better.

IntrovertInDisguise · 22/10/2024 16:53

GalacticTowelMaster · 22/10/2024 13:50

I heard it was eleventy billion

🤣🤣🤣

Tickledpinkk · 22/10/2024 16:52

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MouseMinge · 22/10/2024 16:51

I haven't read the whole thread so apologies if this has already been raised but we shouldn't assume that the death penalty saves money.

Here's a link to an Amnesty International report from last year:

Death Penalty Costs

Quicky summary. All in all, including trials, legal costs, keeping a prisoner on death row, more legal costs as there are repeals, death row costs more per year than a trial where life imprisonment is on the cards and subsequent imprisonment. Further to that it also diverts money from the whole of the criminal justice system including crime prevention, education and rehabilitation.

The cost differences aren't small. Death row system, and this is from a Californian report so I would assume these costs are just for that state, currently $137 million per year, with reforms that are being called for, $232.7 million. Life imprisonment system - so a system where there is no death penalty - $11.5 million per year. I'm sure that the amounts could be argued with. Maybe the death row system is a little less (or more) and the same with the life imprisonment system, but whichever way you look at it the cost differences between both systems are huge and all moral questions aside - and I'm against the death row system on moral grounds - the death row/death sentence system costs a lot more than life imprisonment.

N.b. the amounts are not per person per year but for they systems as a whole.

GoldenPheasant · 22/10/2024 16:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

You seriously want different sentencing for men convicted of murder? That would be a very slippery slope indeed. After all, if you can impose harsher sentences on men convicted of killing women, why should you not impose harsher sentences on women for other offences?

Why does it matter less if a wrongly convicted man is killed than a wrongly convicted woman?

ShinyShona · 22/10/2024 16:45

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 13:42

Just read that it cost the taxpayer 11 billion to keep him alive including his funeral?
Do you still feel the same way about him being hung for his murders?

is it acceptable to the taxpayer to pay that much, when there are so many other things that the money could have been spent on, or dosent the money matter?

It was estimated to be £10m, not £11bn. Even the whole of Broadmoor didn't cost £11bn to run whilst he was there. £10m could easily have been spent (and more) on a death penalty case if it was conducted in the same way as the USA with all the stages of appeal.

Had he not been judged to be insane, his incarceration would have been cheaper too.

user47 · 22/10/2024 16:40

@PassingStranger OP, please can you request a change to your thread title. Peter Sutcliffe was a weak and pathetic man. He only 'got away with it' due to the imbecility and misogyny of the police.
The murdered women's family's have repeatedly asked for him not to be called YR. Richard McCann is a hero, please respect his wishes and change the title. Thank you
https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2020/11/16/stop-calling-sutcliffe-by-his-pseudonym-pleads-son-of-his-first-murder-victim/

Son of Yorkshire Ripper's first victim reveals he forgave the killer

Richard McCann, 53, whose mother Wilma was the Yorkshire Ripper's first victim has revealed how he forgave the serial killer before his death after hearing a lecture from Desmond Tutu.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12614269/Son-Yorkshire-Rippers-victim-reveals-phoned-serial-killers-family-offer-condolences-died.html

Lifeomars · 22/10/2024 16:40

this is interesting, Ian Hislop points out the problematic nature of the death penalty to Pritti Patel

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/Azk0875MKm8?si=RDrS2FOmESStzu9U

TarantinoIsAMisogynist · 22/10/2024 16:39

Onlyonekenobe · 22/10/2024 16:38

Why the fuck should the good people of Rwanda have to put up with the scum of the UK?

This whole post is beyond disgusting. I wish such obviously racist people could all be deported. Maybe Antarctica so no other human has to deal with them.

The whole premise is just dripping with colonialist arrogance, isn't it? You'd hope that society had moved on from seeing other countries as our dumping grounds, but clearly not.

Onlyonekenobe · 22/10/2024 16:38

taxguru · 22/10/2024 14:04

Perhaps we should learn from the past and deport them, like they did when they deported criminals to Australia. How about Rwanda as a modern day alternative?? So no to actually killing them, but getting rid of them from our country, and giving them the opportunity to build a new life elsewhere at their cost and subject to their hard work, initiative etc. Sink or swim - their choice. It would be worth paying Rwanda a couple of million per person to get rid. If in years to come, it turns out they were innocent after all, then they could be brought back if they wanted.

Why the fuck should the good people of Rwanda have to put up with the scum of the UK?

This whole post is beyond disgusting. I wish such obviously racist people could all be deported. Maybe Antarctica so no other human has to deal with them.

TalesOfTheGoldMonkey · 22/10/2024 16:38

Worth it so that we don't have the death penalty, in my opinion.

tachetastic · 22/10/2024 16:36

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 13:42

Just read that it cost the taxpayer 11 billion to keep him alive including his funeral?
Do you still feel the same way about him being hung for his murders?

is it acceptable to the taxpayer to pay that much, when there are so many other things that the money could have been spent on, or dosent the money matter?

I agree that prisoners should be put to work to earn their keep while staying at His Majesty's pleasure, but I don't think cost savings can be used to justify state sanctioned murder.

GoldenPheasant · 22/10/2024 16:36

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 14:16

We dont even have whole life terms for murder anymore. Its gone too far the other way and we seem to hear of murders every week now.

You only have to look at the horrific homicide rates in the US to work out that the death penalty is no deterrent. Murderers either think they will never get caught or don't care.

Remember the Moors Murders? We had the death penalty while they were happening,

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 22/10/2024 16:31

RelationshipOrNot · 22/10/2024 15:14

Surely it's a worse punishment for the murderer to spend their life in prison than to be executed and have done with it all? I never understand this logic. (Against the death penalty btw.)

Edited to add examples: people were angry when Harold Shipman and Ariel Castro died by suicide because they were seen to have escaped justice. How would it be any different from that?

Edited

This. I remember reading about how Ian Brady wanted to die and being glad he was being made to suffer by being kept alive against his will.

Onlyonekenobe · 22/10/2024 16:29

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 13:44

yes. Amazing isnt it!

😂

So amazing that it's untrue.

Do you know that a billion is a thousand millions. A million is a huge number. 11 of them is 11 times as huge. Multiply THAT number by ONE THOUSAND and it'll be unfathomable to most humans.

And yet, so casual, "yes. Amazing isn't it!" when questioned. As casual as sanctioning state-sanctioned murder. It's not about the Yorkshire Ripper getting a punishment worthy of his crimes (11 billion of them, perhaps?). It's about living under laws where you can be killed, legally, by an administrative process. NOBODY has the right to take another person's life. Not the Ripper, and certainly not a temporarily elected government and its executives.

Definitely not anyone who doesn't know the difference between a million and a billion and casually doesn't even care.

NoMoreLifts · 22/10/2024 16:29

PassingStranger · 22/10/2024 14:23

FGS, stop going on. stop trying to appear superior. I read it as 11 billion so not my mistake.
If I post on AIBU hundreds of times, and I only make one mistake thats not bad going then. Instead of homing in one mistake, think of all the times I didnt make a mistake.🙄😋

Well, that's the main problem with the death penalty. It can't be corrected.

YesterdaysFuture · 22/10/2024 16:29

Doesn't require the death penalty, but with assisted suicide soon to be debated we should consider offering this to lifers in prison.

GoldenPheasant · 22/10/2024 16:28

taxguru · 22/10/2024 14:04

Perhaps we should learn from the past and deport them, like they did when they deported criminals to Australia. How about Rwanda as a modern day alternative?? So no to actually killing them, but getting rid of them from our country, and giving them the opportunity to build a new life elsewhere at their cost and subject to their hard work, initiative etc. Sink or swim - their choice. It would be worth paying Rwanda a couple of million per person to get rid. If in years to come, it turns out they were innocent after all, then they could be brought back if they wanted.

You really think we should deliberately put the women of Rwanda at risk?

GoldenPheasant · 22/10/2024 16:25

Zenmorning · 22/10/2024 13:46

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1360087/yorkshire-ripper-peter-sutcliffe-taxpayers-money

11 million

and yes, totally worth it not to have the death penalty

Daily Express there, lying again saying his victims' families didn't get a penny. It admits itself that some did, and the fact that others didn't was down to failures in the compensation system which wouldn't pay out to people believed to be prostitutes, even when they definitely weren't. I don't recall the Express complaining about that at the time, they almost certainly completely agreed with the refusal to pay.

chipsewfast · 22/10/2024 16:23

Goady OP can't even get the 'facts' right

DuckBushCityLimit · 22/10/2024 16:22

Yeah, the "£11 million" figure looks suspiciously like someone has just taken the most recent estimate for the annual cost of a single place at Broadmoor and multiplied it up by 32 years.

Bagpuss83 · 22/10/2024 16:21

A while back, the police brought him to Arnside to scatter his uncle's (I think) ashes as he had had a caravan there and Sutcliffe visited as a kid.

I know some people who live there. They went into the village one day and there was big police presence - roads closed etc. This is a sleepy village. Only found out later what it was about. He'd been brought all the way from Broadmoor to scatter his uncle's ashes in this specific place.

I wonder how much all that cost.

Very kind of us wasn't it?

TarantinoIsAMisogynist · 22/10/2024 16:21

housethatbuiltme · 22/10/2024 15:49

How have they come to 11 million?

In the UK they state a single persons level of income for a 'acceptable' living is £29,500 (bare in mind many people do live below this too).

That is a free person who buys the food they want, pays their own bills, rent/mortgage, own clothing and 'luxury' items (phones, internet, holidays, games consoles, music/arts etc...), has subscriptions, runs a car or pays for travel, has social days/events etc...

How can a person who lives a limited life in 1 room of a mass housing building, on pre-set micro budgeted meals, no luxury add on or associated 'fun' living costs cost over £344,000 per year?

I mean if you take running costs for a whole prison wing including electric, food and multiple salaried staffing (which is economically creating jobs) yes but he is just ONE prisoner. Even with staffing the staff costs aren't soley his.

The ministry of Justice reports the cost to keep a prisoner in their system is £32,716 annually at the moment. That makes it barely over 1 million for 32 years of incarceration and the cost are based on current inflation, they would be less in the past.

I don't think people should be so quick to accept 'shock' news paper articles as utter fact.

I don't think people should be so quick to accept 'shock' news paper articles as utter fact.

100% agree