Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DWP Work Coaches to go into MH wards

144 replies

Rinoachicken · 16/10/2024 13:19

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98y09n8201o

so when you are at you absolute lowest and most unwell (which they are if they are an inpatient as bed are so scare), possibly lacking capacity, lacking cognisance function to understand and retain information, suicidal, psychotic - some tick box Jo, who’s only knowledge of mental health was a half day online course a couple of weeks ago, is going to come along and chat about your CV?!

If you are wanting to support people who are mentally unwell back into work, those acutely unwell in a hospital setting wouldn’t be my first priority - I’d be trying to increase the support AFTER discharge once stable, to those in the community and at primary care level first surely??!!

The DWP should have NO PLACE on a mental health ward imho - where the ONLY considerations and objectives should be stabilising people’s mental health.

A medium close up of Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall wearing a blue jacket and white top with tree and bushes in background

Mental health patients could get job coach visits, says minister

Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall says trials of the idea have produced "dramatic results".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98y09n8201o

OP posts:
x2boys · 16/10/2024 14:23

NewmummyJ · 16/10/2024 14:20

Whoever thought of this clearly has never stepped foot on a mental health ward. As if you can engage someone mid psychotic episode in a discussion about work...

Nobody is going to be.doing that.

arthar · 16/10/2024 14:22

Neighboursfromhell · 16/10/2024 14:17

I don't actually think it's a horrendous idea for those nearing discharge.

Could help them as part of a plan/goal that helps them with their recovery

I think it would be detrimental to the recovery to have a work coach rock up before you had even been discharged. There is no actual need for this to happen. It's all targets and tick boxes and as usual we are collateral damage.

NewmummyJ · 16/10/2024 14:20

Whoever thought of this clearly has never stepped foot on a mental health ward. As if you can engage someone mid psychotic episode in a discussion about work...

Neighboursfromhell · 16/10/2024 14:17

I don't actually think it's a horrendous idea for those nearing discharge.

Could help them as part of a plan/goal that helps them with their recovery

arthar · 16/10/2024 14:15

KrisAkabusi · 16/10/2024 14:00

The government can't win here can they?

"The Government isn't doing enough to help mental health patients!"
"Ok, here's a programme we will trial to see if we can help people get jobs after they leave hospital"
"How dare you! I hope you get attacked by a patient you're trying to help"

People in mental health units are at their most vulnerable, it's not the time for thinking about getting back to work

listsandbudgets · 16/10/2024 14:15

Wow... will they also be sending DWP workers to cancer wards ?

I do agree that for some people helping them back into work may well be beneficial to their mental health. However, if it's got bad enough for someone to be actually admitted to hospital there are more important things to consider - like for example keeping the patients from badly damaging themselves or others.

Has the bureaucrat who made this astonishing decision ever been on a mental health ward.... or met someone who has... or asked the people who work there?? The mind boggles

KrisAkabusi · 16/10/2024 14:13

Windchimesandsong · 16/10/2024 14:09

@KrisAkabusi there's a time and a place. When someone's so unwell they're in hospital, that's not the time or place to send someone in to make them more distressed and frightened. Which is exactly what this would do. The immediate priority for someone in hospital is to focus on their health and recovery.

Also how will work coaches stressing unwell people make employers hire those unwell people? Even when someone's recovered from an illness (physical or mental illness) there's widespread discrimination by employers against disabled candidates and those with employment gaps. If anyone needs a "work coach" employers do.

From the article:

Kendall praised projects in Leicester and at the Maudsley Hospital in Camberwell, in south-east London, which offered employment support - such as training on CV writing and interviews - to people with serious mental health conditions, including on hospital wards.
"The results of getting people into work have been dramatic, and the evidence clearly shows that it is better for their mental health," she said.

Surely it's worth a bigger trial rather than dismissing it out of hand, particularly if initial results are positive?

Nellieinthebarn · 16/10/2024 14:13

This is shocking, and shows how out of touch they are. Mental Health is so underfunded, and beds so few and far between, you have to be very very unwell to be admitted at all in this area.

I know of people who have having very clear suicidal ideation and very distressing delusions, who had to go miles out of area to get a bed. And they were being sectioned.

Do they think that mental health wards are full of people who just need some positive thinking and a nice bit of fresh air?

Windchimesandsong · 16/10/2024 14:09

@KrisAkabusi there's a time and a place. When someone's so unwell they're in hospital, that's not the time or place to send someone in to make them more distressed and frightened. Which is exactly what this would do. The immediate priority for someone in hospital is to focus on their health and recovery.

Also how will work coaches stressing unwell people make employers hire those unwell people? Even when someone's recovered from an illness (physical or mental illness) there's widespread discrimination by employers against disabled candidates and those with employment gaps. If anyone needs a "work coach" employers do.

x2boys · 16/10/2024 14:06

Asci said I worked on acute mental health wards for years
These coaches are not going ti be allowed to just wander on a ward willy ,nilly
These types of wards can be loud and chaotic with some very unwell patients
At best maybe the can see patients that have consented to see them who are calm and recovering, maybe as part of their treatment plan ,nobody is going ti be forced to see them.

KrisAkabusi · 16/10/2024 14:00

The government can't win here can they?

"The Government isn't doing enough to help mental health patients!"
"Ok, here's a programme we will trial to see if we can help people get jobs after they leave hospital"
"How dare you! I hope you get attacked by a patient you're trying to help"

Windchimesandsong · 16/10/2024 13:57

It sounds quite abusive.

And what a massive waste of money. A good way to increase the "black hole in the finances".

The obvious result will be people made more ill and so less able to work. Worrying about benefits and disability assessments are known to push people over the edge - setting back any chance of getting well enough to work.

And obviously it also won't make employers hire people who aren't well enough to work. And that's the real issue re disability and illness. There are people (not on psychiatric wards) who're recovering or managing their illness - but employers won't hire them due to disability and employment gap discrimination.

If the government genuinely wants to help people get well and back in work, then they need to,

a) Have a supportive benefits system, so people don't get more ill worrying about financial survival and can instead focus on their health

b) Address the widespread disability and employment gap discrimination that jobseekers face. Perhaps they should send "work coaches" into businesses to speak to HR departments.

Also, c) More council housing. Bad or insecure housing harms health. Physical, as published in the VNJ. But also mental health.

itsjustbiology · 16/10/2024 13:52

Jasmin71 · 16/10/2024 13:49

The DWP are heinous. If you have ever been on the receiving end of interactions with their health "professionals" you would know. Cruel, mendacious, and not even remotely qualified to take a holistic approach to helping people. None of this is going to end well!

A million percent agree x

GinandGingerBeer · 16/10/2024 13:51

Rinoachicken · 16/10/2024 13:37

And I acknowledge that my views on this are probably very much influenced by the fact O have ZERO faith that these DWP staff will have sufficient training, based on my experience of DWP.

I don't believe it's DWP work coaches, the article it says "job coaches"
There's a 'work well' pilot run by NHS CCGs at the moment (I know they're not ccg's anymore- forgotten new name!) so it's NHS staff who deliver the service not DWP.
If you re read it there's no mention of DWP delivery in the article.

bluelavender · 16/10/2024 13:50

The only potential good reason for this would be to ensure that the person in crisis was receiving all the benefits that they are entitled to, and to put additional support in to make sure they have a home to go back to (eg making sure rent/ mortgage payments are not missed)

Jasmin71 · 16/10/2024 13:49

The DWP are heinous. If you have ever been on the receiving end of interactions with their health "professionals" you would know. Cruel, mendacious, and not even remotely qualified to take a holistic approach to helping people. None of this is going to end well!

itsjustbiology · 16/10/2024 13:44

So by the time they have been through your bank accounts, and yes they do and have been through mine recently they can now charge into your hospital ward during your most vulnerable stay,its like a starsi regime has been implemented! What ever next? We will wait , revel and wonder at the next thing they come up with! FFS bloody ridiculous

rainfallpurevividcat · 16/10/2024 13:43

Work coaches gently helping people back to work sounds a lot better than the system of punishments and sanctions the Tories brought in which has just made a bad situation worse.

But seeing people in hospital sounds like far too early in the process. To get into hospital anywhere for a mental or physical condition you normally have to be acutely unwell and will certainly not and should not be thinking about work.

There is a trial being done apparently - as the spokesperson from Mind says, let's see the results.

Devilsmommy · 16/10/2024 13:41

Hopefully it gets scrapped when they get attacked by a patient who they shouldn't be harassing In the first place. It really would be their own fault if they did get attacked

arthar · 16/10/2024 13:41

Flextime · 16/10/2024 13:37

They would not remove the benefits for someone in a mental health hospital .

Maybe not, but what about when they are discharged? Will they be expected back to work within a small time frame?

Anonym00se · 16/10/2024 13:41

It’s obscene. They’re out-torying the Tories. Liz Kendal obviously has never met a psychiatric in-patient.

Rinoachicken · 16/10/2024 13:39

Flextime · 16/10/2024 13:37

They would not remove the benefits for someone in a mental health hospital .

I wouldn’t be so confident - I have supported more than one person applying for PIP who have been declined even though they were sectioned in a psychiatric hospital at the time.

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 16/10/2024 13:38

Rinoachicken · 16/10/2024 13:37

And I acknowledge that my views on this are probably very much influenced by the fact O have ZERO faith that these DWP staff will have sufficient training, based on my experience of DWP.

I think that's a pretty fair fear though.

Rinoachicken · 16/10/2024 13:37

And I acknowledge that my views on this are probably very much influenced by the fact O have ZERO faith that these DWP staff will have sufficient training, based on my experience of DWP.

OP posts:
Flextime · 16/10/2024 13:37

They would not remove the benefits for someone in a mental health hospital .