Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's wrong to refuse to put a father on the birth certificate

333 replies

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 14/10/2024 19:25

I often see people on here tell the OP to refuse to put the father on the birth certificate. AIBU to think it's fundamentally wrong to deny parental rights to a child's parent and it's wrong for a baby to have a blank space on their birth certificate where their father should be unless the father is unknown because it's their birth and heritage information?

I know that women often do it to make sure the father has no say over the child because they think they know best and want to make all the decisions but I just don't think it's fair to deny parental rights to fathers.

If a father could refuse rights to the mother there would be uproar and rightly so, so why isn't it the same when women deny fathers their rights?

OP posts:
SoiledMyselfDuringSomeTurbulence · 15/10/2024 15:37

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 15/10/2024 15:03

Obviously not. I said I would report him. I am perfectly capable of protecting my daughter.

From a parent with PR? Let's hope you never have to test that claim out.

SaltySallyAnne · 15/10/2024 15:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheSnugHare · 15/10/2024 15:26

I think it’s worse to put the wrong father on the birth certificate for medical reasons

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 15/10/2024 15:24

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 15/10/2024 15:03

Obviously not. I said I would report him. I am perfectly capable of protecting my daughter.

You can't protect her from someone who has parental responsibility for her.

InformerYaNoSayDaddyMeSnowMeIGoBlameALickyBoom · 15/10/2024 15:10

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 15/10/2024 15:03

Obviously not. I said I would report him. I am perfectly capable of protecting my daughter.

You wouldn't be if your ex was abusive and he had PR, there are women who have had to hand their kids over to abusers or get arrested and the ex would get to be the RP.

These men will use whatever power they are given, but they often don't bother to do anything that isn't handed to them in a plate.

CleftChin · 15/10/2024 15:07

My friend's daughter, who has returned from visitation with nasty bruises from her father, has had the police turn up at her door to ensure that she still hands her over for weekend contact.

It's destroying my friend that she can't protect her daughter. You have a very rosy view of what 'reporting' someone with parental responsibility of a child can achieve.

Oh, and if she withholds contact, her ex takes her back to court and has her marked as being obstructive. She's never been able to take the child on holiday out of the country because if she books anything, he immediately takes her to court to prevent it. She can't get the child therapy, because he threatens the providers if they see the child without his permission, he's done the same to the brownie leader.

Now, he's malicious enough that even if he wasn't on the birth certificate he'd have got himself added, but this idea that you can protect your child from a determined abusive parent is just not the reality.

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 15/10/2024 15:06

SaltySallyAnne · 15/10/2024 06:25

Yes. People say it because many on here post about shitty boyfriends and this is a sure fire way to protect mum and baby, as 90% of the time the dad won’t go to put himself on the BC

Its always good to research before forming opinions on topics you clearly have no idea about

This post is embarrassing for you

I'm not embarrassed at all. There have been some very informative posts where people have civil and have been interested to read and given insight into why people say "don't let him go on the birth certificate" when it turns out they can't stop him anyway.

Most people have just shouted childish things and menz and wimminz and embarrassed themselves.

OP posts:
HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 15/10/2024 15:03

Fiveminutesinthegreenhouse · 15/10/2024 04:58

If you thought he would harm her you would report him but continue to give him contact? You know this is a failure to safeguard your daughter right? Do better! SS give women this choice in order to check if they are capable of keeping their children safe.

Obviously not. I said I would report him. I am perfectly capable of protecting my daughter.

OP posts:
SoiledMyselfDuringSomeTurbulence · 15/10/2024 12:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ATastingMenuButItsAllCrisps · 15/10/2024 12:54

The very first reply mentioned it, but @HorsePeopleAreStablePeople
Parents do not have rights.

BCSurvivor · 15/10/2024 12:48

My son is now 32.
I met his dad abroad, short ish relationship and we split while I was pregnant.
When my son was born I also had the blank box next to father's name.
The country we met in was neither my country or his, it was pre social media and mobiles and, for various reasons, it took me 16 years to track him down, but within 8 weeks of this I took my son to meet him.
I was in the UK, he was in Australia.
For me, it was so important for my son to know his heritage, his roots, and have his dad's name on the birth certificate.
I was able to add his dad's name to a reissued birth certificate when he was 17.

MushMonster · 15/10/2024 12:43

There is no answer to this one.
If the father is decent and wants to get involved, then the mother is wrong not to add him to the certificate.
If he is an idiot with abusive behaviour and does not even want to be involved, why give him any control? That could turn to harm to the child later on.

Fathers can, and do sometimes, take parental rights from mothers.same as above. All depends on the individual parent.

Fiveminutesinthegreenhouse · 15/10/2024 12:42

The reason for OPs thread is that she disagrees on another thread that an alcoholic drug user should not be named on the birth certificate. If OP is happy to hand her child over to an alcoholic drug user, I think that says more about her parenting than the other OP.

CleftChin · 15/10/2024 12:38

I'm not an idiot. I know you can't force a man to be on the birth certificate, but I didn't say that did I? I was referring to men being denied the opportunity to be on the birth certificate because the mother simply doesn't want them to be on there.

But they're not - there's a straightforward process to get themselves put onto it. No-one's stopping a father going on the birth certificate if he wants to.

The thing is, a birth certificate isn't a factual record of a child's parentage. It's often used as a method of control.

PiggleToes · 15/10/2024 12:37

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 14/10/2024 21:23

Not at all. I am suggesting a woman shouldn't unilaterally decide a father can't have parental rights. If a man is a danger to his child his rights should be revoked by the authorities, as is the case for mothers too.

Oh good . Because that’s exactly how the system currently works. HTH.

newnamethanks · 15/10/2024 12:37

Example of father with custody and parental rights on show today. Who wouldn't attempt to present that if foreseen?

PiggleToes · 15/10/2024 12:33

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 14/10/2024 21:15

"but not important enough for a man to be forced to, or even important enough for him to have to deal with his own admin"

I never said either of those things.

You said that of course they shouldn’t be forced to have their name of the BC.

Why?

PiggleToes · 15/10/2024 12:29

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 14/10/2024 20:57

Not at all don't be obtuse. I'm talking about all the times on here the advise is given "don't let him be on the birth certificate" which I assume means register the birth without telling him.

I'm not an idiot. I know you can't force a man to be on the birth certificate, but I didn't say that did I? I was referring to men being denied the opportunity to be on the birth certificate because the mother simply doesn't want them to be on there.

I thought it was about the child though? So surely you think he should be forced? Or is only women who have to be forced to do shit entirely against their own interests just to massage the ego of shitty men?

PiggleToes · 15/10/2024 12:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Krumblina · 15/10/2024 12:15

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 14/10/2024 23:32

I recognise she is not only my daughter but her fathers daughter too. Her father loves her as much as I do and it would destroy him if I kept her from him. I see how much he loves her and wonder how can anyone obstruct that relationship.

I have seen other male friends have divorces turn nasty and the ex wife tried her very best to take the kids away from them when they are good, loving fathers just to be vindictive. It's not only abuse that makes women try to block men from their kids.

If I thought he would harm her I would report him. If he had been awful to me but good to her it would be wrong to keep her from him. She is not just my child!

Do you actually think it's good for kids to be forced to see their dad's when their dad's have been abusive to their mum?
If my dad had advised my mum I'd bloody hope I'd be protected from him.

Icedlatteofdreams · 15/10/2024 11:32

YouZirName · 15/10/2024 08:49

Perhaps women should be thinking more about the men they're having children with BEFORE the fact.

Dear god, you have a pp who was raped by her child's father, what thinking could she have done to avoid this?

I hope this isn't your real view because you know abuse is likely to start during pregnancy? Also, my ex promised he would be a great father, we talked and talked before I became pregnant how we would raise our children. It has been nothing like this but how was I to know? I loved and trusted him.

TattedBarley · 15/10/2024 09:52

I did not tell my child’s ‘father’ her DOB or registry date to protect her and myself. He is an alcoholic rapist and abuser and if ‘denying his parental rights’ makes me the bad guy in your eyes I’m more than happy to wear that with pride. You clearly have no idea of the consequences of giving men like that parental rights.

wombat15 · 15/10/2024 09:47

Alina3 · 15/10/2024 09:41

YANBU. It can be done manipulatively.

A birth certificate is supposed to be a factual reflection of the child's parentage.

It's only ever been a factual reflection on who the mother is. The man's name has always been her husband's or no one if she's not married.

SoiledMyselfDuringSomeTurbulence · 15/10/2024 09:43

Alina3 · 15/10/2024 09:41

YANBU. It can be done manipulatively.

A birth certificate is supposed to be a factual reflection of the child's parentage.

That's not what the birth certificate system is.

wombat15 · 15/10/2024 09:42

NotOneOfTheInCrowd · 15/10/2024 01:57

Something like one in ten men is not their child’s father and doesn’t know it.

I agree that there are reasons for not wanting your child’s name on the birth certificate, but not doing so also opens up the ability for a woman to demand money from a man’ who isn’t the father. The number of women who don’t know who the father of their child is is significant enough for that.

That's a very old figure and comes from the days where there was a stigma with divorce and women were trapped in marriage.. Do you seriously think one in 10 women are sleeping and getting pregnant with men other than their partner nowadays? We have DNA tests.