Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think having children isn’t an accomplishment?

322 replies

RealGreyLemur · 10/10/2024 16:58

It feels like society places so much emphasis on having kids as if it’s some grand achievement, but I don’t see it that way. AIBU to think that having kids shouldn’t be treated as an accomplishment in itself?

OP posts:
Namechangedforthis25 · 11/10/2024 01:25

Tattletwat · 10/10/2024 17:10

Whilst it may seem miraculous it clearly isn't seeing there are billions of people on the planet now and have existed.

But the point is - think of all the beings who have never existed - all of the sperms and eggs that never came together. Each embryo is really 1 in a million in itself - a totally unique being

so yes it’s miraculous and incredible

just because it’s real life, it doesn’t make it any less incredible

HVfan · 11/10/2024 01:22

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 10/10/2024 23:24

But that doesn't make having a child and equal achievement to walking on the moon.

Also if the astronauts parents didn't have them someone else would just walk on the moon instead...

Someone had to have the person that walked on the moon. Good gosh babies don’t come from the cabbage patch. I think having a child is a greater achievement than walking on the moon. If we were intended to walk on the moon we would have been born there. Just another example of humans beings where they don’t belong. Like Antarctica. All this environmental nonsense and so many places humans not meant to be at on this planet and we have people in Antarctica. Why? Let’s leave things be. The next time you are in a plane look out the window. Plenty of space for wild animals, crops, untouched nature and homes. Enough to house properly the people in each place. This war on humans has got to stop.

Firefly1987 · 11/10/2024 01:18

Makeherhappy · 10/10/2024 23:51

I personally don’t think it’s how the child turned out that is the accomplishment (many things are beyond a parents control) but in how the parent raises them.

Eg a paeent could have a child and leave them and never see them again or contribute towards them - no accomplishment in raising them

a person could have a child they do their best to raise, they’re kind, calm, patient, nurturing, invest in the education and hobbies etc - they have given the child a good upbringing and have that as an accomplishment.

@Makeherhappy agree but it's easy to see you raised your kids well if they're all successful and well-adjusted. Much harder if they've struggled. You're not supposed to go off the rails or fail at life if you had good parents, but it happens.

theprincessthepea · 11/10/2024 00:45

It’s an achievement to me. I said to my partner that bringing a life into this world and raising them is a big deal - I don’t care what anyone says. It’s a huge responsibility and sticking at it feels like an accomplishment.

But there are other things that people can do to feel fulfilled - this may be one.

Makeherhappy · 10/10/2024 23:51

Firefly1987 · 10/10/2024 23:46

Yes and most of it's luck, I'm sure there are lots of narc parents out there taking credit for their successful kid/s when they had very little to do with it. Likewise there will be young adults who were raised well but massively struggled. I don't really think parents should take any credit or blame (unless they neglected/abused them of course) for how their kids turn out.

I personally don’t think it’s how the child turned out that is the accomplishment (many things are beyond a parents control) but in how the parent raises them.

Eg a paeent could have a child and leave them and never see them again or contribute towards them - no accomplishment in raising them

a person could have a child they do their best to raise, they’re kind, calm, patient, nurturing, invest in the education and hobbies etc - they have given the child a good upbringing and have that as an accomplishment.

Firefly1987 · 10/10/2024 23:46

BonneMaman77 · 10/10/2024 23:21

For those who say that the achievement is in raising children well, what does that mean? “Well raised“ is subjective, how do you describe it what would it look like for you?

Yes and most of it's luck, I'm sure there are lots of narc parents out there taking credit for their successful kid/s when they had very little to do with it. Likewise there will be young adults who were raised well but massively struggled. I don't really think parents should take any credit or blame (unless they neglected/abused them of course) for how their kids turn out.

Makeherhappy · 10/10/2024 23:29

BonneMaman77 · 10/10/2024 23:21

For those who say that the achievement is in raising children well, what does that mean? “Well raised“ is subjective, how do you describe it what would it look like for you?

It’ll mean different things to different people to me it’s this;

you do the best you personally can for your child in all areas of raising the child
no neglect
no abuse

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 10/10/2024 23:24

HVfan · 10/10/2024 22:45

Could have no one walking in the moon if that astronaut’s parents were childless. This is basic folks.

But that doesn't make having a child and equal achievement to walking on the moon.

Also if the astronauts parents didn't have them someone else would just walk on the moon instead...

BonneMaman77 · 10/10/2024 23:21

For those who say that the achievement is in raising children well, what does that mean? “Well raised“ is subjective, how do you describe it what would it look like for you?

venus7 · 10/10/2024 23:12

HVfan · 10/10/2024 22:42

You really are a sheep. I am 52 and a woman. In the U.S. before Roe every state had a different law about if and when and under what circumstances. During Roe every state had a different law about it and when and under what circumstance and after Roe every state has a different law about it and when and under what circumstances. You can buy contraception at any age. You can have sex legally with the same sex meaning zero chance of pregnancy. You will not be kicked out of school or work if pregnant. You can be a SCOTUS Justice with 7 kids and are female. You can run for President if female. You can be CEO if female. You can code if female. All without written permission from a male relative. You don’t need permission from the Chinese Communist Party to move to another part of the country. You don’t need permission to travel within the country from. North Korea. You do not have to wear a scarf in front of males who are not relatives like in Iran. You can have custody of your child after they turn 10 unlike Iran. The west are idiots. If you cared about women’s rights you would not be distracted to the place women actually have them and instead focus on where they don’t.

Goodnight.

HVfan · 10/10/2024 22:45

purpletrees16 · 10/10/2024 22:22

I feel that what people are arguing about is:
a. where, on the below diagram, they would colour in if they were asked to colour in the area that they would define as an accomplishment.
b. Where they would place a x for having a child on this diagram.

The Rarity axis is meant to represent effort involved to do the thing as well. As in, it is rare to have the skills/tenacity and opportunity. So a gold medal would count but having a rare eye colour would not.

(I made this on my notes app so please don’t come here to say the labels are in the wrong place.)

There are people who agree on b but disagree on a and vice versa.

Edited

Could have no one walking in the moon if that astronaut’s parents were childless. This is basic folks.

HVfan · 10/10/2024 22:42

venus7 · 10/10/2024 21:53

You don't consider the environmental damage? The diminishing of women's rights as they are pressured to have children, as has happened in the U.S. with abolishing abortion rights and access to contraception? The reduction of education to women from poorer countries?

You really are a sheep. I am 52 and a woman. In the U.S. before Roe every state had a different law about if and when and under what circumstances. During Roe every state had a different law about it and when and under what circumstance and after Roe every state has a different law about it and when and under what circumstances. You can buy contraception at any age. You can have sex legally with the same sex meaning zero chance of pregnancy. You will not be kicked out of school or work if pregnant. You can be a SCOTUS Justice with 7 kids and are female. You can run for President if female. You can be CEO if female. You can code if female. All without written permission from a male relative. You don’t need permission from the Chinese Communist Party to move to another part of the country. You don’t need permission to travel within the country from. North Korea. You do not have to wear a scarf in front of males who are not relatives like in Iran. You can have custody of your child after they turn 10 unlike Iran. The west are idiots. If you cared about women’s rights you would not be distracted to the place women actually have them and instead focus on where they don’t.

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 10/10/2024 22:41

ShiteRider · 10/10/2024 22:22

Who had done that on this thread? I certainly haven’t. Again, all I’m asking is for you to be respectful about it as an option for some people. If it’s not for you, that’s fair enough but it’s not second best and it’s not a replacement for anyone. To talk about it in such terms is upsetting for adoptive families (including adoptees), not least because it’s absolutely not true. I’ve asked politely and respectfully a few times not to use the sort of language you are using because it’s offensive and upsetting, at no point have I suggested that you should consider adoption.

I'm trying to explain to you why suggesting adoption to a person who is suffering from infertility is offensive and upsetting, the fact that you think what I am saying about adoption is offensive shows that it is offensive to suggest it to infertile couples. Because what I am telling you it sounds like, is what infertile people hear when the suggestion is made. I know this after spending years in infertility support groups.

No you didn't suggest it to me, but you suggested it to the PP who said they were childless because of infertility and I am trying to tell you why it is offensive. You may think it's harmless but I guarantee you when you hear it for the thirtieth time you lose patience for people's insensitivity.

As I said previously, I don't see adoption as a replacement, it's the suggestion of adoption to infertile people by other people that makes it seem that way. Like I said in my previous post it does adoptive parents and adoptees a disservice when adoption is inappropriately suggested to infertile couples. I admire adoption and adoptive parents, it's the pushing it towards infertile couples as a solution that devalues it.

If you find my explanation offensive I apologise but I do not intend to offend, I intend to show you how the suggestion is offensive. The thanks are rolling in for my explanation so there are a lot of people, who I assume are going through infertility, that clearly feels I have articulated their feelings on the topic well.

MinervaMcGonagallsCat · 10/10/2024 22:30

Well it was a bloody huge accomplishment for me - twice.

After fertility treatment, multiple miscarriages, health complications, sections and more post op complications.

I don't give a flying fuck if you don't agree.

Mansionscoldandgrey · 10/10/2024 22:27

MigGril · 10/10/2024 17:08

Absolutely this, as just about anyone can have kids (of course excluding those who have had fatality issues). But raising them well requires a lot of time and effort.

Actually, if you have had fatality issues, I would say that having a child is a huge accomplishment.

purpletrees16 · 10/10/2024 22:22

I feel that what people are arguing about is:
a. where, on the below diagram, they would colour in if they were asked to colour in the area that they would define as an accomplishment.
b. Where they would place a x for having a child on this diagram.

The Rarity axis is meant to represent effort involved to do the thing as well. As in, it is rare to have the skills/tenacity and opportunity. So a gold medal would count but having a rare eye colour would not.

(I made this on my notes app so please don’t come here to say the labels are in the wrong place.)

There are people who agree on b but disagree on a and vice versa.

To think having children isn’t an accomplishment?
ShiteRider · 10/10/2024 22:22

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 10/10/2024 22:01

It's only not being suggested as a replacement if you're suggesting it to fertile people to adopt instead of having their own children as well, which no one does. No one hears "we're trying for a baby" and says hey! Why don't you adopt instead! The fact it is only suggested to infertile couples literally makes it sound like you're suggesting a replacement.

No one needs to keep adoption a dirty secret, I haven't suggested that. It just needs to stop being suggested to infertile couples as a solution to their problems, because I promise you, they are aware it is an option already. Some infertile couples will choose adoption but every time it is suggested to someone going through infertility you are both insulting their intelligence and invalidating their pain. I really don't know what kind of answer you're expecting? Yes we thought about it but it didn't work out, yes we thought about it but it's not for us, yes we thought about it and we've done it. The only answer that would make it a useful suggestion is "oh thanks, we haven't thought about that/didn't know it was an option" and that is just not an answer you're ever going to hear because we all know adoption exists.

So I really don't understand why adoption is always trotted out as a suggestion. It's good that it exists, it's good that it happens, it's fine to talk about it in a positive way, it's just rude to suggest it to people who are having problems. Like lots of other things in life you would never suggest to someone because it's a personal choice.

If you want more respectful discourse about a topic, don't say hey I know this might come across as insensitive and then suggest it anyway. That's not how you get nice polite responses from people going through something painful and upsetting.

Who had done that on this thread? I certainly haven’t. Again, all I’m asking is for you to be respectful about it as an option for some people. If it’s not for you, that’s fair enough but it’s not second best and it’s not a replacement for anyone. To talk about it in such terms is upsetting for adoptive families (including adoptees), not least because it’s absolutely not true. I’ve asked politely and respectfully a few times not to use the sort of language you are using because it’s offensive and upsetting, at no point have I suggested that you should consider adoption.

Edingril · 10/10/2024 22:14

Spectre8 · 10/10/2024 21:42

Noone says its wrong for you to feel that, the OP is talking about society pressure.

'Society pressure' is used when people don't want to take responsibility for their own choices

'I had a child with someone unsuitable because society made me do it'

vodkaredbullgirl · 10/10/2024 22:04

Looks like OP did a dump and ran.

HorsePeopleAreStablePeople · 10/10/2024 22:01

ShiteRider · 10/10/2024 21:33

It’s not a solution, but it is an option and not one which anyone should be made to feel uncomfortable to talk about as if it’s a guilty secret.

It’s only disrespectful for people who view adoption as a ‘replacement’. From my experience, people who adopt don’t see it like that and from no one who suggests it sees it like that. I don’t want to detract from the thread but I would ask you to consider how you could be more mindful when talking about adoption in the same way that you’re asking people to be more considerate when talking about infertility.

It's only not being suggested as a replacement if you're suggesting it to fertile people to adopt instead of having their own children as well, which no one does. No one hears "we're trying for a baby" and says hey! Why don't you adopt instead! The fact it is only suggested to infertile couples literally makes it sound like you're suggesting a replacement.

No one needs to keep adoption a dirty secret, I haven't suggested that. It just needs to stop being suggested to infertile couples as a solution to their problems, because I promise you, they are aware it is an option already. Some infertile couples will choose adoption but every time it is suggested to someone going through infertility you are both insulting their intelligence and invalidating their pain. I really don't know what kind of answer you're expecting? Yes we thought about it but it didn't work out, yes we thought about it but it's not for us, yes we thought about it and we've done it. The only answer that would make it a useful suggestion is "oh thanks, we haven't thought about that/didn't know it was an option" and that is just not an answer you're ever going to hear because we all know adoption exists.

So I really don't understand why adoption is always trotted out as a suggestion. It's good that it exists, it's good that it happens, it's fine to talk about it in a positive way, it's just rude to suggest it to people who are having problems. Like lots of other things in life you would never suggest to someone because it's a personal choice.

If you want more respectful discourse about a topic, don't say hey I know this might come across as insensitive and then suggest it anyway. That's not how you get nice polite responses from people going through something painful and upsetting.

venus7 · 10/10/2024 21:53

HVfan · 10/10/2024 21:45

There should be no reason to control population growth. Ever. When a gov does it it’s for monetary reasons or military goals or control. To make them have more or have them have less is always for the government to have it easier controlling the population.

You don't consider the environmental damage? The diminishing of women's rights as they are pressured to have children, as has happened in the U.S. with abolishing abortion rights and access to contraception? The reduction of education to women from poorer countries?

He11oKitty · 10/10/2024 21:51

Sitting here after one round of IVF, I think it is a huge achievement - even if it’s one that some people or couples seem to find easier than others.

I’m a feminist. I’ve lived around the world, obtained multiple degrees including a doctorate - plenty of achievements that I am proud of. But I don’t think it’s feminist not to celebrate different women’s achievements, whatever that looks like for them.

KimberleyClark · 10/10/2024 21:49

Overthebow · 10/10/2024 21:42

I disagree, it’s not more basic. Getting pregnant, pregnancy, childbirth and raising children is very hard physically and mentally and women shouldn't be put down for being proud of doing it. It absolutely is an achievement. I have degrees, career, have competitive achievements and but having my children is my greatest achievement. As an aside, getting pregnant sometimes can be something you can study for, it took me a long time researching, tracking, trying supplements, working out what works for me to get pregnant before got pregnant the first time.

I didn’t mean basic in the sense of being easy or simple. I meant that it’s basic in the sense of what the female body is meant to do.

I was ttc in the early 1990s and there really wasn’t the same amount of information available. It wasn’t that I was too lazy to put my mind to it properly. I went through loads of IVF.

Some of the replies I’ve had show a startling lack of empathy or compassion. I do however agree that raising a child well is a hell of an achievement.

HVfan · 10/10/2024 21:46

Spectre8 · 10/10/2024 21:42

Noone says its wrong for you to feel that, the OP is talking about society pressure.

But the “society” has been pressuring the opposite for decades.

HVfan · 10/10/2024 21:45

venus7 · 10/10/2024 21:12

Um....think you misunderstood my point; I think unfettered population growth for monetary reasons, or any other, is wrong.

There should be no reason to control population growth. Ever. When a gov does it it’s for monetary reasons or military goals or control. To make them have more or have them have less is always for the government to have it easier controlling the population.

Swipe left for the next trending thread