Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To change IVF clinics

35 replies

naomimn · 09/10/2024 21:49

Question for those who have done IVF

I had my first round at this clinic, 13 eggs retrieved with only 8 mature... of them 2 made it to day 5 blastocyst. I tested PGTA non euploid and one ended in a miscarriage.

Round 2. Different protocol. Of 20 follicles only 7 eggs retrieved. Waiting to hear back on fertilisation and development.

I'm 29 so for my age should be better results.
It's a well known clinic in London, one of the big ones.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
amothersinstinct · 11/10/2024 10:55

Medication wise

Cycles 1 & 2 - 225ml Bemfola daily plus double trigger

Cycles 3-5 - 75ml Bemfola every OTHER day plus tamoxifen tablets plus double trigger

Cycle 1 and 2 I got a total of 28 eggs but less than 30% fertilised with ICSI and day 3 quality average to poor - blastocysts were all BB grade or lower

Cycle 2-5 - 2 eggs each time 100% fertilised with ICSI all good quality day 3 and 2 grade AA blastocysts and then my twins which were a day 5 BB and day 6 BB/BC

amothersinstinct · 11/10/2024 10:53

@naomimn

I guess it was a psychological choice to work backwards in terms of quality

Cycle 1 short protocol - I did 2 transfers of average blastocysts, first transfer was a BFN and the second was a ruptured ectopic (my second ectopic and I lost my last tube)

Cycle 2 short protocol - this was the one I PGTA on - 2 average blastocysts neither came back normal but they agreed to transfer a low level mosaic but that was a BFN

So cycles 3-5 I did back to back natural modified egg collections and embryo banking and got 4 blastocysts and didn't PGTA

I'd decided by this point this was the end and I didn't want to do any more egg collections / the toll on family life became too much - it becomes addictive doing IVF and I felt my eldest was suffering from my lack of focus, couldn't take holidays or book anything in case I was mid cycle etc. Also I'd spent £40k - remortgaged house and took a loan out. And I was ready to stop emotionally as I knew I'd given it my absolute all and I'd have no regrets that I could/should have tried something else

Anyway psychologically I felt if I put the best back in first and it didn't work then I'd lose hope. If I put the "worst" back in first then I knew I still had the best frozen!

My worst 2 stuck and i had twins 😅

naomimn · 10/10/2024 21:57

amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 21:30

Having done a fair amount of IVF and also TTC naturally supplements made zero difference to my egg quality - the only thing which did was changing protocol and focussing on far fewer follicles

In cycle 1 and 2 on short protocol I had fertilisation rates of less than 30% PGTA 2 embryos on the second cycle neither came back euplojd - changed to natural modified - got 50% fewer eggs but fertilisation went up to 100% and transferred the 2 lowest quality without PGTA testing and had twins and still have the top quality ones still frozen

Out of curiosity why did you transfer lowest quality? Because you wouldn't be able to freeze them?

Aside from protocol did anything make a difference to egg quality? What meds were you on for better quality vs worse?

Thanks so much for all the answers btw ❤️

OP posts:
amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 21:30

Having done a fair amount of IVF and also TTC naturally supplements made zero difference to my egg quality - the only thing which did was changing protocol and focussing on far fewer follicles

In cycle 1 and 2 on short protocol I had fertilisation rates of less than 30% PGTA 2 embryos on the second cycle neither came back euplojd - changed to natural modified - got 50% fewer eggs but fertilisation went up to 100% and transferred the 2 lowest quality without PGTA testing and had twins and still have the top quality ones still frozen

naomimn · 10/10/2024 20:57

@amothersinstinct oh and yes I breastfed but weirdly my cycle came back 3mo postpartum even though I breastfed for 13mo

OP posts:
naomimn · 10/10/2024 20:56

@amothersinstinct thank you, that's so helpful! I really do need to start reading more but I guess I don't really know where to start. I've read It Starts with the Egg so do take lots of supplements (pregnacare pre conception, ubiquinol, omega 3, vit d, melatonin). I've tried to read up on the drugs but everyone seems to have such different experiences in the forums!

No I didn't have a c section, I had a vaginal delivery but with an episiotomy and ventouse

OP posts:
amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 20:52

Did you have a c section with your first child? I did and that was ultimately the reason why I ended up needing IVF so a lot can change post birth in those 2 years and if you breastfed as well it can take a few months for your cycles to return properly - so if you breastfed say see the recommended 6 months you are only just likely to be having your cycles back to normal?

amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 20:47

It depends on your clinic how receptive they are really - some won't let you have any input at all

I was with Create Birmingham and found them very amenable and I was able to - not dictate - but certainly have a lot of say in my treatment and even which embryos to put back

I chose Create because I only wanted to do short protocol and wanted to cycle as quick as possible with the minimum possible impact on my older child who was around 2 when I started IVF (I'd had multiple miscarriages and also lost a tube to repented ectopic)

I also didn't want to take a lot of drugs - in the end I paired it back even further and after 2 initial failed short protocol cycles with Create changed to natural modified - able to cycle back to back embryo banking and that gave me my twins

So it's a personal thing really - I would say read read read be prepared research and question everything - the more informed you are the more you can push your clinic

naomimn · 10/10/2024 20:23

@amothersinstinct noted - from now on will be writing down the follicle sizes.

My doc, when I initially saw him after trying for about 10mo did say try another 6. I went away and came back one month later saying I couldn't do it. So whilst he did suggest it, he didn't exactly insist.

I've only had 1 early miscarriage. In the year of trying I never once got pregnant, then got pregnant with a fresh transfer on my first cycle of IVF, miscarried at just under 6w. With my first child I vaguely agreed with DH that we will stop contraception that month, aimed to buy ovulation tests but never got round to it... then found out I'm pregnant. How can so much change in 2 years?? As we started trying when she was just over 1. I convinced myself during my first pregnancy that I'm super fertile so maybe I'm just paying now for being smug 😄

Would you say it's better to go for a long protocol or short? I feel like I'd rather do short but a few cycles rather than 1 long? Can I refuse a long and ask for a few short in the same timeframe? What would you suggest?

OP posts:
Misty999 · 10/10/2024 20:20

It's the high dose it damages the eggs, have a consultation with create fertility, they use lower doses that doesn't damage the egg quality. Also agree with ICSI to get max fertilisation.

Your update sounds like you have a good number fertilised so fingers crossed for this round.

amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 20:11

Oh and the follicle size - sorry forgot to reply on that - statistically you want follicles of 14mm and larger on trigger day for the best chance of getting a mature egg from it

I did 5 rounds of IVF....each follicle scan I would write down the follicle numbers and size. Control freak??! Yes but it helped me feel in control. I was then able to monitor growth over the stims - you want to see at least a 2mm growth every other day.

If they say told you you had 20 follicles but lots of them were below 14mm on trigger day that could explain why you only got 7 eggs?

amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 20:07

I would ask about ICSI but if the sperm is good quality there is no reason to do it

NK cells - again it's only really something you'd look at if you'd had a high number of chemical or early miscarriages

Have to say also....this is for a second child but you were "only" trying for a year. I know that feels like a long time when you are TTC - I've been there. But Statistically at your age it takes up to 24 months to conceive and you'd only just be in the window for when the NHS would refer you for testing had you not already had a child

I fear that your clinic may be taking advantage here - getting you to pay for PGTA etc - and most decent ethical clinics would have said try a few more months - 6 at least and come back rather than take your money for 2 cycles in quick succession

amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 20:01

Long protocol - in the simplest terms is much longer duration of treatment. You take initial medication to switch off your ovaries - called down reg - then the clinic gives the go ahead to start stims - the idea being that all follicles grow at the same rate and apparently creates more follicles. But the process can be 6+ weeks long

Short protocol - your protocol - no down reg. start stims at a certain point in your cycle. Risk is follicles grow different rates

Some clinics don't do long protocol - like Create - their ethos is short low Dose stim cycles. Some clinics will only do long and then everyone else do a mixture of both

naomimn · 10/10/2024 16:47

@amothersinstinct no it was short protocol. In all honesty I don't understand the difference in terms of when they'd suggest long over short

OP posts:
amothersinstinct · 10/10/2024 16:42

Hmm so a few things I would say from your reply - at age 29 home AMH of 13 is pretty low - for context when i started IVF age around 34 my AMH was 13 and that was considered low for my age - that would explain you were on a pretty high dose of stims - 450 is the top dose.

Guessing this was also long protocol?

I'd question why a clinic would want to PGTA - its still not a proven science and most reputable clinics would only suggest it after lots of miscarriages (like in my case) rather than a young woman in their 20s with no obvious reasons for infertility

idrinkandknowthings · 10/10/2024 16:09

naomimn · 10/10/2024 12:47

A little update...
Of the 7 eggs retrieved, 1 was damaged (presumably during egg retrieval), 6 fertilised. Although 1 of the 6 looks like it might have dodgy fertilisation, they said we'll observe.

@JontyGentoo that's the thing, I've not had tests for NK cells, I've not had the Chicago tests which someone mentioned earlier. I'm sure there's a million other tests I've not had and haven't been offered. Presumably there's endless things we could test in theory so not even sure where to start. Hate it being unexplained.
@Worldgonecrazy ahh ok maybe ICSI still something to ask about. Although I think fertilisation rates seem ok?

The Chicago tests are not routinely offered, they were an additional cost of about £2k and were sent over to Chicago for testing - although that was a few years ago so hopefully they have begun the same type of blood testing here.

Peonies12 · 10/10/2024 12:51

I’d hold out for now, especially given you already have a child and are having IVF after a relatively short time TTC. Most people I know it’s taken a few rounds.

naomimn · 10/10/2024 12:47

A little update...
Of the 7 eggs retrieved, 1 was damaged (presumably during egg retrieval), 6 fertilised. Although 1 of the 6 looks like it might have dodgy fertilisation, they said we'll observe.

@JontyGentoo that's the thing, I've not had tests for NK cells, I've not had the Chicago tests which someone mentioned earlier. I'm sure there's a million other tests I've not had and haven't been offered. Presumably there's endless things we could test in theory so not even sure where to start. Hate it being unexplained.
@Worldgonecrazy ahh ok maybe ICSI still something to ask about. Although I think fertilisation rates seem ok?

OP posts:
Worldgonecrazy · 10/10/2024 09:06

naomimn · 10/10/2024 08:26

Have you discussed ICSI to try and increase the number of mature eggs developing to blastocyst?

They said we didn't need it as the sperm sample was really really good both times... so presumably the infertility is somehow a female issue

I needed ICSI because the sperm couldn’t get through my egg outer surface. There was nothing wrong with the sperm, my eggs just didn’t like letting sperm through. We went from 20% fertilised to 90% fertilised meaning we could take more to blastocyst to give us the best chance. ICSI can still be relevant for female issues.

JontyGentoo · 10/10/2024 08:53

Hopefully this round will have better results for you. Sometimes a change of protocol can make the difference. I did 4 short and 1 long protocol. I think I got more eggs on my long protocol but sadly although most fertilised only 2 were suitable for day 3 transfer and that cycle didn’t work for me.

I ended up doing 6 cycles altogether as we had unexplained infertility and had been trying for 13 years. The first 4 were at our local hospital and for the remaining two we travelled to Glasgow as I felt that my local teaching hospital were quite set in their ways about IVF. I never got pregnant on the first 4 and they said that there was no correlation between high TSH and infertility (there is!). They also didn’t believe in immune issues. My GP phoned an endocrinologist at our local hospital who said I would never get pregnant with my TSH as high as it was (think it was 4.6 and it needs to be below 2.4).

We moved to a clinic in Glasgow and I started on levothyroxine and had a biopsy of my uterine lining and my NK cells were 6.5 and they should be below 5. I was put on steroids and had to inject myself every day with blood thinners after transfer. I got pregnant for the first time ever but my hcg numbers were low and was told that they would continue to drop then I’d miscarry which did happen. For my 6th attempt we went for donor eggs at the same clinic as I was 41 and I got pregnant again and now have a 6 year old.

I would say to stick where you are for now as this is only your second cycle (which may be successful) but if you feel that your not being listened to or they’re not willing to try something else then I’d say to move. Being in London you will have more of a choice on clinics. Wishing you all the best on this difficult journey xx

Snowdrops17 · 10/10/2024 08:39

I never made it to ivf was just about to start and got pregnant so extremely lucky but l had strongly considered going abroad for treatment even my nurse in my Gp surgery went abroad after many failed attempts and got pregnant and really urged me to go abroad, when the clinic I was with found out I got pregnant naturally I was treated horribly I won't go into it but basically no care at all no advice even on medication they had prescribed if I were to fall pregnant naturally as they went making ivf money off of me. I remember sobbing down the phone asking them for a blood test to confirm and they all but hung up on me. (I'm not in the UK btw)

Have a look at (the wait ivf) on Instagram x

naomimn · 10/10/2024 08:29

Probably also worth noting that I have a nearly 3 year old child conceived naturally, first month

OP posts:
naomimn · 10/10/2024 08:28

@idrinkandknowthings yes makes sense what about say about being a wait and see approach... my consultant always says the same thing about ivf. But then the cynical part of me wonders if he only says that because he doesn't know what he's doing exactly 😄

OP posts:
naomimn · 10/10/2024 08:26

Worldgonecrazy · 10/10/2024 07:06

Have you discussed ICSI to try and increase the number of mature eggs developing to blastocyst? This worked for me, plus metformin during early pregnancy to reduce increased risk of miscarriage due to PCOS.

A good clinic will consider what areas can be worked on for the next round, though a lot is luck.

H I’ll e you get your miracle.

Have you discussed ICSI to try and increase the number of mature eggs developing to blastocyst?

They said we didn't need it as the sperm sample was really really good both times... so presumably the infertility is somehow a female issue

OP posts:
naomimn · 10/10/2024 08:25

DoYouReally · 09/10/2024 23:29

I mean this kindly but you have only two rounds and you don't even know the outcome of the second round yet and they also changed the drugs from the first time.

Give it time and be kind to yourself.

It's a draining process and really individual to each person.

I know the reasons for my issues and I think it a lot of ways that makes it easier. When it's unexplained it's more difficult.

I really hope you get the outcome you want.

I think what's making me sad about the second round is 20 follicles -> 7 eggs. Not even been told yet how many of them are mature, maybe none...
and then the first round losing 40% to being immature

OP posts: