Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not allowing heavily pregnant woman to use a loo

665 replies

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 10:38

I’m imminently due my third baby and have a massive bump. Popped to the local coop post school run and as I was checking out was desperate for the loo. My pelvic floor is pretty shot from previous 2 kids, the baby had dropped during the school run walk so I was feeling like I could not wait. The store was empty bar a couple of pensioners. I asked if I could use the staff loo as desperate, there are no other loos nearby and I was unlikely to make it the half a mile home in time. The member of staff said no against policy and I soiled myself before I even made it the front door of the shop. Completely humiliating and had to walk home like that and could have been avoided if a little kindness shown.

AIBU to expect some flexibility in branch policy to accommodate for those in need? It hardly fits with the coop key value of caring for others.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MrsLBrown · 08/10/2024 12:28

Its years since I worked in retail as a student so the law must have changed.

However, then, we would allow someone to use the loo in an emergency BUT they would be escorted there by the staff who'd wait outside the loo door and escort them back through the shop.

This gets around the 'stealing' as they are often located off rooms where staff leave their bags etc and have their lunch.

I honestly think that now, I'd have taken a risk and escorted a desperate woman to the loo.

The odds of losing your job are remote if you take someone to the loo and back out.

ChungKing · 08/10/2024 12:27

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 12:25

Why would a shop take out an insurance policy like that?

Often because it's all they can afford, but also often so they don't have to deal with issues like people using the toilets for drug use, and other nefarious purposes. When I was a student working in a shop, two people got thrown out for having sex in the loos! The staff shouldn't have to deal with stuff like that!

Alicana · 08/10/2024 12:27

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 11:58

If you read my post again then you will see that my problem is not with the individual staff member. I understand why she said no and I understand why they have a policy in place. She was young (maybe early twenties). I asked politely as I was checking out and explained I was desperate/pregnant. When she said no I did not push back, I tried to leave.

What I stated was that coop has some grandiose statements on their website with their number one value caring for others. Quickly followed by social responsibility and equality etc etc. My statement was that their should be some flexibility in those policies. I don’t think what happened to me in their store this morning fits with their key values.

Co-ops aren’t generally very big. In order to change their policy they would have to reconfigure the layout of all the staff toilets so a member of the public can use the toilet without any access to back of house, no access to staff possessions, no access to high value stock items, no access to staff data, and be accessible so a member of staff would not have to solely accompany a member of the public in a private area for their own safety.

I don’t think this is viable for most co-ops so I don’t think you can say they are not adhering to their values. I am sorry for your position and I can definitely sympathise, but in the grand scheme of things it’s not with someone’s job to allow you to use the toilet, or to expect the store to change the location of the staff toilet (which often is impossible).

eggandonion · 08/10/2024 12:26

Our policy is that a pregnant woman or toddler weeing on the floor is less dangerous than taking them out the back and waiting for them.
A sudden wet floor needing mopped is a hazard.
In other words we use common sense. The men I work with have children so understand the sudden need. They also have wives who breastfed so we can cope with that too!

TartanPJs · 08/10/2024 12:26

Ohhbaby · 08/10/2024 11:08

Oi people are harsh, I have small kids 2 and 4 years and have used shop toilets abroad. They allow it because they know a newly potty trained kid can't hold out.
Pregnant is no different.
Gosh I thought a little compassion goes a long way.
England is so rule obsessed it's nauseating.
( And before you come at me, shops abroad also have the insurance policy thing , they're just kind first and foremost

Absolutely this. When I worked in retail in the 90s/early 00s we regularly let people use the staff loos, and that was in national chains. It's probably not allowed now.

I now live abroad. I have a preexisting bladder issue and am now pregnant, but only 2nd trimester so baby isn't exacerbating it yet. I'm lucky in that there are lots of public toilets here, and if there's not one around its always easy to find a cafe I can pop into. I do usually buy a drink out of courtesy. But I have no doubt that if I needed to use a staff loo, they'd let me. There are just as many rules and regulations about insurance, health and safety etc here. People are just kinder, more practical, less rules obsessed and jobsworth-y and more trusting. It's an attitude difference, not a legal difference.

Sorry you went through that OP.

TheDrunkenClam · 08/10/2024 12:26

Caddycat · 08/10/2024 12:15

I have both (part of the same insurance policy) and they don't distinguish between areas. In fact, it's personal to the business, not the premises as covers incidents outside of business premises.

Possibly your combined small business policy is different to a large corporation like Co-op? That specialist employers liability insurance is required when thousands of people are on the payroll? That safety and training have to be in place and demonstrably adhered to in order for the policy to be valid?

coffeesaveslives · 08/10/2024 12:25

@pikkumyy77 when you rely on your job to keep a roof over your head, you're hardly going to risk it to let someone use the toilet 🙄

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 12:25

coffeesaveslives · 08/10/2024 12:16

Why would a shop take out a restrictive insurance policy that states that only people on the payroll are covered for accidents?

They wouldn't, they'd have one saying that members of the public are only covered for accidents if they're in public access areas.

Why would a shop take out an insurance policy like that?

thepariscrimefiles · 08/10/2024 12:24

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 12:17

@rainbowunicorn

I’m not claiming that it’s
against the law. I am stating that the coop have set out clear aims about their moral stance and the kind of changes they want to see in society.

There 10 core values that they abide by are:

  1. Caring for other people
  2. Democracy
  3. Equity
  4. Equality
  5. Honesty
  6. Openness
  7. Self Help
  8. Self Responsobility
10. Social Responsibility

I don’t think that my experience as a customer fits in with that. If they want to make these big claims then they should allow flexibility in their policies to allow a society where you can be “caring for other people”

Maybe write to Head Office to explain the situation and ask how your treatment aligns with their values. Stress that you are not complaining about an individual member of staff but about the policy itself.

zeitweilig · 08/10/2024 12:24

TheDrunkenClam · 08/10/2024 10:39

Insurance is the answer. They can’t allow members of the public into staff restricted areas as insurance wouldn’t cover if you had an accident

Exactly this.
It's not the fault of the front line staff.

ChungKing · 08/10/2024 12:24

pikkumyy77 · 08/10/2024 12:22

Of course staff should be free to do what is right and humane. What a passive lot you are! See an injustice? Challenge an injustice!

Yes, in an ideal world. but the fact is, we aren't living in an ideal world and they could lose their jobs over it! I have compassion for OP but also for the staff who may well have wanted to say yes to her but were scared of losing their living!

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 08/10/2024 12:24

Sixteenandfourteen789 · 08/10/2024 12:19

Why are we all so accepting and passive?

It doesn’t have to be the “reality of being pregnant” if the law insisted on the provision of decent facilities.

Absolutely. There should be adequate public facilities in all towns and villages.
Sadly, people are dirty bastards and they cost a fortune to keep cleaning and repairing.
We need a campaign to bring back public toilets.
And another one to teach people not to be filthy animals smearing their shit everywhere.

coffeesaveslives · 08/10/2024 12:23

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 12:17

@rainbowunicorn

I’m not claiming that it’s
against the law. I am stating that the coop have set out clear aims about their moral stance and the kind of changes they want to see in society.

There 10 core values that they abide by are:

  1. Caring for other people
  2. Democracy
  3. Equity
  4. Equality
  5. Honesty
  6. Openness
  7. Self Help
  8. Self Responsobility
10. Social Responsibility

I don’t think that my experience as a customer fits in with that. If they want to make these big claims then they should allow flexibility in their policies to allow a society where you can be “caring for other people”

Then take it up with head office, don't complain that a minimum wage staff member wouldn't risk their job to let you use the toilet 🙈

Showbel · 08/10/2024 12:23

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 08/10/2024 10:52

Return home and go back out. I'm not being funny, you are pregnant not disabled.

Clearly you've never been pregnant or you'd understand how much stress it puts on a woman's body.

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 12:22

Peaceandquietandacuppa · 08/10/2024 12:21

No I don’t think shops should let customers use the staff toilet, as PPs said, it’s an insurance thing. It’s worth asking but not to get angry at them saying no.

You should have preempted that you may need the loo before getting home and either - gone home after school run and back out, or asked at the school to use theirs.

I’ve already answered this.

OP posts:
pikkumyy77 · 08/10/2024 12:22

coffeesaveslives · 08/10/2024 11:30

Maybe the policy should be changed, and maybe it is inhuman, but that doesn't change the fact that staff can't just do what they think is right and totally ignore what their contracts say.

Retail is, unfortunately, one of those jobs where you have to follow the book - you can't just do whatever you like unless you're happy to risk your job over it.

Of course staff should be free to do what is right and humane. What a passive lot you are! See an injustice? Challenge an injustice!

MrRobinsonsQuango · 08/10/2024 12:22

YABU it’s not all about you. You aren’t staff and it’s not a public toilet. I say this as someone who has been pregnant with twins, who ended up with a combined weight of 12 pounds plus 2 plus placentas and 2 sacs. I clearly needed the toilet a fair amount of the time

Peaceandquietandacuppa · 08/10/2024 12:21

No I don’t think shops should let customers use the staff toilet, as PPs said, it’s an insurance thing. It’s worth asking but not to get angry at them saying no.

You should have preempted that you may need the loo before getting home and either - gone home after school run and back out, or asked at the school to use theirs.

ClarasSisters · 08/10/2024 12:21

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 12:17

@rainbowunicorn

I’m not claiming that it’s
against the law. I am stating that the coop have set out clear aims about their moral stance and the kind of changes they want to see in society.

There 10 core values that they abide by are:

  1. Caring for other people
  2. Democracy
  3. Equity
  4. Equality
  5. Honesty
  6. Openness
  7. Self Help
  8. Self Responsobility
10. Social Responsibility

I don’t think that my experience as a customer fits in with that. If they want to make these big claims then they should allow flexibility in their policies to allow a society where you can be “caring for other people”

So are you going to complain to the Co op then?

ChungKing · 08/10/2024 12:20

Sixteenandfourteen789 · 08/10/2024 12:18

Humanity would literally end without women being pregnant and having babies; it’s not an optional extra!

Store policies and insurance policies should reflect that.

There should be some public acknowledgment in the form of private and civic facilities that women having babies allows economies to function and countries to thrive.

Look at any struggling community and it is one where the birth rate has fallen dramatically.

The law is an ass sometimes it really is! Society has forgotten what is important.

I agree, that there should be more flexibility, and it is most often women who lose out with these strict policies, but the OP seems to think the staff should have been flexible in her situation right now, when they could have gotten into a lot of trouble for doing so. So, absolutely we should campaign to change things, in the future, but I don't think the staff can be accused of not caring or having no morals because they don't want to lose their jobs based on how things stand right now!

Sixteenandfourteen789 · 08/10/2024 12:19

MattSmithsBowTie · 08/10/2024 12:18

It must have been embarrassing for you but unfortunately that is the reality of being pregnant. The Co-op aren’t going to let you go in their staff area because if you start trying to steal stuff they then have to manhandle a pregnant woman out, and that will look worse on the front page of the local paper than wouldn’t let someone use staff loos. It’s not the Co-ops fault you don’t have a car or that you had to do the school run or that the baby moved.

Why are we all so accepting and passive?

It doesn’t have to be the “reality of being pregnant” if the law insisted on the provision of decent facilities.

Octavia64 · 08/10/2024 12:19

I'm disabled (use a wheelchair) and have IBS.

It's very rare these days that shops etc will let you use staff loos.

Tena pads are the way to go.

There are many people with problems with continence and this website can be useful.

www.toiletmap.org.uk

ahemfem · 08/10/2024 12:19

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 11:58

If you read my post again then you will see that my problem is not with the individual staff member. I understand why she said no and I understand why they have a policy in place. She was young (maybe early twenties). I asked politely as I was checking out and explained I was desperate/pregnant. When she said no I did not push back, I tried to leave.

What I stated was that coop has some grandiose statements on their website with their number one value caring for others. Quickly followed by social responsibility and equality etc etc. My statement was that their should be some flexibility in those policies. I don’t think what happened to me in their store this morning fits with their key values.

You can't be flexible with policies. That's why they have policies. Same with any other industry.

Rachie1973 · 08/10/2024 12:19

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 10:47

How could I plan better?

I live in a small town. I went to the loo immediately before the school run. I don’t have access to a car during the week as my husband uses it to commute to work so my only means od transport is to walk the kids to school and was just picking up some milk before returning home. There are no public loos. The staff in that coop see me several mornings a week picking up staples. I don’t normally need the loo on the school run but the baby dropped.

Use some Attends.

Sorry but you’re not the only woman that’s been there. Would you expect a random homeowner to open up and let you in to use the bathroom?

4FoxxSake · 08/10/2024 12:18

I work in retail, we do on occasion let customers use our loos. But one of us has to escort them and wait outside the toilet door and escort them back.
When a delivery has come in, it's no.
When it'd leave one person alone on the shop floor, it's a no.