Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Baby P witch hunt

262 replies

the7Vabo · 05/10/2024 22:44

I watched a full documentary on Tik Tok about Baby P today.

The thing I’m most struck by is that social worker/s were fired, a doctor is in permanent psychiatric care, social workers received death threats and in the middle of it all the mother receives a minimum 5 year jail sentence and has been in & out of jail since 2013.

There were clear failing but a lot of it was against the background of an overwhelmed system. In particular the clinic where the doctor worked had been flagged as dangerous to senior management by two doctors who resigned and another doctor was on stress leave. There was no access to notes at this clinic. The doctor who last saw Baby P had no access to notes, wasn’t familiar with procedures around child protection in the UK, was working without the assistance of a nurse who might have helped her. She saw Baby P for a specific reason to rule out underlying conditions that might explain his injuries. She was blamed for missing that he had a broken back but it’s not clear when his back was broken.
Her face was plastered all over the papers and she went to train stations multiple times with thoughts of ending her life, asked for her name to be removed from the register and is now in psychiatric care.

The social worker directly involved might have been able to do more but she did a lot including removing Peter, taking him to hospital, contacting the police and immediately contacting the mother when she heard she had a boyfriend.

The head of the area had serious death threats and was fired.

I know people say the different agencies between them had contact 60 times and they shouldn’t have missed it. But that also means there was a lot of effort being made to protect him.

There were reports written immediately afterwards blaming various social workers, the police and medical staff involved with the exception of that doctor seemed to get off more lightly.

The thing that floors me is the mother got min 5 years and was first released in 2013!!! It’s bloody extraordinary. I saw a clip of her speaking to social workers, she was v convincing!

I just can’t get over how a doctor can have a nervous breakdown but the mother is meanwhile out & about!!!! She back in now for breach of conditions I think. I keep thinking about that doctor.

AIBU?!

OP posts:
BurbageBrook · 06/10/2024 14:48

I don't think Ed Balls should have sacked the boss live on TV but I do think generally it was justified anger at professionals not doing their jobs properly.

Pat888 · 06/10/2024 14:45

Ed Balls who iwas Health Secretary at the time sacked the poor woman who was head of Social services and Education for ?Essex publicly in Parliament before she had even been informed -such a big brave man - as if she could have had that much input
She was suicidal.
I wrote the above. I didn’t exactly get my facts right but reading a later newspaper article I see
The boss of Haringey Council's children's services was awarded a £680,000 payout for unfair dismissal after arguing she had been "unfairly scapegoated".
So thanks Ed Balls - I see she got compensation but that is 680,000 of tax payers money - and Ed swans off with his pension in tact.
updated info here
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-62087519

Suddenfeelingofsadness · 06/10/2024 14:40

Child protection is hard and I think many SW lose faith in the system. I felt conflicted that we could potentially remove a nine year old who desperately loved their mum, wanted to protect her and lied to us to protect her. The mum was getting back involved with a man who beat her. I felt that this was working against trying keep the child's best interests at heart. Yes their mum was not right but the removal would mean the child would end up living with strangers, probably fucked up for life, and the mum would cling even tighter to the man that abused her, as she had nothing left now. I couldn't do it. I wish I'd seen more happy endings for the children who were removed but unfortunately it seemed if they were over a certain age, the removal left a legacy almost as bad as if they had grown up in their abusive family homes.

MaybeItsBecauseImALodoner · 06/10/2024 14:33

SherbetSweeties · 06/10/2024 14:30

It was a failing across the board. He visited that doctor with a broken spine.

They failed that child catastrophically. So I disagree it wasn't a witch hunt. It was justified anger at professionals who jobs are to protect children and failed massively.

Agree, they were the same council that failed Victoria Climbie seven years before baby P.

SherbetSweeties · 06/10/2024 14:30

It was a failing across the board. He visited that doctor with a broken spine.

They failed that child catastrophically. So I disagree it wasn't a witch hunt. It was justified anger at professionals who jobs are to protect children and failed massively.

the7Vabo · 06/10/2024 14:24

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 14:07

You are right. 2 years out from 2013-15. Apologies. However I’m thinking Sen and and personality are an issue here. Parole board too lenient in 2013 I think,

The whole system was too lenient on her both before & after Peter’s death. She sounds like an very messed up individual to put it politely. She has made a fool of the system in the time she has been out.

She got away with lying and being a feckless parent before the fact and I struggle with hold much SS can ever be held responsible for that. They are human generally women who probably don’t relish the idea of separating a family and want to give people the benefit of the doubt.

OP posts:
Frankensteinian · 06/10/2024 14:16

I don’t think Lucy letby is guilty @TheShellBeach . I’m in America and so I read the New Yorker magazine article that was suppressed in the UK. However BBC sounds have since done a podcast suggesting the same- these very sick babies died because of systemic failures in management

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 14:07

You are right. 2 years out from 2013-15. Apologies. However I’m thinking Sen and and personality are an issue here. Parole board too lenient in 2013 I think,

MaybeItsBecauseImALodoner · 06/10/2024 14:03

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 13:40

You do realise the sentence was a minimum! That means she could apply for parole. and she was actually released in 2022. Maybe if posters understood sentencing it might help. She was in prison for 15 years.

She was released in 2013 but brought broke her bail conditions and was put back in prison two years later. She should never see the light of day again in my opinion, along with the horrific way that poor baby died the things she also allowed to happen to her two year old daughter are sickening.

the7Vabo · 06/10/2024 13:58

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 13:40

You do realise the sentence was a minimum! That means she could apply for parole. and she was actually released in 2022. Maybe if posters understood sentencing it might help. She was in prison for 15 years.

I understand it was a minimum.

As far as I understand it she was first released in 2013 - https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-62087519

She’s been in & out since due to her own behaviour.

A minimum of 5 years is too little.

Tracey Connolly

Baby P's mother Tracey Connelly released from prison

Dominic Raab previously condemned the decision, saying the Parole Board needs an "overhaul".

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-62087519

OP posts:
NowImNotDoingIt · 06/10/2024 13:42

@the7Vabo you can read it here. The services involvement section is an eye opener.
While not maliciously or intentionally, that baby was failed , despite multiple agencies and professionals being involved. It IS a travesty. Even worse, his death was used as a political football and click bait revenue.

https://basw.co.uk/sites/default/files/resources/basw111257-100_0.pdf

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 13:40

You do realise the sentence was a minimum! That means she could apply for parole. and she was actually released in 2022. Maybe if posters understood sentencing it might help. She was in prison for 15 years.

NowImNotDoingIt · 06/10/2024 13:37

I also have to add , I could never be a social worker as I'd either end up with a mental breakdown or in jail myself trying to rescue a kid. I struggle enough being a TA and only marginally involved in cases of neglect and abuse. I can't imagine how these people do it day in, day out.

ChampaignSupernova · 06/10/2024 13:30

It's awful the mother got such a pathetic sentence and I think the Government has since addressed the sentencing guidelines. It's awful the prpfessionals get dragged through the press and photos released etc. That should never happen unless they have acted in such a way that warrants their own criminal charges. They should be held to account internally or by an independent authority.

I think the government need to stop prioritising keeping clearly neglected and abused children with their parents. It's a gamble of an innocent life. There should be more money, more resources and tougher rules around child safe guarding but that's the same sadly in all essential services.

TizerorFizz · 06/10/2024 13:24

The mother was released in 2022 and has been recalled to prison for breaking the terms of her licence. Not sure why a poster earlier said she was out in 2013.

I think the problem with this case was social worker and doctor being too trusting and as individuals they cannot remove a child from a dangerous situation. They can however, feed into the senior team that starts the court process. This case did show a clear light on the failings of SS and the police and the NHS. They were not working together for the safety of children. Parents are capable of crime and dc depend on these services. Everyone letting dc down does need investigation.

This case did lead to a shortage of social workers. I’m not sure it’s all about money either. It’s about not wanting to do children work. Who can blame them?

PassingStranger · 06/10/2024 13:21

JudesBiggestFan · 06/10/2024 12:56

I think we really really need as a society to invest in parents and their children. All of society's ills come down to parents not parenting well enough for a huge variety of reasons. Knife crime, violent crime, mental health problems...all directly linked to kids being parented by struggling lone parents, abandoned by their dads leading to an absence of male roles models and lack of adequate support generally. We have become horribly individualistic as a society and we are also work obsessed for financial reasons. All our public services are under funded and there are just as a result a huge number of kids who are in real danger at worst and incapable of becoming productive members of society at best.
Its tragic. And yet we tinker around the edges rather than say kids need community. Kids need fathers. Kids need structure. The poor social workers are getting the blame for complete societal breakdown.

The Societal breakdown has broken down by more and more people shagging around and have babies,and babies with multiple partners.
Most cases of neglect abuse, murder of children seems to be where a stepparent or mothers new partner is involved or fathers new partner even.

Very rarely are the children products of relationship were parents are happily married.
People enter into having children far too easily and without committment.
Fathers bugger off and start again elsewhere, thinking the social will provide for the mother and the kids.
It's just so depressing.
Wonder what it's like in say France, Spain, and Germany, do they do it better?
If so we should learn from them.
It's all basically about sex and contraception though.
We have more and more contraception than ever, but more and more people having babies that they are not equipped to be able to care for them properly.
We may have laughed at no sex before marriage but at least we didn't have the terrible social problems we have today.
Some people are disgusting the way they carry on.

PattiSmithsPattis · 06/10/2024 13:20

Pass the parcel of blame.
The people who killed poor Peter are those people who seem to have been overlooked as far as the press were concerned.
Yes there were failings in a non joined up system.
The sacking by Ed Balls was a chest beating exercise. Poor woman. I'm too am pleased she felt able to stand up for herself.
The rest of the professionals who were publicly named, just unacceptable. They were not charged with any crime, they had a right to anonymity surely?
The fact the poor boys mother cannot keep herself out of jail says everything about her paltry sentence and 'rehabilitation ' .

BurnoutGP · 06/10/2024 13:05

mathanxiety · 05/10/2024 23:31

They should have had the book thrown at them, for sure.

But I think it's appropriate to ask questions about a child protection "system" that actually isn't fit for purpose.

Why were no notes available at the clinic?
Why were various services incapable of communicating and sharing information?

You are correct. But what happens in all aspects of health and social care, is that individuals are scapegoated rather than looking at the system issues.

Autumnblackberries · 06/10/2024 13:04

Weighing up the truth (or otherwise) what's written by the scum press should be a mandatory part of the curriculum.
The problem with low quality click bait stories and the subsequent social media frenzy is that huge swathes of the GB public are too stupid or too lazy to see the actual truth.

the7Vabo · 06/10/2024 13:01

JudesBiggestFan · 06/10/2024 12:56

I think we really really need as a society to invest in parents and their children. All of society's ills come down to parents not parenting well enough for a huge variety of reasons. Knife crime, violent crime, mental health problems...all directly linked to kids being parented by struggling lone parents, abandoned by their dads leading to an absence of male roles models and lack of adequate support generally. We have become horribly individualistic as a society and we are also work obsessed for financial reasons. All our public services are under funded and there are just as a result a huge number of kids who are in real danger at worst and incapable of becoming productive members of society at best.
Its tragic. And yet we tinker around the edges rather than say kids need community. Kids need fathers. Kids need structure. The poor social workers are getting the blame for complete societal breakdown.

I 100% agree with your last sentence - that’s it in a nutshell for me.

And it’s not just SW a lot of teachers end up in a nightmare situation trying to deal with kids who are not being looked after by their parents.

OP posts:
Autumnblackberries · 06/10/2024 13:01

Yet still they wonder why there's a recruitment crisis with doctors and social workers.
Go figure.

the7Vabo · 06/10/2024 12:58

Sharontheodopolodous · 06/10/2024 12:44

This reminds me of my aunt and cousin

Aunt and uncle broke up and she brainwashed my cousins (male and female) not to have anything to do with my uncle as 'he left us!wahh!'

Cousins are not very bright and even though they'd seen what had been happening between their parents,they 100% believed my aunt

Long story short,aunt started dating a bloke who groomed her and started abusing cousin (female)

Aunt refused to believe cousin and turned on her,new bloke dumped her so aunt and cousin started seeing men from the takeaway round the corner to their house

Both aunt and (then just turned) 14 year old cousin where sleeping (being raped in cousins case) with two men from the takeaway-cousin was threatened to keep sleeping with (being raped) with her 'boyfriend' as it was her fault aunts boyfriend had dumped aunt and if this new boyfriend dumped aunt,she'd destroy cousins life

Cousin fell pregnant at 15,nothing happened-she went on to have the baby (aunt brought baby up and cousin went on to have 4 more babies)

As a family,we rang the police,ss,childlike,nspcc-you name them,we rang them from the moment aunt started seeing the first bloke

I was 19 and had just had my first baby,was interviewed by a sw (who was a nasty bitch) was called a liar who deserved to have my own baby taken away (with a threatening phone call a week later) and was told to 'keep my nose out-'aunts rules are the only rules for those children'

She believed whatever aunt said without digging any further,even when it became obvious what was happening and then cousin fell pregnant

She was badly let down by ss and it could have been a lot different if only they'd dug a bit further (or saw what was right in front of them)

The family did have a few sw's but I was only interviewed by that one and all believed aunts take on it all

Not one stepped in

The frontline SW in Baby P’s case really did seem like she genuinely tried.

OP posts:
JudesBiggestFan · 06/10/2024 12:56

I think we really really need as a society to invest in parents and their children. All of society's ills come down to parents not parenting well enough for a huge variety of reasons. Knife crime, violent crime, mental health problems...all directly linked to kids being parented by struggling lone parents, abandoned by their dads leading to an absence of male roles models and lack of adequate support generally. We have become horribly individualistic as a society and we are also work obsessed for financial reasons. All our public services are under funded and there are just as a result a huge number of kids who are in real danger at worst and incapable of becoming productive members of society at best.
Its tragic. And yet we tinker around the edges rather than say kids need community. Kids need fathers. Kids need structure. The poor social workers are getting the blame for complete societal breakdown.

the7Vabo · 06/10/2024 12:55

NowImNotDoingIt · 06/10/2024 12:37

Have you read the serious case review ? It's a fact that there were failings in the system. I have extreme sympathy for the professionals involved and the way their lives were ruined. Mainly because, they did fucking care. But the system was (and still is) broken ,and they were used as scapegoats and easy targets. CPS Decided not to prosecute after the mum being investigated twice. Why did no heads fall there?

The witch hunt was extremely political and there was pressure from society and the media to see "heads roll ". The higher ups caved to that pressure. It was all a shit show.

The criminals were dealt with by the justice system, not a lot to milk there. A broken system though, generated headlines and campaigns for months and months. It wasn't the system on trial by media though, it was named individuals that did the best they could, with what they had , within the restrictions and laws they had available to them.

It wasn't a single social worker or doctor that had the power to remove the child . It wasn't a single social worker or doctor that decided he was to be returned to his mother.

Baby WAS failed. Primarily by his "care" givers , but also by the system.

The reason why lessons must be learned and procedures scrutinised is that you can't stop people from killing their kids . You just can't. You can ensure there are systems in place to intervene and protect these children. Given all the cuts though, that's just lip service.

SS as they stand atm are still underfunded, overworked, understaffed, under resourced. Lack of sufficient foster carers , adequate placements, funds, alternative support etc. Time lines are ridiculous, the number of chances given are ridiculous.No lessons have been learned.

i haven’t read the review, from what was said in the documentary it seems it was rushed and full of errors.

But I otherwise agree with you. Peter was clearly being very badly abused and wasn’t removed so ultimately the system did fail.

It is hard to know that the system is worse than it was when Baby Peter died. The population keeps increasing and social deprivation is on the increase. It’s a recipe for disaster.

The media need to be held accountable also for witch hunts and storing up social unrest. A reporter for The Sun was asked why they didn’t report on the police involvement with Baby P and if it had been because the police gave a press conference to charm their way out of things. She said she didn’t want to answer. I find her her & people like her enraging. Happy to push people to the brink to sell red tops.

OP posts:
Sharontheodopolodous · 06/10/2024 12:44

Beryls · 06/10/2024 08:45

I think it's because the services are there to protect and they failed. Social work isn't a job I could do and it's so much responsibility. However, having dealt with social workers frequently when I was a teacher I can't tell you the sheer frustration of reporting constantly and nothing being done.

One instance in particular, this social worker was totally taken in by the mother of these kids who very clearly being dangerously neglected and there were also signs of abuse. The mother was very manipulative and at a meeting the head was trying to tell her this is serious with everything that had been going on and she just would not listen. Every day I reported something on cpoms it was an awful time. The mother then moved to a different council area and no doubt the entire process started again. It was a pattern, they'd moved several times to different local authorities.

God knows what has happened to them since I often think about them, but that social worker believed the lies the mother told over experienced professionals who saw these children day in, day out. If I ever found out something awful had happened to those kids I would absolutely hold her patrly responsible for failing to protect them when she could have, 2 years this went on for before they disappeared to another part of the country. That's negligent.

This reminds me of my aunt and cousin

Aunt and uncle broke up and she brainwashed my cousins (male and female) not to have anything to do with my uncle as 'he left us!wahh!'

Cousins are not very bright and even though they'd seen what had been happening between their parents,they 100% believed my aunt

Long story short,aunt started dating a bloke who groomed her and started abusing cousin (female)

Aunt refused to believe cousin and turned on her,new bloke dumped her so aunt and cousin started seeing men from the takeaway round the corner to their house

Both aunt and (then just turned) 14 year old cousin where sleeping (being raped in cousins case) with two men from the takeaway-cousin was threatened to keep sleeping with (being raped) with her 'boyfriend' as it was her fault aunts boyfriend had dumped aunt and if this new boyfriend dumped aunt,she'd destroy cousins life

Cousin fell pregnant at 15,nothing happened-she went on to have the baby (aunt brought baby up and cousin went on to have 4 more babies)

As a family,we rang the police,ss,childlike,nspcc-you name them,we rang them from the moment aunt started seeing the first bloke

I was 19 and had just had my first baby,was interviewed by a sw (who was a nasty bitch) was called a liar who deserved to have my own baby taken away (with a threatening phone call a week later) and was told to 'keep my nose out-'aunts rules are the only rules for those children'

She believed whatever aunt said without digging any further,even when it became obvious what was happening and then cousin fell pregnant

She was badly let down by ss and it could have been a lot different if only they'd dug a bit further (or saw what was right in front of them)

The family did have a few sw's but I was only interviewed by that one and all believed aunts take on it all

Not one stepped in

Swipe left for the next trending thread