Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Just because I'm there doesn't mean I'm free childcare

364 replies

itsmeits · 04/10/2024 07:13

I go out once a week and take my DDs with me 7 and 13. It's a social evening thing, the girls love it, there are different activities on.
My sister has started coming fine no issue with that. Her mate is now coming with her DD 8
This is where the issue is. They swan off for 15-30 min cig breaks and leave the child unattended. Going for a cig is the announcement and off they pop.
Last night child of sisters friend was messing about and has hurt themselves, mum nowhere to be seen for over 20mins.
I am being blamed for not watching the child 😳
Apparently announcing I'm going for a cig is que for me to watch her child - never have either said can you watch DD while I nip out. Plus I don't know this child, met her a few times that's it.
When this happened I should have been sat with/watching her DD not participating in an activity my DDs wanted to do.

My sister is trying to rip me a new one and her friend has threatened to report me to SS for neglect, as it was my neglect (according to them) that has caused this hospital visit and her to be reported to SS.

Should I have watched this child
YANBU you have your DDs she needs to step up
YABU she's a single mum provide free cig breaks child care for her

OP posts:
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 06/10/2024 08:59

StormingNorman · 06/10/2024 08:49

Why do you think it was beyond OP to ask who was looking after the other child?

They weren’t randoms at the same event. They were there together as a group (although I do note that OP revised this in later posts to say they weren’t there together) so it’s fairly obvious that as the only remaining adult she was being expected to look after the children.

I don’t agree with the mum going off and leaving her child, but OP understood what was happening and chose not to say anything knowing the child was unsupervised. Aside from the obvious on that occasion, the other mum had form for this so OP k ew it was coming.

It was a pass ag move on OP’s part.

Because the child in question was absolutely nothing to do with the OP, @StormingNorman.

Personally if I saw someone leave their 8 year old unattended for 20 minutes in a place like that I would assume it was because they thought their 8 year old was old enough to be left unattended for a while.

Daleksatemyshed · 06/10/2024 08:58

Can't agree @StormingNorman , the child was colouring in when they went out so how was the Op supposed to know she'd get up and hurt herself? If they'd taken the 5 mins it takes to smoke a cigarette and come straight back probably this wouldn't have happened

StormingNorman · 06/10/2024 08:49

DecafGreen · 06/10/2024 05:44

But that was not what happened, is it?

The OP did not ignore the child 'out of meanness'. She was doing an activity with one of her children, while keeping an eye on her other child. What was she supposed to do? Stop the activity and ignore her own children so that she could watch the other woman's child?

You seem to have twisted everything you have read so that you can have a dig at the OP. The only person to blame is the woman who went outside to smoke.

Why do you think it was beyond OP to ask who was looking after the other child?

They weren’t randoms at the same event. They were there together as a group (although I do note that OP revised this in later posts to say they weren’t there together) so it’s fairly obvious that as the only remaining adult she was being expected to look after the children.

I don’t agree with the mum going off and leaving her child, but OP understood what was happening and chose not to say anything knowing the child was unsupervised. Aside from the obvious on that occasion, the other mum had form for this so OP k ew it was coming.

It was a pass ag move on OP’s part.

Jack80 · 06/10/2024 08:44

This is not on, if they want to have a cig they should go separate and watch their own children.

Coruscations · 06/10/2024 07:14

August1980 · 06/10/2024 03:26

i think this is a fair comment. You should have said something before they left. It’s not very nice out of meanness to let a child get hurt. You seem to articulate yourself on here quite well so should have said who is watching x? Rather than saying nothing and ignore the child completely because they didn’t ask you….

No, it isn't. They must have seen that OP was fully occupied. Why would she interrupt what she was doing to say, in effect "I know you haven't asked me to look after your child, but just in case you think I'm going to, I can't". They knew plenty of other people in the club, for all OP knew they had asked someone else to keep an eye on her. After all, the mother had history expecting all and sundry to take over her responsibilities.

DecafGreen · 06/10/2024 05:44

August1980 · 06/10/2024 03:26

i think this is a fair comment. You should have said something before they left. It’s not very nice out of meanness to let a child get hurt. You seem to articulate yourself on here quite well so should have said who is watching x? Rather than saying nothing and ignore the child completely because they didn’t ask you….

But that was not what happened, is it?

The OP did not ignore the child 'out of meanness'. She was doing an activity with one of her children, while keeping an eye on her other child. What was she supposed to do? Stop the activity and ignore her own children so that she could watch the other woman's child?

You seem to have twisted everything you have read so that you can have a dig at the OP. The only person to blame is the woman who went outside to smoke.

August1980 · 06/10/2024 03:26

StormingNorman · 04/10/2024 07:25

I’ve said you are being unreasonable because by your own admission you were not watching an eight rear old child when you knew nobody else was.

If you weren’t able to watch the child along with your own, you should have spoken up at the time. So when they announced they were going for a cig you say “I’m tied up with my DC at the moment, could you take yours with you”

Your post reads like you got the hump, behaved in a passive aggressive way and now it’s backfired because the child ended up in hospital.

Equally, the other mum is being unreasonable to expect you to look after her child…and to take such long fag breaks. It’s incredibly antisocial of them to leave you sat alone and with all the kids for so long.

Edited

i think this is a fair comment. You should have said something before they left. It’s not very nice out of meanness to let a child get hurt. You seem to articulate yourself on here quite well so should have said who is watching x? Rather than saying nothing and ignore the child completely because they didn’t ask you….

BruFord · 06/10/2024 02:35

This is not the first time a club member has had the child 'left' with them, while mum swans off for a smoke/gossip with drink in hand.

If the Club Owner told SS this, that’ll be the end of the matter as far as you’re concerned.

Justice4Friend · 06/10/2024 02:20

OP your sister is a leach.
Wants to live with you and gets you in trouble.
Keep her at a distance.

BlueFlowers5 · 06/10/2024 02:07

The mum puts smoking before her child's welfare?
SS won't like that if your DSis interferes.

AliceMcK · 06/10/2024 01:39

ForBetterForWorseOrNot · 05/10/2024 17:50

Social services do not just get involved because a child has an accident and splits head open. My son did this twice in 8 weeks due to a heart murmur and loosing his balance when dizzy. We didn't know that was the cause at the time but no ss involvement. Unless their is other stuff in the background one accident would not lead to involvement. Sounds like this parent most likely has a tendency not to pay attention to her child.

Absolutely this.

One of my DDs has been in a&e multiple times for head injuries, 4 times between the ages of 3 & 5, out of those 4 occasions 1 I was in the shower so didn’t see what happened, DH was chasing her (playing) she ran in another room and we assume she went head first into a dresser she was running so fast, he got there a split second after it happened. 2 I was leaving the toilets in the supermarket dd ran ahead and head first into a metal shelf she hadn’t seen knocking herself out. 3 dd apparently ran into a brick wall, we were outside school, next to the school is a church that has grounds around it, as I was chatting to other mums we heard a scream from around the corner all the children said she just went head first into the wall, we are talking mainly reception age children and finally 4 DH was upstairs I was in one room and heard a crash in the next dd was on the floor when I picked her up she had a massive dent on her head a huge bump already showing, we’ve no idea what happened. The same child also sprained her wrist in this time at someone else’s house where the mum didn’t see what happened.

SS were never called even though I couldn’t say I’d witnessed each incident. This particular child had dozens of bruises all over her legs too. But she would happily chat to the Drs and nurses and tell them proudly how she gained each one.

Id say the fact the accident happened in a place where alcohol was being served might be another factor especially if the mum had been drinking.

Butnothingsclear · 05/10/2024 23:44

PuggyPuggyPuggy · 05/10/2024 20:51

This might be the maddest thing I've ever heard. Imagine going to a busy playground with your kids, and then just loudly announcing "I'm just popping to the pub!" and BAM! anyone in earshot is now resonsible for your kids as you leg it 😂

And then there's a mad rush as all the other parents yell "I'M JUST POPPING OFF SOMEWHERE TOO! YOU'RE IT!" And some poor sod who was engrossed in their phone during all this is left supervising 30 kids they've never seen before.

😂😂😂 I did it all wrong!

Beautifulweeds · 05/10/2024 22:57

Well let's see how far the neglect report goes, of course an empty threat, as the friend of your sister was responsible for her child. Did you sign a document to say you would be fully responsible for her welfare and have it signed by parent and counter signed by a witness?

Honestly, jog on this irresponsible entitled parent, tell her to f##k off!

KMGrath · 05/10/2024 22:40

You have every right to be angry. Loosers, take your kids to smoke with you. I never trusted anyone with my kids except my mom. Tell them you will be happy to talk to CPS. If they asked you to watch the child and you said yes, that’s different.

BirthdayRainbow · 05/10/2024 22:38

I accept that this woman is in the wrong. However if I knew a small child was alone I wouldn't be able to help but keep an eye on them. I used to be a nanny and am still the one watching the kids and counting to make sure one hasn't wandered off. I do it for them to make sure they are safe, It necessarily for the parents sake. I was at a family do and there was a hot tub with three little ones in. I hated it as no one seemed to be specifically watching the very small kids that were in it. So I did.

PotatoLove · 05/10/2024 22:27

Both your DS and her neglectful friend are taking the absolutely piss. Glad you've got lots of support OP.

Peaceandquietandacuppa · 05/10/2024 22:14

exaltedwombat · 05/10/2024 17:48

Tricky one. You were in a group. When the other mums announced they were off for a ciggy break, if you didn't say anything you DID sort of tacitly take responsibility for the kids.
Pity it turned into a blame contest.

Nope. The child was 8, if the mother did not explicitly ask her to watch the child then how could OP know? I wouldn’t dream of swanning off somewhere and not saying ‘oh do you mind watching x for a few mins please?’

bringslight · 05/10/2024 21:53

MeMyCatsAndI · 04/10/2024 07:21

So basically she wants you to tell SS that she regularly leaves her kid unattended?

yes and not only, but smocking also, may be even in her own house and near kids

LookItsMeAgain · 05/10/2024 21:04

I'm gobsmacked at your sister's behaviour here. I really can't. I'm delighted your mother told her to get back in her box and give her head a wobble while she's at it. Fair dues to your mother!!!

It would take a hell of an apology from the sister and the neglectful friend here for me to forgive them passing on my details to Social Services. I mean really!!!

2Rebecca · 05/10/2024 21:02

The ridiculous thing is that this mother did have someone who could watch her sprog whilst she had a fag. She had come to the evening with a friend. That friend was not the OP it was her sister. The mother should have gone off for a cigarette alone and left her friend who presumable knows her daughter better than the OP and who doesn't have any children of her own to watch.

surreygirl1987 · 05/10/2024 20:59

PuggyPuggyPuggy · 05/10/2024 20:51

This might be the maddest thing I've ever heard. Imagine going to a busy playground with your kids, and then just loudly announcing "I'm just popping to the pub!" and BAM! anyone in earshot is now resonsible for your kids as you leg it 😂

And then there's a mad rush as all the other parents yell "I'M JUST POPPING OFF SOMEWHERE TOO! YOU'RE IT!" And some poor sod who was engrossed in their phone during all this is left supervising 30 kids they've never seen before.

Hahagaha exactly. You've explained that far better than I did, and made me laugh too.

surreygirl1987 · 05/10/2024 20:57

surreygirl1987 · 05/10/2024 20:56

That's ridiculous. I was at a softplay last weekend and saw a mother leave her child in the soft play while she went to the toilet. If something happened to the child, does that make me responsible just because I didn't stop the woman and say I'm not going to watch your child? Be reasonable.

Sorry that was obviously supposed to be to the person you were replying to!

surreygirl1987 · 05/10/2024 20:56

Thursdaygirl · 05/10/2024 17:58

So if you don’t make it clear you are not taking responsibility, then you become responsible by default?? Not sure how this would stand up legally!

That's ridiculous. I was at a softplay last weekend and saw a mother leave her child in the soft play while she went to the toilet. If something happened to the child, does that make me responsible just because I didn't stop the woman and say I'm not going to watch your child? Be reasonable.

PuggyPuggyPuggy · 05/10/2024 20:51

This might be the maddest thing I've ever heard. Imagine going to a busy playground with your kids, and then just loudly announcing "I'm just popping to the pub!" and BAM! anyone in earshot is now resonsible for your kids as you leg it 😂

And then there's a mad rush as all the other parents yell "I'M JUST POPPING OFF SOMEWHERE TOO! YOU'RE IT!" And some poor sod who was engrossed in their phone during all this is left supervising 30 kids they've never seen before.

Slartibartslow · 05/10/2024 20:50

StormingNorman · 04/10/2024 07:25

I’ve said you are being unreasonable because by your own admission you were not watching an eight rear old child when you knew nobody else was.

If you weren’t able to watch the child along with your own, you should have spoken up at the time. So when they announced they were going for a cig you say “I’m tied up with my DC at the moment, could you take yours with you”

Your post reads like you got the hump, behaved in a passive aggressive way and now it’s backfired because the child ended up in hospital.

Equally, the other mum is being unreasonable to expect you to look after her child…and to take such long fag breaks. It’s incredibly antisocial of them to leave you sat alone and with all the kids for so long.

Edited

Ludicrous.
So I’m responsible for watching all children whose parents aren’t watching them when I know they’re not being watched am I? No.
if children are not being supervised that is just down to those who are responsible for them.
Her child, her problem.

Swipe left for the next trending thread