Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Go Ape refusing refund

459 replies

Stripyseason · 02/10/2024 14:13

I can’t work out of I’m being unreasonable or fighting like a mama bear here in the right.
took my kids to Go Ape on Sunday as a treat as it’s expensive (£60 for all of us). I’ll pop my original complaint email in as it explains it all thoroughly. Emails have been back and forth since then with them apologising and offering a discounted voucher for us to return and “give it another go”. I’ve said we don’t want to return as the left in tears feeling like they’d been rushed and the last thing they want is to go back! I just want a refund but 12 emails back and forth are going nowhere. They have said they shouldn’t have been rushed but they don’t do refunds and theyd like us to come back with a discount. Do I just leave it and chalk it up to experience? Or do I keep going and if so how? TIA.

Dear customer services,

Im just writing after quite a disappointing experience at X Go Ape today. It was myself and my 2 children, 8 and 11, one of whom has autism. We booked for the only available slot left which was 16:30 and arrived by 16:15 to be in plenty of time.

We had to wait for a while for the safety briefing which was fine, and we got started. We were told we would have the chance to do 4 levels if we wished. We started off great and were enjoying it until we finished level 2 and my son heard some instructors saying we were “over time”. When we went to wait at #3 an instructor said we were running behind with time and as they were closing soon we likely wouldn’t have time to do course 4 if we did 3 so we felt pushed to do 4. This wasn’t helpful as it felt a big step up from course 2 and my son felt rushed and was worried saying they’re closing, so we hurried as much as we could. It ended in a bit of a downer sadly with the kids just feeling like they’d “taken too long” on courses 1&2 despite being told in the safety briefing that we could take as much time as we needed on the levels.

I’m disappointed because we arrived in good time and if the last slot was always going to be rushed I think that should have been made clear at point of booking. We had to miss out a whole level which we had paid for. It was a lot of money as a treat and we all just left
A bit downhearted after a good start.

I’ve been to Go Ape before and had a really
Positive experience so this felt quite disappointing sadly and I’d appreciate a gesture of a refund and to let the very nice staff know that rushing us didn’t feel fair given we had paid for a slot so feel we should have been given the same time as everyone else who booked for earlier.

Many thanks etc

OP posts:
PuddlesPityParty · 02/10/2024 17:23

You’re just coming across as grabby to me sorry 🤷‍♀️

Apolloneuro · 02/10/2024 17:19

Stripyseason · 02/10/2024 14:31

We didn’t get the hour and their terms say you have a a lot up to 2 hours if needed ☹️

I agree you might feel aggrieved if you didn’t get one hour in the trees, but it’s very clear that the two hours is for hold ups their end etc and not that it’s a two hour slot for you. Them allowing two hours is not the same as you get two hours.

It’s like when you get a hospital appointment and the letter says ‘allow three hours for this appointment.’ Doesn’t mean your appointment is going to be three hours.

Focus your complaint on the fact you didn’t get one hour actually doing the activity. You’ll get nowhere if you keep saying “it’s a two hour slot.”

Soontobe60 · 02/10/2024 17:17

Stripyseason · 02/10/2024 14:30

sorry I agree it’s confusing

  1. you are meant to complete each “stage” in around 15 mins but they have a buffer of a 2 hour slot to allow for safety briefing and handing back harness. We had 90 mins but 20 of those taken up waiting for safety briefing

The website makes it clear that you have 1 hour in the treetops. You had longer than that so they've been more than fair offering you another slot rather than a refund. Your main argument seems to be that you were unable to complete all the stages, but clearly some people will not complete the whole course. Do you think someone with a disability should be given more time?

LunaandLily · 02/10/2024 17:14

Did you and the manager really refer to “myself” in the emails? Myself is not interchangeable with me, it is not a more formal or professional way of saying “me”. It’s not “myself and my kids” and “myself and the team”, it’s “me and my kids” and “me and the team”. All of this myself/yourself instead of me/you is a madness that needs to stop.

Talipesmum · 02/10/2024 17:12

Walkaround · 02/10/2024 17:03

Not the only thing - it is also relevant that the rushing them was not even necessary, given they ended up leaving 30 minutes before closing time, which is exceptionally poor customer service when they have been made specifically aware of the customers’s special needs and advertise to the world that they are able to cater for people with such needs.

I do think it’s the only relevant point - because it’s up to go ape to fit a full hour into the 2 hour window. It would be reasonable of them to move the family on or say they can’t start another course if they’d had their one hour. But not reasonable if they hadn’t.

The company are basically saying “yes you were done before 6.30, but you had your full time in the trees so sorry, that’s the only thing we promise”. And OP needs to say “no we didn’t get an hour actually”. Not “but you weren’t closed yet and we were asked to leave before the end of our 2 hour slot”.

JumperStripes · 02/10/2024 17:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

It’s just one of those things. So instead of being able to whizz round three or four times, you might be stuck just doing two.

Stripyseason · 02/10/2024 17:06

Walkaround · 02/10/2024 17:03

Not the only thing - it is also relevant that the rushing them was not even necessary, given they ended up leaving 30 minutes before closing time, which is exceptionally poor customer service when they have been made specifically aware of the customers’s special needs and advertise to the world that they are able to cater for people with such needs.

Thank you - exactly this

OP posts:
Atichen · 02/10/2024 17:06

Just a thought (I don't work for go ape) I've been once but that was over 10 years ago

you said you'd been befor so they might have assumed you were confident/could go at an adverage pace,

but if the "adverage"times to complete the course are something like:
Stage 1 -10min
3 min queue/change over time
Stage 2 _10min
3 min queue/change over time
Stage 3 - 20 min
3 min queue/change over time
Stage 4 -10 min
(So added up to 59 min)

But if you took
Stage 1 -15min
6 min queue/change over time
Stage 2 _15min
6 min queue/change over time

(You would only have 18 min left on the hour for the last stage)

Based on the slower speed it would be expected you'll not have time to do 3 and 4 in under an hour)

If you'd taken another 15 min for stage 4 that would be 57 min on the course
I think you said yourself were quicker on the last one -(sorry not clear how long you actually had on the course so only guessing at times)

MikeRafone · 02/10/2024 17:06

I went to Go Ape and didn't like the experience and they offered me a straight refund - I actually asked for gift voucher to gift to my daughter as it wasn't their fault I didn't like it and thought it would be unfair - they gifted me two vouchers so my daughter could take someone else with her - which I thought was very generous. I found their customer service excellent

Dyke · 02/10/2024 17:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

JumperStripes · 02/10/2024 17:04

Our Go Ape has a one hour policy and it’s really infuriating when stuck behind someone who stops moving and needs help, because then everyone just misses out.

Walkaround · 02/10/2024 17:03

Talipesmum · 02/10/2024 16:59

Yes, like I said, the only thing that matters is how long they had in the treetops compared to one hour.

Not the only thing - it is also relevant that the rushing them was not even necessary, given they ended up leaving 30 minutes before closing time, which is exceptionally poor customer service when they have been made specifically aware of the customers’s special needs and advertise to the world that they are able to cater for people with such needs.

Viviennemary · 02/10/2024 17:01

Ablondiebutagoody · 02/10/2024 14:22

I mean it sounds to me like you were a bit slow, they were closing and you only had time for level 3 or 4 so they gave you the choice. What should they have done?

In my experience with Go Ape, if you are quick they often let you go round again. If you are slow and they are closing, there's not much that they can do.

I would accept the discount.

Well It would have been generous if they offered you a full refund but I don't think you can really expect it. You had quite a while there. Maybe it would be better if they specified a maximum amount of time you can take.

Talipesmum · 02/10/2024 16:59

Walkaround · 02/10/2024 16:58

They were cheated if they had 20 minutes left of their hour in the treetops and it was still actually another 30 minutes until the official closing time.

Yes, like I said, the only thing that matters is how long they had in the treetops compared to one hour.

Walkaround · 02/10/2024 16:58

Talipesmum · 02/10/2024 16:54

Yes, exactly this. The ONLY relevant thing to mention in your complaint is how much activity “treetop” time you got compared to the expected hour. I can’t tell from your various messagings on timings how long you actually had on the activity, but if you had less than an hour that’s all you need to highlight. Especially as they seem to think you had 90 mins.

And I strongly agree with the post below too:

You didn’t book a 2 hour slot though- you booked an arrival time. If you’re going to get anywhere with them you need to drop the fixation with the 2 hour slot.

The two hour thing is “your one hour activity will take place within this two hour window”. Not “you should expect to be on site for a 2 hour window and if you were there for less, you’ve been cheated”.

They were cheated if they had 20 minutes left of their hour in the treetops and it was still actually another 30 minutes until the official closing time.

Talipesmum · 02/10/2024 16:54

Dishwashersaurous · 02/10/2024 16:38

But all the other factors are irrelevant to the actual complaint.

The complaint is that you had 40 minutes on the course instead of an hour.

All the other information is probably confusing the person in customer service, particularly as the time wasn't included in the first email.

Maybe send one more email, really clearly explaining that you only had 40 minutes of a one hour session and would therefore like a third refund.

Yes, exactly this. The ONLY relevant thing to mention in your complaint is how much activity “treetop” time you got compared to the expected hour. I can’t tell from your various messagings on timings how long you actually had on the activity, but if you had less than an hour that’s all you need to highlight. Especially as they seem to think you had 90 mins.

And I strongly agree with the post below too:

You didn’t book a 2 hour slot though- you booked an arrival time. If you’re going to get anywhere with them you need to drop the fixation with the 2 hour slot.

The two hour thing is “your one hour activity will take place within this two hour window”. Not “you should expect to be on site for a 2 hour window and if you were there for less, you’ve been cheated”.

SweetSakura · 02/10/2024 16:53

I'm confused what the relevance of your child's autism is here. I think you would need to explain his specific issue to go ape as autism presents in many different ways. DH and I and two of our DC have autism but I cant think what special treatment we would need at Go Ape. So if there is something particular then you do need to explain that not expect them to be mind readers

Fearne23 · 02/10/2024 16:53

Agree with most others - it boils down to whether you had 40 mins or the full hour in the trees. The 2 hour slot is irrelevant. If you didn’t get the full hour, I think the 10% is a bit stingy but personally I couldn’t get worked up about it since they have genuinely apologised.

HollyKnight · 02/10/2024 16:53

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

It's how most activities work. There will be a time when they will accept no more people. If the activity ends at 18:00 they're not going to let someone start it at 17:50 when it takes at least 15 mins to complete. The day is probably meant to look like 16:30-17:00 prep and safety briefing, 17:00-1800 on the course, 18:00-1830 whatever needs to be done on the way out. Their mistake was taking until 17:10 to let them start the course when they stop letting people start courses before 17:50.

We don't know how long it took them to do the first 2 courses. If they were fast/efficient they might have let them do all 4 courses even if it meant overrunning slightly. But if the pace was slow, that wasn't going to be possible. Staff want to get closed up and go home.

LBFseBrom · 02/10/2024 16:53

SoupDragon · 02/10/2024 14:20

I also think their response is perfectly reasonable.

So do I.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 02/10/2024 16:53

FiveTreeHill · 02/10/2024 15:22

It wasn't OP that was running slow it was them. She completed 3 sections in 40 minutes, actually quicker than they anticipate you do. They cut her time short by 30% because they were slow to start the safety brief

I get OPs times keep changing. But if what she's saying is true then of course she should be pissed off, you don't pay for something and expect to only get 2/3rds of it just because you paid for the last slot!

Imagine you go to the cinema and they stop the film 2/3rd of the way through because they were slow to start the ads!

There may have been a delay in getting through the safety procedures (I’m not sure if OP is right about this though - these always seem to take quite a long time!).

The original post very much admitted that she and her children were running slowly through the course as well as this original delay.

I think Op had got fixated on the idea of a “2 hour slot” which doesn’t really seem to have been the case.

Stripyseason · 02/10/2024 16:51

HollyKnight · 02/10/2024 16:35

It says to phone them to discuss.

And I did, and they said they had all the info I needed from the form. But thanks

OP posts:
Walkaround · 02/10/2024 16:49

You explained the issue phenomenally badly at the start. Why not just say you paid for a one hour session in the trees and only got 45 minutes, were unnecessarily rushed so that you left nearly 30 minutes before the site was supposed to close, which was the same amount of time before your 2-hour time slot ran out, and you were made to wait an unacceptably long time for the safety briefing? Then it would be easier to understand why you want your money back, or at least a partial refund (although after going on about the nice bits of the experience, it comes across as a bit odd you don’t want to go back and give it another chance?).

iwfja · 02/10/2024 16:47

We were told despite having 30 mins left of our slot and 20 mins of treetop time we couldn’t do level 3 as it was now shut!

They probably estimated that you would take longer than that to complete level 3 based on how long you had taken to complete the other levels.

However, if you really only had 40 minutes of treetop time instead of 60 minutes, I think they should give you a discount of more than 10% on a future visit.
I don't see why you should get a full refund though because you did have the experience.

Bellavida99 · 02/10/2024 16:47

If they were closing of course you are being unreasonable. You had your fair time and didn’t get everything done. Briefings and harnesses always take a while. When I go to our local indoor ski place I don’t ask for a refund because my kids are better than me so I don’t do as much as them

Swipe left for the next trending thread