Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder how anyone affords to move house?

267 replies

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 09:45

We are a mid 20s married couple with our first baby due next month. Earlier this year we managed to buy our first home. It is an ex-council house which needed significant improvement in an okay area. Not the best, but good schools around and convenient motorway links. With kindness, practical and financial support from our families, we are slowly turning it into a beautiful place to live. It is now a really lovely home with just a couple of rooms left to upgrade. It is technically a 3 bedroom but the third bedroom is very small and houses our clothes as well as the boiler so would never be functional as a third room.

We are glad to be on the property ladder and feel lucky we had so much support, but the cost to maintain and upgrade this house has been more than I could ever imagine. We have a 4 figure mortgage as it is, thanks to interest rates. If we wanted a bigger house/slightly more desirable area, I can’t see how we would do it. Anything that wouldn’t need this level of work again would be most likely well out of budget plus the new stamp duty thresholds mean we’d have that to factor in as a large cost too. Plus you know, childcare fees and the general cost of living crisis.

How do people afford to move? AIBU to think nowadays it is increasingly harder and not as simple as just climbing the property ladder?

(To add before anyone asks why we didn’t start with a flat, most if not all have been bought by landlords round here, the ones that haven’t are leasehold and exceptionally difficult to sell on.)

OP posts:
Hatfullofwillow · 01/10/2024 15:22

Yes, it really is shocking, especially when you see practically every country in the OECD spends so much less as both a % of income and of total spending.

https://news.sky.com/story/uk-spends-more-on-housing-than-almost-any-other-developed-country-and-gets-the-least-value-from-it-too-13099925

Labour's plans for house building should significantly increase supply and increase mobility, but it looks like being almost all private building. Unless they implement a programme of significant council owned house building, the impact on prices won't be enough to actually impact the housing crisis.

Those at the bottom will still be trapped in paying high rents and those that can't will still be in temporary accommodation.

UK spends more on housing than almost any other developed country, and gets the least value from it too

Research from the Resolution Foundation reveals how the UK has some of the oldest, smallest, inconveniently located and worst quality housing in the developed world - and also pays the most for it.

https://news.sky.com/story/uk-spends-more-on-housing-than-almost-any-other-developed-country-and-gets-the-least-value-from-it-too-13099925

housemaus · 01/10/2024 14:52
  • Earning more (this is the main one, I imagine)
  • Adding a lot to their equity either via inheritance or windfall or saving very hard/living frugally so they have a bigger deposit for the next place
  • Not having children/nursery to pay for (ties into the point above I suppose)
  • Cheaper area (mortgage on my no-work-needed 3 bed is nowhere near £1k a month and wouldn't be even with a 95% mortgage. We sacrifice certain things living here, i.e. the cultural capital of a bigger city or posher area, but where we live is a nice part of a generally very cheap area)

People have struggled to move as much in the last couple of years as interest rates were much higher, so there's also the fact that you're right - it is harder to move into a bigger house at the moment. But plenty of people are still moving, through some combination of the above factors.

Nsky62 · 01/10/2024 14:50

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 09:53

Yes that’s what I mean, in excess of £1000. I think it’s so wrong. I don’t know how families bigger than us or on one wage are supposed to afford to live.

Interest rates are historically low, and have been for years
17 % way back, remember that

Boltonb · 01/10/2024 14:47

Mydogisaknob · 01/10/2024 09:50

Have you heard of the housing crisis?
What's a 4 figure mortgage out of interest?

A mortgage payment that is over £1,000 presumably? Not difficult to understand, unless you’re being purposefully obtuse which isn’t helpful to anyone.

Butchyrestingface · 01/10/2024 14:45

WiserOlderElf · 01/10/2024 14:44

The OP has said multiple times that she means her monthly mortgage repayments are 4 figures, ie over £1000.

Fab. Couldn't see that when I scanned her posts. It's an odd phraseology but makes more sense why she feels hard-done by.

WiserOlderElf · 01/10/2024 14:44

Butchyrestingface · 01/10/2024 14:43

Has the issue of what a "four figure mortgage" been resolved yet?

Enquiring minds want to know ...

The OP has said multiple times that she means her monthly mortgage repayments are 4 figures, ie over £1000.

Butchyrestingface · 01/10/2024 14:43

Has the issue of what a "four figure mortgage" been resolved yet?

Enquiring minds want to know ...

westisbest1982 · 01/10/2024 14:39

Completelyjo · 01/10/2024 13:35

Even at 25 years is £1,000 a month.

A 30 year mortgage is ridiculous given the average first time buyer is almost 34 in the UK, leaving almost no wiggle room before pension age.
But even in your scenario it would still be over £900 a month for a 30 year mortgage on an averagely accessible interest rate, and if they fixed any time during the last 2 years it’s likely to be over £1,000.

Edited

A 30 year mortgage in your 20s isn't ridiculous at all.

Peonies12 · 01/10/2024 14:37

Monthly mortgage payments above £1,000 is totally normal to me? And why are you worrying about moving when you have a 3 bed house? We have lived for years in a 3 bed house with 2 kids. You’re very young to own a house, I don’t know anyone that has bought a house til their 30s.

BellesAndGraces · 01/10/2024 14:36

I completely agree with you @towonderwander. It is absolutely ridiculous that you are struggling so much as a couple working full time and earning an average wage. As you will have seen from a lot of responses to your post, there is a race to the bottom in this country. If you complain or expect your wages to go further, you’re inevitably told that there are lots of people worse off than you and you should be grateful for what you have. The government doesn’t need to respond to your genuine questions when the majority of the electorate will tell you that you should be so grateful to have a home in the first place. If you and your DP are good at your jobs you should expect pay rises as you progress through your careers. You will then find that the tax system disproportionately penalises middle and high earners. You will also lose out on tax breaks such as child benefit. Your question then will inevitably be “how come I am still struggling when I earn so much money? Why do we have to choose between a nice house and a holiday when our joint income exceeds £100k?” And as sure as the sun rises in the east and night follows day, you will be met with a chorus of “you make me sick / you’re so privileged / how dare you complain when there are people using food banks”. Like I said, a race to the bottom.

babyproblems · 01/10/2024 14:35

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 09:52

We earn the UK median salaries so very much ‘normal’. Are you saying you have to earn much higher than average to be able to afford the average house?

In a word: yes! It’s a housing crisis and doesn’t bode well for the future or equality within the Uk. I would say you are lucky to own a home with an average salary. It’s depressing!

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 14:30

westisbest1982 · 01/10/2024 13:26

No, they wouldn't - at least not over a 30 year period.

Yes, they would. These are nearly our exact figures. Hope this helps.

OP posts:
Wtfdude · 01/10/2024 14:16

bernadette1984 · 01/10/2024 12:55

It's not immigrants fault housing is unaffordable, but they do limit the amount of available social housing. Many of my work colleagues, who are immigrants, have been housed in social housing (with the benefit, of security of tenure, and cheap rent), while my family and I (we all born here) remsin on the housing list, but have had to live in privately rented accommodation, with my 5 year old son moving home 4 times in his lifetime thanks to no fault evictions, while struggling with much higher rent costs, and the money involved in moving regularly and setting up a new home. This is why people get annoyed when others are prioritise, over those who have worked, and paid taxes longer!

They fall under need test of need as well. Immigrants don't get priority automatically just for being immigrants.
If yes, I've been well cheated! Same like that free housea we apparently get🙄 still waiting for my free housing

Hellogoodbyehello4321 · 01/10/2024 14:15

You are doing really well mid 20s to own a house so you are ahead of your peers. I think the average ftb these days is something like 30 so ppl moving houses are likely to be at least mid 30s so in answer to your Q, they probably have 10 years of earning on you if they are moving house.

That's before I consider that you're also ahead of average to be having your 1st child so your finances are squeezed more than the average mid 20 something.

At 25 I was renting a room in a shared house and was financing myself only, not having to worry about childcare bills.So I'd say you are doing really well just to be able to get on the ladder. The affordability to move house will come with time as you pay down your mortgage , progress in your careers, build equity etc.

C152 · 01/10/2024 14:09

Paying a mortgage of £1000+ per month is pretty normal now, so it's a bit unreasonable to be surprised by that. YANBU to highlight the increasing difficulty of moving now though.

When I was in my 20s, it was normal for people to buy a shit studio/one bedroom as their first home, live in it a few years, then sell it in order to get a 2 bedroom, live in it for a while, sell it to get a flat with a garden or a house etc. But I think that sort of ladder approach doesn't really work anymore, as the increase in property prices (and tightening up of banks and brokers on the availability of mortgages) hasn't kept pace with salaries, which have stagnated or, in many cases, gotten worse.

I didn't have the money to buy in my 20s and when I finally did, I had a finite window in which I should have sold to move up to the next step on the ladder, but I missed the chance through poor choices. Now I'm stuck in the same property.

Crikeyalmighty · 01/10/2024 13:44

I think as you are 'up north' and in a cheaper town you are in a lucky position to be able to do so- I'm originally from a midlands mining town and had a 3 bed semi by the time I was19 back in the early 80s! My son in his late 30s and still in that area has a beautiful 'done up' 3 bed semi in a good area bought for £185,000 - hence you will see couples around you with average paid jobs with nice homes probably from mid 20s onwards- they just take on bigger mortgages , use a bit of equity to pay stamp duty , often buy 'done up' places still at modest cost or new builds etc- in some parts of the country none of this is remotely possible at all without big family help, inheritances or very high earning jobs- and I don't just mean London- so count your lucky stars , finish off making it a palace, and look at the situation again in 4 or 5 years- even 2 young kids in same bedroom won't hurt them!!

Theboymolefoxandhorse · 01/10/2024 13:40

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 11:17

I also didn’t say we want to move now. I just don’t know how we (or anybody else like us) will ever afford it now things have become so unreachable. Again, thanks to everyone who’s shared their own experiences as it’s interesting to read. Appreciate those of you who nicely said that the post reads quite naive too. What a shame this post brought so many unpleasant people out!

@towonderwander thanks for clarifying - I apologise if I was harsh - I thought from your post you were hoping to move.

Having bought so young, you have plenty of time to build up equity in your house. Childcare costs will come down over time. These are just the expensive years. We’ve done the same as you just 10 years later and as we saved for 10 years before we bought and have had pay rises over the years have bought a house that whilst definitely not cosmetically perfect we can stay in for the next at least 10-15 years then reassess.

As I’ve said elsewhere I grew up in a 3 bed house with a family of 6 until early teen years and only have fond memories of my childhood. Your kids whilst little won’t have an issue with sharing or care what their house looks like.

Again enjoy baby

SmileyHappyPeopleInTheSun · 01/10/2024 13:36

I do wonder though with high rents and high house prices we are reaching point when it massively impacts rest of economy - budgets focus on housing meaning discretionary spending rapidly declines impacting jobs and turn over.

Though seen people in USA say similar and others point out UK and other countries have even more out of wack average earnings and house prices than them so it can clearly get worse.

Completelyjo · 01/10/2024 13:35

westisbest1982 · 01/10/2024 13:26

No, they wouldn't - at least not over a 30 year period.

Even at 25 years is £1,000 a month.

A 30 year mortgage is ridiculous given the average first time buyer is almost 34 in the UK, leaving almost no wiggle room before pension age.
But even in your scenario it would still be over £900 a month for a 30 year mortgage on an averagely accessible interest rate, and if they fixed any time during the last 2 years it’s likely to be over £1,000.

SovietSpy · 01/10/2024 13:31

It used to be a social norm for siblings to share a bedroom and with the housing crisis as it is now, we're going to have to go back to those days

The UK in 2024. Going backwards. Even wanting a bedroom for each of your kids is an indulgent luxury only the rich can afford.

No wonder young people are disillusioned in this country.

hoglets · 01/10/2024 13:30

all these threads. Aibu how do people afford car/holiday/house etc.
Different people have different earnings/outgoing/help or priorities in life. Seriously, it's getting tedious (and I am saying that as someone who cannot afford a lot). Bit isn't it bleeding obvious?

xxSideshowAuntSallyxx · 01/10/2024 13:29

towonderwander · 01/10/2024 09:53

Yes that’s what I mean, in excess of £1000. I think it’s so wrong. I don’t know how families bigger than us or on one wage are supposed to afford to live.

Because people have to live somewhere.

I find the comment about single earners patronising.

I'm a single earner, I need to live somewhere so I prioritise a house over a new car and lots of expensive clothes and jewellery. I live within my means. I don't need pity or faux surprise at the cost of living and questioned on how I cope.

Single earners and large families adjust their lifestyle.

Fizbosshoes · 01/10/2024 13:27

I haven't rtft but I'm pretty sure the average age for buying a property and for having children is well above mid 20s....so would potentially have 10+ years more to save* and 10 more years of wage increase, or promotion opportunities

*I realise it's virtually impossible to save with some rental prices

westisbest1982 · 01/10/2024 13:26

Completelyjo · 01/10/2024 13:23

@SeenYourArse With respect OP the maths aren’t matching to be honest

I think you just don’t understand current costs.
Even if OP’s house was 200k which for a small 3 bed in many places is considered a cheaper house. Just because there are homes near you for £85k that isn’t representative of the entire ‘North’. The repayments on a mortgage of 180k with 20k down would still be £1,000 a month.

No, they wouldn't - at least not over a 30 year period.

floral2027 · 01/10/2024 13:23

Theboymolefoxandhorse · 01/10/2024 13:20

I agree - the point I was making in my original post is that sacrifices always have to be made whether it’s when you have kids, the type of house you have or the quality of life you have when you have kids. I agree with squeezing a little now - kids won’t notice when they’re little and will more than likely appreciate more space when they’re older. I have 3 siblings and we lived quite happily as a family of 6 in a 3 bed terraced house until I went to secondary school - the parameters of what is normal and expected has changed a lot over time.

I would say £2000/ month seems quite expensive for childcare costs unless you’re not eligible for using government tax free account or any free hours. Sounds like you may be in London where it might be slightly more expensive but check you may be able to get some help that makes things cheaper.

We have a tiny 2 bed flat but equally dh was born in a 1 bed flat where he lived until age 5 with two younger siblings (also in London).. his parents owned that flat but couldn't upsize without family help (on one income due to father losing his job in 92 recession).

Neither dh or I earn 100k individually so technically eligible for help.