Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked that 97% of 12 years olds have smart phones?

361 replies

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 18:15

My DCs school does not allow smartphones and most of the schools around here are the same. The kids all have Nokias (and often an AirTag or similar for tracking).

I can’t believe it’s 97%! Am I totally out of touch? She’s never even asked for a phone.

https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/23/children-who-dont-have-smartphones

Only 3% of UK 12-year-olds don’t have a smartphone. Here is how four of them feel about it | Smartphones | The Guardian

There has been a huge wave of parental concern about smartphones this year. So do kids without them feel deprived – or more alive?

https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/23/children-who-dont-have-smartphones

OP posts:
mcdonaldschip · 27/09/2024 21:13

eeeeeeeee · 27/09/2024 18:45

I’m in my 20s and had a smartphone at that age as did most of my peers. The original iPhone came out in 2007. I think your view of technology is outdated, if it was normal a decade ago, it’s certainly going to be normal now.

I'm also in my 20s. I got my first phone at 11 (non-smartphone as they weren't really common place back then). When I was in year 8, a lot of people had Blackberries and then when the iPhone 4S was out most people had smartphones at school.

Londonrach1 · 27/09/2024 21:13

Homework get set on apps, children travel from age 11 alone to school...can't see why it's not 100÷>. Yabu

goodluckbinbin · 27/09/2024 21:10

InandOutlander · 27/09/2024 18:54

Honestly any 12 year old with a smart phone is bad parenting. It's a hill I'm happy to die on.

A phone that can text and call is plenty for a 12yos needs

How old are your kids, out of interest?

LaughingPig · 27/09/2024 21:05

A couple of points here:

  1. For me, ‘banning’ smartphones until an arbitrary age is a lazy solution. We (parents and schools) need to be teaching DC to use smartphones appropriately as like it or not, they are a major part of life.
  2. Smartphones are simply a piece of technology. The problem comes with how theyare used (e.g. too much) or what they are used to do (e.g. cyber bullying). No one would seriously suggest DC be banned from watching TV because there are porn channels on there, but that is what some are suggesting with smartphones).
  3. The proposal to only allow them from a certain age is quite dangerous in my view. I can’t see how 16 year olds who’ve never been allowed near phones by ‘protective’ parents will possibly be able to use them safely or sensibly when allowed free access.
Rhayader · 27/09/2024 21:02

Frogmarch89 · 27/09/2024 20:53

It's funny how we're all different as that is just as worrying to me as the smartphone thing!

The school is very open about how religious it is and you couldn’t accidentally send your child there. It requires many years of weekly attendance at a certain denomination AND living in a certain area to get in. Parents are 100% buying into the ethos of the school, although it’s exam results are really good so I guess some parents play the game and attend church for ten years or whatever it is to get in.

I am very interested in the parents of other faiths who choose to send their children there though. Around 100 applicants each year for 20 “other faith” places.

OP posts:
Frogmarch89 · 27/09/2024 20:53

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 19:38

Bible readings/prayers twice a day in tutor time, compulsory worship (singing), religious entry requirements for most of the kids (a small number of places for other faiths and scholars), compulsory RE GCSE for all children, scripture on the walls & in their homework diary, parents prayer meetings etc

It's funny how we're all different as that is just as worrying to me as the smartphone thing!

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:47

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:45

Yes but if vulnerabilities, is it possible to reconstruct a synthetic sample that matches the actual fingerprint, I wouldn't know but don't want to risk it.

As I stated though it isn't just about that for me, it is the privacy aspect, I just don't want my DC's fingerprint codes stored somewhere.

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:45

noworklifebalance · 27/09/2024 20:26

Although the fingerprint is not actually stored but just a few points or measurements

Yes but if vulnerabilities, is it possible to reconstruct a synthetic sample that matches the actual fingerprint, I wouldn't know but don't want to risk it.

Oblomov24 · 27/09/2024 20:37

Laughing at no phone but Chromebook, do what does that achieve.

What's the problem with WhatsApp too? Like it's some sort of den of iniquity. I'm on the parents football WhatsApp. Ds2 is on the boys football group. Mostly details only - Football Match against xx team, kick off at 10am. Hardly bullying misery!

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 20:37

florasl · 27/09/2024 20:34

DD’s school aren’t allowed phones anywhere on campus (even the boarders) until they are in sixth form.

Okay it’s taken 8 pages but finally someone else whose school does this 😆 it’s not just our school that is funny about phones.

Our school also bans them on the borders. You need to be “past x shop or past y shop” in the other direction - roughly 500ft.

edit: misread boarders for borders 😅

OP posts:
OhmygodDont · 27/09/2024 20:35

Oh and don’t forget children all went to the closest schools. They didn’t travel hours to get to school unless very in the sticks or off to a private school.

florasl · 27/09/2024 20:34

DD’s school aren’t allowed phones anywhere on campus (even the boarders) until they are in sixth form.

OhmygodDont · 27/09/2024 20:33

The world pre smart phone. Working pay phones everywhere. Where every child and adult knew the reverse charge number and new landline numbers in their heads. Where everyone knew the local shop keeper.

We all have a nosey neighbour who knew if you farted or burped.

Police where regularly seen down the streets keeping an eye and knew the local children and weirdos.

Where kids played in the street playing Kirby and climbed trees in the local fields.

Now its country lines, concealed knifes, no bobbies on the beat, barely any working pay phones, no one knows the reverse charge number let alone their own landline. That’s if they even have a landline anymore.

And Nosey Nora would be called a pedo nonce so she doesn’t look out anymore. Plus people don’t even talk to their neighbours.

So tracking phones and maps on phones is the new safety net as the old ones don’t exist really in the same way anymore.

Lovelysummerdays · 27/09/2024 20:33

ThinWomansBrain · 27/09/2024 20:10

Yet according to the house of commons Library, 17% of children live in poverty. (22/23)

Some of the poorest people I know have the most expensive phones and so do their kids. I do wonder if it’s a status symbol? Or if people get sucked in as it’s not that much more to move up to next model. I’ll be passing down my 3yo iPhone at some point tbh. I’ll probably get a 12. I could afford a newer version but I don’t think I’ll like it £30 a month for three years more than an older version.

MeatRaffleRita · 27/09/2024 20:32

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 19:42

Well my child has a mini board and chalk - I don't care what his sixth form friends say!

Mini board AND chalk!

Your child doesn't know how lucky they are.

Mine is only allowed a charred stick and has to write messages to friends on the pavement or a wall.

He can have chalk when he's 18.

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:29

Soccermumamir · 27/09/2024 19:49

My point exactly. My eldest is 18, he had a smartphone from year 7, and he has left college, 2nd top in his class. He's at university now and has a part-time job with the council. It's done him no harm at all. Yes, at that age, he had restrictions as has my youngest now, but it's down to the parent to limit screen time on any device, and it's down to the maturity of your child. Some children are still very immature at any age. Technology is huge now. I mean, even AI has taken over jobs and is set to take over many more. We have to live with technology, not against it. Children need to be aware of online danger just as much as the dangers in the real world. They can't do that if everything is being overly controlled. That will make them even more inquisitive as they're being molly coddled.

I think you have to be on top of it but it can be managed but also I don't think we are all bad parents from thay have DC our ages as it just wasn't in the news then, it's the new campaign now, I saw an article on it on breakfast news and listened to a radio programme about it, it's the hot topic at the moment.

noworklifebalance · 27/09/2024 20:26

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 19:58

Not biometric data unless you have actively chose that.

Although the fingerprint is not actually stored but just a few points or measurements

Bignanna · 27/09/2024 20:25

Greenqueen40 · 27/09/2024 18:20

That's Yrs 7&8, the majority travel to school independently. I'm not letting my son go 40 mins on a bus without having some way of getting hold of me so yes you are being ridiculously unreasonable.

He can have a phone but it doesn’t have to have a smart phone!

Freshersfluforyou · 27/09/2024 20:22

Missingpate · 27/09/2024 20:00

Well we are very unusual by the sounds of it. DS 12 has an old style phone and forgets to take it with him most days, he doesn’t care in the slightest. He cycles to school, it takes 10
minutes, we only pressure him to take it on bad weather days as we will pick him up if it’s pouring. We don’t want a smart phone for as long as we can leave it, WhatsApp groups for kids sound awful to us. We are open to letting him have one when it starts to really matter. Hopefully not for some time yet. Thankfully he isn’t bothered at all. He plays online games with his friends, arranges to meet them on Google chat on his Chromebook, does homework and uses school apps on the Chromebook, and doesn’t miss a phone at all. His best friend also has a brick phone and doesn’t want a smart phone either. His parents feel the same as us and want to leave it as long as possible. No religious school, just a massive ordinary comprehensive. Other kids do all seem to have them, and no we don’t care.

So basically your DS gets loads of screen time, just not on a phone? In what way do you think thats really any different....

MadKittenWoman · 27/09/2024 20:22

DS had one from Y5 when he was 10. We did not restrict his use. He was trusted to be sensible and he was. He gained an MEng in computer science and now has his dream job as a programmer of a well-respected and very popular computer sports game.

Summertimer · 27/09/2024 20:21

Ponderingwindow · 27/09/2024 18:18

I’m shocked that you are shocked

Same, but I have an older DC and schools didn’t ban them or ask for them to be turned off all day. They actually photographed their science projects in the lessons in Yr8.

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:21

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:19

Yes, I get that and also it is pushed by the schools as more convenient but I was informed by my knowledge in this area and new it was Consent based so knew they had to provide an alternative. I don't think finger print canteen payment should be obligatory, the lawful basis should always be Consent so maybe take it up with your school.

You maybe seen as a bit of pain by the school but in my mind it was/is important.

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:19

Knew not new

OhmygodDont · 27/09/2024 20:19

LongLiveTheLego · 27/09/2024 20:18

And there was a pay phone in every corner so completely different situation.

And bobbies on bikes where seen.

Goldenbear · 27/09/2024 20:19

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 20:16

Yeah I agree it’s not ideal but I don’t think there is an option other than packed lunch which I just don’t have the capacity to do.

Yes, I get that and also it is pushed by the schools as more convenient but I was informed by my knowledge in this area and new it was Consent based so knew they had to provide an alternative. I don't think finger print canteen payment should be obligatory, the lawful basis should always be Consent so maybe take it up with your school.