Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nick Robinson on the Today programme said that people affected by withdrawing the Winter Fuel Allowance were "the wartime generation". AIBU to think he's wrong?

288 replies

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 21:53

Also, I am genuinely bored of this British obsession with referencing World War II when talking about unrelated random subjects.

World War II ended 80 years ago. The "wartime generation" don't need a Winter Fuel Allowance because they're all already dead, barring the odd 97 year old who is still living at home and paying all bills themselves.

OP posts:
AncientAndModern1 · 26/09/2024 09:04

Blimey. The first winter fuel allowance in 1997 was only £20.

Tel12 · 26/09/2024 09:02

They could have put their intention in the manifesto. They could have warned people it was going to happen and introduced it next year. They could have taxed it or kept it for those with a disability. They could also have targeted the super rich first. It's a very politically inept decision.

CeruleanBelt · 26/09/2024 09:02

I'm not sure i understand the connection between WW2 and the entitlement of people to winter fuel allowance anyway.

The country can't afford to keep giving handouts to rich people.

The ones I've seen moaning about it the most are the children of the war generation. They keep using photos of veterans on Facebook as evidence that old people need it - one of them is currently selling her half a million pound mortgage free house to downsize, which will put 200k in her pocket ... Yet she still feels entitled to WFA and uses pictures of very old soldiers to argue it. She's never been near a battlefield in her life.

Kiuyni · 26/09/2024 08:56

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 21:53

Also, I am genuinely bored of this British obsession with referencing World War II when talking about unrelated random subjects.

World War II ended 80 years ago. The "wartime generation" don't need a Winter Fuel Allowance because they're all already dead, barring the odd 97 year old who is still living at home and paying all bills themselves.

I totally agree with you.

I have a real dislike of the endless obsession with ww2

I don't think the obsession has done anything for this country in recent years, just reinforced our ridiculous sense of superiority.

Figgygal · 26/09/2024 08:53

Absolutely agree
My parents born in the 50's losing their WFP actually had the cheek to say they'd have to book less cruises bevause they've got less money coming in. My dad has a final salary pension!!
Another couple I know massive public sector final salary pension, £30k caravan Sat on the drive and endless Facebook posts about the WFP.

Those who need it should get it those with other means shouldn't- Where's the bloody outrage about the millions of children living in poverty in this country? Where's the anger towards big energy companies and their endless profiteering?

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 26/09/2024 08:49

CassieMaddox · 26/09/2024 08:31

Yes it is. The Conservatives started this before the Election. Pitting young against old is particularly disgusting.

I have older children, one going to uni next year which is going to leave her with debts of circa £60,000. One who can't afford to move out on his NMW job. For myself my mortgage had gone up by 50% because of Trussonomics. Don't even start me on what's happened to people on UC.

Pensioners benefited from Trussonomics because of the triple lock. I'm sorry, but we all have to share the pain of this and from my perspective pensioners have been fairly well cushioned so far compared to other demographics.

The message of division on this as opposed to a message of "we are all in this together" is really unhelpful.

Edited

Your whole message was divisive though. Read it back if you’re not sure.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 26/09/2024 08:47

TotalAbsenceOfImperialRaiment · 26/09/2024 08:25

There seems to be a lot of emotional attachment to a benefit that didn't exist until 1997.

I can remember that benefit being announced on television. It was a big deal I can assure you which is why the Tories didn’t want to cut it. They knew the backlash for cutting it would run deep.

Hooefully the winters will stay mild due to climate change and we don’t go back to pensioners dying in their homes again. Those were very sad reporting days each winter before that benefit came in.

CassieMaddox · 26/09/2024 08:31

HoppityBun · 26/09/2024 08:26

It’s the politics of resentment: divide and rule. We’re being played and most people don’t realise, and if they realise, they don’t care. Chiefly because a grievance is so energising.

Yes it is. The Conservatives started this before the Election. Pitting young against old is particularly disgusting.

I have older children, one going to uni next year which is going to leave her with debts of circa £60,000. One who can't afford to move out on his NMW job. For myself my mortgage had gone up by 50% because of Trussonomics. Don't even start me on what's happened to people on UC.

Pensioners benefited from Trussonomics because of the triple lock. I'm sorry, but we all have to share the pain of this and from my perspective pensioners have been fairly well cushioned so far compared to other demographics.

The message of division on this as opposed to a message of "we are all in this together" is really unhelpful.

Pleaselettheholidayend · 26/09/2024 08:28

The point is that while there are pensioners who you could describe as TECHNICALLY part of the wartime generation, in a political context the 'wartime generation' is used in a way to evoke a misty-eyed, sympathetic nostalgia for a generation who are - on average - the wealthiest cohort in our society.

There is no equivalent term that can be applied to other groups - e.g kids in care - that is so instantaneously emotive, even if that group is struggling from government cuts/policies.

It feels disingenuous because whether or not some pensioners belong to the 'wartime generation' is neither here nor there on the question on what benefits pensioners should receive and how much and why.

HoppityBun · 26/09/2024 08:26

TotalAbsenceOfImperialRaiment · 26/09/2024 08:25

There seems to be a lot of emotional attachment to a benefit that didn't exist until 1997.

It’s the politics of resentment: divide and rule. We’re being played and most people don’t realise, and if they realise, they don’t care. Chiefly because a grievance is so energising.

TotalAbsenceOfImperialRaiment · 26/09/2024 08:25

There seems to be a lot of emotional attachment to a benefit that didn't exist until 1997.

HauntedBungalow · 26/09/2024 08:22

AncientAndModern1 · 26/09/2024 05:57

The accepted definition of the Greatest Generation/Wartime Generation is people born before 1928. And there are very few of those left. However, people of Nick Robinson’s age would have grown up surrounded by them and he seems to be using the term as an emotive synonym for ‘old’. As a nation we are obsessed with WWII. None of this has much to do with the WFA. The decision to scrap it for all but the very poorest pensioners feels like an own goal for Labour which is overshadowing any good work they are doing.

Exactly.

When Nick Robinson was young, old people were indeed the Wartime Generation.

However now that he is only a few years off state pension age himself, old people are clearly not the Wartime Generation. In five years he will be "old people". I wonder if he'll realise then that he did not fight in the Second World War.

OP posts:
iwishihadknownmore · 26/09/2024 08:22

Nick Robinson is a self confessed Tory supporter, he used to run the Young Conservatives & at Oxford Uni was chair of the Conservative Association.

Everything that comes out of his mouth needs to be considered in that light.

So of course he will portray cuts in WFA as damaging the "War Time Generation" because thats the Tory narrative they wish to give us all.

BogRollBOGOF · 26/09/2024 08:20

The difficulty of means testing for pensioners is that many will not claim it out of ability to navigate the system (especially if online), awareness or pride.

Cold kills. That's why the payment was created. Elderly people have low muscle mass and often restricted mobility. They have low resistance to feeling cold and are vulnerable to hypothermia. Their housing is less likely to be modern or updated to have optimal insulation or heating systems. Cold, damp houses exacerbate many health conditions such as respiritory problems or arthritis- that will increase the load on the NHS.

The barrier has been shifted too low and many people just eeking by will miss out and suffer for it. Older pensioners often retain the legacy of the "waste not want not" years of rationing in the war/ post-war era and it is common for them to skimp on their needs if they don't feel sufficiently protected by abundance.

Just being brought up by a war child in the 1980s, I have to resist the mentality that I was raised with by actively using things in the moment and not holding back for future circumstances. There was a massive generational trauma experienced by those who were young in the 1930s- early 1950s who lived through the war and its aftermath.

HumptyDumptysWife · 26/09/2024 08:12

He's an idiot.

Can't stand the man.

CassieMaddox · 26/09/2024 08:11

Courgettey · 25/09/2024 22:14

I heard him say that and I thought the same. It's more the baby boomer generation surely.

It is the boomers but he won't have wanted to say that because of the negative "boomer" implications!

OP YANBU and imo shows a bit of bias in reporting

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 26/09/2024 08:08

crumblingschools · 26/09/2024 07:47

There are a lot more pensioners who aren’t millionaires

Not in mumsnet! Money breeds money and we know there’s an awful lot of wealth on here.

stargirl1701 · 26/09/2024 08:02

I agree. My Dad was born in 1946. He is a baby boomer not wartime.

LaerealSilverhand · 26/09/2024 08:00

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:53

They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Which conflicts are those then? There wasn't conscription in the 1950s. Who were they fighting? Just people they encountered randomly?

Yo really are hauntingly ignorant. Men doing their compulsory national service fought and died in all the shitty little wars that Britain fought to try and shore up its collapsing empire in the 50s (eg Kenya, Aden, Malaya), and some bigger ones like Korea.

redhatpurplehair · 26/09/2024 07:56

Eh? My dad was born in the 30s - so lived through the war and is still alive and well, as is his sister, my MIL and quite a few neighbours.

ILoveAnnaQuay · 26/09/2024 07:52

I agree that the. WFA should be means tested but think the cut off is too low. It should be set at around £18k pa.

Afterrain · 26/09/2024 07:50

Flittingaboutagain · 25/09/2024 22:19

That's just not true. They're not all dead at all! Many people who were children in WW2 are still very much live including my grandparents. They lost their fathers, older brothers and uncles, often in families where grandfathers had already been killed in WW1. They lived very hard lives and then went onto have children themselves in the 50s with so much undiagnosed trauma.

I wish the WFA for older people was going to be distributed based on council tax banding. It seems much less likely to leave vulnerable older people in fuel poverty.

I like the idea of using council tax bandings for WFA along with pension credits.

Seasmoke · 26/09/2024 07:49

NQOCDarling · 26/09/2024 06:57

No doubt you were given money in some way or the other when you had your children? Non-means tested?
Why should people be paid for having children when they have £150k in the bank and are working?

Edited

The equivalent of child benefit ( which most pensioners would also have got ) is the state pension. Not the WFA. Means testing of child benefit was implemented years ago. Pensioners have largely been protected over the last 30 years by successive governments while child benefit and many other services have been cut with hardly a peep.

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 26/09/2024 07:48

The wording is deliberate to make you think that these were people who fought in the wars for us and so the government are being especially cruel. The reality is there will be very few of that age and those that are still here will either be able to claim or in care.

crumblingschools · 26/09/2024 07:47

There are a lot more pensioners who aren’t millionaires