Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nick Robinson on the Today programme said that people affected by withdrawing the Winter Fuel Allowance were "the wartime generation". AIBU to think he's wrong?

288 replies

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 21:53

Also, I am genuinely bored of this British obsession with referencing World War II when talking about unrelated random subjects.

World War II ended 80 years ago. The "wartime generation" don't need a Winter Fuel Allowance because they're all already dead, barring the odd 97 year old who is still living at home and paying all bills themselves.

OP posts:
HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 23:03

JenniferBooth · 25/09/2024 22:58

National Service WAS a form of conscription. And i bet you would have no trouble describing it as such if your kids were made to do it.
DM is 88 And at 8 years old had to work in the fields to help my gran while my grandfather was conscripted into the Italian Army. Remember not all pensioners are British and those who had their childhood in other countries will have experienced the war differently

Oh ok. Well there are still countries now with conscripts that fight, Israel and so on. But in the UK conscription to active service ended with WWII, and national service after that was mostly a bit of a jolly or, in times of low employment, a way of keeping lads off the street.

OP posts:
Meadowfinch · 25/09/2024 23:03

OP, there were plenty of women and children who weren't fighting but they had to cope with being bombed out of their homes. Or whose dads didn't come back so they grew up in poverty with widowed mums. There was no UC.

And plenty of children who dads came back so damaged, mentally and physically, that life afterwards was very difficult.

Meat rationing did not end until 1954. You couldn't go and buy what you wanted, even if you had money.

I imagine this is who is referred to as the wartime generation.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 25/09/2024 23:01

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:53

They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Which conflicts are those then? There wasn't conscription in the 1950s. Who were they fighting? Just people they encountered randomly?

My GF did National Service and ended up in Egypt in the aftermath of the Suez "crisis".

According to the man himself, the only fighting he ever got close to was scaring off Bedouins who would steal anything the Army hadn't nailed down, and sometimes that didn't even stop them. He did say though that in order to go to town or deliver mail, you had to do so in a Scout car because the same Bedouins were fond of taking potshots at the Brits.

The other did his NS just after the war but was never posted to any active combat zone, unless you include some of the rougher parts of a few of the UK's larger cities.

My eldest GP guarded prisoners of war toward the end of WWII, which was seemingly a fairly common duty for women in active service.

Shinyandnew1 · 25/09/2024 23:00

I presume he means people like my parents who were born during the war.

Putting · 25/09/2024 23:00

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:58

Seriously, where did they fight?

My uncle fought in the Korean war but he was paid for it because he was in the navy. He wasn't fighting alongside national service folk.

This might be an interesting link. Lots of conflicts going on at the time,

https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/national-service-experience

Between 1947 and 1963, a total of 395 National Servicemen were killed on active service.

PigeonLady · 25/09/2024 23:00

ForPearlViper · 25/09/2024 22:09

Yes and no. There aren't many people who were adults during the war left with us but there plenty who were children and it left a mark. The war left a long shadow of rationing and frugality for a couple of decades affecting the children of the time. There a lot of older people who are terrified of debt and over-economise on things like heating to stay in their small budgets.

Yeah this is true. Sometimes completely nonsensically too.

An example is Grandfather in law. 80s. Independent. Since the fuel price nightmare and the Russia invasion he will not put the gas heating on. Says he’s not spending that much and it’s his way of standing up to putin.

Instead he uses an electric heater to blow hot air under a blanket which he drapes over his feet propped on a footstool. Like some kind of human body hot tent.

I have expressed many times he’s likely to set himself on fire. It is concerning.

IvysMum12 · 25/09/2024 22:59

Meadowfinch · 25/09/2024 22:23

Gosh, what a luxury for you to be 'bored with it' !

There are plenty of people still around who were born 1939-1952 so understand the hardship and deprivations of war, and can remember rationing. That didn't end until 1954.

Few people had decent heating. Houses were poorly insulated. That age group understand the impact of cold. It seems you do not.

You are embarrassing in your ignorance.

I was born in 1950, and completely agree with you.

JenniferBooth · 25/09/2024 22:58

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:53

They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Which conflicts are those then? There wasn't conscription in the 1950s. Who were they fighting? Just people they encountered randomly?

National Service WAS a form of conscription. And i bet you would have no trouble describing it as such if your kids were made to do it.
DM is 88 And at 8 years old had to work in the fields to help my gran while my grandfather was conscripted into the Italian Army. Remember not all pensioners are British and those who had their childhood in other countries will have experienced the war differently

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:58

florasl · 25/09/2024 22:55

@HauntedBungalow that is embarrassing for you.

Seriously, where did they fight?

My uncle fought in the Korean war but he was paid for it because he was in the navy. He wasn't fighting alongside national service folk.

OP posts:
TimbuktuTimbuktu · 25/09/2024 22:55

My grandparents, who were war generation and have sadly all died over the last few years, probably needed the money. They had small state/ widows pensions and had to pay for home help etc.

My baby boomer parents with a combination of their final salary and state pensions clear about 7k per month. (Public sector/middle management pensions. We were MC but not wealthy) They have long paid off the mortgage on the house that they bought for a fraction of what it is now worth. They have significant savings and investments and have also recently inherited lump sums from their parents. They really really don't need the winter fuel allowance.

We really need to rebalance the economy towards support for working aged people and families who have seen wages fall far behind COL (unlike pensions).

The way they have chosen to means test it seems rather blunt, however. The idea of using attendance allowance or disability status instead would seem like a reasonable idea. Or even just upping the age limit to say 85+ which would allow continued support the most vulnerable.

I actually think using disability benefits in some way makes the most sense. But then I would also include non pension aged recipients who had the highest level of need. Housebound people with disabilities, whatever their age, must struggle with winter heating costs.

florasl · 25/09/2024 22:55

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:53

They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Which conflicts are those then? There wasn't conscription in the 1950s. Who were they fighting? Just people they encountered randomly?

@HauntedBungalow that is embarrassing for you.

Franhollywood · 25/09/2024 22:54

fridaynight1 · 25/09/2024 22:40

FIL is wartime generation. He lives off his state pension and is over the threshold for claiming pension credit. He was managing - just about. He is now worried sick about how much his fuel bill is going to be this winter.

I know the majority of mumsnetters have parents who are living their best lives, driving jags and crusing the med but there real people out there who genuinely have nothing.
He is 92, has just bought his first ever duvet and has literally taken to his bed and says he's not leaving it.

Poor FIL. Tell him you’ve found a way to claim it and pay it into his account yourself with an official sounding reference. That’s what we’re doing for a similar situation. Our senior now expects their WFA on 1 October (and will get it).

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:53

They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Which conflicts are those then? There wasn't conscription in the 1950s. Who were they fighting? Just people they encountered randomly?

OP posts:
Nothingmatters · 25/09/2024 22:53

Well I'm affected by losing the Winter Fuel payment and I'm definitely not war time generation.
It's a really weird thing to say.
Actually Nick Robinson himself is just a little over 10 years younger than me. I wonder what generation he regards himself.

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:51

CableCar · 25/09/2024 22:38

They're not the wartime generation, they're the baby boomers... And the baby boomers are collectively some of the wealthiest in terms of generations atm. It's impossible to make a sweeping statement, YANBU. The people who will be most affected are those on low income!

Yeah boomers in UK/USA were collectively born at the sweet spot re ability of middle classes across lower and middle rungs to acquire high value assets and also to secure those assets undisturbed in their post-work years by having steady income pension streams.

Upper middle have done even better of course but they always do.

And also ofc not every individual lower/middle middle class citizen was able to, but it was easier than previously and easier than now (because all the assets have already been bought and been resold multiple times and each time the pool that can access gets smaller).

OP posts:
florasl · 25/09/2024 22:50

My grandparents remember seeing their city being bombed, I would call them the wartime generation. They did their National Service during the 50s in conflicts too.

Falsenegative · 25/09/2024 22:49

Doggymummar · 25/09/2024 22:09

1948 for my parents, so wartime generation

Three years after the war ended is not wartime generation. They weren’t even born. They’re the children of the wartime generation.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 25/09/2024 22:48

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:35

Plus my wider point is, can we not discuss anything in this country without referencing a war that ended 80 years ago?

Whether pensioners should or should not get extra cash towards their bills is entirely unrelated to world war II.

There is a tendency to harp on and on about it, in my opinion because emerging the victor in WWII is about the last notable thing the UK achieved before sliding into relative obscurity and decades of managed decline, so I think it's viewed as some sort of Halcyon era even though I also think that's a very slanted view of things, and I doubt merchant seamen who were being torpedoed in the mid-atlantic or private soldiers facing Japanese suicide charges in the Burmese jungle would see it the same way.

It also annoys me that this generation is also feted as superhuman and used as a comparator to denigrate younger people, as if WWII combatants weren't fighting for their own existence as much as anything else, some reluctantly, and as if younger people today would somehow be incapable of much the same thing. The idea that every UK participant in WWII was motivated by a universal hatred of Fascism is nonsense. The majority of people were there because they were conscripted or signed up before it inevitably came to that. There's still a lot of overly-romantic bollocks written about WWII, but it's not polite to point that out.

eddiemairswife · 25/09/2024 22:44

I remember coming out of the air-raid shelter on the morning of my 3rd birthday, and feeling excited. I remember doodle-bugs and later on, rockets It. was just life then. I have a decent teacher's pension and am able to shop at Waitrose, drink gin and feed my cat.

OneBadKitty · 25/09/2024 22:41

Surely 'the war time generation' are those that were born and grew up during the war- so people in their late 70s and 80s.

fridaynight1 · 25/09/2024 22:40

FIL is wartime generation. He lives off his state pension and is over the threshold for claiming pension credit. He was managing - just about. He is now worried sick about how much his fuel bill is going to be this winter.

I know the majority of mumsnetters have parents who are living their best lives, driving jags and crusing the med but there real people out there who genuinely have nothing.
He is 92, has just bought his first ever duvet and has literally taken to his bed and says he's not leaving it.

MrsPeterHarris · 25/09/2024 22:40

GreenShady · 25/09/2024 22:08

If you were born in 1940 you'd be 84 now. I'd call that the war time generation!
They may not have fought but they lived through a period of hardship and deprivation for sure. Years of rationing.

This!

YABVU Op & actually quite ignorant.

CableCar · 25/09/2024 22:38

They're not the wartime generation, they're the baby boomers... And the baby boomers are collectively some of the wealthiest in terms of generations atm. It's impossible to make a sweeping statement, YANBU. The people who will be most affected are those on low income!

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:38

Even if she was flying bombers over France it's irrelevant to whether or not she should get a fuel grant.

But also, I do think it's time that we stopped saying "wartime generation" for anyone older than we are.

OP posts:
HoppityBun · 25/09/2024 22:37

HauntedBungalow · 25/09/2024 22:25

I don't think many of those would consider themselves as having experienced war though, certainly not in the UK where there was no invasion/firestorm/atom bomb etc. My dear old Pa is age 91 and he certainly wasn't piloting war planes or landing on the beaches of Normandy during the war. I have asked him about what life was like in the war and he says he barely noticed it. Because he was a child!

He had a tough childhood but that was down to horrendous living/working conditions for the precariat labouring class.

He did national service when he was a bit older but from what I can gather that mostly consisted of getting hammered in country pubs and was a bit of a fun break from his job on the railway.

Anyway none of his lot were shoving it to bally Fritz or whatever.

My mother was born in 1931 and my father (now dead) in 1928, and my aunt in 1932. They definitely remember/ remembered the War and experienced it. But I’m not convinced that their assumptions about politics and people’s behaviour at the time was correct.

Otoh my aunt was recently telling me how her father ordered eggs from the grocer on the black market (he asked for golf balls, which seems a touch comedic). She remembers it vividly, as does my mother and it had a huge influence on their lives. But Nick Robinson is way out with his calculations.

Swipe left for the next trending thread