Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU or should we fund welfare officers in schools and leave teachers to teach

29 replies

CanelliniBeans · 21/09/2024 13:54

Listening to lots of debates n this.
It seems teachers are not able to focus n teaching because they are so busy dealing with basic social issues, making sure students are safe and even fed properly, and able to concentrate. They also have an array of special educational needs and poor behaviour to deal with.
So, instead of giving teachers more time off so there's even less time to educate, why not relieve their stress by addressing the actual issues and spend the money on welfare staff in each year group who deal with everything outside actual education. If we already have them, get more of them. Let them sit in classrooms and deal with behaviour and safeguarding.

OP posts:
NowyouhaveDunnett · 21/09/2024 14:21

Many schools already do this. BBC breakfast did a report about it last year and went to visit a primary school which employs a social worker who has a relationship with families that need support for all sorts of reasons.

OldChinaJug · 21/09/2024 14:19

I dont disagree but where does the funding come from? There are many issues around this is schools.

TAs used to offer pastoral support and support with low level behavioural disruptions in class so the teacher could teach. But then more teaching was added to their role running booster groups, interventions and pre-teach sessions. So they now longer do this.

Then the budgets were slashed which means I'm going into my 6th year without any TA support at all even though I have taught many high needs children (behavioural, cognition and learning, and significant pastoral needs) during those years - and have dealt with violent attacks on myself and other children. I don't know of any schoools that have a class based TA outside of KS1 personally.

Teachers could do more if the curriculum weren't so overstuffed you can hear it groaning at the seams.

Less stuffed curriculum, the capacity for a slightly slower pace and the opportunity to consolidate learning would also help. There is a big problem with cognitive overload in children due to the curriculum. Address this, and a lot of the behavioural issues would be reduced.

Last week, I came on during the first lesson of the day. No one else in class and no phone to call the office to ask for someone to come down for 5 mins. My only option was to send the emergency 'red hand' which would have brought the Head Teacher to my door expecting a violent/severe behavioural incident or a severe medical issue/accident in a child. I didn't feel I could do that and tell him I needed the loo so I just had to manage until breaktime an hour later.

I know that last paragraph is an aside but there are many problems in schools.

There just isn't any money.

NinaOakley · 21/09/2024 14:18

Sounds good in theory but sometimes it’s the relationship with the teacher as trusted adult that fosters a child to confide the social issues. After Covid and 14 years of conservative austerity policies teachers would need an adult:child ratio of about 1:10 to undo the damage!

AbitOfProblem · 21/09/2024 13:55

I think that would be a good idea. I suspect there is not enough money even for teachers, let along welfare officers.

I think we need to start taxing billionaires tbh, before we think about this stuff. There's just no money to do it.