Would you have sex-missionary with someone if offered money

I just think it's interesting. I'm not saying you're wrong. It's just interesting.

I've seen a lot of posts on mumsnet where women say that they couldn't be with a man , if he had been with a prostitute.

As it would show that he a bad character. They describe men who have been with prostitutes as absolutely disgusting.

Yet, then you get a lot of women on this thread saying that they would sell themselves for sex

Because this thread is based on the hypothetical scenario the OP asked about.

One off missionary sex that is over quickly. So on that basis, the no weirdness is implied. I will admit that the missionary part of it is my biggest issue, not the sex itself.

Firstly this is the first time I have EVER been here and no I commented on a thread, stop before you start insinuating things. My posts were singular to me. No suggestions no insinuating either nice try tho but I won’t bite

You said it's a highly paid one off with no weirdness.

How do you know there'd be no weirdness.

What if the man paying you for one off sex is fat, ugly, has bad hygiene and is really nasty.

It's not usually the nice men who pay for it

Eeuww, @Abbylikeswine. The film industry's pretty disgusting, isn't it? (I hope it's a bit better these days.)

Hmm, what was your previous username? Why the name change to hand around a thread talking to women about sex?

Yeah, but they aren't damaged by a highly paid one-off requiring no weirdness or pain.

In case you're confused, prostitutes have to have a lot of unpleasant, unchosen sex with unpleasant people they did not choose. Women and men who, like my younger self, have freely-chosen sex with whom they want, as often as they want, are not remotely harmed by it (unless something goes wrong).

Interesting story about indecent proposal.

I read demi moores book. She said that she had a weird director on indecent proposal.

She said that she was filming the sex scene and the director would be shouting at her "yes I got a boner when you did that! "

Indecent Proposal was not about sex it was about the power he had to destroy the young couples relationship with his money.

As a father of 3 at 35 and been single for 7 years I’d say yes to improving my children’s and my life

Just once, for a life changing amount, like lotto winning amount £10 million. No touching, no kissing, in the dark. Yes.

The likelihood is about the same as winning the lottery.

I think that many of us have had sex that left us feeling used and unhappy with men that were supposed (and claimed) to love us. So the idea of doing exactly that with someone who made no such claims but we were left with a life changing amount of money isnt a huge issue.

Its not a massive leap in terms of self worth or "losing soul". I lost far more of my soul when my ex husband raped me than I ever would in a transactional "yes you can shag me as soon as £XXX hits my bank account". The sex would be done and I would get something out of it.

Again, perhaps age and experience makes a difference to views on this.

Back in the 90s I would probably have actually paid to have sex with Robert Redford.

10 years ago I'd probably say yes, but now after being single for so long and most definitely out of practice, the thought of getting cramps rules me out, so no lol

My instinctive reaction is no, not for any amount of money. But thinking of it the other way round, I'd be fine with DH doing it for £500k. He wouldn't though.

It's you who's wrong actually.

Go and read up on what a sugar baby is

Nope that’s not a thing I’d say at all

I am not getting into this. You are sadly uneducated on the subject.

Older men paying younger women for sex is a tale as old as time. The sugar baby/Sugar Daddy thing is very very different. I will leave you to find this out for yourself.

@Mossyeyes

You only have to do it once, not 10 times!!!

🤣🤣

on a more serious note, sorry to hear about your work situation!

If you do research into it, a lot of studies show that women who do prostitution, do end up becoming psychologically damaged

Honestly, I just couldn’t bear the idea of money being on the bedside I would feel cheap and paid for afterwards personally. I suppose it depends on each person individually. Some people might not be that bothered but I’m someone whereby it would affect me psychologically more afterwards so I couldn’t do it. I can’t explain why really but it’s just a thing in my head, it’s transactional. I suppose I think sex is something special between two people so that transactional thing for me would be a huge turn off for my head! Offer a young rich kind man in my youth that I could love be loved and share my life with I would have snatched your hand off. I think it’s definitely a personal choice this question and different horses for courses. I very interesting question to ask and it’s nice to see lots of different answers.

Unfortunately, a £1 million payout for an 18 year old with no legs isn’t a huge sum. It would have been calculated based on the cost of future prostheses (needing replacement every certain number of years) different prosthetics for different activities (swimming, resting, running etc) specially adapted housing, adapted car, not being able to reach full earning potential etc. Many things which are costly and wouldn’t necessarily be available to the same standard on the NHS. Yes, she could spend it on whatever she wanted technically and wear NHS prostheses (which I’d be surprised if an 18 year old
would want to do) but still it wouldn’t mean that money would never be an issue as unfortunate as it is, that amount doesn’t go a long way over a lifetime even if you have your own legs. That, coupled with stump pain etc. I’d never chose that. I agree that the guidelines for how much you get for body parts is rather fascinating (jsb guidelines)

Let's throw something into the scenario.

Say if the man was old, fat, smelled bad.

Would you still take a half a million pounds for sex with him.

These kinds of men are not usually kind nice and good looking

Haha, no, it wouldn't do any! I've had a lot of uninspiring sex with both long-term partners and strangers. Some of it wasn't my choice. I imagine I would find the money quite inspiring enough, I'd be consenting all the way and I've never viewed myself as a vessel of chastity, thank you.

Anyway, to echo a PP - these days I'd probably have to pay him 😂

I'd pay myself.