Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School banning banter

359 replies

Citrusblast92u · 10/09/2024 07:45

DS is in year 11. They had a whole school assembly yesterday's entitled 'banning bants', this includes banter between friends. One strike and they're in detention, 2 and they have to attend a workshop, 3 and parents have to attend the workshop, 4 and the police are called.

I asked him what they meant by bants and he said anything that anyone might find offensive. His mates have spent many hours at our house. They're a lovely bunch of lads, very polite and kind but their main form of communication with each other is piss taking.

Just after some opinions really rather than an AIBU.

Yabu-banter should be banned
Yanbu-they can't ban banter

OP posts:
oldwhyno · 10/09/2024 13:59

@crumblingschools do imagine a school can't do that and maintain a ban on bullying, without having to resort to ill-defined nonsense like banning banter?

crumblingschools · 10/09/2024 13:34

@oldwhyno do you think the pupils were told we don’t accept banter, end of assembly, never to be discussed again. Do you not think the assembly might have been slightly longer than that, that there will be more discussion in tutor groups, PHSE lessons?

crumblingschools · 10/09/2024 13:31

For those who excuse banter maybe you should read the OFSTED review paper on peer on peer abuse (now called child on child abuse). There are some horrifying statistics on how many young people (mainly girls) have to put up with sexual harassment, name calling taunts etc. When surveyed many boys classified this as banter.

Now I know this has been happening forever and this report was commissioned after the Everyone’s invited website was set up for victims of sexual behaviour in schools to post their experiences. Initially it concentrated on historic abuse but more and more people posted about current incidents and that promoted OFSTED to act and new safeguarding guidelines for schools which specifically refer to not using banter, boys will be boys as an excuse for any such behaviour. Obviously this report/guidelines deals with other aspects of abuse/behaviour as well.

Maybe, just maybe we can start making a difference, but it can’t just be schools sending this message, it’s got to come from the home too. We need to change the mindset

oldwhyno · 10/09/2024 13:26

Children need to be taught the difference between banter and bullying.Banning it won't help that, and is daft. It's likely to be impossible to enforce to anyone's satisfaction.

oldwhyno · 10/09/2024 13:22

stripybobblehat · 10/09/2024 07:46

Seems fair enough. A lot of "bantz" is actually quite rude and wouldn't be acceptable in a workplace.

🤦‍♂️who wants life to be like the workplace ffs

Octavia64 · 10/09/2024 13:12

Most kids in secondary schools who defend it as "just banter" are in fact being racist, sexist or otherwise using hate speech.

I was a secondary school teacher until recently it and it really is quite common even in good schools for teenagers to break the bounds of reasonable behaviour.

At my old school we regularly had to involve the police, usually due to kids fighting and actually seriously injuring someone (broken leg, head injury etc) or bringing in a knife.

Sexual coercion and blackmail was also common - so the lad would say to his girlfriend do this or I'll send this naked picture of you round, she'd refuse to do it and he'd send a naked picture of her to the whole year WhatsApp group. Police get involved then as well as that's distributing child pornography technically as well as appalling
Behaviour.

I've heard the lad in that case describe seeing the photo round as "bantz" as well.
Revenge porn isn't bantz but some teens genuinely think it's funny and if it's funny it's bantz and thus it's ok.

Banter as the teens use it includes practical jokes (= stealing someone's valuable stuff and destroying it, etc etc).

Not to mention the girl who called someone else a "fucking P*ki" and passed that off as "bantz"

We had about ten or eleven racial abuse cases a year and nearly all the perpetrators passed them off as "bantz"

MyUmberSeal · 10/09/2024 13:10

SoTired12 · 10/09/2024 11:23

The fragility on this thread is unbelievable

My thoughts exactly.

Mumteedum · 10/09/2024 13:04

Sirzy · 10/09/2024 07:48

The problem is “banter” is often actually bullying but they think labelling it banter makes it acceptable.

school have obviously have significant issues in order to decide this is needed.

My DS is bullied. They get away with it sometimes by calling it banter. I'm not sure they actually understand the difference.

Hankunamatata · 10/09/2024 12:59

Banter/roasting/having a laugh Iv heard from my teen dc is rude or bullying - not whitty or anything remotely like it. No place in school or work

MyUmberSeal · 10/09/2024 12:59

rosesareredvioletsareblueaimverytiredandsoareyou · 10/09/2024 12:52

Banter definitely can be bullying.
It's also not the only way to bond with someone.

I totally agree. All banter is totally subjective. I was merely offering up a view that banter is enjoyable for many people. I enjoy being the recipient of banter, and I love giving it back. It makes us laugh and it makes the day go quicker.

I fully accept that myself and both the guys and girls I work with have zero boundaries when it comes to banter. No subject or insult is off limit. It’s not for everyone and we are not bad people. Perhaps a lesson for all is to ‘read your audience’.

Luio · 10/09/2024 12:56

It is an overly simplistic solution to a very complicated type of social interaction. It will be impossible to police because children/teens will simply switch the word banter to something else and say they were not bantering.

BoysBagsShoes · 10/09/2024 12:54

Teacher here! Yes, we’ve tried to do the same. As others have said, what is banter to one pupil is offensive to another. This is especially true regarding older siblings/cousins/their friends who extend it to the younger pupils…who then use it with their friends as it’s seen as the thing to do.

It’s also amazing how ‘bantz’ often lead to a friendly head lock here, a punch on the shoulder there…it quickly goes from banter, to a mucky fight, to a full on punch up 😬

rosesareredvioletsareblueaimverytiredandsoareyou · 10/09/2024 12:52

MyUmberSeal · 10/09/2024 08:02

My work place without banter would be miserable as hell. If the c**t word hasn’t been used or directed at someone or everyone within the first hour on shift, something is up.

Banter is not bullying. It’s very different and is often how people bond. Offence is taken, not given.

Edited

Banter definitely can be bullying.
It's also not the only way to bond with someone.

crumblingschools · 10/09/2024 12:49

@Newsenmum it doesn’t even have to be serious bullying, it can be a general mindset that using racist, misogynistic terms etc amongst your mates is fine, especially if it is not targeted at a specific person. This needs to be challenged.

Social media and the likes of Andrew Tate have a lot to answer for, but so have parents who just say well it has always been this way.

Newsenmum · 10/09/2024 12:44

Clearly there has been some serious bullying labelled as banter. That’s what they’re tackling.

Whatafustercluck · 10/09/2024 12:43

crumblingschools · 10/09/2024 12:17

If posters have teenage boys and their group of mates were chatting and in their conversation you heard misogynistic comments, not aimed at a particular person but still misogynistic. Would you call them out on it, would you want your son to call them out on it? Or would you just excuse it as banter and not harming a specific person.

If you wouldn’t want it calling out, why not? I assume you would if they were being racist.

I absolutely would call him out on it, and have done (the trend of calling women 'Karen' for example - low level, but I always challenge sexism). And yes, I'd expect him to call his friends out, too - he's certainly not afraid to (and has done). It may not be harming a specific person, but the entrenched prejudices around women are incredibly harmful and it's only by calling out some of the assumptions around negative gendered language (women are 'bossy' and not assertive for example) that anything will ever change. And it'll take boys and men challenging it to change it, because let's face it nobody listens to women.

I completely agree with you. Any kind of thinly veiled prejudice in the form of 'banter' should be challenged.

Newsenmum · 10/09/2024 12:43

Banter is bullying. It’s what you say when you’re being an absolute total dick. I’m assuming that’s what they’re referring to. It’ll only get reported if kids are upset by it so if your boys are making jokes in your home I’m sure they’re not going to get found out.

needhelpwiththisplease · 10/09/2024 12:42

When

Everanewbie · 10/09/2024 12:40

Choochoo21 · 10/09/2024 12:22

They’re not going to get the authorities involved when 2 friends are messing about having fun with each other.

They are wanting to put a stop to bullying which is disguised as ‘banter’.

The school does not have time to pull up everyone joking with their mate but they will not tolerate bullying behaviour or comments that someone finds offensive.
Which can only be a good thing.

So if someone is heard making a racist comment or someone complains about someone being racist to them, then they will be pulled up on it and they can’t just use the phrase ‘it’s just banter’.

I assume you don’t have teens or work in a school.
Unfortunately, a lot of bullying and offensive behaviour happens which goes unpunished purely because it’s ‘banter’ and the victim is made to feel like they can’t report it for this reason.

I really don't agree with the sledgehammer to crack a nut approach. What I am trying to say is that the school need a better approach to determining and educating on the difference between genuine banter and bullying, and that what might feel like banter to you, may feel like bullying to them. Where the line is, well that is very difficult to determine. But that doesn't mean you ban banter and police mutually agreeable private conversations.

crumblingschools · 10/09/2024 12:36

@Longma that sort of defeats the object. School are trying instil in these young minds that some of the conversations they are having are not acceptable whether in school or outside of school. People excusing it as banter, boys will be boys etc just carries on the mindset for males that they can carry on being misogynistic etc.

RonObvious · 10/09/2024 12:36

I'm 46, so grew up in a generation where "banter" was acceptable. I can honestly say that I have witnessed more extreme cases now, than I did then. Whatsapp groups and online games can be incredibly toxic, and the amount of racist, disablist and misogynistic language absolutely staggering. My kids are banned from all Whatsapp groups and not allowed to voice chat online for that reason. For some (optimistically, I would like to think most!) banter is just gentle teasing that bonds people together a bit, but I can completely see the logic in banning it completely to limit the spread of this kind of abuse.

Seiling · 10/09/2024 12:25

CBAMumma · 10/09/2024 08:20

How to strip all the fun out of life! It's so sad that people have lost the ability to laugh at themselves.

All through school and every place I've worked thankfully I've always been with teams who have had a laugh, and a lot of that is being able to laugh at oneself and situations. It doesn't involve being mean to anyone.
There is a huge difference between a gentle bit of 'poking fun' and tormenting/bullying someone.

I feel so sad for you DS and his mates that can't grow up having a bit of fun. How awful that they practically can't say anything about someone else for fear of it being misconstrued. Laughter is good for the soul, what are they supposed to laugh about?

Something that isn’t unkind? I find it pretty easy to have a bit of fun and laugh without resorting to nasty ‘banter’.

Seiling · 10/09/2024 12:23

Citrusblast92u · 10/09/2024 07:56

They're already labelled as the 'snowflake' generation.

Only by idiots

Choochoo21 · 10/09/2024 12:22

Everanewbie · 10/09/2024 11:20

Its not scaremongering, its pointing out the absurdity of the so-say 'policy'. It is clearly absurd to involve the authorities where two willing and happy friends engage in good natured genuine banter, and quite frankly, it isn't the schools business either.

They’re not going to get the authorities involved when 2 friends are messing about having fun with each other.

They are wanting to put a stop to bullying which is disguised as ‘banter’.

The school does not have time to pull up everyone joking with their mate but they will not tolerate bullying behaviour or comments that someone finds offensive.
Which can only be a good thing.

So if someone is heard making a racist comment or someone complains about someone being racist to them, then they will be pulled up on it and they can’t just use the phrase ‘it’s just banter’.

I assume you don’t have teens or work in a school.
Unfortunately, a lot of bullying and offensive behaviour happens which goes unpunished purely because it’s ‘banter’ and the victim is made to feel like they can’t report it for this reason.

Longma · 10/09/2024 12:21

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.