Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Has the Government shot itself in the foot?

153 replies

Fernie6491 · 09/09/2024 09:31

Just wondering about the idea of the government stopping winter fuel payments for us oldies.

i admit we are comfortably enough off, to not actually need it, but they say those claiming pension credit etc., will still be paid the fuel allowance.

The goverment spokespeople say not all pensioners who could claim pension credit are doing so. If this prompts those pensioners to claim their due, the government will be paying out a whole lot more than they currently do, plus the allowance .

They seem to have shot themselves in the foot, trying to save money, but actually will end up paying out even more to those who previously never claimed benfits. Is this correct, or am I going mad?

OP posts:
luckylavender · 09/09/2024 11:01

Limth · 09/09/2024 10:52

Yes, I think it has.

Scrapping the winter fuel payments while also giving pay rises to their union mates is awful optics.
Even if you agree with the winter fuel scrapping and/or the pay rises, it doesn't look good.

That's a weak argument. The two things are completely separate. The Tories would have let strikes go on and on and did not honour pay agreements.

Limth · 09/09/2024 10:52

Yes, I think it has.

Scrapping the winter fuel payments while also giving pay rises to their union mates is awful optics.
Even if you agree with the winter fuel scrapping and/or the pay rises, it doesn't look good.

Locutus2000 · 09/09/2024 10:15

The policy seems well-intentioned, and it's good to see a government not just bending whichever way the wind blows for popularity.

The optics however are appalling and Labour need to clarify urgently how poorer pensioners will be fully protected.