Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Refugees "visiting home"

412 replies

Notanotherkendoll · 04/09/2024 09:03

I'm not sure how I feel after this conversation with a friend so would like to hear other opinions.
My friend took in a Ukrainian refugee back in 2022, she was a 18/19 year old teenager. She didn't stay for long before getting employment/started studying and was able to move out but they have remained in touch and my friend sort of views herself as the girls "uk mum".
Anyway friend is once again beside herself as she has gone back to Kyiv for a few days. This isn't the city she is from but sadly the city she was from was under siege for sometime and is now mostly destroyed. She is going to visit her family who all moved to Kyiv, as the only girl her family pushed her to flee when the war started but her mum stayed put.

This has me thinking, surely if it is safe enough for her to return home to visit, it's safe enough for her to move back? I thought the whole point of being a refugee was that your own country wasn't safe, if you are going back to visit how can that be the case?

AIBU to think it's incompatible with the very nature of being a refugee to be able to visit home?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
DoodleLady · 04/09/2024 09:47

coldcallerbaiter · 04/09/2024 09:37

I thought everyone knew that historically refugees fleeing, run over the border with just the clothes on their backs. Many still do and I do not envy them. Not the same anymore, now that asylum is a loophole for economic migrants. I know of someone that has always employed refugees in his business as he is from the same country and they all go back on holiday and so do their relatives. It is Afghanistan.

Does Afghanistan seem like a viable place to live to you? Really?

Starlight1979 · 04/09/2024 09:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Are you joking?! Well firstly, it says in the OP that the girl has a job so there's that.

Also, a "few holidays" a year?! I don't think going back to visit family in a war torn country is what many of us would class as a holiday.

You sound absolutely awful and heartless.

JustEatTheOneInTheBallPit · 04/09/2024 09:46

I have many dear Ukrainian friends who frequently visit home. Each time they go, they are afraid. But they have husbands, brothers and sons that they want to see, and they accept the risks. They aren’t willing to live with those risks every day.

I just can’t believe what I’m reading.

MrsSkylerWhite · 04/09/2024 09:45

Get a life.

heet9nthesand · 04/09/2024 09:43

I came to the UK as a refugee as a young child, with my family (accepted under a formal refugee program and flights were arranged by the UK govt to fly us to the UK, we did not come here as asylum seekers). I am 45 and have never gone back to that country, although my mother did go back about 10 years after we first came to the UK, to go to her father's funeral. It was a safe country by then, but by that stage we had settled in the UK. My mother would definitely not have returned within the first few years when it was still unsafe. I don't get it either.

Zanatdy · 04/09/2024 09:43

They are here on visa’s, they are not refugees, they maintain their Ukrainian passport and travel is not restricted

MinorTom · 04/09/2024 09:41

Would you go on holidays to Ukraine? I believe some of it is absolutely beautiful.

No? Then maybe it is obvious why someone might remain a refugee while the war is going on and Russian soldiers are massively using rape as a weapon of war.

Peakpeakpeak · 04/09/2024 09:40

Notanotherkendoll · 04/09/2024 09:27

See it isn't this. She isn't claiming benefits, she works and is studying. My friend claims she never did claim benefits and prior to being able to get employment she lived off of cash savings she'd brought with.

It's more just confusion about what qualifies as a refugee. I don't think she's using the benefits system more that the refugee system is being misused for people who just want to move to the Uk and could do via other routes such as getting a work visa etc.

She won't be a recognised refugee. The UK didn't want Ukrainians claiming asylum, so instead introduced a couple of alternative systems.

coldcallerbaiter · 04/09/2024 09:37

I thought everyone knew that historically refugees fleeing, run over the border with just the clothes on their backs. Many still do and I do not envy them. Not the same anymore, now that asylum is a loophole for economic migrants. I know of someone that has always employed refugees in his business as he is from the same country and they all go back on holiday and so do their relatives. It is Afghanistan.

DoodleLady · 04/09/2024 09:36

Notanotherkendoll · 04/09/2024 09:27

See it isn't this. She isn't claiming benefits, she works and is studying. My friend claims she never did claim benefits and prior to being able to get employment she lived off of cash savings she'd brought with.

It's more just confusion about what qualifies as a refugee. I don't think she's using the benefits system more that the refugee system is being misused for people who just want to move to the Uk and could do via other routes such as getting a work visa etc.

Do you accept your “confusion” about this has been adequately addressed by several of the posts on this thread? Or are you still “confused”?

DoodleLady · 04/09/2024 09:34

This is such an incredibly callous way of thinking about things. Christ, OP. Hope you voice these thoughts in public too so everyone knows how cruel and unimaginative you are.

gannett · 04/09/2024 09:33

Sasannach · 04/09/2024 09:18

This attitude of distrust and total scepticism towards people fleeing conflict and desperate situations is so, so tiring and draining. As if people are uprooting their entire lives and making arduous journeys to the UK just to profit from the wonderful, glorious (and not at all dehumanising!!) asylum or benefits systems here. 🙄Change the record already.

This.

There's a wilful refusal from some people to put themselves in anyone else's shoes, or to consider that not everyone's situation falls neatly into a perfect box.

It shouldn't be hard to grasp that a country is safe to visit, but not to live in. Or that one part of a country may be safer than another. Or that someone is willing to take certain risks to see their loved ones, based on the above grey areas and more, but not the risk of residing somewhere permanently.

Anonym00se · 04/09/2024 09:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It’s not an all inclusive to the Maldives, it’s a budget flight to Poland and a bus. You can get a return flight from Manchester to Przemysl for £32.

Fluufer · 04/09/2024 09:33

Ukrainians here are not strictly "refugees". People here on actual asylum grounds are very rarely able to travel home - it would usually result in their applications being denied. I do find the double standards a little galling, but the reasons are political rather than personal.
But simply, sometimes it can be safe to visit, but not to live.

WalkingaroundJardine · 04/09/2024 09:31

Ukraine still may still be completely taken over by Russia in the long term, especially if Trump gets voted in and pulls back US support. It’s not exactly safe now and is still being bombed in parts , Isn’t it?

It doesn’t surprise me if people go home in periods of relative calm to see family members left behind, especially if the particular city hasn’t been bombed. I would do the same, especially if they were elderly relatives.

Devilsmommy · 04/09/2024 09:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Anonym00se · 04/09/2024 09:29

Firstly, Ukrainians are not technically refugees, they’re here under ‘humanitarian protection’. During WW2, some people left London or sent their children to a place of safety. Others stayed and got on with ‘life as normal’. They went to work, they went out dancing and met their friends. Maybe that was their way of coping, or perhaps they had no other options. 43,000 civilians died in the London Blitz. It wasn’t safe, despite people ‘living as normal’.

Would I want to live in a war torn country? Absolutely not. Would I return to a war torn country to visit my husband, sons, brothers, mother, etc. Absolutely, I’d crawl over broken glass to see them. Does that make it a “safe place”? Of course it bloody doesn’t.

Ratisshortforratthew · 04/09/2024 09:27

Tell you what OP, why don’t you move to a country actively at war since you’ve decided it must be safe? Or alternatively ask yourself why you begrudge this woman having asylum in the UK.

Notanotherkendoll · 04/09/2024 09:27

Sasannach · 04/09/2024 09:18

This attitude of distrust and total scepticism towards people fleeing conflict and desperate situations is so, so tiring and draining. As if people are uprooting their entire lives and making arduous journeys to the UK just to profit from the wonderful, glorious (and not at all dehumanising!!) asylum or benefits systems here. 🙄Change the record already.

See it isn't this. She isn't claiming benefits, she works and is studying. My friend claims she never did claim benefits and prior to being able to get employment she lived off of cash savings she'd brought with.

It's more just confusion about what qualifies as a refugee. I don't think she's using the benefits system more that the refugee system is being misused for people who just want to move to the Uk and could do via other routes such as getting a work visa etc.

OP posts:
DadJoke · 04/09/2024 09:25

This is really simple. Some places are not safe for refugees to live in. They might or might not be safe to visit. It has literally no bearing on the legitimacy of their refugee status. It’s just nasty refugee bashing.

AgileGreenSeal · 04/09/2024 09:23

My neighbour is a refugee from Ukraine, along with a very young daughter & teenage son.

She regularly goes “home” for holidays and takes the young daughter with her. Maybe four or five times a year. Never expresses any concerns for their safety. I think she leaves the son here so he won’t be drafted.

WatchersOfTheKnight · 04/09/2024 09:22

I agree that it is odd to return to the country you've fled from, for whatever reason. It's either safe enough to go to or it isn't. For some, it's govt-approved relocation.

Howdull · 04/09/2024 09:20

Catza · 04/09/2024 09:17

He says it's wonderful and he has a great time camping with his mates. He is planning to buy a car for 5k in the UK and sell it for 25k at home.
Unless you are on the front line, life goes on as normal. That's what I gather.

I'm surprised he hasn't been mobilised. I thought men under 60 had to stay in Ukraine??

1dayatatime · 04/09/2024 09:19

@Notanotherkendoll

I get your logic, I also understand other posters comments about her missing her family.

Perhaps it would have been more understandable if she had met (if possible) with relatives in say Poland or Hungary or even in the relatively safer western Ukraine.

Either way you will get flamed and labelled as a far right anti immigration fascist on MN for even raising the question on whether the migrants are genuine refugees.

Sasannach · 04/09/2024 09:18

This attitude of distrust and total scepticism towards people fleeing conflict and desperate situations is so, so tiring and draining. As if people are uprooting their entire lives and making arduous journeys to the UK just to profit from the wonderful, glorious (and not at all dehumanising!!) asylum or benefits systems here. 🙄Change the record already.