Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if you have private health insurance?

205 replies

CherryValley5 · 01/09/2024 20:15

Do you have it? Would you get it?

Having just received DD’s (eye watering) PHI renewal it struck me that 10 years ago it would not have even entered my mind to insure a teenager, nowadays it would feel like borderline neglect if I cancelled her policy and instead made her sit on endless NHS waiting lists. I am insured too through work and would never take another job that didn’t offer it. Just sitting here in disbelief that something I would’ve called a luxury not too long ago now feels like an essential for quality of life. It’s so depressing!

OP posts:
papadontpreach2me · 05/09/2024 11:12

Yes through dh work

Jumpingthruhoops · 05/09/2024 10:41

WalkersAntler · 03/09/2024 23:31

Company PMI policies often cover pre-existing conditions, whereas those taken out individually do not.
I was amazed that my company policy covered my serious MH condition which I have had for 30+ years.
I spent a month in a private psychiatric hospital recently which was covered by my policy and was a much more comfortable and less traumatic environment than my previous stay in an NHS psychiatric hospital.

I could have written your post. My experience of an NHS psychiatric hospital was nothing short of horrific. Those places need seriously investigating.

Jumpingthruhoops · 05/09/2024 10:15

FloralGums · 01/09/2024 21:29

It’s because the Tories have run the NHS into the ground to encourage more and more people to use private. Hopefully Labour will invest properly in the NHS.

And pigs might fly...

Didimum · 05/09/2024 10:12

DeLoreanLaura · 05/09/2024 09:56

Not only is your reading comprehension terrible, you don't seem to know what words actually mean. No need to call other people long-winded when you just can't read properly.

First of all, there's no bad things that would have happened. They did happen. Personal experience.

Secondly, in said scenario I got no NHS treatment in a timely manner. I needed it, therefore I paid. The treatment was essential.

The definition of 'luxury' is an inessential good. So what you're really saying is, the treatment I received was completely unnecessary. I should have just waited a year in pain.

You know, some people can't afford food. That doesn't mean food is a luxury. I wouldn't go so far as to call private health insurance that - but it's not a luxury in the way holidays or private jets are. The clue is in the name...insurance, it's only going to be useful if something bad actually happens.

Maybe don't buy house insurance, car insurance (although illegal) , travel insurance or any other type if you don't believe in it.

Edited

Ah, the age-old Mumsnet 'your reading comprehension is terrible' retort. It never fails to appear when someone simple doesn't like what someone else is saying – and it's always entirely meaningless.

It's OK – you can pay for a luxury. It doesn't mean it's not what it is. I didn't say you should have waited a year in pain – but those who could afford what you did (again, the majority of the nation) would have had no option but to wait a year in pain. Again – I'm not saying you should have, I likely would have done the same, but it being expensive enough to not be obtainable for the majority means it is, in fact, a luxury. If you don't think it is expensive, then that's completely relative to what money you have.

There are many definitions of the word luxury – 'a state of comfort, obtained at great expense', 'a desirable item which is expensive and difficult to obtain' – all of which fit the bill to describe the affordability of private healthcare. The root of the word also means in excess to what is already provided – and it most definitely is an excess to what is already provided. You might not like what is provided, you might find yourself if a lesser state to what is provided – but you have the luxury of not having to accept it.

I suggest you make your peace with the definition and stop seeing the definition itself as an attack.

Jumpingthruhoops · 05/09/2024 10:01

whateveryouwantmetosay · 01/09/2024 20:38

We don't line in the uk anymore, but when we did we had private insurance. Worth every single pence given how much we used it, how many waiting lists we avoided, and how much NHS negligence we didn't have to deal with.

This! With bells on. 👏👏

DeLoreanLaura · 05/09/2024 09:56

Didimum · 05/09/2024 09:49

No, this is all just a very long-winded version of saying 'isn't it nice to have money'. Endless streams about the bad things that would have happened to you if you didn't pay privately, does not remove the fact that it's a luxury – both things can be true at the same time. If you're not aware that the majority of the UK cannot afford it, then that's a you problem.

You don't need to stop paying for it, but you should recognise what it is.

Not only is your reading comprehension terrible, you don't seem to know what words actually mean. No need to call other people long-winded when you just can't read properly.

First of all, there's no bad things that would have happened. They did happen. Personal experience.

Secondly, in said scenario I got no NHS treatment in a timely manner. I needed it, therefore I paid. The treatment was essential.

The definition of 'luxury' is an inessential good. So what you're really saying is, the treatment I received was completely unnecessary. I should have just waited a year in pain.

You know, some people can't afford food. That doesn't mean food is a luxury. I wouldn't go so far as to call private health insurance that - but it's not a luxury in the way holidays or private jets are. The clue is in the name...insurance, it's only going to be useful if something bad actually happens.

Maybe don't buy house insurance, car insurance (although illegal) , travel insurance or any other type if you don't believe in it.

Didimum · 05/09/2024 09:49

CherryValley5 · 05/09/2024 09:44

Very well said.

No, this is all just a very long-winded version of saying 'isn't it nice to have money'. Endless streams about the bad things that would have happened to you if you didn't pay privately, does not remove the fact that it's a luxury – both things can be true at the same time. If you're not aware that the majority of the UK cannot afford it, then that's a you problem.

You don't need to stop paying for it, but you should recognise what it is.

CherryValley5 · 05/09/2024 09:44

DeLoreanLaura · 05/09/2024 08:33

Why all the projection? And fallacies?
PP wasn't saying those who can't afford it 'don't' prioritise their children's health.
They're simply giving their views on private healthcare.

Unfortunately in 2024 it's not a luxury I'm afraid, unless you count not suffering in pain a luxury instead of a basic human right.

Instead of getting angry at people who do what's best for them maybe be angry at those in power who have allowed this to happen .

BTW, many a time it's not the 'treatment' that's the issue but getting a diagnosis. The two times I'd had to use the NHS I got my consultant appointment a YEAR after first being seen by my GP! Granted I wouldn't have died but my condition caused a lot of discomfort and had a massive impact on my daily life and work. They expected me to just live with it for a year.

Went private, got to see a consultant within days and if I'd needed long-term treatment he'd have referred me back to his NHS list. So I'd have skipped the queue.

You can't get any treatment without a diagnosis yet the diagnosis itself takes a long time.

BTW if I hadn't gotten treatment the loss of income from sick days etc would have mounted up not to mention the damage to my career and reputation. Insurance is a small price to pay.

It shouldn't be like this. But it is. If you were lucky enough to receive stellar treatment well then be grateful because it's a postcode lottery and not all of us are as fortunate.

Edited

Very well said.

OP posts:
BorisJohnsonsPhysique · 05/09/2024 08:53

I would love to rely on the NHS. In our case the insurance has saved us huge waiting times but I’m sure the treatment is largely the same. It’s the waiting times and access for us. Family members in a different area seem to have much better access to GPs and healthcare. We have to wait 6-12 weeks for a GP appointment that isn’t urgent (and even some urgent stuff is done by text if they think it just needs antibiotics) and waiting lists are years. I’ve been on one for something not covered by insurance for over two years now. And the lack of access definitely affects diagnosis. Doctor friends of mine are really concerned about the many lost opportunities that moving to GP phone (or text) interactions is having for example.

Didimum · 05/09/2024 08:48

DeLoreanLaura · 05/09/2024 08:33

Why all the projection? And fallacies?
PP wasn't saying those who can't afford it 'don't' prioritise their children's health.
They're simply giving their views on private healthcare.

Unfortunately in 2024 it's not a luxury I'm afraid, unless you count not suffering in pain a luxury instead of a basic human right.

Instead of getting angry at people who do what's best for them maybe be angry at those in power who have allowed this to happen .

BTW, many a time it's not the 'treatment' that's the issue but getting a diagnosis. The two times I'd had to use the NHS I got my consultant appointment a YEAR after first being seen by my GP! Granted I wouldn't have died but my condition caused a lot of discomfort and had a massive impact on my daily life and work. They expected me to just live with it for a year.

Went private, got to see a consultant within days and if I'd needed long-term treatment he'd have referred me back to his NHS list. So I'd have skipped the queue.

You can't get any treatment without a diagnosis yet the diagnosis itself takes a long time.

BTW if I hadn't gotten treatment the loss of income from sick days etc would have mounted up not to mention the damage to my career and reputation. Insurance is a small price to pay.

It shouldn't be like this. But it is. If you were lucky enough to receive stellar treatment well then be grateful because it's a postcode lottery and not all of us are as fortunate.

Edited

What fallacies and projection? The OP gave specific examples and I responded to them.

I don’t care a jot if people pay for private healthcare, my one and only point is that it is a luxury to be able to.

We paid privately for my daughter to see an ENT faster than the NHS. It was a luxury to be able to do that.

Rather than asking me why I take issue with people paying privately (I don’t, which I have repeatedly said), you could ask yourself why you take issue with it being a luxury to be able to.

Whatever the wait times or hardships or inadequacies of being on the NHS, that still doesn’t mean that paying for the alternative isn’t a luxury.

Mandylovescandy · 05/09/2024 08:46

Through DP work but I probably wouldn't have it otherwise. We pay to add on me and DC and it has paid for itself in massage/physio and a dental treatment so it has been worth it

Ozanj · 05/09/2024 08:41

Sudden death runs in DH’s family. My Private healthcare policy discovered the slight enlargement of the heart in DSD that precipates this and a hole in the heart for DS that night have led to a stroke. DSD is now on meds and being monitored monthly on the NHS. DS is monitored annually and will get surgery after he turns 7.

Note the NHS doesn’t check for this unless you’ve had a confirmed sudden death in the immediate family. Deaths of immediate family in places where autopsies aren’t done don’t count - which is probably why so many South Asians die of preventable heart issues.

DeLoreanLaura · 05/09/2024 08:33

Didimum · 04/09/2024 22:44

If they own a property with enough equity to remortgage and savings to that amount, then yes it’s a luxury. Please go and educate yourself on the financial state of the vast majority of the nation.

Do you think people who can’t afford it do not prioritise their children’s health? If so, this is more woefully ignorant than I first thought.

Pay for it by all means, who cares, but accept it’s a luxury to do so.

Why all the projection? And fallacies?
PP wasn't saying those who can't afford it 'don't' prioritise their children's health.
They're simply giving their views on private healthcare.

Unfortunately in 2024 it's not a luxury I'm afraid, unless you count not suffering in pain a luxury instead of a basic human right.

Instead of getting angry at people who do what's best for them maybe be angry at those in power who have allowed this to happen .

BTW, many a time it's not the 'treatment' that's the issue but getting a diagnosis. The two times I'd had to use the NHS I got my consultant appointment a YEAR after first being seen by my GP! Granted I wouldn't have died but my condition caused a lot of discomfort and had a massive impact on my daily life and work. They expected me to just live with it for a year.

Went private, got to see a consultant within days and if I'd needed long-term treatment he'd have referred me back to his NHS list. So I'd have skipped the queue.

You can't get any treatment without a diagnosis yet the diagnosis itself takes a long time.

BTW if I hadn't gotten treatment the loss of income from sick days etc would have mounted up not to mention the damage to my career and reputation. Insurance is a small price to pay.

It shouldn't be like this. But it is. If you were lucky enough to receive stellar treatment well then be grateful because it's a postcode lottery and not all of us are as fortunate.

CherryValley5 · 05/09/2024 07:52

Didimum · 04/09/2024 22:44

If they own a property with enough equity to remortgage and savings to that amount, then yes it’s a luxury. Please go and educate yourself on the financial state of the vast majority of the nation.

Do you think people who can’t afford it do not prioritise their children’s health? If so, this is more woefully ignorant than I first thought.

Pay for it by all means, who cares, but accept it’s a luxury to do so.

Have your opinion, I’ll have mine. I believe that people having to financially stretch themselves (including me - insurance shortfall last week for pain management treatment now means that I have a maxed out credit card..) for timely care which should be available via their national insurance is a disgrace, not luxurious in the slightest. I feel that ignoring the situation is woefully ignorant.

My point is that I would feel neglectful if I cancelled something that I can (just about) afford which has given DD so much hope and better quality of life over the last years. I wasn’t referring to anybody else.

OP posts:
DeathNote11 · 05/09/2024 06:28

Absolutely yes, for me & my children. Had my parents & young nephew been insured they'd likely still be alive today, so I regard it as an essential bill. I have zero trust in NHS services in my area.

aramox1 · 05/09/2024 06:05

No. None of us have needed it, though we have paid privately for counselling. I'd struggle to do it both mentally and financially.

PeloMom · 05/09/2024 04:09

Yes, we have 2 policies through 2 different providers (it’s allowed where we are). Use them all the time.

Jumpingthruhoops · 05/09/2024 03:18

Kitkat1523 · 01/09/2024 20:25

No ….never been in a position where I would have needed it ( touch wood) ….always had timely nhs referrals for me and my children

You don't think you'll need it... until you do.
Seriously ill health often comes totally out if the blue and, in my case, did.
I'd strongly advise you look into it.

Jumpingthruhoops · 05/09/2024 03:08

100%. Wouldn't be without it now. Literally saved my life after the NHS totally failed me. The thought of ever not having it is truly terrifying.

DogCEO · 05/09/2024 02:53

Yes, we're all covered through my partners work.

CherryValley5 · 04/09/2024 23:54

WalkersAntler · 04/09/2024 23:43

My company insurance scheme actually covers up to 90 days of MH inpatient treatment per year.

Yes, fortunately have never had to use it but both mine and DD’s policies cover up to 90 days in MH inpatient facilities per year.

@BeatenbySassafras We have private ambulance cover too so definitely not out of the realms of possibility or awfully impractical - life I’ve said, we’ve travelled far for treatment before and I wouldn’t hesitate to do it again if it meant better care/outcome.

OP posts:
WalkersAntler · 04/09/2024 23:43

BeatenbySassafras · 04/09/2024 23:11

Not going to happen it you're detained under mental health legislation. Totally impractical anyway. Perusing the insurers it appears 28 days is the max inpatient stay covered. 60/70 + day admissions aren't unusual for episodes of severe psychiatric illness.

My company insurance scheme actually covers up to 90 days of MH inpatient treatment per year.

BeatenbySassafras · 04/09/2024 23:11

CherryValley5 · 04/09/2024 20:37

I’d assume that they would be able to organise a transfer to a private facility, albeit in a different part of the country. DD needed surgery requiring high dependency care post operatively, there are no private HDU services anywhere near us so they ended up arranging for her to have it done in London. They also paid out for our flights and accommodation.

Not going to happen it you're detained under mental health legislation. Totally impractical anyway. Perusing the insurers it appears 28 days is the max inpatient stay covered. 60/70 + day admissions aren't unusual for episodes of severe psychiatric illness.

Didimum · 04/09/2024 22:44

CherryValley5 · 04/09/2024 22:28

I wish I had a luxurious life, or that my head was up my arse. I work 6 days per week, haven’t bought clothes, any luxuries for myself or been on holiday etc in years and live pay check to pay check - apologies that I think my child’s health and future is something to prioritise.

The fact is that more and more people who cannot really afford it are being forced into using private healthcare due to the state of the NHS. Ignoring this and pretending it doesn’t happen is blatant refusal to see the magnitude of the situation or how bad it has gotten. Would you say that the people using up their entire life savings or remortgaging their home to pay for a new hip live a life of luxury too? I’m sure they’d disagree.

If they own a property with enough equity to remortgage and savings to that amount, then yes it’s a luxury. Please go and educate yourself on the financial state of the vast majority of the nation.

Do you think people who can’t afford it do not prioritise their children’s health? If so, this is more woefully ignorant than I first thought.

Pay for it by all means, who cares, but accept it’s a luxury to do so.

CherryValley5 · 04/09/2024 22:28

Didimum · 04/09/2024 21:58

What’s luxurious about paying for private health insurance?? Erm … having the means to pay for private health insurance? Please get your head out your arse.

I wish I had a luxurious life, or that my head was up my arse. I work 6 days per week, haven’t bought clothes, any luxuries for myself or been on holiday etc in years and live pay check to pay check - apologies that I think my child’s health and future is something to prioritise.

The fact is that more and more people who cannot really afford it are being forced into using private healthcare due to the state of the NHS. Ignoring this and pretending it doesn’t happen is blatant refusal to see the magnitude of the situation or how bad it has gotten. Would you say that the people using up their entire life savings or remortgaging their home to pay for a new hip live a life of luxury too? I’m sure they’d disagree.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread