To think we should all boycott John Lewis until they respect their female employees

This thread is literally about the fact the OP would like to deny transwomen the rights that they’ve been given by John Lewis, Wes. Read from the beginning….

Interesting you say the rights John Lewis have given to them are you finally now accepting that they do not have these rights in Law?

Our local JL is ridiculous on changing rooms anyway. They have dedicated children’s changing rooms but they are often not in use. Their solution is to send children to the next over set of changing rooms, in the women’s department. This includes teen and pre-teen boys. Absolutely horrific for my kids who very much didn’t want to be in the women’s changing room (the men’s are on a totally different floor and miles away and the staff wanted them in the women’s). The other women using the facilities also didn’t want my young boys in there (and the noise and fuss) and the staff couldn’t care less. Couldn’t even empathise.

Ive got to that paranoid stage where i screen shot my posts 😳

Every single poster knows that a man can’t be a woman. Some are willing to pretend otherwise for reasons that must make sense to them.

Everyone is, of course, entitled to their opinion. They’re just not entitled to make everyone behave as if their delusion is fact.

Has it occurred to any of the transphobia-accusers that the women you’re accusing of transphobia are probably the same sort of women who’ve fought sexism, racism, homophobia - all the ‘isms’ - probably before some of you were even aware there was prejudice in the world. We’re not bigots. Why would we suddenly become bigots now? Can you not see what’s happening?

Can a male deer be a doe?

I think anyone who comes out with 'males can be women' which isn't a difference of opinion but factually incorrect, insists that men have a right to be in female spaces to the detriment of women (and a big fuck you to boot), belittling women's lived experience of things like sexual assault, denying women who for religious reasons want to be away from men in their single SEX spaces and women who just don't fucking want to share their spaces with boundary pushing men, would do well to get away with a little patronising post.

@ElleWoods15 thinks men can women. I struggle to see how that could be positioned as a 'valid opinion'. On what grounds?

How incredibly patronising. Maybe @ElleWoods15 isn’t interested in your forgiveness and maybe also has a valid opinion even if it happens to be different to yours.

Look, I get it. Being on the side of men and belittling women is an evolutionary survival instinct in women.
@ElleWoods15 at al. I forgive you. But I will continue to work against you.

Women’s rights are not solely yours to hand over to men.

You are advocating for the rights of men,the fact that you imagine them to be something else doesn't change what they are.

Why would you not campaign for biological males to be more accommodating to males with a different ‘gender identity’, whatever you describe that to be. Why would you not want to advocate for third spaces?

Define gender identity. What about those who do not subscribe to or believe in gender identify?

I think biolgical males should not use changing rooms or loos for biological females.

If someone in a 45 year old body, identified as a 16 year old, would you advocate for them to go into the space designated for the 16 year old? That’s their inner identify after all.

You would like (as I understand it) for trans women not to be able to use the changing rooms or loos specific to the gender they identify as. Do you disagree with that as a description?

Avoiding the question/s as per. Quelle surprise.

So trans women don’t have the right to use a bathroom or changing room?

This thread is literally about the fact the OP would like to deny transwomen the rights that they’ve been given by John Lewis, Wes. Read from the beginning….

Nah we just don’t think allowing men in women’s single sex spaces is a good idea. We keep men out however they present becatse we have no way of differentiating between men who are fine, men who get their kicks out of listening to women pissing for example or a man who is going to assault someone

my husband is lovely & wouldn’t hurt anyone but I don’t expect other women to just know this by telepathy hence he’s kept out of women’s spaces. He doesn’t take it personally because he’s not a self obsessed arse, he understands it’s about keeping out all men not just him

Any context about how men can become women, and if women can be transwomen by the arguments given here would be most welcome. Or will this be avoided. Every. Single. Time.

No I'm not boycotting JL based on that scanty information.
My previous workplace had unisex toilets. Each cubicle was self-contained, lockable, no urinals, own sink and mirror. No problem.
There's no information in that letter on what they have in mind.

🤷🏻

Nobody has ever just got deleted for saying yawn or bless. 🙄
Look, I just said it now.
Context. Background. Always conveniently missing.
Reminds me of those crying about racist rioters "just getting arrested for saying hurty words on the internet" 🙄
Conveniently missing out any context.
Exact. Same. Argument.

*anti men in women’s spaces. Try reading the thread/letter it’s actually about.

The post literally says personal attacks and transphobic.
So why repeat the personal attack bit?
(Maybe an excuse to tag someone in to attack them again?)
I was asking what else do you get deleted for as the pp was saying you don't only get deleted for those.