Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wish I could stop paying into the utterly broken NHS black hole

357 replies

Juanhundred · 29/08/2024 14:38

The last few years have really opened my eyes to the utter chaos of the National Health Screwers

If you've not needed them or only needed them for minor things, you honestly have no idea how bloody scary it is to be seriously ill and under the "care" of people I wouldnt usually trust to look after a dog

Every month I pay out about a weeks worth of wages in tax towards the NHS, then I pay a bit off my staggering credit card debt thats accumulated on going private when the NHS fail at life (rheumatology, gynaecology, dermatology, podiatry, basic antibiotics when my GP insisted an infected tick bite was "just allergies", the list is endless!)

I'm not rich, I earn less than 30k. Some days towards the end of the month I literally cant afford to eat what or when I want

20 years ago (when the NHS was actually the envy of the world) I had cervical cancer. Caught early by a smear test and treated in time to save my life. I was told by the consultant, "Another 6 months and your chances wouldn't have been good. Be very mindful of any changes moving forwards, and act on them immediately"
It was around the same time that Jade Goody died; she was told if she'd been seen 6 months earlier, her chances would have been infinitely better.
That brush with the Big C scared me shitless, and as per the advice given I'm super mindful of any changes and take them seriously.

Well I've probably just saved my own life this time by getting a private smear test, because despite my history and all the symptoms I am now experiencing (irregular heavy bleeding, random spotting, discharge, bleeding after intercourse, tummy and back pain), I was refused an NHS smear as I'm "not owed one" until three years after my last test, history / symptoms be damned.

The system was "reformed" in 2017. The NHS no longer do proper smear tests, just HPV tests. If you have HPV, you get a smear, if you dont, its off you go we'll see you in 3 years.

My private test showed major cell changes but HPV negative. My NHS GP surgery refused to acknowledge it or record the results on my medical record.
Luckily I'm already under an NHS gynaecologist (due to my symptoms), who initially agreed to refer me for colposcopy off the back of my private smear, but the referral was "triaged" and then rejected. My gynaecologist is just like 🤷🏻‍♀️ "You dont have HPV and around 50% cell changes rectify themselves without treatment. So yeah, bye."

50%? So 50% DONT rectify? And you think I'm betting my life on being in the lucky 50%, with my history and current symptoms? Is 50% really a good enough percentage to deny women with symptoms any further investigations? I dont think so, but apparently the NHS now does.

The NHS insists that as most (not all!) cervical cancers are caused by HPV, the women who fall into the grey area who have bad cells but no HPV are pretty rare, therefore our lives dont matter. Thats the message I'm getting.

Basically, I've just been abandoned by the NHS until I've got full-blown Big C, then maybe they might do something, if I'm lucky?

They can fuck off. I have two DDs who need their mum!

So here I am faffing around online trying to up my credit card limit so I can book myself in for a private colposcopy, and thinking to myself "If I didnt have to pay all this fucking money towards the NHS every month, I'd be able to afford this without credit!"

Sorry for the rambling ranty post I'm just stressed scared skint and at the end of my fucking tether

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Tryingtokeepgoing · 03/09/2024 16:59

BIossomtoes · 03/09/2024 16:35

Although for context, under in the Bliar / Brown years, partly hidden by badly negotiated PFI that some trusts are still suffering with, the NHS delivered worse patient outcomes than any other ‘first world’ health service. And that was after 13 years of significant spending increases

Can you verify that? And what about the last 14 years?

Which bit would you like verifying? The worse patient outcomes? Take a look here:

http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51215/1/__libfile_REPOSITORY_Content_CASE_CASE%20Social%20policy%20in%20a%20cold%20climate%20series_Working%20papers_spccwp02_full%20text.pdf

Page 11

Or perhaps the scale of privatisation under the last Labour government? For that you could look here:

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2023/07/forty-years-of-nhs-privatisation

And yes, I agree, the last government should have put more emphasis on NHS reform, to give the taxpayer the same type of service our European neighbours get. They failed as well.

That’s why we need to take tribal politics, failed ideology and dogma driven focus on ‘because NHS’ out of the equation.

To wish I could stop paying into the utterly broken NHS black hole
To wish I could stop paying into the utterly broken NHS black hole
BIossomtoes · 03/09/2024 16:35

Although for context, under in the Bliar / Brown years, partly hidden by badly negotiated PFI that some trusts are still suffering with, the NHS delivered worse patient outcomes than any other ‘first world’ health service. And that was after 13 years of significant spending increases

Can you verify that? And what about the last 14 years?

Tryingtokeepgoing · 03/09/2024 15:41

BIossomtoes · 30/08/2024 15:23

It’s still got fewer beds and spends less than other European countries. There’s been virtually no investment in infrastructure in the last 14 years. It didn’t take long for Johnson’s 40 new hospitals to go by the wayside.

Although for context, under in the Bliar / Brown years, partly hidden by badly negotiated PFI that some trusts are still suffering with, the NHS delivered worse patient outcomes than any other ‘first world’ health service. And that was after 13 years of significant spending increases.

The NHS is unable to deliver world class healthcare in its existing structure. Failure to reform means continued reform by the back door…which is the increasing privatisation by stealth started by the last Labour government. At least the Tory’s are open about it.

Labour, let’s not forget, brought in 100 privately funded hospitals, privately run dialysis clinics in 2008, and outsourced most community care through the ‘Transforming Community Care’ initiative. Arguably leading to the crisis in community care we now face.

No government understands how or can be trusted to deliverer a fit for purpose, never mind world class, heath service as long as its (a) subject to short term polictal interference and (b) held to ransom by its staff.

taxguru · 31/08/2024 09:30

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 30/08/2024 23:15

The Tories destroyed the NHS. People voted Labour in to fix it but it can only be done if we get out of the "Tax cuts good / tax rises bad" mindset set by the tabloid press. You get what you pay for. And going private - as you have found - is way more expensive than any tax increase.

Brown and Blair also did the same tax cuts good, rises bad mantra too!

We as a country have had that for a few decades now.

Brown brought in a new Lower 10% tax rate and starter O% corporation tax rate. Also brought in tax credits, increased ISA allowances etc.

Successive governments have consistently sent the message of lower taxes by all kinds of different incentives etc.

You really can’t blame it solely on the Tories!

Babadookinthewardrobe · 31/08/2024 09:29

ForGreyKoala · 30/08/2024 02:33

So? Is this an MN thing or a UK thing? I don't live there and I have literally never heard anyone discuss how much they "contribute" to the health system - or any other system - here. Everyone expects the same treatment, as they should.

OP has had shocking treatment, and I can understand her questioning why she is paying for this - but why oh why are so many of you intent on showing how clever you are by calculating how much she actually does, or doesn't contribute. IT DOESN'T MATTER!!! The point of her post is the treatment she has not received, not the amount she has paid it. What is wrong with you all?? Some of you seem to have got your money's worth from the NHS with your empathy bypass.

Absolutely agree. What a shitshow reading through the thread and seeing all the posters completely ignore the point of the post and gleefully start going on about how great their maths is. Empathy bypass is bang on.

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 30/08/2024 23:15

The Tories destroyed the NHS. People voted Labour in to fix it but it can only be done if we get out of the "Tax cuts good / tax rises bad" mindset set by the tabloid press. You get what you pay for. And going private - as you have found - is way more expensive than any tax increase.

taxguru · 30/08/2024 23:00

SaltAndVinegar2 · 30/08/2024 21:01

That's not what unemployment is.... Unemployment is people on job seekers.
Economically inactive includes a lot of students, people who retired before 65, spouses whose husbands or wives pay their living costs, mums of young kids who will go back to work in a few years, as well as long term sick and disabled.

Yes, but it’s still lots of people not contributing! Whether by actually doing work or paying taxes.

SaltAndVinegar2 · 30/08/2024 21:01

CuttySarcasm · 30/08/2024 16:38

The UK's economic inactivity rate was 21.8% between November and January, marginally higher than a year earlier. It means 9.2 million people aged between 16 and 64 in the UK are not in work nor looking for a job. The total figure is more than 700,000 higher than before the coronavirus pandemic.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68534537#:~:text=The%20UK's%20economic%20inactivity%20rate,than%20before%20the%20coronavirus%20pandemic.

That's not what unemployment is.... Unemployment is people on job seekers.
Economically inactive includes a lot of students, people who retired before 65, spouses whose husbands or wives pay their living costs, mums of young kids who will go back to work in a few years, as well as long term sick and disabled.

VotesForWomen · 30/08/2024 19:19

taxguru · 30/08/2024 14:47

American companies are "slithering" their way in because the NHS has become a national untouchable religion and any suggestions to reform it are batted away by the cry that all it needs is more money, and more, and more.

If we could have a proper conversation about it's future, and accept some unpalatable changes, then the NHS may well survive in a form similar to some other European countries with a mix of co-payment, nationally backed insurance schemes, etc.

As it is, we're stuck with the covering your ears chanting "la la la" whenever anything like that is suggested so the politicians are too scared to change it fundamentally.

By doing that, we'll end up with the American system by default because more and more people will make their own arrangements and the private providers will be able to cherry pick what private payers want at stupidly high charges and the NHS will continue to collapse.

We, as a country, need to accept that fundamental change is needed and yes, that's going to cost. We also need to accept that just throwing more money into the leaky bucket without reform won't produce good enough improvements. Time for everyone to get real, smell the coffee, and put pressure on politicians to reform the NHS, not just the lazy option of throwing more money at it.

Otherwise it really will be USA here we come! We'll sleep walk into it.

I'm 40, when I was 20 I worked in a job which was massively affected by the NHS being part way through major reform already, so at a guess it's been in major reform of one kind or another for at least 30 years.

I don't think people are resistant to NHS reform, so much as they're just tired of it being touted as in progress for so long and it's just got noticeably worse.

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 18:04

Well that gives a small insight into what privatisation would look like- disjointed and lack of control and less regulated.
Go for it!!!!

mrshoho · 30/08/2024 17:48

DeLoreanLaura · 30/08/2024 16:24

@taxguru Beautifully put, exactly what I was trying to say! You're more eloquent.

@KurtShirty You keep posting random links but I don't think you really get the point - that taxguru has made nicely above.

It's not about 'idealising' other healthcare systems (in fact I clearly stated that various approaches are needed) but having the conversation.

One thing I am clear on is that just 'pouring money' into the NHS isn't going to be sustainable. Yet, discussing any other approaches is unpopular, people see it as a sanctified entity.

And as taxguru pointed out THIS is what's ultimately going to cause sleepwalking into privatisation. More than any active action. Inertia.

Anyway you CBA to discuss it so that's that

Edited

Agree with this and privatisation/self funding is on the way. I've noticed now an update on the nhs/patients know best/patient access app there are loads of links to services that you can pay for. I only updated yesterday so haven't fully looked at it.

I discovered recently that DHL now run the patient transport in some parts of London. I was trying to organise transport for a v elderly relative to attend a specialist hospital in the City for preoperative assessment. It was a nightmare and the day before they informed they would not take them. I had to phone the hospital who were also fuming as they had to remove him from the op list. Before this hospital staff would deal with the arrangements but they are unable to get involved now. They advised me to report to the CCG. What a mess.

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 17:12

When it was funded adequately it worked very well. It needs to be properly funded.

CuttySarcasm · 30/08/2024 16:38

LakieLady · 30/08/2024 16:20

Are you including pensioners in your unemployment figures or something @CuttySarcasm ?

There were 1.44m people unemployed in June this year.

Unemployment figures last quarter

Edited

The UK's economic inactivity rate was 21.8% between November and January, marginally higher than a year earlier. It means 9.2 million people aged between 16 and 64 in the UK are not in work nor looking for a job. The total figure is more than 700,000 higher than before the coronavirus pandemic.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68534537#:~:text=The%20UK's%20economic%20inactivity%20rate,than%20before%20the%20coronavirus%20pandemic.

Woman at home looking at laptop

More than a fifth of UK adults not looking for work

The UK's economic inactivity rate was 21.8% from November to January, official figures show.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68534537#:~:text=The%20UK's%20economic%20inactivity%20rate,than%20before%20the%20coronavirus%20pandemic.

KurtShirty · 30/08/2024 16:36

DeLoreanLaura · 30/08/2024 16:24

@taxguru Beautifully put, exactly what I was trying to say! You're more eloquent.

@KurtShirty You keep posting random links but I don't think you really get the point - that taxguru has made nicely above.

It's not about 'idealising' other healthcare systems (in fact I clearly stated that various approaches are needed) but having the conversation.

One thing I am clear on is that just 'pouring money' into the NHS isn't going to be sustainable. Yet, discussing any other approaches is unpopular, people see it as a sanctified entity.

And as taxguru pointed out THIS is what's ultimately going to cause sleepwalking into privatisation. More than any active action. Inertia.

Anyway you CBA to discuss it so that's that

Edited

Yeah, I can’t be arsed to have a conversation where people respond to points I haven’t made, you guys are all over the place!

DeLoreanLaura · 30/08/2024 16:24

taxguru · 30/08/2024 14:47

American companies are "slithering" their way in because the NHS has become a national untouchable religion and any suggestions to reform it are batted away by the cry that all it needs is more money, and more, and more.

If we could have a proper conversation about it's future, and accept some unpalatable changes, then the NHS may well survive in a form similar to some other European countries with a mix of co-payment, nationally backed insurance schemes, etc.

As it is, we're stuck with the covering your ears chanting "la la la" whenever anything like that is suggested so the politicians are too scared to change it fundamentally.

By doing that, we'll end up with the American system by default because more and more people will make their own arrangements and the private providers will be able to cherry pick what private payers want at stupidly high charges and the NHS will continue to collapse.

We, as a country, need to accept that fundamental change is needed and yes, that's going to cost. We also need to accept that just throwing more money into the leaky bucket without reform won't produce good enough improvements. Time for everyone to get real, smell the coffee, and put pressure on politicians to reform the NHS, not just the lazy option of throwing more money at it.

Otherwise it really will be USA here we come! We'll sleep walk into it.

@taxguru Beautifully put, exactly what I was trying to say! You're more eloquent.

@KurtShirty You keep posting random links but I don't think you really get the point - that taxguru has made nicely above.

It's not about 'idealising' other healthcare systems (in fact I clearly stated that various approaches are needed) but having the conversation.

One thing I am clear on is that just 'pouring money' into the NHS isn't going to be sustainable. Yet, discussing any other approaches is unpopular, people see it as a sanctified entity.

And as taxguru pointed out THIS is what's ultimately going to cause sleepwalking into privatisation. More than any active action. Inertia.

Anyway you CBA to discuss it so that's that

LakieLady · 30/08/2024 16:20

CuttySarcasm · 29/08/2024 19:18

Honestly considering leaving the UK at the moment, just had a serious chat with DH about it. Not enough people pay into the NHS, for the amount that use it.

The tax in this country is going to get ridiculous (it’s already pretty bad), to support the 9 million unemployed, no thanks. This country is going bust.

Another thread entirely but starmer is going after the working middle classes, not the old and asset rich, or the billionaires, or trying to get people into work, and we’re going to bloody leave!! Had enough.

Are you including pensioners in your unemployment figures or something @CuttySarcasm ?

There were 1.44m people unemployed in June this year.

Unemployment figures last quarter

KurtShirty · 30/08/2024 16:08

taxguru · 30/08/2024 14:47

American companies are "slithering" their way in because the NHS has become a national untouchable religion and any suggestions to reform it are batted away by the cry that all it needs is more money, and more, and more.

If we could have a proper conversation about it's future, and accept some unpalatable changes, then the NHS may well survive in a form similar to some other European countries with a mix of co-payment, nationally backed insurance schemes, etc.

As it is, we're stuck with the covering your ears chanting "la la la" whenever anything like that is suggested so the politicians are too scared to change it fundamentally.

By doing that, we'll end up with the American system by default because more and more people will make their own arrangements and the private providers will be able to cherry pick what private payers want at stupidly high charges and the NHS will continue to collapse.

We, as a country, need to accept that fundamental change is needed and yes, that's going to cost. We also need to accept that just throwing more money into the leaky bucket without reform won't produce good enough improvements. Time for everyone to get real, smell the coffee, and put pressure on politicians to reform the NHS, not just the lazy option of throwing more money at it.

Otherwise it really will be USA here we come! We'll sleep walk into it.

Disagree, but cannot be arsed to discuss it further

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 15:46

Though they just closed ours for a while as no NS to manage it.

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 15:45

We already have discharge lounges.

mrshoho · 30/08/2024 15:42

I'm sorry OP and I agree with you.

I've had more than my fair share of experience with the NHS over the last few years with family members and I've been left feeling scared and let down time and again. I've met really wonderful staff but also really really poor, heartless, incompetent and dangerous staff too. The system is wrong and I don't even know where we need to start as the problem is far bigger than just more money.

One example is Urology department. A patient is left suffering with no point of contact other than the GP of A&E. The GP emails Urology to ask for advice of how to treat but even they are ignored. When PALS have been consulted the answer is go to A&E. But this isn't necessarily an emergency. We were actually told in order to speak to a urologist we must present ourselves at A&E. What the fuck system is that? By the time you go through A&E after sitting in a germ infested waiting room for 11 hours you are sicker than when you went in.

I've always championed the NHS and they are amazing at saving lives but I've now seen the other side where the system is harming patients and leaving them with permanent injuries that could be avoided.

LakieLady · 30/08/2024 15:37

Not everything can be done privately.

Someone I know needs surgery for a slipped disc. They're a tree surgeon, so unable to work until it's done, and the NHS wait is 10-12 months, so stand to lose shedloads of money.

A family member offered to pay for them to have the surgery done privately, so they got a private appointment with the surgeon, paid for scans and/or x-rays and stuff, had a second appt to go through what needed doing, and booked a date for the operation. Around a fortnight prior to the surgery date, they had an appointment for pre-op checks at the private hospital. Among the questions was "Are you diabetic?". They are T1 diabetic.

A couple of days later, they got a call from the surgeon's secretary saying that they wouldn't be able to do the operation there, as they didn't have the necessary back up if the diabetes led to problems, so it would have to be done in an NHS hospital where there is intensive care and all sorts of other stuff.

The person concerned has stumped up over £500 that they could ill afford in costs but is no nearer getting it done. Thankfully, they were still on the NHS list, so the waiting time is now down to 8-10 months.

BIossomtoes · 30/08/2024 15:23

Onemoreterm · 30/08/2024 15:13

But isn’t it the fifth largest employer in the world? About 1.5 million staff?

It’s still got fewer beds and spends less than other European countries. There’s been virtually no investment in infrastructure in the last 14 years. It didn’t take long for Johnson’s 40 new hospitals to go by the wayside.

Onemoreterm · 30/08/2024 15:13

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 15:02

It spends less per head than other European countries and has less beds too.

Don't fall prey to the previous Tory propaganda

But isn’t it the fifth largest employer in the world? About 1.5 million staff?

piccolorhinoceros · 30/08/2024 15:07

Auburngal · 30/08/2024 14:24

It’s not nice being told you are going home that morning and by the time meds are sorted out, get a sick note etc - it can be 6pm.

How many patients had surgery cancelled final minute because of patients waiting to be discharged are awaiting a bed but because of these delays? Bed blocking!

What NHS can do is make a room like a day case room. Patients have a chair, not a bed on day of discharge. Call it a discharge room. So beds can be freed up earlier in the day and less likely to have surgery cancelled last minute.

If anyone is offered surgery at private hospitals paid by NHS - do it!

Free car parking, own room with en suite, free tv, better food…..

They already have this in a lot of sites, e.g. a discharge lounge. It doesn't solve all the problems. Patients are awaiting medical review, physio, OT, package of care, etc. Sometimes they might not be fit for discharge until later in the day.

@Nat6999 The private hospitals can work so efficiently as they're not under anywhere near the same pressure though. Post-op medications can be organised in advance because they're elective procedures, the patient is generally well, they're not supplying any pre-admission medicines, so the ward staff will generally know what needs to be written up. In NHS hospitals medicines like co-codamol, anti-sickness tablets, reflux tablets etc are pre-labelled and can be supplied by nurses where appropriate. So the NHS do aim for efficiency, but there are complicating factors.

letmego24 · 30/08/2024 15:02

Onemoreterm · 30/08/2024 14:30

The NHS is really inefficient and needs a root & branch sort out. The country spends an enormous sum on the NHS and it is one of the biggest employers in the world!

It spends less per head than other European countries and has less beds too.

Don't fall prey to the previous Tory propaganda