Mums of sons. (Hard hat on for this)

you're creaming your pants

shows how much time you obviously have on your hands.

Calm down a bit love

These kinds of rejoinder are made by people who don’t have the capacity for intelligent debate and have given up. Everyone who is contributing here clearly has had time to post. So what. OP this could have been an interesting but spirited debate. As the thread has progressed, you have shown your true unimpressive colours.

I await the flounce. Maybe have a few weeks to reflect and have another go.

They get a bit over excited when women engage with them and they can't control themselves and stay in role. They are however idiot utile as the poor arguments serve as a vehicle for women to make important points in response, and their offensive behaviour damages their own cause.

I hate people who abuse others. People who rape. People who let their partner do all the housework and childcare. People who abuse their partners financially. People who walk away from their kids. People who sexually harass others in the workplace. People who commit violent robberies. People who urinante over public monuments. People who contribute nothing to family life and accuse their partners of nagging. People who get drunk and pull all-nighters but don’t bother informing their partners who then worry at home. People who murder.

I don’t hate ‘men’. But the vast majority of people who do the above are men, and I will always point it out. As would my son and husband.

OP is one classy poster ;-)

‘Hard hat’ not working then?! You have had so many comments deleted I see.

The sad thing is a lot of mums (and some dads) like this do have sons and treat them poorly because they're boys. I've seen it so many times. Their hatred of men spills over onto their sons. Makes me sad.

But then you didn’t address that several posters do in fact know women who have been murdered by men, specially their husbands or partners.

Just like you didn’t address anyone who answered your ‘my brother got accused of assault and nothing happened to him, but it could have cause it was a woman’ post.

I already explained where you said it.

But let’s try again. A poster said that as women raise children if men are arseholes they need to look at themselves.

Someone pointed out that kids have 2 parents (unless one died) and if it’s only the woman that’s raising them maybe the issue is that men are stepping enough and actually parenting their kids.

You jumped in at the defence of men to say ‘well the men are out working’ when it was pointed out that many women also work you started saying ‘I know some sahm’.

But men working doesn’t stop them being an engaged parent. So what was your point, when you argued against someone saying raising kids was both parents responsibility, by pointing out men work?

@sarfwestlondonmassive only has two posts to its name, both on this thread.

Yes. Women talk like that all the time. In between hating men and making false accusations about them

How many usernames do you have OP?

'Creaming your pants'
'The things you lot get wet over'

For someone who isn't an MRA, you don't half talk like one.

Cross posted and have seen that it was indeed OP with a name change.

FYI OP your deleted posts weren't all removed because they were TAATs.

I imagine the one with you name calling and using a pretty outdated term for a woman without sense was removed because it wasn't in the spirit of the site.

@sarfwestlondonmassive

It was because it was a TAAT - HTH.

OP's deleted posts weren't deleted for that reason. I was clearly referring to OP and their posts, as I said the following:

"Maybe consider why your replies are being deleted OP and whether it might be because you're engaging with people really poorly and saying inappropriate things."

Did you think for some reason I was referring to your posts? Or are you OP under a different name? I'm not sure why you felt my previous post (suggesting OP think about why their responses are being deleted) was about you?

'Creaming your pants'
'The things you lot get wet over'

That's nice.

You’re really just digging yourself a deeper hole 🥴 Well, since you’re apparently new here and don’t understand how MN works, there are protocols in place to stop sock puppets from replying to their own threads. So you’re clearly not just flicking between threads and forgetting to change your username, because um, you can’t. Unless of course, you’re using sock puppet accounts.

I have a feeling op is being influenced by some male 'victim' out there.

I can feel protection mode in full swing.

Op, you're not under some charlaton's spell are you ?

@BernardBlacksBreakfastWine
So it sits ill with me that any woman would take the trouble to start a thread about the 1% of times when a man gets the sharp end of the ‘double standards’ situation. It’s off.

Well quite. Especially by someone who's had ten years of abuse that required police intervention. Might explain the anger but it doesn't explain the starting position.

I think I'm hiding this thread, it's too rotten.

Aww OP it’s ok. Your credibility is still intact 😎

OP stop digging 😂

I just can’t take OPs like this seriously- it doesn’t seem in good faith.

It’s not that there’s never anything unfair said about men on here. It’s just that it’s such a drop in the ocean. Men have blighted women’s lives for centuries. That’s not to say there aren’t lovely, good men - there are! They’re the ones who’ve helped us get some semblance of equality.

But it’s still not an even playing field, obviously, and the ‘double standards’ are, 99% of the time, in men’s favour! We’ve even had women coming onto this very thread, singing the praises of men who are doing basic level parenting! So it sits ill with me that any woman would take the trouble to start a thread about the 1% of times when a man gets the sharp end of the ‘double standards’ situation. It’s off.

What words am I twisting? What lies?