Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

SS visited today

467 replies

sotiredandconfused · 20/08/2024 20:07

I recently had a HV come round. She appeared a little rigid and looked like she was attending a wedding but she seemed chatty and reflected back lots of positive things she was seeing. Today I had a SW unexpectantly visit and after she read out everything that the HV had raised, to say I was shocked is an understatement. Both my DH were there and the HV literally fabricated and misrepresented things she saw. The SW was lovely and stated she had no concerns and let me know I could make a complaint (I have).

So WTF! I'm still in shock. The HV asked me at the time whether I wanted another visit and I said no, and then SS turn up!

OP posts:
Exposingthetruth · 21/08/2024 15:37

Ace56 · 21/08/2024 00:07

Sorry but no smoke without fire. If your family are involved with SS there’s a reason for that.

Are you completely oblivious to the thousands of malicious reports SS receive? On entirely innocent parents? The "no smoke without fire" quips on SS report threads really are utterly appalling.

Innocent families have had their children removed over malicious allegations like yours, which have been proven as false through family court battles, it's taken these families years to get their children back despite no wrong doing in the first place. The Family Court system is a corrupt joke with their secrecy gag orders placed on families, who cannot speak out about what has happened to them without facing jail for contempt.

You need to open your eyes and stop being so naïve.

EsmeSusanOgg · 21/08/2024 14:56

KerryBlues · 21/08/2024 14:30

They're available for advice, certainly. They don't usually make house calls uninvited past the first year.

In Wales they do.

sotiredandconfused · 21/08/2024 14:46

Niessechalk · 21/08/2024 13:57

The hv should have made you aware of the referral unless it would endanger the children to do so.

First two questions for any referral

  1. Has consent been given for referral (considers best practice)

And

2.does person know

On both occasions - no. The o ly reason that this can be omitted is if in gaining consent could put child at risk. HV came last week and yet the referral made a week later. As the SW said when she was trying to comfort me - she would not have left the house if she had any indication that our daughter was at harm. She also expressed that what was written down on paper did not coincide with what she saw.

OP posts:
sotiredandconfused · 21/08/2024 14:42

Just read through and I just wanted to say thanks for everyone that took the time to share your thoughts. It certainly has offered a spectrum and sadly some posters who I do feel have jumped to conclusions to readily and/or seem to want to pick holes.

The whole experience has been very stressful but I have taken the time to reflect. Its been mentioned a few times about me being ND (undiagnosed but I strongly suspect I am, DH and DS are and starting the diagnosis process with DD). I do think this in part has contributed to the miscommunication but what still leaves me confused it the complete disparity with what the HV said to myself and the conclusions she has come to. Literally in one conversation, along the lines of, its so nice when I come to a happy home whilst complimentingme on the warm atmosphere, and then to get the referral completely blindsided me. Of particular concern is the plain wrong feedback about normal role play - where it was cited in the report that DD cat like behavioir was unusual. This is plain incorrect and as has been shared in tbis thread, aninal role playing is normal for alot of children.

I still stand by the notion that the notion of alwasy best to refer brcause 'just in case' is woefully dangerous. Its a waste of resources, erodes trust between fanilies and SS, causes significant harm, thr list goes
On. This is why safeguardimg training is so vital and part of this imvolvrs being able to discern red flags to 'nornal for that fanily AND no harm bring done whoch could impact the safety of that child'. I have worled im safegurdimg and have witnessed inappropriate referrals and i have also heard those in senior positions make comments like 'npthkng surprisrs me anymore' or 'i dont trust what people say' - this is a clear imdication that at tgis point thry are dangerously ineffective and harmful. I work
In a prpgession where unconditiknal ppsotive regard is cebtral to anyone i work with, so for any HCP to go into a situation with aforememtioned feelkmgs are present, are no longer in the right job.

Apologies for typos. I have a neurological comdition which has slowly startrd to impact my typing.

OP posts:
KerryBlues · 21/08/2024 14:30

EsmeSusanOgg · 21/08/2024 03:51

HVs see children up to the age of 5. So child is 5 or younger. When they start school, the school nursing team take over.

They're available for advice, certainly. They don't usually make house calls uninvited past the first year.

Niessechalk · 21/08/2024 13:57

The hv should have made you aware of the referral unless it would endanger the children to do so.

minipillquestions · 21/08/2024 13:54

I do feel after catching up on this thread that Op has just fallen victim to basically being misinterpreted due to being ND - it’s happened to me I have ASD and adhd and the more Ive read the more I think is the HV just not experienced with this ? I once had a teacher refer me with just this to SS ‘I can’t put my finger on it but something is wrong if that’s not enough to investigate please just log my concern’ I think because I just come across differently! It was investigated I was angry tbh but let them do it and complied knowing there was no danger and after I didn’t complain although I was fuming I just thought il leave it it’s done it’s their job.

CellophaneFlower · 21/08/2024 13:32

MelodyMalone · 21/08/2024 12:35

I'm really troubled by the "offering it on a plate" comment (don't recall who said it). This implies to me that most men are, given the opportunity, quite likely to consider sexually abusing their child. This is not the case. The majority would never.

We should all be vigilant for signs of abuse, but co-sleeping with dad shouldn't in itself be a red flag. (If there are other concerns, then maybe.) My daughter when young slept in parental bed often, including when I was away for work (not even in the house - shock horror!) and I had no concerns at all, because I knew there was nothing to be concerned about.

Agreed. It's like that poster was saying every man is capable, we just have to do our bit by removing temptation.

Disgusting.

CellophaneFlower · 21/08/2024 13:28

lillipilli · 21/08/2024 11:31

I couldnt read and run. What a weird thread!

It is not possible at all to understand what has gone on or not. I do not find the OP as a reliable narrator. She said her DD was pretending to be a dog, and then it was a cat...

It did make me slightly sad to see so many negative comments about HVs. Every profession will have people who are not professional or outright not suitable but our experience was only positive. Moreover, we had an incident where our dog had bitten our son, and social services were informed because the skin was broken but neither hospital staff were thinking anything sinister, nor social services ever made contact with us. I will also say that if they ever would want to, we have nothing to hide or worry about. But I understand how frustrating it would feel if a referral was made with no good reason.

Edited

Except she didn't. She said an animal at first but when another poster mentioned a cat, she agreed that's what animal she meant. Never did she say a dog, but don't let that get in the way of you trying to pick holes in her story 🙄

MelodyMalone · 21/08/2024 12:35

Petitchat · 21/08/2024 12:26

Re: young children co sleeping with their dads.

Maybe we should all just get rid of our childrens dads when we've finished having children?

Although I don't know what single dads or gay male couples are supposed to do?

I'm really troubled by the "offering it on a plate" comment (don't recall who said it). This implies to me that most men are, given the opportunity, quite likely to consider sexually abusing their child. This is not the case. The majority would never.

We should all be vigilant for signs of abuse, but co-sleeping with dad shouldn't in itself be a red flag. (If there are other concerns, then maybe.) My daughter when young slept in parental bed often, including when I was away for work (not even in the house - shock horror!) and I had no concerns at all, because I knew there was nothing to be concerned about.

Uguberry · 21/08/2024 12:31

Scirocco · 21/08/2024 12:16

No, they genuinely thought DC was talking, as they put it, "gobbledygook". Once I explained that DC didn't yet understand that not everyone spoke both their languages and I got DC to speak English to them, it was fine.

DC has since weaponised their language skills and, when they don't want to engage with someone, they just talk at that person in their other language. 👍

Edited

Geat use of their skills! Wish I had that superpower. Actual gobbledygook could have the same effect I suppose.

Petitchat · 21/08/2024 12:26

Re: young children co sleeping with their dads.

Maybe we should all just get rid of our childrens dads when we've finished having children?

Although I don't know what single dads or gay male couples are supposed to do?

Petitchat · 21/08/2024 12:18

Scirocco · 21/08/2024 12:16

No, they genuinely thought DC was talking, as they put it, "gobbledygook". Once I explained that DC didn't yet understand that not everyone spoke both their languages and I got DC to speak English to them, it was fine.

DC has since weaponised their language skills and, when they don't want to engage with someone, they just talk at that person in their other language. 👍

Edited

You Go dc

Brilliant 😁

Scirocco · 21/08/2024 12:16

Uguberry · 21/08/2024 12:03

Sorry, I'm sure it was frustrating at the time but this really made me laugh! Maybe it was a case of them having no choice but to tick the box since they couldn't understand what was being said, rather than not realising it was another (real) language, or couldn't verify it was the correct grammar etc.

No, they genuinely thought DC was talking, as they put it, "gobbledygook". Once I explained that DC didn't yet understand that not everyone spoke both their languages and I got DC to speak English to them, it was fine.

DC has since weaponised their language skills and, when they don't want to engage with someone, they just talk at that person in their other language. 👍

Gratchet · 21/08/2024 12:13

So many people giving anecdotes of children pretending to be animals...

that's like recounting your child playing with Lego... every single child does imaginary play...? It's really not that interesting

NowImNotDoingIt · 21/08/2024 12:09

OP giving examples is irrelevant anyway as people would just make up their own (worst case scenarios) and run with them anyway. Like it has happened with the two she gave.

Cyclebabble · 21/08/2024 12:06

I had a similar experience, though with a malicious complaint direct to SS. I am disappointed to see some of the comments above around no smoke without fire- my experience was that there absolutely can be. Also, once an SS record exists, even if the initial report is wholly incorrect it is very difficult to get it removed entirely- clarification can be added, but any initial points stand and therefore any future interactions you have will note this.

Uguberry · 21/08/2024 12:03

Scirocco · 21/08/2024 11:21

Not a HV but a similar example of "I can't understand what your child is saying - we need to refer to Speech and Language".

DC is bilingual and was speaking (entirely comprehensibly) in their other language.

Sorry, I'm sure it was frustrating at the time but this really made me laugh! Maybe it was a case of them having no choice but to tick the box since they couldn't understand what was being said, rather than not realising it was another (real) language, or couldn't verify it was the correct grammar etc.

EI12 · 21/08/2024 11:57

Carebearsonmybed · 21/08/2024 07:27

Op you mention a child protection order, why? Thats the extreme end of a dc being removed from the family home by a judge immediately if they are deemed to be at significant risk of harm. It's a very rare measure. Most DCs under SW will never have this.

I'm not really surprised at the referral tbh. There are a few red flags and the ops said there were other issues raised she's not willing to disclose.

-4yo making animal noises- yes this may be fine but it is an indication of a potential developmental problem
-4yo has already been put on the assessment pathway for ASD (disabled dc are more vulnerable)
-both parents are neurodivergent- so they themselves may be more vulnerable and there is not a NT adult in the house. This can also lead to communication difficulties with professionals- as evidenced.

  • 4yo sleeping with dad regularly- it is likely not a problem but groomers often break these kind of boundaries to accustom a victim to increased physical contact in a state of undress.
  • Mum has a physical health problem which requires sedative medication- this makes Mum more vulnerable and at the points of sedation not in a position to protect DD
  • Dog in the house that has a cage- this may be due to 'bad' dog behaviour, there may be concerns about the dog biting or dog ness.
  • The op's comments about clothes, it's quite tangential from the issue at hand
  • there's a lack of insight from either parent about any concerns- ie do parents really not think a HV or SW would question bed sharing at 4 with dad? That's quite naive and suggests other naivety. Lots of CSA goes under the radar because families aren't on the lookout for potential signs of grooming.
  • the OP's combative and evasive communication style on this thread. That will not come across well to professionals. There is no compromise or insight anywhere into the above potential issues. Professionals want someone they can work with positively who will listen and take advice. The op isn't coming across as someone who would do this.

I can't see SW taking this further but that doesn't mean there are no issues, cases are often dropped more on a lack of evidence which really isn't very reassuring.

Bravo! Spot on!

Petitchat · 21/08/2024 11:56

Arrivapercy · 21/08/2024 08:25

I do question the relevance of health visits for most families.

Its a baseline approach to ensure no child "slips through the net". The children who are most at risk are the invisible ones, in communities who shun outside agencies, with parents who don't go by baby clinic for a weigh in, don't send them to school, don't register them with a doctor. If you have to offend a few parents to ensure you protect all children from abuse/neglect/trauma/death, i'm ok with that.

What people don't see is the success stories. The hv or social worker who picks up something and it prevents a catastrophe down the line.

My friend had an age 2 HV check. The HV spotted a slightly odd, seemingly mild health/physical thing and gently prompted my friend to get DC seen. Turned out to require serious emergency surgery - that HV probably saved her DC life.

if you have to offend a few parents to ensure you protect all children

She made false reports??

mommatoone · 21/08/2024 11:55

againtomorrow · 20/08/2024 22:28

i agree that a 4 year old girl should not be left to sleep alone with dad, why does the OP move to a different bed, why can't dad go?

Don't be ridiculous.

Somuchbetternow · 21/08/2024 11:37

DD is 24 now but I can still picture the awful HV sitting in my lounge in a white skirt, frilly blouse, high heels and loads of dangly jewellery ignoring my needs. Her outfit hit me as totally inappropriate so I completely understand OP mentioning her HV outfit.

lillipilli · 21/08/2024 11:31

I couldnt read and run. What a weird thread!

It is not possible at all to understand what has gone on or not. I do not find the OP as a reliable narrator. She said her DD was pretending to be a dog, and then it was a cat...

It did make me slightly sad to see so many negative comments about HVs. Every profession will have people who are not professional or outright not suitable but our experience was only positive. Moreover, we had an incident where our dog had bitten our son, and social services were informed because the skin was broken but neither hospital staff were thinking anything sinister, nor social services ever made contact with us. I will also say that if they ever would want to, we have nothing to hide or worry about. But I understand how frustrating it would feel if a referral was made with no good reason.

Scirocco · 21/08/2024 11:21

Not a HV but a similar example of "I can't understand what your child is saying - we need to refer to Speech and Language".

DC is bilingual and was speaking (entirely comprehensibly) in their other language.

Comedycook · 21/08/2024 11:19

supersop60 · 21/08/2024 11:14

I have a similar adjacent example. Friend's dd is hyper intelligent and as a 2 yr old was having some sort of developmental assessment. HV asked her to sing a song, so she chose the Cilla Black Rainbow song, except she started mucking around with the words eg Rod and yollop and plonk and blee
HV made a referral for learning and speech difficulties....

And at my dds two year check up, the hv totally disregarded my concerns over my dds S&L...just kept asking me if i ever take her out 🙄very very odd questions. In the end I took her to the GP with my concerns who took them seriously