To suggest a male curfew one night a week

My dh already works late shifts which he hates he's working until 11 pm tonight ,so he would just say bollocks to the licence ill stay home I bet loads of men would

Yes I know, I was making a ridiculous suggestion to highlight how ridiculous the OP’s suggestion is

Tbh I'm always the most suspicious of men who tell me how untrustworthy and threatening all men are as I suspect they're telling on themselves

Quite

If Andrew Tate is speaking hate speech in his vile comments on women...

So too is OP inciting hatred with her suggestion

(And if this thread gets into MRA hands then it'll be great for them. "Look fellas, women wants us locked up for just being men. See the problem?")

Yes, but DV in the home has very specific dynamics and the age group most likely to commit these crimes is not the younger cohort.

Are you the poster who suggested that male fetuses should be aborted?

Do you have any stats to prove this age group is most likely to be a danger to women or did you pull it out of your bum?

I’d love it, I know DH would support it too, many men recognise the threat men pose to women, it doesn’t get their backs up because they know it’s true.

Alternatively we could spend the time, money and resources it would take to implement all that on actually increasing rape convinctions, rather than providing rapists with one night a week when the streets will be quiet and underpoliced.

Not half the population.

Only this 16-25. The rest would have a licence.

Sounds horrific but you can bet your bottom dollar that crime would fall, the streets and roads would be safer and women could venture out more at night.

Crime would fall? Violence in the home against women and children (and adult male relatives) would increase. A large proportion of VAWG happens in the home and behind closed doors, and what do you think the consequences will be of locking violent men in with their victims?

Also, why should innocent non violent young men be on a curfew? Why not, instead, take sensible action to tackle VAWG (and violent crime in general) by doing what I suggested in my first post on this thread - better funded and effective public services?

I don’t think that the ‘undesirable shifts’ are mainly filled by those aged 16-25. I think most would be older. In which case they would have a licence.

But any shortfall would need to be filled by women yes.

Behave. Punishing innocent men will just turn more of them against women.

It would be amazing to go out without any fear.

this isn't the solution though & to be honest, I don't think there is one.

@Swisscave

Sounds horrific but you can bet your bottom dollar that crime would fall, the streets and roads would be safer and women could venture out more at night.

What would there be to venture out for? With half the population forced to stay in their homes, places like pubs, cafes, restaurants, cinemas, theatres, etc wouldn't be viable nor would evening/late night shopping.

You've really not thought it through!

It's a bit like Covid lockdowns, sounded good in theory, but the damage was immense in other ways, i.e. economically, mental health, business closures, redundancies, etc.

No you don't get it both ways if you want men off the street than fine but that means women have to work all the un desirable shifts for this privilege.

Ridiculous idea.

I walk on the street without any fear now. Day or night.

Its a no from me, certainly. My priorities are the safety and wellbeing of girls. Not merely because i am a woman, but also as a matter of priority. Male violence has been declared a national emergency by the police and efforts need to be targeted in that direction.
I'd be happy to contribute to the education of boys to prevent them growing up to harm women, but I don't agree that boys are facing a significant threat from girls, or men from women that requires women to divert their resources away from women towards the protection of boys.
If men disagree, there is nothing preventing them addressing the issue, and the content would be up to them.
I'm concerned that you seem to be suggesting that content would be questionable though, if created by men. I'd have liked to think there were enough decent men out there to come up with something appropriate, and compelling enough to counteract Tate. Do you really think there aren't?

If you look at the very depressing statistics most murdered women are killed by their partners or ex partners, plenty in their own homes. Stopping men from going out one day a week will only stop a few drunken lads from harassing a couple of girls at a club, but not much else.

So basically you are saying that all men are violent?? Which is ridiculous

Goady, stupid and something that will never happen. Also your idea will be met with derision by the male and female population.
You sound a bit idiotic OP.
I go out at night and really dont feel afraid of men.

.

Just castrate them at puberty. Much easier surely?

Realistically nothing

A lucky day for rapists over 55.

On what basis in your eyes would the licence be granted? Ie how to do you propose to tell in advance who is most likely to assault a woman?

Here’s a thought experiment…would you rather send your teenage daughter walking through the city alone at night if that city were:

a) populated only by women
b) populated only by men

🤔

Now obviously OPs suggestion is not workable for a number of reasons, but these posts suggesting women are just as dangerous as men are ludicrous.