Inheritance and care home fees

Totally agree with you. You need to speak to a solicitor but I think the best way would be to jump a generation and the money go to your children.

MN are very hypocritical about this

Actually no - for financial assessment for care home fees it’s the service user’s account only and half of joint accounts.

obviously though they’d look at recent transfers.

moral question aside - yes OP I think if the will was changed so your wife was not the beneficiary then the council would not bring it into her financial assessment

Alternatively your MIL could leave it all to you if she is confident you have your wife’s best interests in mind

Ideally, yes.

And if those lucky enough to buy property fairly cheaply in the 80s and 90s had paid a proper amount of tax during those years I might have had more sympathy for the view that taxpayers should stump up the bill.

Instead we have people who collectively voted for a government that kept lowering taxes on the basis that "people can spend their own money more efficiently than the goverment can". Now they expect today's taxpayers to stump up the bill so they can protect their precious inheritances mostly earned while sitting at home watching the bricks pile up the cash.

And I'm tired of that old "why should we pay while less hard working people get it for free". Very few people have spent their whole lives not working. Mostly people who are poor now never got the chance to earn much.

Look into setting up a trust.

It's the qualifying decision I'm querying.

I would definitely investigate your wife’s care needs as I’m pretty sure that at least part of her care would be funded.
I don’t agree with those on their high horse complaining about you wishing to save on care fees. It’s totally unfair that those who have worked hard and bought a property therefore investing their money are penalised, while those who have spent it all and not bothered to invest and save then get everything paid for.

Under the circumstances you have. Outlined, it is overwhelmingly likely that you will be entitled to NHS continuing care. However, it extremely hard to get as the NHS will fight you every step of the way. Your wife should have received. An assessment on her discharge. You really need to fight for this.
Notwithstanding this, your MIL should not give your wife anything under her will. She could instead leave it to a trust for your wife’s benefit. Distributions from the trust can be made so that mean tested benefits and care home funding is not disturbed. You should contact a STEP solicitor to arrange this. Note it must be done before MIL dies as altering the will or giving the money away will be a deliberate deprivation of assets.

@Hateam Is there a reason why your wife needs a care home now rather than carers at home?

If her needs are so great that she needs 24/7 nursing/care why is that means tested?

I’m more concerned about what’s to stop you from trotting off with all this money? What will be put in place to make it assured you will spend it on your wife and not piss it up the wall on yourself?

30 years is a long, long time and like you said you’re only at the start of this process..

I'm unsure why he is now, if she has combined mental and physical health issues.

Because unless they qualify for NHS continuing care (which is almost impossible to secure) care has to be paid for and LA contribution is means tested according to income, assets and savings.

Missing the point. The OP is asking whether there is a way to stop the whole of MiL’s estate from being used to fund her care - they didn’t just ask about wills, they asked if there was anything they could do to stop the whole £180,000 going towards care fees. There isn’t. If MiL were to give them £180,00 now, it’s deprivation of assets because she had a reasonable expectation of needing care when she gave away the funds. And the reality is that she can’t bequeath specific sums, she can only bequeath whatever is left after care home fees are paid. I understand why OP is asking whether MiL could leave the residue solely to them rather than DW because it would take DW above the savings threshold and she would then have to fund her own care. Legally there’s nothing stopping her. Morally OP will be pocketing funds which should be used for DW’s care, because the alternative is the tax payer footing the bill.

I would hope that the OP has looked into the possibility of NHS continuing care for their wife, as the care is not in respect of age related decline, but medical issues. It’s really difficult to secure but worth the effort as all fees would be paid. I’m also a bit confused because OP appears to have mentioned that they have savings of their own which would take them above the limit for LA contribution. At above £23,250 the OP’s wife would still be responsible for paying for care, with the LA making a contribution once they dropped below that threshold, but they wouldn’t qualify for full funding until the savings dropped below £14,500 and even then it would depend on income.

You're missing the point.

Depending on his wife's illness he may never be means tested.

I'm unsure why he is now, if she has combined mental and physical health issues.

Theres no obligation for your wife to be frugal with her inheritance. Moving home with 24/7 live in carers intil her money runs out, or having trips out , meals in great restaurants, holidays with you and a couple of carers.

Its a very cruel system.

Its very difficult to get nhs to pay for care homes. Understandably, as dementia is a health condition in the same way cancer etc is.

The chief function of the care home is to liquidate cash tied up in the property bubble and funnel it into their coffers.
The person receiving care is a mere length of tubing through which money flows.

I'm fine thanks. Fully grown up and operational.
You?

You need to get proper advice on this. Start here:

www.nhs.uk/conditions/social-care-and-support-guide/care-services-equipment-and-care-homes/care-and-support-you-can-get-for-free/#:~:text=NHS%20continuing%20healthcare%20is%20a,help%20getting%20washed%20and%20dressed

That’s the only reasoning you can stretch to? Maybe you should grow up..

This!
And care home costs are ridiculously high in this country. I know people who own care homes and, what can I say, they're doing very nicely indeed!

Why should I as a taxpayer pay for your wife's care if she gets £180k
You are being totally unreasonable.
Grow up.

The tories didn't ever bring in the cap on care home fees. They talked about it, in the hope of getting people to vote for them. They had 14 years to bring it in, but never did so and they are no longer in power. Labour have inherited wrecked public services and huge debt, so dont wish for the tax payer to fund care home fees that people could afford.
The NHS did used to have a lot of geriatric beds that people didn't pay for. A friend's grandmother was in one for 16 years with dementia. But Margaret Thatcher privatised elderly care, so it's now profit making, which pushed up prices.

If his wife has an illness that is not dementia, and her care is being funded now, why would his savings be relevant?

He doesn't have savings, he's eyeing up the inheritance money his 'physically and mentally impaired' wife will likely recieve in the coming years from her mum. Sounds pretty grim if you ask me!

£180K is not very wealthy.

It would pay for 2-3 years in a care home.

Don't listen to some of the commenters - they are fine with the tax money to be spent on those who never paid into the system, yet adamant taxpayers should be punished in every instance. If I were you, I would talk to a lawyer. My ex SIL from Bulgaria, brought her Bulgarian parents here, they are in a council-paid care home, both of them. Their multiple properties in Bulgaria are being rented, cash, no tax being paid anywhere, and my dn is being educated at a top boarding school, on a 100% bursary, because my ex SIL pleads poverty, and the school is even providing her with a uniform!