Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance and care home fees

594 replies

Hateam · 17/08/2024 11:59

Hello!

My mother-in-law is in a care home.

My wife, her daughter, is also in a care home for medical - non age related- issues. My council are paying for my wife's care as we have under £24500 in savings.

When my MIL dies (she's 94) my wife will inherit about £180,000.

We don't want this money going to Essex CC.

Is there anything we can?

Could my MIL's will be changed to remove my wife and replace her with me? She is still of sound mind.

Could the money go into an account in my sole name?

I am aware of the concept of deprivation of assets.

OP posts:
Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:43

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

It’s not, otherwise he wouldn’t be asking.

MistyMountainTop · 17/08/2024 18:43

The question that you should have asked, OP, is "should NHS treatment be means tested?"

I bet you would have got a whole lot of different answers then!

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:42

crumblingschools · 17/08/2024 18:27

How come MIL’s assets aren’t being used to fund her care?

They are. OP is asking how to avoid any more of them being used.

Danglers · 17/08/2024 18:42

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Whammyammy · 17/08/2024 18:40

lazzapazza · 17/08/2024 18:35

Everybody wants better social care but nobody wants to pay for it.

In this case the lady requiring care is paying for it.
It's her grabby son in law doesn't want her to as wants his mils cash when passes

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Where do you get that from - nothing in OP’s posts suggests that otherwise they wouldn’t be asking how to avoid the care fees.

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:39

ApplesOrangesBananas · 17/08/2024 18:35

Putting money in somebody else’s name so that you can claim care which you would otherwise not be entitled to IS fraud. The money isn’t going to anyone vulnerable it’s going to the husband….!

Yep. And once someone is actually in care, you can’t set up a trust fund to avoid care fees. The expectation of care fees at the time you put assets into trust is already satisified.

Danglers · 17/08/2024 18:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Wishimaywishimight · 17/08/2024 18:37

So you want your MIL's money while the Council pays for your wife's care?

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:37

Greytulips · 17/08/2024 18:28

Deprivation of assets means that if you have a reasonable expectation of needing care at the time you give away your assets the LA will treat you as though you still have them and will refuse to fund your ongoing care

What are you on about?

MIL is in a home and paying fees.

OP’s wife is in a care home and fully funded

The question is if MIL left OPs wife the full inheritance - it will be swallowed up in a couple of years.

There is no fraud.

It’s the same as parents not leaving a disabled child an inheritance so they don’t lose their assisted living and expenses - they leave it to a more bale child who will help and care to the sibling.

Yet again the middle are squeezed - it’s not right and it’s not fair - if the rich paid their dues and the work shy worked we wouldn’t be in this position.

OP is a very small drop in a very large ocean.

Good luck.

Why do you think I was accusing anyone of fraud ? The question is not whether MiL leaves OP’s wife the full inheritance - that’s not possible because MiL has to fund her own care. The most she can will to her DD is whatever is left of her estate after care fees are settled on her death. Read back through my posts, it’s perfectly clear.

ApplesOrangesBananas · 17/08/2024 18:35

Noras · 17/08/2024 18:12

It’s not fraud if it’s permitted under the rules and vulnerable people’s trust were set up exactly for vulnerable people.

Having a life time of care needs on benefits is not much of a life.

Putting money in somebody else’s name so that you can claim care which you would otherwise not be entitled to IS fraud. The money isn’t going to anyone vulnerable it’s going to the husband….!

lazzapazza · 17/08/2024 18:35

Everybody wants better social care but nobody wants to pay for it.

Danglers · 17/08/2024 18:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Whammyammy · 17/08/2024 18:33

Your Mil is paying for her care out of her money. It'd not your wife's money.
Why should tax payers fund your mils care when she has funds to do so herself?

ARichtGoodDram · 17/08/2024 18:32

One friend has mobility issues. She has a car on the motorbility scheme. Should she pay for that herself?

She does pay for it herself. She'll be paying £75 a week for the car from her PIP award.

It is not free.

rickyrickygrimes · 17/08/2024 18:32

Personal care at home is funded by the state - no means testing - in Scotland, nothing more. Up to four visits a day for toileting / feeding / washing / médecin etc.

My mil is in nursing care in Edinburgh: taxpayers spend £1800 per week to keep her alive. She’s completely immobile, doubly incontinent, can’t communicate, can’t feed herself. She’s been there for 4 years. That’s £374,400 already. For one person. She may well live for many years to come. She only worked part-time, not much of a pension, and only owns half an apartment with FIL lives in, so it’s discounted. She didn’t save a penny towards care (and neither she should have).

we need a big conversation about ageing and dying and why we keep people alive well beyond their natural span.

Greytulips · 17/08/2024 18:28

Deprivation of assets means that if you have a reasonable expectation of needing care at the time you give away your assets the LA will treat you as though you still have them and will refuse to fund your ongoing care

What are you on about?

MIL is in a home and paying fees.

OP’s wife is in a care home and fully funded

The question is if MIL left OPs wife the full inheritance - it will be swallowed up in a couple of years.

There is no fraud.

It’s the same as parents not leaving a disabled child an inheritance so they don’t lose their assisted living and expenses - they leave it to a more bale child who will help and care to the sibling.

Yet again the middle are squeezed - it’s not right and it’s not fair - if the rich paid their dues and the work shy worked we wouldn’t be in this position.

OP is a very small drop in a very large ocean.

Good luck.

crumblingschools · 17/08/2024 18:27

How come MIL’s assets aren’t being used to fund her care?

WhyIhatebaylissandharding · 17/08/2024 18:27

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:22

People please stop with this. Deprivation of assets means that if you have a reasonable expectation of needing care at the time you give away your assets the LA will treat you as though you still have them and will refuse to fund your ongoing care. Mil can only leave in her will the residue of the estate once her own care fees are paid . If she lives another few years £180,000 will be eaten up in those fees and there will be very little left. There isn’t any way around this as she is already in care.

And where did I say she should give away her assets!! I said she should change her will so that her remaining estate does not pass to her daughter. This is the question the OP asked - nothing about giving assets away while his MIL is alive, the OP was very clear and said that when his MIL died there was an expectation that £180k would be left.

TheMoment · 17/08/2024 18:26

ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 12:43

The majority of people do not go into care homes.

Correct. Think current figures are only 25% - but the figures are rising and projected to rise significantly. More of us will be effected by carehome fees for various reasons including the councils ensuring they get the money from people who can pay. Things used to be very lax and easy to get away with few 20+ years ago. Even trusts and other ‘loopholes’ etc now are much more challenging and no guarantee to work. Council can and will challenge.

PolaroidPrincess · 17/08/2024 18:24

Hateam · 17/08/2024 15:14

For those that have asked, we have no children.

It must be so hard. I have experience of getting funding 24 hours funding for a family member. It's not an easy process is it? Flowers

SuckPoppet · 17/08/2024 18:24

ClairDeLaLune · 17/08/2024 18:02

Why should tax-payers pay for your wife’s care when she’ll be perfectly able to pay for it herself? This would be fraud imo.

Do tell us next time you take advantage of a service that you are perfectly able to pay for yourself.

Got enough savings to pay for a GP appointment? A trip to A&E? The cost of a fire crew coming to your house? If you have enough savings to fund a new boiler you could likely perfectly well pay for these tax-funded things yourself.

Should you become seriously ill you might be able to afford a couple of weeks in hospital if you have a good amount of savings.

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Exactly, thank you.

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 18:22

WhyIhatebaylissandharding · 17/08/2024 18:02

OP if your MIL has capacity then change the will, it makes sense to protect the money and use it at your discretion to care for your wife in other ways. That money will be chewed through in no time otherwise and you’ll have no cushion to help.

People please stop with this. Deprivation of assets means that if you have a reasonable expectation of needing care at the time you give away your assets the LA will treat you as though you still have them and will refuse to fund your ongoing care. Mil can only leave in her will the residue of the estate once her own care fees are paid . If she lives another few years £180,000 will be eaten up in those fees and there will be very little left. There isn’t any way around this as she is already in care.

Danglers · 17/08/2024 18:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.