Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the amount of SMP is entirely unreasonable?

310 replies

SMPWTF · 13/08/2024 15:02

I knew the amount prior to TTC but only now at 6 months pregnant is it actually registering.

£184 a week, and it’s taxed. If it weren’t taxed the amount would be £736 for a 4 week month.

How is this even close to enough?

DH and I earn similarly, respected careers but we’ll never be millionaires. Our household bills for our small semi-detached home are just over one of our whole salaries.

I understand that in the ideal you’d save up for maternity leave, but in practice that’s difficult for most people. The start up costs for preparing for baby are very expensive. We have been lucky to have been gifted a lot of big ticket items but even so the costs still add up fast. I can’t imagine even trying to save anything for a second maternity leave if you’re paying childcare fees for your toddler - probably one of the reasons we’ll be one and done.

I don’t think working people should have to save for years per child they have. Nor do I think people should only have children if they can afford to live on one income, because then we create a society where only either end of the wealth spectrum find themselves in a position to start and grow families.

No wonder couples are having fewer or no children.

Why can’t women be paid at least 50% of their wage? So many companies offer 6-12 months full sick pay, so why are so many still reluctant to meet this offer for parental leave?

OP posts:
anonhop · 14/08/2024 10:30

ABirdsEyeView · 14/08/2024 09:48

This is tricky because the flip side to paying women more money and giving g longer may leave, is that it makes women an unattractive employment prospect. All things being equal re qualifications/job experience, at interviews the male candidate is seen as a safer bet because they won't be taking mat leave.

Honestly, I think the solution is compulsory shared leave if you want to keep babies out of nursery at 6 months - mum gets the first 6 months, then dad gets the second six months.

This is a really bad idea. Many women are still breastfeeding at 6 months & want to continue (which is supported by national & international guidelines). Why should they be forced to be separate from their babies and back into the workplace just in the name of feminism/equality?

We have shared parental leave as an option. Take up is low because it isn't the right choice for most families. Women should be able to make that choice themselves, it shouldn't be compulsory. Having a baby, nursing etc is biological. Not everyone can split it all 50/50 all the time - mum might just need / want more time off for physical, hormonal, emotional reasons. & how would that work for single parents etc.

Women & their families need to be prioritised, not equality targets.

NotARealWookiie · 14/08/2024 10:17

SMPWTF · 14/08/2024 09:04

Thankfully we’ll be entitled to funded hours and we only need 3 days a week, . We’ll be paying for school holidays only so when spread across the year we’ve had it confirmed our monthly bill will be about £200. Really relieved, originally thought it would be more than a thousand

That’s amazing! Even with the funding mine is £1k a month so you are definitely into a winner there.

fitzwilliamdarcy · 14/08/2024 09:55

Anonym00se · 14/08/2024 07:45

No, it shouldn’t be a race to the bottom, but what’s really striking about this topic is the difference in attitudes towards SMP and to other benefits (UC, JSA etc).

Could you imagine a person insisting that their UC should be more so they can cover gifts for relatives, days out and takeaway coffees? They’d be ripped to shreds!

Agree.

The amounts paid to people who have disabilities preventing them from working, to single people who can't find work through no fault of their own, and to carers of disabled children are much, much less than the amount quoted in the OP. And those people haven't chosen their circumstances and may be completely unable to change them, so are arguably much more vulnerable.

I'd much rather see those people helped before more money is given to women on mat leave.

My org offers shared leave, which would allow more time at full pay and therefore a better overall income for a household, but take up is lower than 1% as women don't want to share "their" leave.

ABirdsEyeView · 14/08/2024 09:48

This is tricky because the flip side to paying women more money and giving g longer may leave, is that it makes women an unattractive employment prospect. All things being equal re qualifications/job experience, at interviews the male candidate is seen as a safer bet because they won't be taking mat leave.

Honestly, I think the solution is compulsory shared leave if you want to keep babies out of nursery at 6 months - mum gets the first 6 months, then dad gets the second six months.

SMPWTF · 14/08/2024 09:04

NotARealWookiie · 14/08/2024 08:53

It’s shite OP...bit of a warning though, it’s best not to look at it as “getting through the year” but more as a permanent reduction in family income because when you do start earning again, most of it will go on childcare so you won’t have what you had before or you’ll reduce your hours/stop work so you won’t have what you had before.

Thankfully we’ll be entitled to funded hours and we only need 3 days a week, . We’ll be paying for school holidays only so when spread across the year we’ve had it confirmed our monthly bill will be about £200. Really relieved, originally thought it would be more than a thousand

OP posts:
NotARealWookiie · 14/08/2024 08:53

It’s shite OP...bit of a warning though, it’s best not to look at it as “getting through the year” but more as a permanent reduction in family income because when you do start earning again, most of it will go on childcare so you won’t have what you had before or you’ll reduce your hours/stop work so you won’t have what you had before.

NotARealWookiie · 14/08/2024 08:49

mitogoshi · 13/08/2024 15:23

Maternity leave was only 6 months long when I had mine, babies coped just fine in nurseries or you did what I did and took a career break. By the smp is below the taxation threshold so you won't be paying tax if you have no other income.

Honestly, you are choosing to have children, we've always needed to make sacrifices, it used to be quitting work entirely

You are taxed on smp if your earnings for the calendar year fall above the threshold.

So if you have your baby in April and have a year maternity with only SMP you won’t be taxed but if you have your baby in November you will likely be taxed for the first 5 months. It’s awful.

thecatsthecats · 14/08/2024 08:49

It's in the interest of everyone to have well-adjusted kids joining society. Regardless of when the parents came off leave, they need to be adequately financed to afford this.

FYI, in spite of being someone who got Mat Allowance only, I was able to live off this as we're very financially prudent as a couple. However I've worked in the early years and in the prison sector, both of which show the abundant need to invest in the early years. Best provided by direct support to parents, who no, will for the large part no fritter it all away on fags.

Crude maths, but let's say a company sells a product for £95. But they need to fund better parental leave, so it now costs £100. However, the overall picture of less policing, less insurance, more educated and higher paid workforce now means that instead of 40 people spending £95 they now have 45 people spending £100.

But I also think that time is missing from the equation. Everyone focuses on wages, but in my experience, most people want more TIME with their families.

FinalInstructionstotheAudience · 14/08/2024 08:31

SMPWTF · 13/08/2024 15:02

I knew the amount prior to TTC but only now at 6 months pregnant is it actually registering.

£184 a week, and it’s taxed. If it weren’t taxed the amount would be £736 for a 4 week month.

How is this even close to enough?

DH and I earn similarly, respected careers but we’ll never be millionaires. Our household bills for our small semi-detached home are just over one of our whole salaries.

I understand that in the ideal you’d save up for maternity leave, but in practice that’s difficult for most people. The start up costs for preparing for baby are very expensive. We have been lucky to have been gifted a lot of big ticket items but even so the costs still add up fast. I can’t imagine even trying to save anything for a second maternity leave if you’re paying childcare fees for your toddler - probably one of the reasons we’ll be one and done.

I don’t think working people should have to save for years per child they have. Nor do I think people should only have children if they can afford to live on one income, because then we create a society where only either end of the wealth spectrum find themselves in a position to start and grow families.

No wonder couples are having fewer or no children.

Why can’t women be paid at least 50% of their wage? So many companies offer 6-12 months full sick pay, so why are so many still reluctant to meet this offer for parental leave?

Why should they?
Pregancy is a lifestyle choice (in such a scenario, not talking about by non-planned mean), illness is not.
also, many companies have to hire maternity cover, which is an extra cost, so why should they pay you more?

Sunglow1921 · 14/08/2024 08:19

SMP is shockingly low. There are lots of (professional) jobs where there is no enhanced maternity pay, mine being one of them (this is the norm in my industry unfortunately).

Although I knew this, it was still a shock to suddenly become financially dependent on my dh. And he’s a good one, there are plenty of threads on MN about women who are suffering financial abuse during their mat leave.

While I understand that having children is a choice, it becomes a society issue when women decide to stop having children due to cost.

Spectre8 · 14/08/2024 08:07

IDontHateRainbows · 14/08/2024 08:05

Have you ever tried asking to see a maternity policy as an applicant/ candidate for a job?

It's called research go to glass doors often people have provided that information in their reviews.

And quite frankly most large companies offer good packages so aim for those companies.

Pretty obvious a small business is less likely to have a good one as they can't afford to

IDontHateRainbows · 14/08/2024 08:05

Spectre8 · 13/08/2024 15:55

Relatives do not NEED birthday presents though. So you could save some money by cutting out unecessary expenditures

Why work for a company that offers crap maternity pay? Many offer much more so why did you choose not to move jobs in preparation for having a child?

Edited

Have you ever tried asking to see a maternity policy as an applicant/ candidate for a job?

Mil3nnial · 14/08/2024 08:01

This is why some people only have one child or wait until they can afford a child and some have help from the State anyway.

There isn't an endless pot of money to help everyone.

Pensions are the same idea and you could delay having children if you're not ready to save. Maybe have fewer holidays.

Worrywartandall · 14/08/2024 07:56

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 07:31

Well if you haven’t saved enough that’s what you will need to do. Or your partner does overtime or takes a second job like my dad did. You have had plenty of subsidies and it’s up to you and your partner to do your own financial planning. If you’re not comfortable with a loan then you need to tighten your belt and save during pregnancy.

I took a 0% credit card and put all my groceries on it for a few weeks at the end of mat leave. Lots of people do this. It took me years to pay it off (we also moved house with second child and I purchased stuff for house) but it was a manageable low monthly payment. It was in my budget and fine. I’m afraid that’s what you need to do if you haven’t saved enough/ your partner doesn’t earn enough money to sub you.

Edited

To be crystal this doesn’t apply to me, I’m talking in the general sense.

taking on debt is foolish and no card as a 0% interest for years as you say. Remember not everyone qualifies for them, likewise with low loan rates.

same that every cannot save enough to sustain themselves for 9 months on less than £1k a month. Not everyone has a partner to be relied on either, a lot of dads just walk away

Hariborocks · 14/08/2024 07:56

I think it's awful and will deter more and more women from having children. Its not just the SMP but how expensive everything is connected to raising children, detriment to your career, childcare/nursery, cost of living, university fees/loans, having to help your kids on the ladder. It only makes sense if both parents are mega earners or have full access to benefits. Everyone else will be impoverished having children.

Anonym00se · 14/08/2024 07:45

No, it shouldn’t be a race to the bottom, but what’s really striking about this topic is the difference in attitudes towards SMP and to other benefits (UC, JSA etc).

Could you imagine a person insisting that their UC should be more so they can cover gifts for relatives, days out and takeaway coffees? They’d be ripped to shreds!

Bogasphodel · 14/08/2024 07:42

anonhop · 13/08/2024 18:30

My company advertise that they offer "enhanced" maternity pay.

Instead of 6 weeks @ 90% then 33 weeks at SMP, it's....

4 weeks @ 100%, 2 weeks @ 90% and 33 weeks at SMP

Will be reading the ins & outs of policies if I can before my next job!!!!!

That’s like mine! They say it’s enhanced but it’s 6 weeks at 90%, then 7 weeks at 1/2 pay + SMP, then the rest at SMP till about 9 months then unpaid. So it’s only 7 weeks enhanced…. That’s for a government authority.

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 07:40

Hateam · 14/08/2024 07:34

If mothers were given 1 full year on full pay, there would be threads on here saying how unfair this and demanding 2 years on full pay.

The deal right now is broadly speaking not too bad.

Cut your cloth.

Yes this! Pushing for more when you’ve had it so much better than the previous generation.

I am shocked that women with enhanced 6 months full pay don’t feel responsible for their own financial planning and want even more subsidy for the gap. I got 12 weeks full pay, then half pay and thought that was generous enough. I lived very frugally and saved like mad to afford a year off.

If you know what you’re going to get at the start of pregnancy you have months to make a financial plan and execute it. No eating out/ holidays/ treats if that’s what it takes. If you want to sustain your lifestyle and won’t save or sacrifice… you will need to borrow to afford it.

Hateam · 14/08/2024 07:34

If mothers were given 1 full year on full pay, there would be threads on here saying how unfair this and demanding 2 years on full pay.

The deal right now is broadly speaking not too bad.

Cut your cloth.

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 07:31

Worrywartandall · 14/08/2024 06:44

So just to be clear, you should take on unsecured lending debt in this current high interest rate environment and knowing that when you go back to work, you’ll have even higher outgoings due to childcare?

that sounds like an excellent plan 🙃

Well if you haven’t saved enough that’s what you will need to do. Or your partner does overtime or takes a second job like my dad did. You have had plenty of subsidies and it’s up to you and your partner to do your own financial planning. If you’re not comfortable with a loan then you need to tighten your belt and save during pregnancy.

I took a 0% credit card and put all my groceries on it for a few weeks at the end of mat leave. Lots of people do this. It took me years to pay it off (we also moved house with second child and I purchased stuff for house) but it was a manageable low monthly payment. It was in my budget and fine. I’m afraid that’s what you need to do if you haven’t saved enough/ your partner doesn’t earn enough money to sub you.

Worrywartandall · 14/08/2024 06:44

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 00:25

If you don’t have help from family you take out a 0% credit card or loan and pay it back when in work.

I don’t understand the entitlement on this thread. It’s really strange that people don’t consider the need to save or borrow to bridge the gap in earnings… these financial instruments exist for this kind of purpose. Bizzare how you think the taxpayer should plug the gap after 6 months of full pay.

Enhanced maternity packages were hard fought for by women in their 50s/late 40s in the places I’ve worked in. Now the younger generation are complaining it’s not enough to get 6 months pay. So ungrateful

So just to be clear, you should take on unsecured lending debt in this current high interest rate environment and knowing that when you go back to work, you’ll have even higher outgoings due to childcare?

that sounds like an excellent plan 🙃

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 00:25

Mel2023 · 13/08/2024 19:25

I agree with you OP. Yes, in an ideal world you’d save and save to cover SMP, but that’s not always realistic or possible. DS was a surprise in an already heightened period of financial outgoings (we’d just got married days before finding out I was pregnant and had booked and agreed for work to be done on the house immediately following the wedding) and then we had to foot the upfront costs of preparing for a baby with no time to save for anything else. I was very lucky and got enhanced maternity pay (6 months full then onto SMP). We managed to put some money aside during my first 6 months to top up the SMP, but in reality my maternity income was needed to pay bills elsewhere as DHs income didn’t cover all our mortgage and bills. My family helped us out for the last couple of months, which I realise isn’t possible for everyone and we were very fortunate as it gave me a extra couple of months off with DS or I’d have had to go back at 6 months instead of 9. We even asked about taking a mortgage break to help financially. Honestly it’s made me realise just how unrealistic SMP is. And childcare fees are astronomical so not a chance could we have had DC2 and manage those on maternity pay. Already agreed DS needs to be in school before we even consider DC2. If I ever look for another job I won’t even consider an employer that doesn’t offer the enhanced maternity pay as we just couldn’t cope financially. Although as pp have said most companies don’t advertise it until you’re in the role!

If you don’t have help from family you take out a 0% credit card or loan and pay it back when in work.

I don’t understand the entitlement on this thread. It’s really strange that people don’t consider the need to save or borrow to bridge the gap in earnings… these financial instruments exist for this kind of purpose. Bizzare how you think the taxpayer should plug the gap after 6 months of full pay.

Enhanced maternity packages were hard fought for by women in their 50s/late 40s in the places I’ve worked in. Now the younger generation are complaining it’s not enough to get 6 months pay. So ungrateful

WannabeMeeeeee · 14/08/2024 00:07

Isn’t that what 0% credit cards are for? That’s how I funded my two maternity leave periods as I am higher earner so it was a big blow . Also you get Child Benefit too. That’s quite a generous handout. I saved like mad before going off… used annual leave on return and KIT days. It was tight but we managed and through the other side. Totally normal!

To be honest you sound unrealistic in your expectations… starting a family has always been a struggle. Speak to anyone older … my parents had no savings, had to do nights cleaning to make ends meet. You just gotta suck it up. Those slightly older than me at work got naff all mat leave… companies have really upped their game, I consider you to be part of a lucky generation when it comes to maternity support.

I think SMP is pretty generous looking at other benefits…it was £140 when I claimed a few years ago. I see it’s gone up a lot more than CB has.

Also YABVU saying you need a lot of money to fund baby equipment. That’s rubbish. Your baby actually NEEDS very little… you just WANT it. Baby doesn’t care about second hand stuff, ikea cheapo baby chair etc

Worrywartandall · 13/08/2024 23:53

Hateam · 13/08/2024 23:51

My bad!

It was a different poster who said that.

Please accept my apologies

Happens to the best of us

Hateam · 13/08/2024 23:51

My bad!

It was a different poster who said that.

Please accept my apologies