Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Shamima Begum

360 replies

Mamabear04 · 07/08/2024 14:30

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2n8xv61x3o

I'll admit I actually don't know much about this apart from it being on the news when it happened and I did watch a documentary about it. Do you think she should be allowed to have British citizenship? I mean she was a child when it happened, surely she was groomed? And now stateless, doomed to live indefinitely in a camp with nowhere to go? I think running away to join Isis is of course absolutely awful but surely she should be treated as a child that was groomed? Or am I missing something?

Shamima Begumphotographed at Roj Camp in Syria, where she is currently interred with other women who were members of Islamic State, on March 14, 2021.

Shamima Begum loses citizenship removal appeal bid

The 24-year-old will not be allowed to challenge the removal of her British citizenship at the Supreme Court.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2n8xv61x3o

OP posts:
Moreofthesamenothanks · 08/08/2024 08:06

Tandora · 08/08/2024 07:56

None of what you say here is anything resembling a fact

She said this in an interview she did years ago. She talked about watchibg beheadings and watching them in a very cold way. Her earlier interviews are very different to her latest approach.

Tandora · 08/08/2024 07:56

Moreofthesamenothanks · 08/08/2024 06:37

This

None of what you say here is anything resembling a fact

User7171 · 08/08/2024 07:48

Tandora · 08/08/2024 02:54

YANBU OP, I feel so desperately sorry for her.
How she has been treated by the British state is an abomination , and shouldn’t be allowed under international law.

You feel "desperately sorry" for this terrorist?!

Luckily sanity prevails within the British state and international law.

Aaron95 · 08/08/2024 06:47

KTheGrey · 07/08/2024 20:13

She had a citizenship under Bangladesh’s rules, not the UK’s. The UK can’t be held responsible for another country’s citizenship laws. They could have different laws if they liked. How is it not fair if they have to keep their own laws?

No she didn't. Until the age of 21 she had the right to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship because her father was born there. She had no guarantee she would get it. It would seem unlikely any application would succeed given that the Bangladeshi government has said publicly they would not allow her to enter the country.

Moreofthesamenothanks · 08/08/2024 06:37

twomanyfrogsinabox · 07/08/2024 14:56

She stayed willingly when she was an adult, she saw peoples heads being put in bins and didn't care, she helped fit people with suicide bombs, she only wanted to come back after ISIS was pretty much defeated, she would have happily stayed there helping them otherwise. I feel sorry for the child she was, not for the adult she became and I don't want her back in the UK, possibly stirring up hatred.

Edited

This

TunnocksOrDeath · 08/08/2024 06:23

KTheGrey · 08/08/2024 05:00

Oh well if it’s distasteful I guess that Bangladesh should not be allowed to make its own laws. Law by good taste will be a riot, possibly in more than one sense.

Clearly that is not a logical conclusion from my pointing out that the UK government is not behaving well. I have not proposed changing any laws, in either country, or suggested creating laws by taste.

I don't think that "it's not illegal" is sufficient justification for pushing one's own problems onto others. I expect better of myself, and I expect better of my government.

KTheGrey · 08/08/2024 05:00

TunnocksOrDeath · 07/08/2024 23:31

If you can't see how distasteful it is to use the law to make your own problem into someone else's problem, when they were not involved in creating the problem, and couldn't have prevented it, then really nothing else I say is going to enlighten you.

As it is, this wrangling by the UK government has made it so-far impossible for Begum to be put on trial for her alleged crimes, and since Bangladesh understandably won't make any effort to take her, she'll stay in the camp in Syria indefinitely and possibly never stand trial, to be either absolved or convicted. I don't see that as a positive thing.

Anyway I've made my point for the last time now. I'm not standing for office so it's of no real consequence if people agree or not.

Oh well if it’s distasteful I guess that Bangladesh should not be allowed to make its own laws. Law by good taste will be a riot, possibly in more than one sense.

Tandora · 08/08/2024 02:58

OhmygodDont · 07/08/2024 18:52

The answer to not wanting your citizenship stripped as a duel citizen is not to commit crimes 🤷🏻‍♀️

She was a vulnerable 15 yr old girl. She ran away. Her best friend persuaded her online. She shouldn’t be paying for this for the rest of her life, she more than suffered the consequences of her bad decisions at that time.

EsmaCannonball · 08/08/2024 02:56

DragonFly98 · 07/08/2024 15:05

If she was white, blonde and middle class she would have been back in the UK years ago.

Not sure about his hair colour but Jihadi Jack is about as white and middle-class as you can possibly get and he had his citizenship revoked and was tried in the country where he committed his crimes, as tends to happen when you commit crimes abroad.

Tandora · 08/08/2024 02:54

YANBU OP, I feel so desperately sorry for her.
How she has been treated by the British state is an abomination , and shouldn’t be allowed under international law.

EsmaCannonball · 08/08/2024 02:43

I'd like to know if she was involved in keeping women and children as slaves, if she really did sew people into suicide vests, if she was part of the morality patrols that beat women or earmarked them for death for showing their face, hair or an inch of flesh. Did she have any involvement with the prisoners who were tortured and killed? Let her be put on trial abroad like other ISIS/ISIL brides or like Jihadi Jack. She's lucky she's amongst sympathetic people in a camp and not in a prison.

PomPomtheGreat · 08/08/2024 02:16

User7171 · 07/08/2024 16:03

You're right, and no doubt her not attempting to obtain Bangladeshi citizenship was because she thought it would force the UK court's hand.

In reality what happened was she made herself stateless.

It was because Bangladesh said if she ever turned up there, they would execute her. I wouldn't have exercised my right to apply for citizenship under those circumstances either.

PomPomtheGreat · 08/08/2024 01:57

CointreauVersial · 07/08/2024 14:46

Goodness me, I wouldn't like to be judged on the dumb things I did at 15. I didn't run away to Syria, at least.

Yes, I do feel they should have made allowances for the fact that she was groomed at a young age, as a child, and I don't think she's any threat at all to GB. However, she hasn't endeared herself to anyone, as she seems blissfully unaware that the course of action she took was wrong.

I reckon if she had made a clear apology from the start and completely renounced ISIS and everything they stand for then she would have got a more favourable outcome.

"I reckon if she had made a clear apology from the start and completely renounced ISIS and everything they stand for then she would have got a more favourable outcome."

While living in a camp full of ISIS sympathisers? That would have been an extremely dangerous thing for her to do. No idea whether she would even want to, but she isn't exactly free to speak up if she does.

Ponoka7 · 08/08/2024 01:43

Just to add has anyone read what her ex husband has said previously (he has now changed his tune a bit)? He admits to beating and raping her daily to teach her how to be a good jihadi wife, she was 15. Throw in three pregnancies in camps, births and the death of her babies, were was the time to be the dangerous individual that she's made out to be? It was also a massive failure by the police that those girls were able to fly out of the UK.

Ponoka7 · 08/08/2024 01:34

We know that she was groomed because two people were charged at the time. Not just for grooming her, but others as well. She came under the trafficking conditions enough that she should have been viewed as a child trafficked for sexual exploitation.
At the time we said that she couldn't come back, her last child was alive. We let 300 Isis fighters back in. She was the poster person for the wonderful Tory reaction to Isis and what a good job they were doing. We have very violent men who don't even hold British citizenship in British prisons and they aren't living under a threat of deportation. We let men in constantly who go straight onto watch lists. Every bomber and the likes of the London bridge stabber were known to authorities. She's had the decisions made about her because they are popular to some of the public.

DragonFly98 · 08/08/2024 01:21

MelIy · 07/08/2024 15:28

Womp womp. There are a million other people I could be fretting over before SB.

Womp , womp! Are you a child? Grow up.

Kpo58 · 08/08/2024 00:17

Purplebunnie · 07/08/2024 18:20

I thought she was a straight "A" student. I thought all three were which is why it was so odd that they gave it all up

Nevertheless she is our problem and probably she should be brought back - not just yet though, she'd be sought out by the thugs out there

You can still be a straight A student and be deeply unhappy with no hope for the future. Being academic doesn't stop you from having mental health problems.

prh47bridge · 07/08/2024 23:37

Marilynmansonsthermos · 07/08/2024 22:37

She made her choice. What she did was not a childish rebellion, it was very extreme. She isn’t stateless she could go to Bangladesh.

She is stateless. She lost her Bangladeshi citizenship on her 21st birthday. Bangladesh has made it clear that she would not be allowed to enter the country.

TunnocksOrDeath · 07/08/2024 23:31

KTheGrey · 07/08/2024 20:13

She had a citizenship under Bangladesh’s rules, not the UK’s. The UK can’t be held responsible for another country’s citizenship laws. They could have different laws if they liked. How is it not fair if they have to keep their own laws?

If you can't see how distasteful it is to use the law to make your own problem into someone else's problem, when they were not involved in creating the problem, and couldn't have prevented it, then really nothing else I say is going to enlighten you.

As it is, this wrangling by the UK government has made it so-far impossible for Begum to be put on trial for her alleged crimes, and since Bangladesh understandably won't make any effort to take her, she'll stay in the camp in Syria indefinitely and possibly never stand trial, to be either absolved or convicted. I don't see that as a positive thing.

Anyway I've made my point for the last time now. I'm not standing for office so it's of no real consequence if people agree or not.

Krumblina · 07/08/2024 23:13

Marilynmansonsthermos · 07/08/2024 22:37

She made her choice. What she did was not a childish rebellion, it was very extreme. She isn’t stateless she could go to Bangladesh.

No she can't go to Bangladesh. Why do you think that?

queenMab99 · 07/08/2024 22:45

She may not have shown remorse, but would you? If you were living in a camp surrounded by dangerous and desperate people who still believe in the cause, she can't very well say she was wrong to join them and the cause is evil.

Marilynmansonsthermos · 07/08/2024 22:37

She made her choice. What she did was not a childish rebellion, it was very extreme. She isn’t stateless she could go to Bangladesh.

TeaOrCoffeeOrHotChocolate · 07/08/2024 22:34

I do feel sorry for her. But I don't think she should be allowed back into the UK.

Krumblina · 07/08/2024 22:13

K0OLA1D · 07/08/2024 14:44

What about the kids who killed James Bulger? Should they be forgiven?

The 2 kids who were in the news recently who killed the 19 year old? Them too? They're still children after all

They have both been convicted and since released so they were forgiven.
They actually murdered someone and weren't groomed.
She should be brought back and tried if we actually want justice.

MelIy · 07/08/2024 20:59

skyandocean · 07/08/2024 20:41

@GlitterGirlZone oh really? So you think girls groomed at 13 by older men for sexual purposes, the girls are at fault too? Not the men.

Nobody chooses to be sexually exploited, they're victims of a crime.

Seeking out extreme content and having awful thoughts is a bad thing that can harm others. Our compassion can stretch to understand this. Most people's compassion does not go as far as planning a trip to Syria, partaking it happily, and still when your little society crumbles, defending it (literally, that interview was the best acting she could pull off so you can only imagine what she really thought).

Swipe left for the next trending thread