Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be really sick of supermarkets treating paying customers like scum

416 replies

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 14:34

Sainsbury's traps you in the self service pen of shame until you scan your receipt like a good little girl

Tesco won't take the security tags off your wine until you've not only paid but they've examined your receipt in detail to make sure your wine is paid for - sort of a performance so you remember your place

Waitrose makes a bit song and dance about doing the rescan of self scanning shops (I don't do self scanning because why would I sign up for this extra work?)

Just in Lidl and my wine set off the security alarm even though I've had the tags taken off and the security guard chased me out the door to try to get me to show him inside my bags (er no fuck off pal)

Aldi staff try to look in your shopping bags as you queue

Does anywhere NOT get a kick out of treating their profit drivers like filth any more?

I will probably just have to live off UHPs from the local Greggs at this rate

OP posts:
FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 25/07/2024 21:07

I've been scan-and-shopping at tesco for 7/8 years and buy alcohol almost every week. Never had my receipt checked or anything of the sort.

Weirdly aggressive OP.

Floatlikeafeather2 · 25/07/2024 20:38

FinnJuhl · 25/07/2024 14:41

Booths have now removed all their self service tills, owing to negative customer feedback.

Interestingly, Booths in Windermere and Keswick haven't. Equally interestingly, they are the only Booths stores I know of with a noticeable security presence.

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 25/07/2024 20:34

I don’t understand it either. If I was going to steal anything then I’d be taking my chances by running out the front door not going through the self scan.

WithOneLook · 25/07/2024 20:27

S0livagant · 25/07/2024 15:05

Putting the barrier in the self service area means you at least have to buy SOMETHING to get out, you can’t simply walk straight on through.

Why should you have to buy something? What if they don't have the thing you were looking for?

I do wonder about the health and safety aspect of all of these gates, especially where it is also gated to get into the store, for example if the store needed to be evacuated in an emergency.

Experience tells me that needing a receipt to exit (or to ask to be let out without buying anything) is problematic if you need to rush out.....morning sickness was so much fun!

janeintheframe · 25/07/2024 17:14

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:53

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention.

False accusations of theft raise all sorts of legal issues. You can't ban people on a whim.

Harassment by security staff can raise discrimination issues.

The employer has to ensure that their employees don't behave unlawfully to members of the public and that the inside of the shop is safe.

This can’t be a serious post?

Hateam · 25/07/2024 17:12

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:53

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention.

False accusations of theft raise all sorts of legal issues. You can't ban people on a whim.

Harassment by security staff can raise discrimination issues.

The employer has to ensure that their employees don't behave unlawfully to members of the public and that the inside of the shop is safe.

Illegal detention!?!

Are you nuts? Oh actually you are... sorry.

Magnastorm · 25/07/2024 17:01

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:53

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention.

False accusations of theft raise all sorts of legal issues. You can't ban people on a whim.

Harassment by security staff can raise discrimination issues.

The employer has to ensure that their employees don't behave unlawfully to members of the public and that the inside of the shop is safe.

I'm guessing you have no actual idea of the legalities around any of this at all.

I mean, it's pretty obvious you don't.

Personally, I have no issue with the odd measure to help keep shoplifting down. Who do you think covers the cost of all the stuff nicked?

Hint: it's not the shareholders and it's not coming of profit.

S1lverCandle · 25/07/2024 16:56

Comedycook · 25/07/2024 16:55

Of course. That's why I used the word HYPOTHETICAL

I'm asking that poster hypothetically what they would be willing to put up with in order to stop theft

Presumably the same as the rest of us? The drama! 🎭

orchiddottyback · 25/07/2024 16:56

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:53

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention.

False accusations of theft raise all sorts of legal issues. You can't ban people on a whim.

Harassment by security staff can raise discrimination issues.

The employer has to ensure that their employees don't behave unlawfully to members of the public and that the inside of the shop is safe.

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention. 😂😂

Oh please please go to a human rights or criminal lawyer and claim the barrier was illegally detaining you and film it please.

Comedycook · 25/07/2024 16:55

S1lverCandle · 25/07/2024 16:51

None of that stuff happens in shops, nor has anyone suggested it should.
Why the hype?

Of course. That's why I used the word HYPOTHETICAL

I'm asking that poster hypothetically what they would be willing to put up with in order to stop theft

S1lverCandle · 25/07/2024 16:54

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention
No.
No, it couldn't.

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:53

orchiddottyback · 25/07/2024 16:49

Care to provide legal text where shops are not private property?

Many shops are private property. Store that are on private property, have an implied invitation for customers to come in and shop, they are also fully entitled to ban someone from entering the premises. There does not have to be a reason, but customers are usually banned because of theft, intimidation, disruption, drunkenness or drugs.

What laws are you claiming they are breaking in an event to prevent theft from you or others, no where have you said they are illegally detaining or imprisoning you?

The receipt scanner barriers and the physical blocking could amount to illegal detention.

False accusations of theft raise all sorts of legal issues. You can't ban people on a whim.

Harassment by security staff can raise discrimination issues.

The employer has to ensure that their employees don't behave unlawfully to members of the public and that the inside of the shop is safe.

OP posts:
S1lverCandle · 25/07/2024 16:51

Comedycook · 25/07/2024 16:46

What else would you be happy with? So let's say hypothetically, instead of just a random check, would you be happy to be checked every single time? Bags searched every time you go shopping? What about being patted down and searched? Strip searched? Questioned and interrogated? Ok, these are extreme examples obviously. I'm just wondering how much intrusion you are willing to go through to protect the profits of a company?

Edited

None of that stuff happens in shops, nor has anyone suggested it should.
Why the hype?

ExpressCheckout · 25/07/2024 16:51

I think it does vary depending on where you live. Talking with my family about this (all over the country) many of their supermarkets are more relaxed than those where I live - shopping has now become very tiresome due to security.

orchiddottyback · 25/07/2024 16:49

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:36

Shops are obliged to obey rules in relation to how they treat customers. Shops aren't "private property" - they're businesses open to the public and thus required to treat people in certain ways.

Yes sadly the only way to get around it at the moment is to vote with your feet and make sure you don't contribute a penny to the salaries of the managers who think these policies are genius but for some reason shoplifting keeps going up and up almost like they're not genius at all 🤷

Care to provide legal text where shops are not private property?

Many shops are private property. Store that are on private property, have an implied invitation for customers to come in and shop, they are also fully entitled to ban someone from entering the premises. There does not have to be a reason, but customers are usually banned because of theft, intimidation, disruption, drunkenness or drugs.

What laws are you claiming they are breaking in an event to prevent theft from you or others, no where have you said they are illegally detaining or imprisoning you?

Comedycook · 25/07/2024 16:46

janeintheframe · 25/07/2024 16:42

I don’t understand the objection. We all know people are stealing; I’m more than happy to have a random check, as I don’t steal and people stealing adds costs to all of us. So as far as I’m concerned they can crack on.

if it was my business you can be damn sure I’d be checking and not letting people rob me blind.

What else would you be happy with? So let's say hypothetically, instead of just a random check, would you be happy to be checked every single time? Bags searched every time you go shopping? What about being patted down and searched? Strip searched? Questioned and interrogated? Ok, these are extreme examples obviously. I'm just wondering how much intrusion you are willing to go through to protect the profits of a company?

janeintheframe · 25/07/2024 16:42

Goldenbear · 25/07/2024 16:40

bit that kind of rationale is not good customer service as the default is everyone is guilty! This is what people are objecting to, the premise that you are guilty of shoplifting despite never having shop lifted

I don’t understand the objection. We all know people are stealing; I’m more than happy to have a random check, as I don’t steal and people stealing adds costs to all of us. So as far as I’m concerned they can crack on.

if it was my business you can be damn sure I’d be checking and not letting people rob me blind.

Goldenbear · 25/07/2024 16:40

janeintheframe · 25/07/2024 16:31

I get they have to do it, but most thieves aren't buying and scanning their weekly shop, they're in and out with holdalls and backpacks within a minute

I think there is a lot of people opportunistic thieving. Scanning most of their shopping, slipping through an few items. Claiming it was a scanning error when caught. And that’s why they do random checks, as they know people are doing it. The random checks designed to be a detterant rather than they think they will catch everyone.

bit that kind of rationale is not good customer service as the default is everyone is guilty! This is what people are objecting to, the premise that you are guilty of shoplifting despite never having shop lifted

Goldenbear · 25/07/2024 16:36

Needmorelego · 25/07/2024 16:29

@Goldenbear I started working in retail in the 90s.
No self service tills.
Yes shoplifting was bad even back then.
It's been bad since the Romans had market stalls.

But it is loads worse in the current age, even on our local news it had an article on this today and it is up 50%! I worked in retail in the mid 90s both supermarkets and fashion shops and I don’t remember it being as bad as this and the end of the day it is down to greed as it about the bottom line and more money for the share holders - good customer service used to be a thing but now it is taken for granted that customers will do the work for them. Of course people are going to exploit that weakness with self service if they are that way inclined, the supermarkets want the best of both worlds, the customers doing the work but having the same profits - of course that is going to be problematic!

OptimismvsRealism · 25/07/2024 16:36

Shops are obliged to obey rules in relation to how they treat customers. Shops aren't "private property" - they're businesses open to the public and thus required to treat people in certain ways.

Yes sadly the only way to get around it at the moment is to vote with your feet and make sure you don't contribute a penny to the salaries of the managers who think these policies are genius but for some reason shoplifting keeps going up and up almost like they're not genius at all 🤷

OP posts:
janeintheframe · 25/07/2024 16:31

I get they have to do it, but most thieves aren't buying and scanning their weekly shop, they're in and out with holdalls and backpacks within a minute

I think there is a lot of people opportunistic thieving. Scanning most of their shopping, slipping through an few items. Claiming it was a scanning error when caught. And that’s why they do random checks, as they know people are doing it. The random checks designed to be a detterant rather than they think they will catch everyone.

Needmorelego · 25/07/2024 16:29

@Goldenbear I started working in retail in the 90s.
No self service tills.
Yes shoplifting was bad even back then.
It's been bad since the Romans had market stalls.

Beryls · 25/07/2024 16:23

I think theft has gone up so much because of the self scan and automated tills. There's so many staff monitoring these things that it takes more off the shop floor.

I always use the normal tills anyway in the supermarket but when I was last in ALDI I saw a man with a backpack loading it up with meats and cheese without a care in the world in front of everyone. No member of staff anywhere near the isles so went to the till to let them know, he was long gone by the time the security guard came out from the back.

Now if I had used a self check out/self scan and been stopped that day and inspected I reckon I'd have been pissed off.

I get they have to do it, but most thieves aren't buying and scanning their weekly shop, they're in and out with holdalls and backpacks within a minute.

Goldenbear · 25/07/2024 16:19

Goldenbear · 25/07/2024 16:18

We’ll employ people n tills again then and stop being so greedy is what it arguably the response to that! Was shoplifting as bad when supermarkets had more tills open.

Sainsburys hardly has anyone on self service tills- I was at one in my lunch break and gave up as the customer service person was scanning a customers elf scanning stuff for her, ignoring everyone else as obviously she can’t be in-two places at once but I haven’t got time for the faffing!

Sorry terrible grammar and spelling throughout this.

Wendycoping · 25/07/2024 16:19

TinyGingerCat · 25/07/2024 15:05

Depends where you live I think. Nothing like this round my way (dull as fuck rural middle) but I had to get a security guard to wrestle the gigantic plastic box off a block of cheddar in Birmingham. You chose OP - nightlife, deliveroo, uber, public transport plus extra security in the supermarket, or none of this and a slow quiet slide towards death (I love where I live btw but I am so jealous of people who get take aways delivered).

Ha ha this made me laugh

Bang on.

Swipe left for the next trending thread