Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there is no more money?

443 replies

Rainbowsponge · 24/07/2024 20:17

And Labour have admitted this.

So many threads saying X or Y needs to be ‘properly funded’ (even though most of the time our spending is actually in line with comparable countries), but no acknowledgment of the fact there’s no money to spend.

And when you bring it up, posters completely ignore you or accuse you of being Jacob Rees Mogg Hmm

Wouldn’t the quality of debate be improved if we stopped burying our heads in the sand?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:57

People, mainly older women who worked part time or did not work when their children were little as there was no childcare support. Have been encouraged to pay extra NI to increase their state pension. If they were no longer eligible, these mainly women would want that additional NI reimbursed.

What about everyone else who paid NI?

Livelovebehappy · 25/07/2024 00:54

MidnightPatrol · 24/07/2024 20:27

Everyone needs to be paying more tax, and we need to address our complex in-work benefits system, funding models for pension provision, NHS etc.

Its not realistic to have an expansive state benefits system, with an increasingly dwindling pool of people funding it.

Well we have the wrong people in government then. Tax hikes yes, but the benefit system will definitely have more money thrown at it.

AvrielFinch · 25/07/2024 00:50

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:33

I would also sue for the extra NI I paid.

How would that work?

People, mainly older women who worked part time or did not work when their children were little as there was no childcare support. Have been encouraged to pay extra NI to increase their state pension. If they were no longer eligible, these mainly women would want that additional NI reimbursed.

1dayatatime · 25/07/2024 00:35

@Circumferences

"Suddenly there is a fucking magic money tree for the pandemic and no one says anything."

The fucking magic money tree for the pandemic was actually called increasing the national debt by £500 billion from £2 trillion to £2.5 trillion. So much so that the interest bill on this debt is the same as the entire education budget.

To put £500 billion into context if you dropped a pound in to a very large jam jar every second it would take 11 days to get to a million. To get to a billion would take 31 years and to get to £500 billion would take 15,500 years or 13000 BC which was the Stone Age and a full 10,000 years before the pyramids were built.

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:33

I would also sue for the extra NI I paid.

How would that work?

1dayatatime · 25/07/2024 00:24

@Mumoftwo1316

"A country's money is way more fluid, you can sell more bonds or tweak the interest rates or whatever."

Selling more bonds (which are effectively IOUs with interest) is simply increasing debt. Tweaking the interest rates is no longer possible since the independence of the Bank of England. And even if you did manage to tweak them then the exchange rate markets would drop the pound causing higher inflation.

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 25/07/2024 00:22

Crispynoodle · 25/07/2024 00:07

You haven't got a clue how much money is there! Neither has anyone else except the government itself. Are you choosing to believe dodgy sources making a statement like that? Labour have been in power for only 3 weeks and they've already done a lot of good. I know it might suit some voters to believe the worse in them but after only 3 weeks it's ridiculous, I didn't vote Labour by the way

The OBR and ONS publish nearly all the data which analysts use all the time so Labour would have known what was going on.

AvrielFinch · 25/07/2024 00:19

Means testing pensions would accelerate people early retiring who would just be over the means test. Spend pension, then get state pension. This is what i would do.
I would also sue for the extra NI I paid.

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 25/07/2024 00:18

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:14

People say means testing pensions will never happen because older people won't vote for it but what would happen if all parties put it in their manifesto?

Cant see the Tories turning off their core voters.

There will come a time they will need to.

Rummly · 25/07/2024 00:16

Zonder · 25/07/2024 00:07

You're evading the point.

No, I’m really not.

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:14

People say means testing pensions will never happen because older people won't vote for it but what would happen if all parties put it in their manifesto?

Cant see the Tories turning off their core voters.

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:10

Like many others I pay more into my pension to reduce my tax burden, Should I not do this?

Towelmode · 25/07/2024 00:08

Even if not true of the past though, I think going forward everyone need to be slow to go to the state for help & try first to manage without

I just think there’s too much nuance. Is it wrong for the cash poor pensioner in the 1m house to claim pension credit? What about the nurse who earns a decent wage but is paying high rent so needs housing benefit. I guess I’m asking where is the line re getting help from the state?

Zonder · 25/07/2024 00:07

Rummly · 24/07/2024 23:57

Why have you quoted that bit and not the part that’s actually relevant?:

its like this after every Tory government (facts can be found in gov stats if anyone doesn't believe me).

I do think the economy is weak, but then, you know, Covid, Ukraine, energy crisis. But the economy was mending under Hunt, so I’m certainly pleased that Reeves is giving signals that she’ll broadly continue Tory fiscal policy. 👍

You're evading the point.

Crispynoodle · 25/07/2024 00:07

Rainbowsponge · 24/07/2024 20:17

And Labour have admitted this.

So many threads saying X or Y needs to be ‘properly funded’ (even though most of the time our spending is actually in line with comparable countries), but no acknowledgment of the fact there’s no money to spend.

And when you bring it up, posters completely ignore you or accuse you of being Jacob Rees Mogg Hmm

Wouldn’t the quality of debate be improved if we stopped burying our heads in the sand?

You haven't got a clue how much money is there! Neither has anyone else except the government itself. Are you choosing to believe dodgy sources making a statement like that? Labour have been in power for only 3 weeks and they've already done a lot of good. I know it might suit some voters to believe the worse in them but after only 3 weeks it's ridiculous, I didn't vote Labour by the way

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 25/07/2024 00:07

mollyfolk · 24/07/2024 23:53

It’s 29th in the world? Still firmly in the wealthy (but unequal) category.

I see here that people blame
children living in poverty
single parents
long term unemployed
refugees

All these marginalised groups are apparently to blame in what is an extremely unequal country with a high percentage of wealthy individuals.

Edited

We are 29th in the world but wanting public services of the top few.

A lot of these things can be partly to blame it is not either/ or

The only way is to completely alter the economy and that would take cross party support ( so never going to happen ).

People say means testing pensions will never happen because older people won't vote for it but what would happen if all parties put it in their manifesto?

XenoBitch · 25/07/2024 00:05

SummerFeelsLikeAutumn · 25/07/2024 00:04

Your reading comprehension is very poor. Please read my post again before being confrontational and only quoting what you choose to.

It is poor, yes. Sorry.

SummerFeelsLikeAutumn · 25/07/2024 00:04

XenoBitch · 24/07/2024 23:59

But DLA/PIP is not a safety net that means no one will starve. It is a means to get disabled people on a level field with the non disabled. Many people on PIP can only work and contribute tax etc, because they are on PIP.

Your reading comprehension is very poor. Please read my post again before being confrontational and only quoting what you choose to.

XenoBitch · 25/07/2024 00:03

SummerFeelsLikeAutumn · 24/07/2024 23:57

I disagree. It needs to be means tested. Why take money when you don’t need it?

I never once said anything about single disabled people, in fact what I said was When someone reaches adulthood and needs support with no other form of income of course our benefits system should support them

Did you miss that part?

If someone is married and their partner is on a high wage why should they get support? Of course if they left the relationship they should be entitled to support but if they are in an abusive relationship then of course they’re entitled to help.

Don’t try and twist my words. PIP/DLA really needs to me means tested on household income.

Why should a spouse/partner pay for the disability of someone else?

XenoBitch · 24/07/2024 23:59

anonhop · 24/07/2024 23:54

@XenoBitch you say that nobody should be "worse off" for having a disability. That's utopia, not real life.

People are going to be "worse off" for all sorts of reasons they can't help including:

  • Health status
  • Age
  • Disability
  • Intellectual ability
  • Inheritance/ lack of

Benefits should be the safety net that nobody starves to death & everyone should be able to access basic healthcare etc. it shouldn't be trying to level the playing field - that is never going to happen & going to be an extremely expensive waste of time.

But DLA/PIP is not a safety net that means no one will starve. It is a means to get disabled people on a level field with the non disabled. Many people on PIP can only work and contribute tax etc, because they are on PIP.

Towelmode · 24/07/2024 23:58

I believe David Cameron claimed DLA.

anonhop · 24/07/2024 23:57

Towelmode · 24/07/2024 23:55

In days gone past, there was a pride issue of not wanting to claim help from the taxpayer unless you really needed it

@anonhop is there evidence of this? There was certainly more social housing in the past, people had more dc, the child benefit equivalent wasn’t mean tested, miras, etc. It seems like there was more help!

True in some times & places! But also far less in others, and certainly people earning good money I don't think would have been trying to milk the taxpayer for every penny.
Only anecdotal, though, and I don't have any hard evidence so perhaps wrong.

Even if not true of the past though, I think going forward everyone need to be slow to go to the state for help & try first to manage without

SummerFeelsLikeAutumn · 24/07/2024 23:57

XenoBitch · 24/07/2024 23:47

Disability benefits should be means tested as can be seen by a thread today of someone earning £300k and wanting to claim for their child. That’s entitled behaviour

Um, no. The DLA is for their child, and their child is not on £300k.

DLA/PIP being means tested wont happen. No one, regardless of their income, should be worse off due to their disability.
The payment is for the claimant, not their household.
I know many women who are unable to work due to various disabilities, yet can only claim PIP because their spouse/partner earns too much for them to claim ESA/UC. It is their money, and it all they are entitled to. You would have that stopped, and they be 100% reliant on their spouse? That is a very dangerous position to be in.
Plus, what about the single disabled folk out there... "oh, sorry.. you are amazing but I can't have a relationship with you because I would have to pay for your disability".

And has been said multiple times now, DLA/PIP is a gateway to other support. It is the gold standard "proof" of a disabilty.

I disagree. It needs to be means tested. Why take money when you don’t need it?

I never once said anything about single disabled people, in fact what I said was When someone reaches adulthood and needs support with no other form of income of course our benefits system should support them

Did you miss that part?

If someone is married and their partner is on a high wage why should they get support? Of course if they left the relationship they should be entitled to support but if they are in an abusive relationship then of course they’re entitled to help.

Don’t try and twist my words. PIP/DLA really needs to me means tested on household income.

Rummly · 24/07/2024 23:57

Zonder · 24/07/2024 23:45

The economy is many times worse than Labours joke about no money

You don't believe this? Then you really don't want facts. Have you seen how much borrowing was under the Tories compared to labour?

You can say it's bollocks til you're blue in the face but it won't make it true.

And Tory action has led to nothing. I'm delighted with this new announcement about a corruption hunter from Labour. At last something might happen.

Edited

Why have you quoted that bit and not the part that’s actually relevant?:

its like this after every Tory government (facts can be found in gov stats if anyone doesn't believe me).

I do think the economy is weak, but then, you know, Covid, Ukraine, energy crisis. But the economy was mending under Hunt, so I’m certainly pleased that Reeves is giving signals that she’ll broadly continue Tory fiscal policy. 👍

anonhop · 24/07/2024 23:56

@Towelmode my point wasn't that they're the same, but rather that the mindset we have in this country is the problem.

Not necessarily saying we need to means test (don't know enough to comment) but we do need to have a cultural shift to where claiming benefits is a last resort & people feel the pride of providing for their own families.

Not sure how we manufacture a cultural shift, though!